User talk:Royalmate1/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 01:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hi Royalmate1, just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 21:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks tenfold. RoyalMate1 22:05, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

WikiProject Cleanup invitation

I've formatted the WikiProject Cleanup page to include members for those that are interested in joining, similar to how other projects have members. Since you've contributed relatively recently to the project's list page, I formally extend this invitation to join WikiProject Cleanup! I've also created a userbox template for members to use on their user pages. Thank you for your contributions to help improve Wikipedia! Northamerica1000(talk) 08:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

Lists of shipwrecks

Re your tagging of various lists with {{refimprove}}. Consensus is that where there is a linked article in these lists, then a reference is not necessary, as the article confirms the fact claimed. Where a fact is claimed that is not in the article, then a reference should be provided. Where there is no article, then a reference should be provided also.

I note that you do not leave edit summaries. Would you please do so in future, as not leaving an edits summary is an unsuccessful tactic sometimes used to try to cover vandalism. Your edits appear to have been made in good faith, and as such cannot be classed as vandalism. Would you mind removing the tags from all shipwreck lists that you placed them on? If there are any individual entries that need referencing, feel free to tag them with {{citation needed}}.

I would ask that you leave all lists linked from the {{WWII shipwrecks}} alone, as I am currently working at these and the few entries that needs refs will done in due course. Mjroots (talk) 04:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I appreciate your concern. Many of those pages were completely unreferenced, and that was why I was tagging them. That thought (the consensus you stated) did cross my mind upon tagging many of the articles that had links, so that is my bad. Many of those lists had links to wikipedia articles and references. I honestly think that all articles should have citations, especially in lists, as they are there to provide an outline of categorized items. I don't support the removing of all of my tags (ones that are unreferenced and unlinked), but certainly some should be given another look at.
I can see that tagging {{refimprove}} or {{unreferenced}} at the top of an article is less beneficial than {{citation needed}} on the specific unsourced statement. I'll keep that in mind, but the articles need attention nonetheless. I'll certainly take another look at those articles.
As for edit summaries, unfortunately, I almost never take the time to fill them out. I see the good they can do to other editors, but I usually leave them out because they tend to be time consuming or redundant. Thanks for the insight. RoyalMate1 20:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
I'd not forgotten this, just got dumped offline for a few days against my will. Getting into the habit of leaving an edit summary is a good thing to do, for the reasons stated above. You can set your preferences to remind you to leave and edit summary should you forget to do so. It soon becomes second nature. I agree that some of the lists do need attention to referencing. Unless the problem is endemic to the list, individual tagging is better. Mjroots (talk) 12:58, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. When you recently edited Joseph Grew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Phillips (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. When you recently edited Henry A. Smythe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delaware County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

An award for you

A Barnstar!
Golden Wiki Award
In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.0.115 (talk) 20:56, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

WikiThanks

WikiThanks
WikiThanks

You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 66.87.2.33 (talk) 23:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

A barnstar for you

The Modest Barnstar
Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.0.140 (talk) 22:49, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

Beetle stubs

I dont know why that many people are interested in making beetle stubs all at once, but you seem to be one of them. Sadly, everyone making them is making the same mistakes. Might I give you some pointers? You should add the "species", "binomial" and "binomial_authority" parameters to your taxobox and lose the genus authority (since your article is about a species and not the genus). Furthermore, the name of the species in the first line of text should be bold and italic (you have that covered I see). And please, could you at least add some info about the species to the article? The bare minimum would be the distribution (where does this species live?). Have a look at Mordellistena martapurana. I changed everything that needs changing to the taxobox. Furthermore, the distribution is listed on the site you use as a reference. It is found behind the species name in brackets. Ruigeroeland (talk) 09:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll look into it - I thought there were some problems when I was working on the articles. RoyalMate1 23:42, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Royalmate1/Archive_2&oldid=1190142142"