User talk:RHaworth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives[edit]

Speedy deletion User:Jvlarion[edit]

[Note to self - keep watching - Jvlarion (talkcontribs)]

RHaworth - request for reconsideration[edit]

Dear Sir, I write this letter to you kindly requesting your reconsideration for the Wikipedia entry for American Sleep Association. Previous entries submitted by others for this association have been deleted due to inaccurate information. I believe that this has caused all subsequent entries for American Sleep Association to be 'red flagged' and dismissed.

Complicating the issue is the fact that there is a domain squatter using a similar sounding domain name, using our good name and selling products for profit. We are currently dealing with this issue. I kindly request that you personally review the most recent entry for American Sleep Association. The information submitted under this entry is correct and represents the organization accurately. Thank you in advance for you reconsideration. Thank you for your service to Wikipedia. Respectfully, Dr. N.S. Kline — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nklin (talkcontribs)

  • I was amused to see a talk page comment which seemed to suggest that adding this link to the page proved the association's notability. Kindly have the decency to wait until your association becomes notable. Then someone with no COI will undoubtedly write about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Cannot bear it[edit]

Dude, How Did You Even Find My Article To Begin With XD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lostpolarbear (talkcontribs)

  • Padraig, you did a good job driving the snakes out of Ireland. Please come back and drive this polar bear out of Wikipedia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Deletion request[edit]

You forgot the talk page of User:Ww2censor/Galfridus Walpole that you deleted earlier. Perhaps you can do it at your convenience. ww2censor (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks ww2censor (talk) 09:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

  • It would have been simpler to slap a {{db-u1}} tag on the talk page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Zionist or Jewish[edit]

Hey RHaworth, sorry for bothering you. This is the discussion myself and the Arab?/Persian? user have had He puts forward a very strong argument for Zionism, but, due to his username and bias towards supporting Zionism over Jewish (remember- Arabs do not like the Jews).

I have accepted his resolve and when he does reply, I will give him the green light for undoing my reversions. I asked him for sources so it does not get disputed in the future. I would like to know your input on which sources would be reliable and/or the bias towards the term 'Zionism'. Cheers, Luxure (talk) 04:10, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

  • May I introduce you to two very useful concepts? The wikilink and the fragment identifier. Using both, you could point me to the discussion instead of reproducing it here. Fact is, I only have a vague idea what Zionism is and I have absolutely no interest in your discussion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

I have a vague idea as well, and I was just passing it by you - i could not be bothered linking it i just wanted to give it straight to you on a plate - there's no need to be insulting. — Luxure (talk) 10:01, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Total inversion of logick - using a link is giving it straight to me on a plate. If you copy and paste there is always a suspicion in the reader's mind that you have changed the wording to suit your thesis. You really are too sensitive: you implied (on your talk page) that I was biting a newbie but have not given details. You now accuse me of being insulting - give details. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:22, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Possibly sock pupperty going on with IP's[edit]

So on a page I AFD Savvy Gupta the main contributor shares the same name (which I put a afd up for a article he created as well) now a bunch of ips keep on updating it-I would do a SPA report but dang there are a lot! Might want to look into this! Wgolf (talk) 17:12, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Semi-protected. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, the page the guy created btw is this Mohammad Shoaib Khan. Wgolf (talk) 17:40, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

International Horizons College[edit]

Dear RHaworth, I have been trying to upload a page for Template:Internationalhorizonscollege and it keeps getting tagged for speedy deletion. Can you please let me know what I am doing wrong so I can get it fixed and published. Thanks, Arsalan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsalan.yunus (talkcontribs) 19:32, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

  • What you are doing wrong is trying to upload a page for the International Horizons College. Kindly have the decency to wait until the college becomes notable. Then someone with no COI will undoubtedly write about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

TIF (Maine)[edit]

Hey man, You deleted my wiki while I was in the process of making it. Of course it didn't have any useful content on the page, I just made it less than 20 minutes ago. I assure you that the content I will be posting is relevant to those in the Planning community. I am going to remake the page now. Here is a link to that page: TIF (Maine) - mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael.havlin (talkcontribs) 22:28, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Hey man, I am learning, can you stop messing with my stuff so I can figure out how to do this properly? - mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael.havlin (talkcontribs) 23:05, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Hey man, The page on Tax Increment Financing (Maine) is ready now. Can you please publish it? Here is a link for it (I think): User:Michael.havlin/sandbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael.havlin (talkcontribs) 23:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Please learn wikilinks. I have done a couple of necessary moves and it is now at draft:Tax increment financing (Maine). If nothing else you must de-duplicate the references - I have done some to show you how. I do not get involved with reviewing drafts so just be patient for a possible final move to (article) space. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:53, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Freedom Meta-Index speedy[edit]

