User talk:Rezonansowy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

TemplateScript[edit]

Hello Rezonansowy. I found the old 'regex menu framework' in your common.js page, so I updated it to the latest version (now called TemplateScript with an improved regex editor, simpler usage for creating text snippets, cleaner scripting support, more powerful features for advanced users, and better gadget support).

I noticed that it was disabled; I wasn't sure from the edit history if that was deliberate, so I left it inactive. Let me know if you'd like me to fix it for you. :) —Pathoschild 23:07, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

@Pathoschild: Hi, thanks for this, however this isn't my common.js but User:Jbhunley. Many thanks for upgrading this script, ti could be very helpful for advanced editors. Regards, --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 14:46, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, the correct link is User:Rezonansowy/Rezonansowy-external.js. —Pathoschild 14:53, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Again, thanks! :) --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 20:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Template:Bananas[edit]

Hi Rezonansowy. Is Template:Bananas, which you created but which is currently unused, still required? If not, I'll nominate it for deletion (or you can if you prefer). Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 12:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks! I forgot about this, it was only test. --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 12:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Userspace pages[edit]

Hi Rezonansowy. I deleted User:Rezonansowy/TWA/Earth as you requested, but I just wanted to check, did you also want User talk:Rezonansowy/TWA/Earth deleted? Regards, Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 16:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes please, it's just a machine generated message (see history). Thanks! --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 16:56, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Sure; no problem. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 17:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Deb (file format) website[edit]

Hi!

What was the reason to change the website for the deb format? The page on the Debian wiki is pretty much meaningless. And the actual format is the one defined in the dpkg deb(5) man page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillem Jover (talkcontribs) 17:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

@Guillem Jover: Hi, Debian wiki appeared to me as a better website, however You're right, so I'll revert it. --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 21:04, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Ah, perfect, thanks! Guillem Jover (talk) 23:57, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tor (anonymity network), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EFF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Subtitle subtilities[edit]

About Template talk:Infobox#subtitle and Template talk:Infobox book#Subtitle. I'd like to read your comments. -DePiep (talk) 14:16, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Wykop.pl[edit]

Witam, Widzę, że przywróciłeś informację dotyczącą filmików obrażających papieża Jana Pawła II, tworzonych rzekomo przez Wykop. Otóż jest to nieprawda. Autorami tych filmików był karachan.org. Co ma z tym wspólnego Wykop? Otóż kilku użytkowników Wykopu namierzyło autorów tych filmików, w związku z czym ich szef, Michał Białek, po nieudanych zgłoszeniach do YT, postanowił zgłosić sprawę do prokuratury, dlatego karachanowcy w ramach zemsty zaczęli oznaczać te filmiki logiem Wykopu jako prowokacja. Można o tym poczytać tutaj [1] Podane zaś linki w artykule o niczym nie świadczą - pierwszy [2] jest wpisem na blogu, a drugi [3] linkuje po prostu do tych "filmików". Gdyby wkleili do filmików logo np. Wikipedii, to wtedy byłyby kontrowersje Wikipedii? Zwróć też uwagę w historii edycji, że było to forsowane głównie przez anonimowych IP-ków, którzy argumentowali edycje wulgarnymi słowami. [4] Filmiki są co prawda wyjątkowo obraźliwe, ale nadaje się to na zupełnie inną stronę. Na pl wiki tych "informacji" nie ma, więc pora, aby na en wiki też tego nie było. Pozdrowienia, --CzakNoris (talk) 19:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

@CzakNoris: Zrewertowałem automatycznie, bo nie dałeś opisu zmian. Takie rzeczy trzeba najpierw poddać dyskusji na stronie dyskusji artykułu, a nie usuwać od tak. Napisz proszę to co napisałeś powyżej na stronie dyskusji artykułu (po angielsku) i będzie OK. --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 14:53, 14 November 2014 (UTC)