User talk:Reddogsix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
S e m i - R e t i r e d
Please put new entries at the BOTTOM OF THE PAGE

Please use talk in the future with Sara Nelson AFA[edit]

Please use the Talk Page/Function in the future to discuss Sara Nelson AFA. Suggesting it be deleted, after being reviewed and approved by other members, seems to highlight a potential political agenda on your end. Nelson is a major political figure in the American Labor movement. Google is your friend Unionyes420 (talk) 23:33, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

I suggest you read WP:UNCIVIL before you accuse anyone else of an agenda. You know nothing of me other than what you could ascertain from my edit history, I suggest you review that before you start making any further claims that cannot be supported. The article needs to be supported by non-trivial support. The WP:BURDEN of providing that support falls to the author of the article, not to the reader. Since you have not provided support, I have AfD the article in the hopes someone will do so. reddogsix (talk) 23:46, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
I've been a wiki admin for over 10 years now with my old account. This account is new because my old one was compromised. The article is supported by non-trivial support. It appears your definition of support is whatever you determine to be non-trivial. You're absolutely right about the burden. However, further attempts to delete the page on your end, after the discussion supports it being up through the burden of the information, will result in WP:RFC/U.
Veda Shook, her predecessor, has less verifiable information. We both know there's a bunch of illegitimate articles on Wiki. As Revert Pirate for many years, I understand your concerns. However, after reviewing your user history, it appears all you do is try to greet new members, and delete information. I would hope that if your concern is for quality, you would allow the Article a moment to be written before you jump the gun and suggest its a non-notable individual with non-trivial information. Then again, I would assume a New York Times op ed would be considered a notable person, with non-trivial information. But hey, what do I know? Unionyes420 (talk) 23:53, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
<sigh/> Rather than threaten feel free to use WP:RFC/U, but please be sure you are correct in your assumptions and accusations. You may have been an admin, but I would suggest you refresh your understanding of WP:UNCIVIL and WP:N. Also I would ask how an Admin would not know how to properly name an article, format a reference, bold a name in an article, or respond to an AfD - just asking. BTW-how is an oped written by the subject of the article support for the subject. It establishes her as a writer, but is not secondary in nature. reddogsix (talk) 00:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Gigi Erneta[edit]

GIGI ERNETA--- Can you hook a sista up? let me know if my contesting deletion was better. Thanks--- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobientgrp (talkcontribs) 03:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

I asked why was the article on Dorcas Makgato-Malesu deleted but I did not receive a response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anissa ducere (talkcontribs) 03:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


You are correct that Thabonithy Thayalakumaran needs work, but it's not the normal kind of misuse of Wikipedia. There is some kind of project underway to create BLPs of Australian women scientists. As normal with these projects, it wasn't thought out very well and a lot of cleanup and/or deletions will be needed. There's no reason to put "August 2014" notices on the editor's talk as they have been given incomplete information. We'll see if it gets fixed in a few days. Some info is at WP:Meetup/Canberra/2014-08-14-Wikibomb. Johnuniq (talk) 12:14, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion[edit]

Hello,m could you respond to the talk page, your first request has been undone already. prokaryotes (talk) 23:33, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Don't know what you are talking about. Please specify. reddogsix (talk) 23:39, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Your request for SD has been undone by an admin. For any further discussion use the article talk page. prokaryotes (talk) 23:47, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
The only person to have removed the tag is you and you are not an Admin. reddogsix (talk) 23:49, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

NigmaPictures Entertainment[edit]

This one was removed by me. Altough I deleted the article, I moved it to the editor' user space. Tagging for A7 within minutes of creation (especially with a rather inexperienced editor) is perhaps a tad hasty... :-) --Randykitty (talk) 00:04, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

I saw the move thanks..reddogsix (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


Hi, Reddogsix.

1 - Did you read my talk entry on Stellardrone? 2 - If yes, why is this insufficient? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaysonSunshine (talkcontribs) 01:47, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

I saw your edition to my talk page entry. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaysonSunshine (talkcontribs) 01:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

1 - Would you be able to share with me why HUVA Network is notable? 2 - Was it simply never contested? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaysonSunshine (talkcontribs) 01:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

I am not sure the article you refer to is notable. I have not looked at it, so I cannot offer an opinion. Not all articles that should be removed are, sometimes articles are not nominated for deletion simply because no one has noticed the inadequacies. reddogsix (talk) 02:16, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Bruce Hawes[edit]

Hi Reddogsix. I'm new to this! hence the errors. Bruce Hawes is pretty well known songwriter! I'm sure you'd recognise his songs, I'm just having trouble referencing, not because there isn't references, but, because I'm new — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walrus Doctor (talkcontribs) 02:38, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Dave Lewis (Tesco)[edit]

Hi mate. Just a quick note to say that I removed the PROD tag here - I've added a couple of sources and there are gazillions more. Cheers! :) — sparklism hey! 18:08, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Beautiful, thanks!!! reddogsix (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
S e m i - R e t i r e d