Hi there, Freedom Meta-Index had two closely related articles Drug Freedom Index and Gun Rights Index which were *declined* for speedy right around the time you speedied the main article. Do I have to go through the AfD rigamarole? They're even less notable than the one you approved for speedy. TiC (talk) 12:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Sorry, you do need to go to AfD. Your speedy tags were removed by a well-established editor and I am not going to disagree with them. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:46, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Terry Ananny[edit]

This has somehow become un-salted since you last protected it in 2009. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Ananny for the history of this subject. Thanks. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 16:48, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

  • It is a weakness of the system that when an admin moves an article to a protected title, they get no warning. In this case the article was re-created at t m annay and then Dennis Brown (talk · contribs) moved it, thereby removing the protection. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:24, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
    • Ah, I didn't even think about checking the target, I just assumed good faith and made the move without being requested, although it does appear they may have been trying to bypass the protection. I was thinking more as an editor than admin there. After it was moved, I saw the laundry list of deletes, but it was already tagged by then. That isn't a situation I run across very often when making a move of my own accord, but will look more closely next time. Dennis 17:39, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

This one page Zeeshan Yousuf[edit]

Okay so I put a non significant csd on Zeeshan Yousuf as it looked like a resume, but now the person who made it said it was something else, not sure what to say now. Maybe a AFD tag or something. But yeah might want to look into it. Wgolf (talk) 17:47, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

The irony of deleting the The Warm Fuzzy Tale[edit]

I am a clinical psychologist. I created The Warm Fuzzy Tale. You put it up for deleting. The Warm Fuzzy Tale edit history here is a children story about people who attract either warm fuzzies - good emotions - or bad emotions.

Clearly you attract bad emotions, not "warm fuzzies" Your website and pictures gives good indication of why. You believe that you are worth more than you really are. Clearly from your photos, posing in front of grand paintings, atop high peaks like a warrior from some fairy tale, you have grand dreams of grandeur. But yet this grandeur never came about. And never will. You are rather unattractive, so you were probably picked on in school. You then found solace in computers. You never have accomplished much, so you take your frustration and rage at your position in life with passive aggressive attacks on those who are weaker than you - newbies. In otherwords, you are an insecure bully. Wikipedia company culture fosters tin pot dictators like you, because Jimmy Wales is the same way. He has an inferiority complex - and he lashes out at others. Any other organization would never put a passive aggressive bully such as yourself in leadership.

Delete the article. That is pretty much the worst you can do. I don't care. Long after I have walked away, my searing words will be remembered long after I forgotten "The Warm Fuzzy Tale". The pathetic thing is, in 2019 I will come back, and you will still be passive aggressively bullying editors, because your worthless real life will be just as pathetic. Thewhitebox (talk) 21:00, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

  • The editor above seems to be claiming to be this person; "Claude Steiner (born 6 January 1935) is a psychotherapist who has written extensively about transactional analysis (TA). His writings have focused especially on life scripts, alcoholism, emotional literacy, and interpersonal power plays. Steiner was born in Paris, France. His parents were Austrian, his mother Jewish and his father Christian. The family left France in 1939 ahead of the impending Nazi invasion. Eventually the family settled in Mexico." --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

The Knowledge Centre for Agriculture Deletion[edit]

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Abuja Declaration[edit]

Why was the new version of deleted instead of restoring the original version. Hello RHaworth, The version of Abuja Declaration (1989) before the one you deleted contained the accurate Abuja Declaration but was edited after people found the important information in it. The edit was made to hide the original info of the Declaration. I would appreciate it if you could: .1 Even though the current version is not accurate, please clarify why you deleted the current version. I see copyright infringement as the reason for deletion but I believe the external site you quoted copied the article from Wikipedia and not vice-versa. .2 I would appreciate if the version before the deleted one is restored. Thanks Aijosh (talk) 20:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

