User talk:RHaworth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


The Knowledge Centre for Agriculture Deletion[edit]

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Varsity Inc[edit]

Hi there-- I'm a nursing student looking for some information related to high school students and undiagnosed traumatic brain injuries and was wondering if the page for Varsity Inc could be made accessible? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 04:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • With pleasure. The entire content of the page was: "is a gay new show on espn2 fuck yea". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

deletion of WUWM from Wikipedia[edit]

To whom it may concern, the nonprofit association World Union of Wholesale Markets (WUWM) entry has at some stage been deleted from Wikipedia. Following the deletion link brings me to you here.

I would like to understand why this entry was deleted. It was created in reference and follow-up to a United Nations Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) article which explained what food wholesaling and food markets are (and WUWM collaborated with FAO colleagues at the time with regard to that article). WUWM is the only world entity to bring together nations and cities in support of, and promotion of, food markets. WUWM membership is mostly municipal management of wholesale and retail food markets. WUWM aims to help local and national authorities in their goal to provide a better service to the many millions of traders and consumers buying food from their local market. Local authorities, millions of small market traders, and the representative body for those markets - WUWM clearly do not have the logistical possibility or resources of 'supermarkets' to pay for mega advertising of a 'brand' name. Is that why our entry - and not those entries - are deleted from Wikipedia?

Traditional food markets are the oldest community service to be offered citizens, and are vital to the health not only of local economies and communities but also local food production the world over. There is much ignorance about the true and original meaning of the word 'market' in our world today. Please could you explain why you have taken the position of deleting us from Wikipedia? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 08:14, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Why are you talking to me when your query is addressed to whom it may concern (talk · contribs)? The article was over long and, more importantly, totally lacking in independent references. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)


Hi RHaworth, I just ended up on the page list of revision control software and realized that our page codeBeamer was deleted. I think your action is unfair since you didn't delete any other company from that list. Can you please explain why you decided to delete only and exclusively us but no other company with similiar entry? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EvaIntland (talkcontribs) 11:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Curious that you should come to me - the only thing I deleted was a redirect at codeBeamer (software). The substantive article was deleted according to the decision at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CodeBeamer. I will admit that the calls for deletion in that discussion were not exactly clamorous but kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your product is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:58, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Commons transfers[edit]

Hello.I see you're interested in working on the files; Therefore, I suggest that you

  1. Transfer this file to Commons
  2. work on delete these files.Thanks --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Out of thousands of files why pick Annales … for my attention. It is a very poor quality image that deserves a decent burial rather than transfer. CAT:CSD is usually enough to keep me busy but I might go to the cst you mention if I am really bored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Fort Saskatchewan/Fort Mall[edit]

Hi. You deleted Talk:Fort Saskatchewan/Fort Mall as CSD G8. It had been restored and tagged with a {{Copied}} – see its counterpart at the top of Talk:Fort Saskatchewan – to attribute this merger. Following Fort Mall's deletion at WP:Articles for deletion/Fort Mall, User:Milowent asked the closing admin User:Arbitrarily0 to restore and move it at User talk:Arbitrarily0/Archive/2010/May-June#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort Mall. WP:Merge and delete#Move to subpage of talk page describes the situation. Flatscan (talk) 04:28, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Sorry. Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Thanks for your quick response. Flatscan (talk) 04:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Bibliography of Aeolian Research: A[edit]

Hi User:RHaworth. The bibliography article was placed in the public domain by the United States Department of Agriculture, and I linked to the license on the talk page. I was pretty sure that was sufficient to prevent speedy deletion. Am I missing something? Thanks, Lesser Cartographies (talk) 08:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

And while we're here, I'll point out that WP:Listcruft is specifically prohibited from being used as a rationale for speedy deletion. See WP:NOTCSD #14. I'll start up the deletion review. — Lesser Cartographies (talk) 08:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Ok, sounds good. Let's see if I can figure out the official notice template, just for gins.... ok, I think that's right. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 09:31, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Bibliography of Aeolian Research A. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 09:31, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Eh, I spoke too soon. I can see the deletion review request here (Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 July 20) but not here (Wikipedia:Deletion review). Can you see which bit of wikimagic I forgot to incant? Thanks. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 09:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Now moot. I expect we got the right result, perhaps for the wrong reasons, and that's not a bad day at the office. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 20:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Dead language, spoken in Ermita, Manila[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Dead language, spoken in Ermita, Manila has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

it is an unused and unreasonably long redirect

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iketsi (talk) 12:39, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

ALGOL 68G[edit]

Please consider a restore of ALGOL 68G. — NevilleDNZ (talk) 03:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

My netbook, even zoomed out at 75%, can't fit the whole post on to my screen. Even at full screen! Be satisfied with what's present at ALGOL 68.--Launchballer 19:59, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • You talk too much. I had no hesitation in deleting the article because despite it having been around for eight (!) years, no one had found any indepenent evidence that it even exists, still less, that it is notable. I have emailed you the text. If, and only if, you can provide decent refs, re-submit via the AfC process. If it actually gets accepted, ask me or any other admin to restore the old version so that the text gets proper attribution. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Thankyou for your cheerful and encouraging response. It still remains strange to me that you deleted the article with WP:G11, when neither of the two WP:G11 deletion criteria are satisfied. And when I take a moment to point this out I get told ... "You talk too much." Sad. I agree with you that the references were weak, but when the page was create "eight (!) years" ago when weak references were common. A stub-marker and an email-alert to the contributors could have made the difference between article life and article extinction. Please, next time, think thrice. NevilleDNZ (talk) 05:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

