User talk:Runningonbrains

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Golden file cabinet.png

2006
2007
2008
2009
Congratulations
Funny, nonsense, insults, and other garbage


Archives


Contents

[edit] GA Sweeps update

Thanks to everyone's efforts to the GA Sweeps process, we are currently over 90% done with only 226 articles remain to be swept! As always, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. With over 50 members participating in Sweeps, that averages out to about 4 articles per person! If each member reviews an article once a week this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. At that point, awards will be handed out to reviewers. As an added incentive, if we complete over 100 articles reviewed this month, I will donate $100 to Wikipedia Forever on behalf of all GA Sweeps participants. I hope that this incentive will help to increase our motivation for completing Sweeps while supporting Wikipedia in the process. If you have any questions about reviews or Sweeps let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 00:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Loss of content during redirect of Academy Award, Best Short Subject, One-reel

Hi, back in June you redirected Academy Award, Best Short Subject, One-reel to Academy Award for Best Live Action Short Film with the edit summary "that article contains all this info already." However, a quick glance at the source page reveals that that is clearly not the case. None of the nominated films past 1940 are present in the target page: literally dozens of films are missing. I see from your Talk page message that you're busy with studies so I'll add them back in. But please be more careful in the future when doing redirects to ensure that information is not lost. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:38, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

No probs. Oddly, another editor merging the two-reelers made exactly the same assumption: I restored those noms as well. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you note re: Nahum Gergel article

Runningonbrains, thank you for taking care of the article I wrote about my grandfather Nahum Gergel. I know it's been a while ago, but I've just learned that the article is in its place now.

Viktor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VRaykin (talkcontribs) 04:55, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] February GA Sweeps update

Progress as of January 2010

Thanks to everyone's efforts to the GA Sweeps process, we are currently over 95% done with around 130 articles left to be swept! Currently there are over 50 members participating in Sweeps, that averages out to about 3 articles per person! If each member reviews an article once a week this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. At that point, awards will be handed out to reviewers. Per my message last month, although we did not review 100 articles last month, I still made a donation of $90 (we had 90 reviews completed/initiated) to Wikipedia Forever on behalf of all GA Sweeps reviewers. I would like to thank everyone's efforts for last month, and ask for additional effort this month so we can be finished. I know you have to be sick of seeing these updates (as well as Sweeps itself) by now, so please do consider reviewing a few articles if you haven't reviewed in a while. If you have any questions about reviews or Sweeps let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 02:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost interview?

Would you be interested in doing an interview for the Wikipedia Signpost on behalf of WikiProject Severe Weather? The interview would be featured as the WikiProject report in the March 1st issue of the Signpost. If so, please answer the questions here by February 27-28th. Thanks in advance, Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 23:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Info on Blizzard template

Thanks for your input on the Blizzards in the United States template. If the conditions you mentioned are the case then that would mean the "category:Blizzards in the United States" would also require adjusting since I included articles listed in that category which I included in the template to make it more complete. If you think things need changes our welcome to do so. Since blizzard requirements are 1/4mi visibility and winds greater then 35mph than that would even contest the naming of some articles. For example the "2009 North American Christmas Winter Storm" should be considered a blizzard because blizzard conditions and blizzard warnings across the Midwest, while the "3rd North American Blizzard" had no blizzard warnings issued or known blizzard criteria. Just some food for thought. Let me know what you think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stormchaser89 (talkcontribs) 00:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps Completed!

Thanks to everyone's amazing efforts in February, we have reviewed all of the articles and are now finished with Sweeps! There are still about 30 articles currently on hold, and once those reviews are completed, I will send you a final message about Sweeps process stats including the total number of articles that were passed and failed. If you have one of these open reviews, be sure to update your count when the review is completed so I can compile the stats. You can except to receive your award for reviewing within the next week or two. Although the majority of the editors did not start Sweeps at the beginning in August 2007 (myself included), over 50 editors have all come together to complete a monumental task and improve many articles in the process. I commend you for sticking with this often challenging task and strengthening the integrity of the GA WikiProject as well as the GAs themselves. I invite you to take a break from reviewing (don't want you to burn out!) and then consider returning/starting to review GANs and/or contribute to GAR reviews. With your assistance, we can help bring the backlog down to a manageable level and help inspire more editors to improve articles to higher classes and consider reviewing themselves. Again, thank you for putting up with difficult reviews, unhappy editors, numerous spam messages from me, and taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 02:37, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