  • At last! On the fourth time of trying, I get a very well worded and properly signed request. (OK, you did not get the link quite right - but you tried.) Now that you have gone to that trouble, I feel guilty that I don't feel willing to help you further. But the next step, I fear is for an admin to go through 43 deleted edits stretching back four years to see which are copyvios. Do please, raise the matter at deletion review (DRV). Also at WikiProject Africa or one of its sub-departments. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:17, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

OK. I think you are mistaking me for someone else. In any case, I'm sorry if anyone had previously frustrated you as regards the topic. As a tech-savvy person, I'm also having issues understanding how this whole process works. I will raise the issue as you have advised but please can you see if you could find time to check it out before I do. The version I'm referring to is the last edit before or the one you deleted stating it was a Hoax, per WP:CSD#G3 (The reference you cited isn't the same as the deleted article which contains 1989. They are two different declarations). I see you are the first to make a deletion that is why I'm contacting you. Let me know if you can do this. I'll appreciate it. Thanks for your time. PS:How come the deleted content keeps getting deleted? I still see a deletion dated yesterday Aijosh (talk) 08:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

  • See previous 1 and previous 2. But I agree very different handwriting from yours. The article keeps getting deleted because people keep creating it! I have emailed you two states. I will leave the DRV people to do any further "checking out". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:26, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Ok. I see. I also got some copies of some of the deleted reviews in my mail. I was hoping I would find the live links to the references in the mail so that I can verify if it is really a hoax but they don't seem to be included. If this is possible, I'll appreciate them. If not, I'll continue as advised. Thanks Aijosh (talk) 18:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

  • I don't know whether it is possible or nor - your request is incomprehensible. Go to DRV - they may even restore the page so you can see the 46 deleted edits. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:58, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

An odd case when I put up a AFD[edit]

I just did one here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maat Morrison and it got formatted odd for some reason. — Wgolf (talk) 22:14, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Use Twinkle for AfD nominations - it appears as XFD in your twinkle pull-down. It will look for previous discussions and automatically create "(2nd nomination)", etc. when appropriate. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Rahim Mombeini[edit]

A article that has been around since 2010 that I don't know what to say! Rahim Mombeini, found him under shortest bios. First off some clean up for sure (born in 1334 and NOBODY has noticed all these years???), he does sound notable though so I don't know what tags to use. — Wgolf (talk) 23:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

The source provided in that article does not actually mention Mombeini. I have A7d it because it does not offer a satisfactory claim to significance.--Launchballer 08:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
  • 1334 is probably AH which works out to a credible CE year of about 1956. Article now given decent burial. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

New content, old page[edit]

I didn't know that it was a discussion, if so; the artist is now signed to a major label, which where the artist (subject) now meets WP:MUSICBIO. What can we do to take this article back? -- Mjnichols (talk) 00:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Simply being signed to a major label is not enough to meet WP:MUSICBIO. To meet it, Morrison must have released two or more albums under that label.--Launchballer 08:25, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Check[edit]

Check out this user User:Ravi kumar sah-sonar. He has made 2 articles of same name with little content in them. What to do with these articles. — Owais khursheed (talk) 04:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Next time do what I have done. You would need to request deletion of the redirects left in mainspace. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

What about User:Hk19811. He has made draft and main space article with the same name. — Owais khursheed (talk) 20:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Please learn to create links when you talk about articles. In this case your action should have been to decide which of four versions (there was a sandbox also) to keep and tag the others with {{db|duplicate of [[…]]}}. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:31, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Humour Hires.png The Barnstar of Good Humor
I especially liked talk:RHaworth#Cannot bear it. Mythological references are always a good way of dealing with errant ursines. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 12:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Wikipedia is, of necessity a rather dour place. I do my best to lighten the tone. Pity that Thewhitebox (see above) picked up no clues to that effect. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
  • This is not uncommon in editors with French-Austrian-Jewish-Christian-Mexican backgrounds who have expertise in alcoholism and interpersonal power plays. I can think of no such editors who understand your sense of humour! I do think it might be wise for you to be more cautious, though, because the number who do understand remains very very small and may even be getting smaller. I am sure your replies are mainly aimed at the people asking the questions, not people like myself who may benefit in other ways. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Kelechi Iheanacho[edit]

