User talk:Redwolf24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Awesome.

Eh. Awesome as in you are going to be more active? KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 04:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Awesome as in there was like 90 messages after I was dead and gone talking about images from an era where we weren't so paranoid. Redwolf24 (talk) 04:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I saw em thanks to that handy watchlist. Well if you're not going to be active again, it's still cool to see you drop by. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 04:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
:D Redwolf24 (talk) 04:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Somebody on Wikipedia likes short shorts, per the corollary to my first law. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 04:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

No one in the site has ever had a problem with vandals. The problems are trolls (though if you don't take things too seriously you should be okay), POV warriors, but most of all how much people seem to dislike eachother here. Like actually dedicated users really dislike eachother a lot. It's kinda sad. Redwolf24 (talk) 04:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Meh true, true, but hey I like Tito, and hey I like RedWolf24 too, all is not lost, just most of it. :p KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 04:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome back This is a Secret account 04:59, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back. As usual, I'll be watching you. Ceiling Cat 05:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Bowser, both you and Linuxbeak disappear then reappear at the same time. Odd! --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 05:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back! Daniel 05:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Good to see you again. Prodego talk 03:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Just popping in occasionally. Redwolf24 (talk) 03:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome back, son. Ceiling Cat will be watching you. Feel free to stop in on IRC. Raul654 (talk) 03:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I will sometime. Also I just edited your laws page. :D Redwolf24 (talk) 03:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Dispute on FGC[edit]

Hi. I am having a dispute with a user on FGC. I noticed your previous contribution and hoped you might provide some third-party commentary on a dispute at Blackworm’s objections. Your opinion would be greatly appreciated. Thank You. Phyesalis (talk) 01:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

  • I'm not really active at this point. Try the WP:MC. Redwolf24 (talk) 23:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
No problem, thanks for the suggestion! Phyesalis 02:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DBBOTD.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DBBOTD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DLV.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DLV.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DYDY.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DYDY.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day[edit]

HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
WikiThanks.png
Balloons-aj.svg

Wishing Redwolf24 a very Happy First Edit Day!

Have a fantastic day!

From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

--SMS Talk 20:19, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Alexwebb.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important blue.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexwebb.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 04:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:JimbotheFonz.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:JimbotheFonz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Asenine  18:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC) -- Asenine  18:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: PS3[edit]

Thanks for the support :) phøenixMøurning ( talk/contribs ) 03:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to Meetup/Seattle6, a focus group[edit]

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Wikipedia. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Wikipedia, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.

I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Wikipedia in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!

Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here. Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk) 01:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Happy birthday[edit]

Have a great birthday, Redwolf24! Good health, and good luck! —what a crazy random happenstance 08:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

re Barnstar[edit]

So I was glancing through my userpage and I saw a barnstar you left for me many moons ago.

"I, Redwolf24 hereby award you this barnstar for several reasons: You have over 8000 edits, you're funny, any wikipedian who's been around for more than a week should recognize you, I haven't seen you being uncivil, and you are all around a great user."

Is that true? Would any wikipedian recognize me? :P I always thought I flew a bit under the radar, my two runs for office notwithstanding. Anyway, I probably thanked you before, but belated thanks again. --Golbez (talk) 22:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Ping[edit]

see also: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Tang Dynasty

I have sent you an e-mail. --Tenmei (talk) 16:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your time and consideration. As a gesture of appreciation, may I share a rhetorical question from the Analects of Confucius: "Is it not pleasant to learn with a constant perseverance and application?" --Tenmei (talk) 00:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Mentorship[edit]

The Revision History of Wikipedia:Mentorship records your participation the article's development; and for this reason, I am reaching out to you.

Please consider reviewing my edit at Wikipedia:Mentorship#Unintended consequences. In the search for a mentor deemed acceptable by ArbCom, I plan to cite this as a useful context for discussing what I have in mind. --Tenmei (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy Birthday (2010)[edit]

Wikipe-tan Birthday.svg
Wishing Redwolf24 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Armbrust Talk Contribs 22:34, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Happy Birthday 2011[edit]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 12:40, 1 November 2011 (UTC).

  • Hello, I am here. Redwolf24 (talk) 04:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Since we last spoke.[edit]

We have both had birthdays :( Oh my gosh, it's a S N A I S Y ! What's a Snaisy? —Preceding undated comment added 23:11, 9 December 2011 (UTC).

Hi[edit]

You are missed. --Zaiger (talk) 22:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suri Cruise (2nd nomination) [edit]

Hello. You previously voted in the 2006 AfD for Suri Cruise. At the time, Suri was less than 10 days old, and the ultimate verdict was to turn the article into a redirect to her mother's page.

Since then, Suri has become much more notable in her own right as a toddler fashion icon, with over 13 million hits on google image search. After getting an administrator to lift the protection on the redirect, I recently restored the article as a stub, but an editor who believes that "6 year olds are not inherently notable" has again requested deletion.

If it's not too much trouble, I'd appreciate your making your opinion known at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suri Cruise (2nd nomination) Warren Dew (talk) 07:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

File:BrianDennehySP.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BrianDennehySP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM 21:06, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

I have added you to Missing Wikipedians[edit]

Just to let you know (I am supposed to - this is what it says). Ottawahitech (talk) 23:49, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Deeker.com[edit]

Now redirects to a diaper superstore. Lolled me out hard. Miss u Oh my gosh, it's a S N A I S Y ! What's a Snaisy? —Preceding undated comment added 20:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)[edit]

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

  • Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
  • Research: The most recent DR data
  • Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
  • Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
  • DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
  • Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
  • Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?
Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 00:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 20:58, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MBisanz talk 05:16, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 02:31, 2 January 2013 (UTC)