[edit] A sincere thank you from Wikiproject Good Articles

GA Sweeps Medal.png

On behalf of Wikiproject Good Articles, I would like to express our gratitude to you for your contributions to the Sweeps process. Completion of this monstrous task has proven to be a significant accomplishment not only for our project, but for Wikipedia. As a token of our sincere appreciation, please accept this ribbon. Lara 01:11, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Renaming of article J. K. Temple

Hi, I would like to rename the article J. K. Temple to J.K. temple (as per WP:VERB under WP:AT) that you had earlier moved from J K Temple. Pls do let me know if it is in accordance with Wikipedia policies.Thaejas (talk) 06:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2

Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 13:00, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

[edit] William Preston Hall

Sorry dude (or dudette)! My bad. I was trying to salvage my previous work on William P. Hall that an overzealous "new page cop" had nuked and guess I screwed it up somehow. First time I'd ever had one get the speedy delete treatment. I'll try not to do it again, and much thanks for cleaning up my mess. Sector001 (talk) 01:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Severe weather

I suspect that it will take me a day or so to get done with the over haul. I drew the short straw but I'll give it a good shot. Respectfully Bullock 04:10, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Quick question since you are a member of the Severe Weather project. Is this your key article or should it be were everyone goes to get started? It may affect how I trim the tree. Bullock 04:14, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Will do, I believe you have provided me with a vision and a bit of latitude. Thanks Bullock 04:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Runningonbrains. You have new messages at E.w.bullock's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

[edit] Benj

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Benj. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Severe weather

Where are the factual errors? If it has errors, we have bigger problems, because most of that content (the last time I looked at the article before the copyedit) was directly or nearly directly from the different types of severe weather's articles. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 23:28, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

[edit] User:Tom12350

Hi - I was trying to be honest and straight with user:tom12350, not trying to be hostile or uncivil.

I've left a message at Wikipedia_talk:Reference_desk#User:Tom12350 regarding them.

Yes when I wrote "soon to be banned" that was hot headed and hasty 94.72.235.30 (talk) 00:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh. Can you take a look at the talk page link above, or get another admin with 'telling off powers' to look at it. Thanks.94.72.235.30 (talk) 00:09, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

[edit] weather

There is not any threat. A user is systematically providing false data and slandering and libeling institutions in Wiki pages, so he should warned about this. The material has been provided and legal actions are being taken against him. So I suggest you to get informed before talking about something you don't have an idea about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.50.26.135 (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

[edit] File:53185dmg2.jpg

I had emailed the owner of the page when i first found the image, and they said as long as attribution was given, i could upload it to wikipedia. i no longer have the emails, though.. and as you can see, the page no longer exists.. i think that's the only extant copy left. RingtailedFoxTalkContribs 15:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Page move

My reply to your comment-

I don't understand your move and merge of Winter storms of 2006–2007 to Global storm activity of 2005-2007. Could you please explain your reasoning for this page title?? -RunningOnBrains(talk) 14:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

There was a trouble about the name 'winter' on Winter storms of 2009–2010 [[1]] and claims that it was not globalized, was largly pro-northern hemispher and should report all big storms in all places.--Snow storm in Eastern Asia (talk) 14:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

A separate page is now occurring for the other non winterty stuff. --Snow storm in Eastern Asia (talk) 18:58, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Highest Temperature Recorded

Hello, thanks for your message on why my edition on List of weather records was removed. as requested am giving the suitable source

The highest temperature ever registered was 57.8 (degrees Celsius) in Libya in 1929 and then 56.7 in the United States in 1913," he noted. "In Kuwait, the highest temperature recorded was 51.3 in 1998." This year, Kuwait recorded its highest temperature in the history of the country. "This year we registered 52 degrees Celsius in Kuwait City and 54 in the Matraba area. It remained 51 degrees at the Kuwait International Airport," said Easa Ramadan. Kuwait Times