May I ask why you deleted this entry for one of Manchester City's most promising young recruits? Please see this and this. — Padsonline (talk) 08:20, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Please learn to provide links to articles and that naked URLs are obscene. Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
    • In future, please be more careful before making such blunt accusations of incompetence. It is very insulting, especially when they are so thoroughly unfounded. Or do you honestly mean to tell me that this discussion, which by the way linked to in the WP:G4 tag, is invalidated by the simple introduction of a comma into the title? Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Please point me to these alleged "accusations of incompetence". Not sure how I missed the 2nd nomination without a comma. If I had seen it, I would probably have refused to restore. But now it has been restored, I propose to let the new AfD discussion run its course. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:37, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Ned Lagin[edit]

To whom it may concern, regarding the deletion of "10:03, 29 September 2014 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Ned lagin self portrait 2011.png (F7: Invalid fair-use rationale)" on Ned Lagin: the owner and creator of that image (ned lagin) asked me to include that image in the wikipedia page for "ned lagin". this was documented when i uploaded the image using your upload wizard. Your uploading wizard is so complicated as far as what should or should not be selected that it is quite possible that in uploading the image, and inappropriate radio button was selected. i would greatly appreciate any advice that you may have regarding the correct radio button that should be selected for this image. In the meantime, please restore the image, as you have removed an image which has permission to be included in the "Ned Lagin" article. I-) ihor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihorwi (talkcontribs) 13:22, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

  • I have a name and it is not "whom it may concern". The image was an insult to Wikipedia: a pathetic thumbnail in the wrong format - should be JPG. Go back to Ned Lagin, get him to supply a decent sized (not less than 800px high) JPG, to release it under {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} and upload it to the Commons. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:37, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Rozzi Crane[edit]

Unprotecting Rozzi Crane to publish Draft:Rozzi Crane? Hi RHaworth, I hear that you're the person to talk to about unprotecting Rozzi Crane? I've AfC-reviewed (and edited to improve) Draft:Rozzi Crane -- do you think this version is ok publish? If not, I'd appreciate it if you'd flag problems I've missed. Thanks! Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 14:12, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Cheers! Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 12:45, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Palam Kalyanasundaram[edit]

Can I ask that you undo your deletion of User:4letheia/Palam Kalyanasundaram and User talk:4letheia/Palam Kalyanasundaram and consider a noindex tag instead. These contain copies of significant research done on the original page talkpage to establish why there should, despite the best efforts of many well meaning social media sharers and occasional newspaper mentions, never be a page on this subject in wikipedia. I appreciate that the main page names have now been salted, but there remain many possible variations which might pop up and require to be nominated for deletion. -- 4letheia (talk) 14:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

  • I have never heard that argument before. Feel free to raise the matter at deletion review but I suspect the answer is going to be "no". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:37, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
    • I second 4letheia's request. Those two pages were not abandoned articles-for-creation; they were archives. They contain irreplaceable research that may be needed again to debunk the claims that are made about this man. If you are unwilling to have this material on Wikipedia, even in userspace, could I request that the contents be emailed to me or to 4letheia for our future reference? --MelanieN (talk) 16:29, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  • I will put that more strongly: please raise the matter at deletion review - the answer will be an help in the unlikely event that similar circumstances arise again. Text emailed to 4letheia. MelanieN, I don't know how you expect me to email you - read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
If you have emailed the text to 4letheia, I am satisfied. Thank you. --MelanieN (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Snake Davis[edit]

Snake Davis. Just wondering why my image keeps being removed from this article? I took the image of the performer, so I can't quite figure out what I am doing wrong on the copyright issue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dashwortley (talkcontribs)

  • If you really did take this image, upload it to the Commons at the original resolution with the EXIF metadata still in place. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:01, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Tejpal Tanwar[edit]

Dear sir i am not getting why my content get deleted. Can you tell me if i will send you all details or send it request page it will be consider or not. The profile is real i will give you references for same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhamlatolni (talkcontribs) 20:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks you are notable and writes about you here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:01, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Time Malaysia[edit]

Hi, can you sent me a copies of the deleted page of the TIME Malaysia wikipedia you may sent it to <redacted> i am curious of its origin and information thank you, akm_zen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.82.22.89 (talk) 05:15, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

  • I think you are trying to ask for an article rather than an whole wikipedia. But I cannot help you unless you provide a link to the article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:53, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Yehoshua Wolhendler[edit]

