User talk:Rejectwater

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Unresolved[edit]

Hello Rejectwriter, I'm here to let you know that your unresolved comment "You have unbundled them, which is good, but it is still unclear which citation supports what information in the table. Each row..." in this FLC has been resolved so I guess you should put them in your resolved comments if you're satisfied, thanks.—FrankBoy (Buzz) 13:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Taken care of, thanks for the heads up. Regards, Rejectwater (talk) 00:21, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment[edit]

As an active member of the WikiProject Ice Hockey, you should be aware that there has been a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment concerning how NHOCKEY will be interpreted. Dolovis (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Detroit Red Wings award winners/archive1[edit]

Hi Rejectwater. There are unaddressed comments at your FLC nomination. Could you please address them? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:20, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Fuck peer review, again[edit]

  1. Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties
  2. Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1

I've listed the article Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for peer review.

Help with furthering along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.

Thank you for your time,

Cirt (talk) 01:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)