Easa Ramadan is the Meteorologist and Superintendent of Stations and Upper Air Division at Kuwait Meteorological Department


so am posting it again.. as 54 c in matraba area is a record for kuwait —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justrizlee (talkcontribs) 07:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Required Information Collected

Hello there,

I have the required information obtained from the meteorology department of Kuwait, on the highest temperature recorded which is 54 C on 15th june 2010, am willing to share the information i have obtained and also i have added the entry in List of weather records hope to hear from you soon

with regards, Riz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justrizlee (talkcontribs) 13:33, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

[edit] i want to leave from wikipedia

Dear sir, since long days I was not here. I just check this account , to remove my account. So I want to remove my pages ie use talks, contribution details etc from wiki.

Please do it.

I don't know how to delete this account. Or One queastion, shall I change my username. when i search, my name came in google. So I don't want this. if possible please change this username.

please help me

[edit] WikiProject Connecticut Autumn 2010 Photo Contest

Camera-photo.svg
Flag of Connecticut.svg

As a member of WikiProject Connecticut, you are invited to participate in the WikiProject Connecticut AUTUMN 2010 Photo Contest!

Rules:

  • You must take the picture yourself; adding public domain pictures (i.e. postcards from pre-1923 that are on a website) will NOT count. The picture cannot already exist on Wikipedia, in Commons, etc.
  • The picture must be of something notable for a CT rated article and be of decent quality.
  • You may not add more than 5 pictures to any one article during the contest.
  • All photos must be uploaded and added to their articles. If it wasn't added to the article and titled, it doesn't count.
  • All submissions must be made after 12:00 UTC (8:00 AM EST) on September 15th, 2010 and no later than 23:59 UTC (7:59 PM EST) on October 31st, 2010.

Everyone who adds 15 pictures will earn a barnstar, and the editor who adds the most pictures will earn a special unique barnstar!

To enter the contest, click here. Thanks for your attention and good luck! Grondemar 04:14, 13 September 2010 (UTC)


[edit] European Temperature record

Hi Runningonbrains,could you please help us in the Catenanuova article?I think we need content and dispute resolution with a user from Italy.Could please suggest a content that would satisfy both sides and as accurate as possible?All the best —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weatherextremes (talkcontribs) 14:55, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Osene Ighodaro

You helped me with this article Osene Ighodaro while ago. Her management contacted me requesting I alter some things I had posted. Somehow in doing it, I messed up the info box. I added instrument (vocalist) and genre (gospel), but it didnt show up. Can you help out, please? Thanks. Kennethtamara (talk) 06:11, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Tornadoes in Hawaii

Info non-talk.png

Category:Tornadoes in Hawaii, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 06:00, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:Weather up for FRC

Weather has been nominated for a featured portal review. During this review, editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the portal from featured status. Please leave your comments and help us to return the portal to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, portals may lose its status as featured portals. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:11, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Aloha

Just though I would let you know I just about giggled with excitement when I saw you were getting involved in the Mid-April 2011 tornado outbreak article. I hope life has been treating you well; I haven't seen you around the wiki hardly at all. At any rate, it would help us greatly if you could help out with that article. The more experienced severe weather editors we have on board the better. =) Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 05:35, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Images

With regards to freely licensed images in the tornado outbreak article, I even checked Flickr for ones of the Tuscaloosa tornado but came up empty. I added the {{Image requested}} template to the talk page, but I doubt that will produce results. It seems the only routes here for images might be permissions requests and or fair-use rationales. Any other suggestions? Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 16:57, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Second question

You might take a look at my question here; I forgot you were an admin. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 17:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Actually, it seems HJ Mitchell got back to me...but feel free to weigh in if you want. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 18:03, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Tornados

I did not ignore the note. 350 is currently the most accepted number by up-to-date sources. Marcus Qwertyus 21:19, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

[edit] No problem

Thanks for the tip about putting in an edit summary. I too have been removing premature EF5 ratings to the Tuscaloosa tornado 8^) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mongoose470 (talkcontribs) 23:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding "Super Outbreak" as an adjective