Please reopen the Yehoshua Wolhendler page. It is a great tribute for the Jewish divorce page. To see more about this person use this link. Thanks a million, Alefbuys (talk) 20:47, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Please learn how to create links. By an interesting coincidence, at the moment your message arrived I was writing about another notable clash between church and state. Are you the author of the article at vosizneias.com to which you refer above? It is in the same style which reminds me of Isaac Bashevis Singer - written originally in Yiddish and then translated into English. With the difference that Singer always had a lady friend to help him with the translation.
My first advice is submit an article about Yehoshua to the Yiddish Wikipedia. However poor it is, it will probably be accepted eagerly. As to something in English, your submission was deleted because it was hopelessly short. Also, in a total of about twenty words, ten of them were incomprehensible to goyim and no attempt was made to link to definitions.
Google searches are not very promising but if you are confident that you can demonstrate his notability: study existing bios in category:Jews and Judaism in New York City for an idea of what is needed and develop you article in user:Alefbuys/sandbox until is viable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:58, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Ryan Zehl[edit]

Mr. Haworth: I am sorry to bother you, as I know (based on your prefatory comments above) that you may be experiencing bouts of "grumpiness. In an effort to avoid inciting any additional grumpiness, I have done my best to be brief: My name is Ryan Zehl, and I'm the subject of the Wikipedia page that you recently removed:

While I realize that the page did mention my business, its purpose was not to promote that business. The page was intended to provide a summary of my background and notable (newsworthy) achievements as a lawyer and had been active for sometime (at least 2 years, I believe). It appears that you deleted it under Rule G11: unambiguous advertising or promotion. I researched the Rule and discovered that it discourages automatic deletion when "a subject is notable and the content can be replaced with text that complied with a neutral point of view: "If a subject is notable and the content can be replaced with text that complies with neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion. Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." I personally didn't view the page as being promotional (and I can assure you I never intended it to come across that way), but it seems that you disagreed. Regardless, I would greatly appreciate if you would allow me to correct and rewrite any text or references that you believe violate Rule G11 or any other of Wiki's guidelines. I just need to know what, in your opinion, violated the Guidelines, so that I can ensure that my rewrite is in compliance.

I apologize again for any inconvenience I may have caused you and hope that you will allow me the opportunity to regain my (much cherished) Wikipedia page. Thank you, Ryan Zehl, 98.198.140.16 (talk) 05:21, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Are lawyers still being paid by the word? If the above is brevity, I would hate to read you in long-winded mode. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks you are notable and writes about you here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Perthetic icons[edit]

Transperth bus transfer.svg

Deletion of File:Transperth train transfer.svg & File:Transperth train and bus transfer.svg. Although these technically qualified for speedy deletion, they are related to McVahl (talk · contribs)'s controversial edits to Template:Rail-interchange. Is it possible to undelete the files until the matter is resolved? Thank you. Useddenim (talk) 10:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Pandering to a spammer[edit]

Dear RHaworth, Just to let you know that I have finally had my account unblocked and I will seek to contribute as best I can moving forward. Could you please advise of how I might be able to find/receive copies of my unblock appeal as well as the original offending article that was formerly located here. I would like copies of these for future reference and/or use elsewhere? Faithfully, Geoffrey. GRobertsPanda (talk) 10:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Text of your article emailed. You blanked the unblock appeal but it is still visible in the history of user talk: GRobertsPanda. Do not even think about writing about your company in any form on Wikipedia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Dear RHaworth, Thank you for pandering to me, however I can assure you that my intention is not to be a spammer as Wgolf initially thought. The unblock appeal that I refer to is one that I lodged using the UTRS system and that was accepted by Yunshui. When I logged on this morning, my IP address had been blocked and I could not even edit my own talk page. Not quite the welcome I had been expecting; and obviously I was pleased that Yunshui overturned the ruling (it had all escalated very quickly so I was pretty distraught at the loss of time yesterday).

Subsequently I blanked the unblock appeal earlier today having had my block overturned - I am entitled to do that, aren't I? If you could lay your hands on the appeal that I refer to, you will learn a little about me and my interests and hopefully see that I am not a spammer nor vandal nor advertiser, infringer of copyright or anything else deemed inappropriate by you more seasoned Wiki folk.