The eBay Effect[edit]

The eBay Effect article (not invented). — Septagram (talk) 03:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

May satisfy WP:GNG. Do bear in mind that not all your sources are reliable per my annotations; Wordpress sites are WP:SPSs, may be reliable but forums are not; is blacklisted, and the site that ref redirected to you had already listed and doesn't have the fact-checking of other websites.--Launchballer 12:39, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • One can only wonder at the mentality of someone who puts a totally unreferenced stub into article space and then litters this page with links. Since no request was made, no reply is required to Septagram. Launchballer, this sort of behaviour is not to be encouraged. I have emailed you the text. If you think the subject is notable, feel free to put these refs up in a proper place. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:42, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

You could say thank you for taking the time trying to create an article that may be useful... Then make a few suggestions to us inexperienced users on how to do things correctly. — Septagram (talk) 17:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

  • You litter this page with external links but you feel that none are needed in the article itself. Why? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Verbal Jint[edit]

Hello, I was interested in creating a page for the South Korean musician Verbal Jint and the notice on the page said I should contact you before (re)creating one for more information. The WP:A7 designation seems to have more to do with the content of the previous article than with the subject himself and I believe my draft surpasses those requirements. Here is my draft: User:Asdklf;/Verbal Jint. I wasn't really sure how to go about this, but I hope this message is satisfactory. Thank you for your time! — Asdklf; (talk) 17:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Asdklf;

  • The version I deleted was devoid of references. You have swung to the other extreme and provided an excess. Probably safe to simply move your draft into article space. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! Asdklf; (talk) 00:09, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Asdklf;

A Dangerous Cure Photos[edit]

Hi, I keep being told that my photos for my page a Dangerous Cure are not to be used because of copyright. I know copyright is a serious issue. But these are my photos. I own them. I have given permission for the photos to be used as archival or historical elements. What more must I prove that I own these photos that are being posted to the Dangerous Cure page. Thanks, Helios718 (talk) 13:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Duplicate files[edit]

I was working from a list here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfan00 IMG (talkcontribs)

Dave London[edit]

Hi, You deleted a page about music producer Dave London. Dave is a pioneer of the music genre Florida breaks. I'm a Florida breaks music fan and have been listening to his music for over 15 years. He is a pioneer for electronic music for the genre of breakbeat. I hope you will reconsider the deletion as he is a major contributor to the electronic music industry. Thanks for your consideration. Sam Cole musicman47 (talk) 10:49, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Please learn how to create links and explain why you included an unrelated authority control tag in the article. If and only if, a) you have no COI and b) can provide decent references, then submit an improved article via the AfC process. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Trusted Nutrients[edit]

Hello, I'd like to rewrite an article you deleted because is has content from another website. This time I'm reviewing everything to it don't happen again. What do I have to do? Here is the link: Trusted Nutrients. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nelcynunez (talkcontribs)

  • Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello sir[edit]

How are you sir? I hope you are doing fine sir? Am just patrolling some WP:BLPs which requires much attentions due to vandalism from vandals. So I decided to check on you, just to know how you are feeling sir.(Wikicology (talk) 21:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC))

Does File:041272 RWH snow.jpg answer your question, sir? This is an image of RHaworth in his home environment. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:31, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

@Demiurge1000: thank you for your attention sir. But unfortunately the file as not answer my question sir. What does it implies? Thanks(Wikicology (talk) 22:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC))

It is a photograph of RHaworth in his natural element. It implies nothing; it is a matter of historical record. In my mind, it is a useful way to gauge how he is at any given time. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:25, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

@Demiurge1000: thank you soo much. It reali answer my question now sir. It implies that RHarworth is very fine. You must be very friendly. I love you. There is something I like to discuss with you. On your talk page or what do you feel sir? (Wikicology (talk) 22:51, 25 July 2014 (UTC))

I love you too. I will ask my social secretary to arrange an appointment with you when the time is right. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry to be a killjoy, but Wikipedia is not a forum.--Launchballer 19:52, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

About deletion of page - empowr[edit]

Hello Sir, this page empowr was deleted by you. Could you please tell me the reason. Further you are an expert so please give me some guidelines so that I may not face such problem in future. Thanks -- Satyam 'Sats' (talk) 09:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Copyvio from Crunchbase. No attempt to show notability. Too soon. At least wait until the service is open to the public and has been reviewed by reliable sources. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:07, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Sir. Can I create article once I find other sources and reviews on it or I can add it only after it is open to public? Thanks for a quick reply. It'll be great If you could send the article text with wiki codes. -- Satyam 'Sats' (talk) 10:51, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

  • In the unlikely event that you can find reviews already in reliable sources, then you may create an article now. I suggest any re-submission should be via the AfC process. Text emailed - not that there is much left after removal of the copyvios. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:04, 26 July 2014 (UTC)


Looks like this might have been resolved since, but yes, given that Qesadila was creating a copy of the Fazlur Khan article as it was immediately prior to the recent rollback (when it turned out that all edits since April had been by socks of Aalaan), this sounds like a quack. In fact, I now see that User:Aalaan coincidentally returned to Wikipedia to try to blank the sock template and declined unblock requests from his or her own talk page, a few hours later. --McGeddon (talk) 18:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC)


Oops, looks like I cut-and-paste moves my draft into the Databending article at the same time you were going to fulfill the {{Db-move}} request. Sorry! 23W 23:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)