User talk:Rahibsaleem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi welcome to wikipedia Rahibsaleem (talk) 04:48, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Rahibsaleem! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk)`

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at Jews[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

See the full report of this case at the 3RR noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rahibsaleem (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)

Request reason:

But they were constructive edits. They added quality information, for Jews. User:Malik Shabazz and User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz had no right to delete. Please review and block them for malice and disruption. Because->Blocks should not be punitive[edit] See also: Wikipedia:Sanctions against editors are not punishment Policy shortcuts: WP:BLOCK#NOTPUNITIVE WP:NOPUNISH Blocks should not be used: in retaliation against users; to disparage other users; as punishment against users; or where there is no current conduct issue of concern. Blocks should be preventative[edit] Policy shortcuts: WP:BLOCK#PREVENTATIVE WP:BLOCK#DETERRENT Blocks should be used to: prevent imminent or continuing damage and disruption to Wikipedia; deter the continuation of present, disruptive behavior; and encourage a more productive, congenial editing style within community norms.Rahibsaleem (talk) 20:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You don't get to edit-war just because you are personally convinced you're right, you must convince other editors too. Your case is a classic example of edit-warring against multiple editors, who have the right to dispute, remove or change your edits within policy, or to demand that you justify your eedits and to convince them before your edits are accepted by the community. Acroterion (talk) 21:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

"I think Rahibsaleem should be banned indefinitely due to his call for genocide against Israelis (in a boxy thing on his user page). He also denies that Israel is legitimate and is somehow a magical invader of itself. If any Jew called for the destruction of Arab countries, he would be immediately banned. I think the same should apply for Muslims. He also adds false information about a Christian ethno-religious group[1] and mocks Christianity on his user page with false quotes attributed to popes and saints. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebonywolf125 (talkcontribs) 08:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC) "

I think you should be banned for antipalestinianism. Palestine was the owner of Canaan for 1200 years. Israel is genocidal racists.

Wasla (diacritic)[edit]

Did you forget to finish this stub? Bearian (talk) 21:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm afraid I cant add more. Leave it to someone else. There's not much to say about a diacritic. Rahibsaleem (talk) 17:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jazma[edit]

Hello Rahibsaleem,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jazma for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ging287 (talk) 01:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sibtain Shah Hamdani[edit]

Hello, Rahibsaleem. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sibtain Shah Hamdani, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Sibtain Shah Hamdani to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Goalbox (talk) 19:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shia Islam may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quranism, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Magog and Gog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 14 April 2015 (UTC)