What I am is a chap who is very short on time, yet who wishes to make a meaningful and interesting contribution. Anyway, taking on board everything that you have written, please consider that Recruitment Panda Ltd is not my company. I am not a shareholder. I am however admittedly an affiliate party, yet I will be retiring my affiliation with them in a few months, thus ending any COI that you may presently perceive.

Having said all that, I do believe that Recruitment Panda Ltd are notable for a number of reasons which I intend to bring to the fore given appropriate time and opportunity. Could I please therefore request your patience and ask you for any guidelines that you could offer me, whilst I draft and re-draft in preparation for publishing? e.g. Did I save and publish when I could have kept a draft safe somehow until I'd had chance to research, review and edit?

What I seek to create is an article that bares similarities with organisations such as Michael Page (company) or Adecco (who are certainly notable, if for no other reason than their size). Yet I want to create an article that is notable for more nuanced reasons that are nevertheless able to be corroborated by independently verifiable sources and hopefully therefore permissible.

Once I have achieved that there are a plethora of topics familiar to me that I can see myself (and my partner) having fun enhancing, such as those touched on in the aforementioned appeal. What say you? Respectfully, Geoffrey GRobertsPanda (talk) 13:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

  • I had understood from the language of your UTRS email that you no longer intended to write about RecruitmentPanda. Your message above seems to indicate that this is not the case. I would strongly recommend that you reconsider, especially given the highly promotional nature of your previous attempt. You said in your email that you intended to edit articles about health and social care; I suggest you do that instead, since further attempts to write about RecruitmentPanda will almost certainly get you blocked again. There's nothing wrong with requesting an article about the company, but please don't try to do it yourself. Yunshui  13:38, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Dear Yunshui, I have absolutely no intention of doing so if it is against the rules due to my present COI. Again a copy of my UTRS email would be appreciated. Can I take it that once my COI ends this will be a different matter (obviously on the assumption that it is properly composed from a neutral point of view)?

Noticing your advice just now, I've actually just finished composing an article which I would be grateful to you if you would review. It is on the subject of Admiral Nursing and can be found here.

Wgolf RHaworth, please also take a look. If I could secure my first successful contribution on day two then I would really feel as if I have swam the channel here. I hope you can see that I have gotten to grips with the markup and required style of writing etc. Regards , GRobertsPanda (talk) 15:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

  • If you sent an actual email to UTRS, then look in the "sent mail" folder of your email client. In any case I do not have access to the UTRS messages. I cannot see what more I can do for you except watch your contributions like an hawk and stomp on you heavily if you attempt to write anything about pandas. You still have some way to go on learning markup: we do not start with an heading and we do not use bold in headings. We do not put external links in the article body. We provide more wikilinks. We do not give naked URLs. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:26, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Draft deletion[edit]

You deleted Draft:Seven the General via G5. The draft was most recently edited and submitted by User:GjonPreni. That account indeed is related to User:Seventhegeneral, but it was unblocked, is now (to my knowledge) the sole account of the editor who started out as User:Seventhegeneral, and is not currently blocked. See also User talk:GjonPreni#After discussion with this user for Fluffernutter's summary of the account's history. Unless I'm missing something, G5 doesn't seem to apply here; do you have any objections to undeleting the draft? (Note that I haven't judged the quality of the draft itself, merely the background of the deletion.) Huon (talk) 14:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

So be it. Huon (talk) 19:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Vera Dik[edit]

Hi, I made a page about Vera Dik for school. My plan was only to have it uploaded for a day so I could show my teacher and could get a good grade. You deleted my page until I could do so. My intention was to upload the page, make screenshots and then delete it. However something came up and I couldn't make screenshots right away. Could I have access to the text for just a little bit and then I'll never bother you.

Kind Regards, Veradik (yes the page was about me sorry for that) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veradik (talkcontribs) 18:00, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Maybe the deleted contents of Vera dik could be moved to User:Veradik if they are not totally unsuitable to be a Wikipedia user page. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Absolutely not. Wikipeida is not a free host for stuff like that. I don't see why it needs to be in wiki format but if it must be so, install the wiki software on your school's internal network and post it there. If you promise not to repost it to Wikipedia, I am happy to let you see the text - read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:58, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Again, thank you![edit]

Thank you for deletions of User:Sharma Amit Pathankot & User:124.253.33.108 under db-g11, today – thank you very much! – Paine  09:57, 2 October 2014 (UTC)