User talk:Reddogsix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
R e t i r e d
Please put new entries at the BOTTOM OF THE PAGE

Proposed Deletion of Stephen Hegyes[edit]

I have added references from IMDB, from which you can see the extent of his movie production credits, which will be later detailed. I have removed the proposed deletion tag accordingly, which I hope is OK. Dreadarthur (talk) 01:13, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Nice... reddogsix (talk) 01:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Copyright Question[edit]

Hey, this is an FYI that I'm asking for user conduct help. I messaged you asking you not to tag photographs which comport with Wiki Policy as "copyright violations". I haven't seen a response, but I have seen more tagging. I don't think it's deliberately spam, but I don't know what else to do except ask for third party help. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cchessman (talkcontribs) 23:18, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

I am not sure what you are asking or are indicating I am doing that is in violation of Wikipedia guidelines. I have marked the images as copyright violations per WP:COPYVIO. You may want to review that article and WP:DCM. For more guidance. reddogsix (talk) 23:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm suggesting that you lack a good-faith basis for marking the photos as "copyright violations" and asking you to stop, or in the alternative asking you to contact me before tagging them. Cchessman (talk) 23:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Based on what do you make the statement that I am not acting in good faith. All you need to do to resolve the issue is show the images are not a copyright violation. Show where the author has released the image under CC-BY-3.0 LICENSE.
I'll also suggest you talk to users directly before assuming that a user is not acting in good faith or opening a complaint against them. I am far from perfect, but I generally do not act in malice. reddogsix (talk) 23:32, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't think you're malicious or a bad person. I do take issue with continuing to tag legitimately uploaded photos as "copyright violations", after a request to stop. I guess that's why I'm asking for a third party, who can help mediate the discussion. I'm not under the impression the thing I filed is a "complaint", just a request for comment (like mediation or arbitration). The authorizations are generally private communications, and I'm honestly not sure where I would even post those. That's why I asked you to stop. Cchessman (talk) 23:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Private conversations are not valid authorizations to avoid copyright issues. The images have to be released for use in Wikipedia. I once again point you to WP:COPYVIO and WP:DCM. reddogsix (talk) 23:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
I've looked over it - I'm not sure what part you're referencing that contradicts what I'm saying. Personal authorization is the definition of avoiding copyright issues. If you have permission to use something, then there's no copyright problem. What part of that is complicated? Cchessman (talk) 18:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Cchessman, to prove that the image is free, have the copyright owner send an email to verifying that the images are free. You should have them use Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries. Make sure that they link to the image's file link on Wikipedia in their email. While the copyright owner gave you permission privately, there's no way the public can verify that they actually gave permission. If we could accept your image, then in the future anyone can upload any copyrighted work by falsely saying "they gave me permission to do it in private". Respectfully, Mz7 (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Mz7 That seems hardly distinguishable. I could make an email account, send a message to the address above, and claim I owned the photograph. That would satisfy the requirements above, but is no less unverifiable than the screenshot (which, incidentally, shows university-specific email addresses which are substantially harder to forge and easier to verify than random G-Mail accounts).Cchessman (talk) 07:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Cchessman, before you answer anymore suggestions with a question, I strongly suggest you read the articles you are pointed to. The question you ask is addressed in the article Mx7 pointed you to - WP:Declaration of consent for all enquiries. Secondary, if you wish to contact Mz7, please do so on their talk page, not mine - if you wish to contact me, feel free to leave your message here. My best to you. reddogsix (talk) 15:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
@Cchessman: I have replied at your talk page. Mz7 (talk) 22:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

I am still working on the article[edit]

