Hi instead of constant reverting, it would be great if you could provide me the quotes from relevant sources that show "many French Muslims feared ... an increase in Islamophobia", as the only one that appears to use the word is "Extremist suspect in French killings profits far right in presidential race; Muslims afraid". Associated Press. 22 March 2012." - that says
The powerful fundamentalist Muslim organization UOIF asked all citizens "not to succumb to the panic of stigmatizing Muslims, which feeds Islamophobia."
- Your edit removed sourced material and was inappropriate. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 07:23, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Given your care about sources, would you be willing to review File:World same-sex adoption laws.svg? I based it on our articles and the sources they had, but they often contradict each other. E.g., the West Bank allows joint adoption even though homosexuality is illegal, Cambodia and the Philippines allow adoption (perhaps only to foreigners?), but we apparently have no sources, etc. — kwami (talk) 02:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
I've removed a dozen other states where our refs did not support the claim, or where we had no ref at all: Greenland, Andorra, Austria, Minnesota, Coahuila, Florida, Arkansas, the Channel Isles, Falklands, Guam, maybe a few more. In some cases a law banning adoption was struck down, but we don't color in other states just because they don't have a law banning adoption. Etc. Amazing how bad these articles are, and have been for years. — kwami (talk) 14:27, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
LGBT Parenting Talk.
Your contributions on the talk page would be greatly appreciated, especially since no one supported keeping Rosenfeld if we exclude Allen on the talk page. It was up there for several days before I tried to make that change. You undoubtedly have an argument for not removing Rosenfeld; if you keep reverting us but I and TheArmadillo (who, by the way, "endorse[s] the legality of gay marriage and child adoption") are two of the three main talk page contributors, it looks like a consensus that isn't there. jj (talk) 14:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Dude, you started a discussion and explicitly failed to gain consensus to add Allen. Do not edit war. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:50, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Scope and title for Bisexuality in the Arab world
During the recent AfD for Bisexuality in the Arab world (closed as 'keep') you will either have seen opinions expressed to expand the scope of the article, or voiced that opinion yourself. I am placing this notice on the talk pages of all who expressed an opinion of whatever type in that deletion discussion to invite you to participate in a discussion on article scope and title at Talk:Bisexuality in the Arab world. You are cordially invited to participate. By posting this message I am not seeking to influence your opinion one way or another. Fiddle Faddle 10:29, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
It's not true that you have to be a Christian to work for Care Net. Could you please change that back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougthehomosapien (talk • contribs) 17:41, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Their statement of faith affirms the divinity of Christ and other particulars that specifically identify someone who adheres to it as a Christian (and actually, specific denominations of Christian). –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:49, 8 November 2013 (UTC)