|This is Rejectwater's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Rejectwater.|
Hello Rejectwriter, I'm here to let you know that your unresolved comment "You have unbundled them, which is good, but it is still unclear which citation supports what information in the table. Each row..." in this FLC has been resolved so I guess you should put them in your resolved comments if you're satisfied, thanks.—FrankBoy (Buzz) 13:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment
As an active member of the WikiProject Ice Hockey, you should be aware that there has been a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment concerning how NHOCKEY will be interpreted. Dolovis (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Fuck peer review, again
- Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties
- Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1
I've listed the article Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for peer review.
Help with furthering along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.
Thank you for your time,