Hello, reddogsix. I am still working on my article, "The Angel Incident". please don't delete it. just give me time. --Wayoyo (talk) 21:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Please read WP:FIRST. It will provide some guidelines on how to create an article. I would suggest you first create the article in your sandbox. That way if it is deleted you have a copy. My best to you. reddogsix (talk) 21:39, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Wayoyo, I have userfied the article to your userspace. You can now find it at User:Wayoyo/The Angel Incident. This action temporarily removes the article from public view so you can work on the article, and it decreases the risk of speedy deletion. When you are finished developing the article, you may either submit it for review by clicking the green button at that page or move it back to the mainspace. Reddogsix's suggestion of reading WP:FIRST is very good advice. Best, Mz7 (talk) 21:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Adam Asgher[edit]

hi my article on Adam Asgher still needs work and time, also hes quite famous and has worked for big companies such as gucci. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:02, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Please indicate how the article meets the criteria in WP:BIO. reddogsix (talk) 22:07, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of Ryan Dizon[edit]

I want the wiki page deleted. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cakelikemichael (talkcontribs) 21:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

You do have that option. Once an article is started in Wikipedia you do not own the content. The article has been edited by others as well.reddogsix (talk) 22:05, 30 April 2014 (UTC)*
I started the page, is it okay to ask to delete a page I started? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cakelikemichael (talkcontribs) 22:08, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of[edit]

Why are you deleting page .. it is a ecommerce just like many other ecommerce companies with wikipedia pages? Its competitors like hayneedle and wayfair and have wiki pages. There is no reason for it to be deleted!!

I am not deleting it, I have only nominated for deletion. The article fails to establish notability. The articles you have discussed have independent, verifiable references. reddogsix (talk) 03:33, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
How is it not verifiable references?? Goto it is clearly an ecommerce site! Im not sure why you are taking time out of your day to exclude legitimate registered businesses from wiki?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 03:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Where is the independence in the references?reddogsix (talk) 03:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of Raz Nadav[edit]

Hello reddog6, I need your help because I do not understand the logic behind the rules and the principles of Wikipedia, regarding the deletion of the article Raz Nadav.

I suggust you look at it a little differently. Start with WP:FIRST and tell me know you believe the article meets Wikipedia notability guidelines. Thanks... reddogsix (talk) 13:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


Why did you delete my Kelly Oubre page its areal person, and a great athlete that is going to kansas. Just why did you do that.Redsfan21 (talk) 12:39, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I did not delete the article, I only nominated it for deletion - an independent ADMIN removed it because it failed to meet Wikipedia notability guidelines.

Canceling Deletion of Infeeds[edit]

hello sir, i'm still getting more resources about Infeeds but i'm sure too that now that article has many references and right syntax if not please let me know but cancel the deletion process as its linked in other articles too... Can you please help me understand more about making it clean and reliable. Thanks !!

Kelly Oubre[edit]

Is there any way they can ecxept it i have worked really hard on it and there deserves to be a wiki page for him. Redsfan21 (talk) 21:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

PROD removals[edit]


When another editor removes a PROD tag, even if they are an involved editor (and even if they have been in some way annoying), you should NOT replace it. I noticed you did replace -- through reversion -- the tag on the article Red Scale of Elements, as well as Suzanna Reeves. PROD is designed to work by unanimous consent, and even involved editors are allowed to remove the tag for ANY reason, or without stating a reason. When a PROD tag is removed, simply take the matter to AfD. Thanks, Xoloz (talk) 20:29, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

By the way, you've retired?!? I know the feeling of Wiki-fatigue, but I for one would be very sad to see you go! Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 20:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Yup, it is time. I am just cleaning up a few things and will move into the sunset. Thanks and my best to you, reddogsix (talk) 21:33, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Deleted African American Fashion Designers[edit]

RE: 05:05, 15 April 2014 Hahc21 (talk | contribs) deleted page African American Fashion Designers (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of

I have recreated the page African American Fashion Designers to make sure that unambiguous copyright infringement is eliminated. This article is in my own words with citations. Is it OK to post the updated article? PHDiva55 (talk) 16:16, 5 May 2014 (UTC)PHDiva55

Yes, as long as it meets Wikipedia criteria for inclusion it will remain. Good luck. reddogsix (talk) 17:07, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
R e t i r e d