Your POV reverts on 2012 Italian shooting in the Laccadive Sea
@User talk:Robertiki: I have responded to your repeated edits of the Italian shooting in the Laccadive Sea on both the EDIT and TALK page of the article giving detailed reasons why your POV inclusion is deemed unfit. If you have any suggestions to improve this article or wish to discuss something regarding this article, then please do it on the Talk:2012 Italian shooting in the Laccadive Sea.
In view of your repeated reverts/deletions of contributions on Wikipedia, I have placed a EDIT WARNING on your talk page and will be obliged to escalate the matter if you continue to cause disruption to the article.
Edit war warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2012 Italian shooting in the Laccadive Sea. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use Talk:2012 Italian shooting in the Laccadive Sea the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 13:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- About "Edit war" I remark that you are doing it. The single word I inserted, no way could be seen as vandalizing. So before reverting you should have asked in the talk page. Anyway, explanations are given in the article talk page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2012_Italian_shooting_in_the_Laccadive_Sea#User_18.104.22.168 where you could reply.--Robertiki (talk) 13:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
A minor change to DRN
Hi there, you're getting this message as you are involved in a case at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard which is currently open. Today DRN has undergone a big move resulting in individual cases on subpages as opposed to all the content on one page. This is to inform you that your case is now back on the DRN board and you will be able to 'watch' the subpage it's located on. Thanks, Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 13:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Kogan Creek Solar Boost: Electric MW or Thermal MW?
Hello...I am wondering on what basis you changed the Kogan Creek Solar Boost sizing from MW electrical to MW thermal? All the references I could find talk about "additional electricity", and more importantly I work in the energy sector in Queensland and have technical documents relating to the project. They state 44 MWe. Please revert your edit.--Graham Proud (talk) 13:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- In addition, I noticed that you updated the project timing but did not provide any references for the new date. I have a few if you need a hand.--Graham Proud (talk) 14:05, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Compare the revisions and you find that I added a reference:  where you read: "The Kogan Creek Solar Boost Project will be the largest solar integration with a coal-fired power station in the world when it is operational in *2015*." and "Construction is underway on the project, which involves the installation of a 44 megawatt solar *thermal* addition to the plant." You could understand otherwise with the following statement: "The solar boost will increase the amount of electricity Kogan Creek Power Station generates by up to 44 megawatts during peak solar conditions" but, having the same turbine and generator it could not be intended that the power grows to 794 MW from 750 MW (it would burn the electrical part, should the turbine take the load). It follows: " ... supply additional steam to the turbine, supplementing the conventional coal-fired steam generation process". And for the funding: "Funding for the project includes a $70 million contribution from CS Energy and a contribution of more than $34 million from the Australian Government. CS Energy has received support from the Queensland Government through a contribution of $35.4 million to CS Energy’s Carbon Reduction Program, which has enabled the company to direct funds to the Kogan Creek Solar Boost Project." I would add, the thermal power of a solar field is straightforward to calculate. But how do you declare the electrical output, without a dedicated turbine and generator ? You could make wild assumption, taking the efficiency of the coal generated steam, which reaches temperatures the solar field could only dream. --Robertiki (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is How to stop a page being 'gamed' ?. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 06:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- @ROBERTIKI: Your participation is solicited in the thread How to stop a page being 'gamed' ? because I have opened a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. My IP has indeed changed but I cannot do much about it. So, as you know I am the Belgian based contributor. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 07:38, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Repeated deletions of sourced content. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Massive re-work of content to suit the Italian narrative on 2012 Italian Navy Marines shooting incident in the Laccadive Sea.The discussion is about the topic 2012 Italian Navy Marines shooting incident in the Laccadive Sea. Thank you. —Onlyfactsnofiction (talk) 00:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)