I agree that such an adjective should be officially defined before using such terminology to describe an event. I accept the undo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mongoose470 (talkcontribs) 03:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Re: April 25-28 2011 Tornado Outbreak wording

Good evening! What I meant to do with my edit was to clean up that particular section so that it would be clear that the Tupelo-Gainesville outbreak was actually the second-deadliest in U.S. history, according to the known death tolls. I didn't make it clear enough the first time around but I tried again. (CapeFearWX (talk) 03:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC))

[edit] Talkback

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Runningonbrains. You have new messages at Ks0stm's talk page.
Message added 14:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

[edit] Made a win script

Enjoy the Windows script for counting tornadoes. It's trivial to make it point to another table when the time comes. -- ke4roh (talk) 23:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Springfield Debris

It's stated in the SPC storm reports

A LETTER FROM SPRINGFIELD CAUGHT IN UPDRAFTS WAS FOUND IN MILLBURY AT 820 PM

Cyclonebiskit (talk)

[edit] Re: yeah, that news article is full of shit; it's pretty much accepted that it was a single tornado.

That is your personal opinion. How about a citation? You offer no citation other than Grazulis. What page number? How about a sample piece of text that supports your claim? How can anyone verify that? I am reverting your revert. Think wisely before starting a revert war. "that news article is full of shit; it's pretty much accepted that it was a single tornado." Back that opinion up. How do I know you are not "full of shit?" I added an additional citation. TimL (talk) 06:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:Weather

Thanks for continuing to update the portal. I have commented on finding more red links and about the portal's "on this day" stories slightly too US-centric.[2] Please take a look and comment on it. OhanaUnitedTalk page 03:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Talkback

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Runningonbrains. You have new messages at Reaper Eternal's talk page.
Message added 02:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

[edit] (Expanding) Blue Circle Phenomenon appearance on NEXRAD weather maps.

To date there are no explanations of this repetitious phenomenon.

This is at least a valid stab at explaining the incidental appearance of expanding blue circles appearing at a distance from radar sites. The comparative analysis to explosive shockwaves may be removed if it will prevent misunderstandings.

I could express the system in greater systematic detail if you wish.

Regards, John Jthuebner (talk) 13:15, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] (Expanding) Blue Circle Phenomenon appearance on NEXRAD weather maps...Continued

I agree with the page change to the Radar page and unfortunately, this is original work - my apologies. I'd like to know your thoughts on the phenomenon which I can possibly provide a screen captured image. I believe that the process occurs in relatively calm but saturated air where the heat of vaporization reaches a super critical level forcing the moisture to diffuse outward from the source and those radars that are in Clear Air Mode can pick up on the wave of outflowing moisture.

Great to hear from you so soon,

John

[edit] DYK for Tornadoes in New England

Materialscientist (talk) 16:11, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Blue Circles Cont.

The image you provided is not the correct image I'm referring to. I'll get back to you after next week - Going to Hilton Head for a week. When I get back I'll try to obtain a sequence of images. It shouldn't take long as these expanding circles are quite common. Have a great week. John — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jthuebner (talkcontribs) 16:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Talkback

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Runningonbrains. You have new messages at Tim1357's talk page.
Message added 03:16, 10 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Just letting you know that I responded to your request. Tim1357 talk 03:16, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Weather records

I'm sorry. I won't be rude anymore. Scheridon (talk) 01:18, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Shuttle promotion

Doesn't look like you filled out the template for the promotion. Says filename.jpg

[edit] FPC closure

Hi RoB! Thanks for closing Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/STS-134 launch, we do need the help. A couple minor squabbles:

  • Make sure you keep the comment "End of FPs" at Template:Announcements/New featured content, your edit removed it. I have added it back. The comment is used by my FPC-closing script. See below.
  • Make sure to increment the FP count at Wikipedia:Featured pictures when promoting, I have done so for your promotion.
  • Instead of doing all that work manually, you can use a script I wrote: User:Jujutacular/closeFPC. There are only a few things you still have to do manually, mainly adding the image to the proper sub-page of WP:FP. If you have any trouble with it, or you are not sure exactly how to install/use it, let me know.

Hope this helps! Thanks for taking an interest in FPC closures, and I hope to see you around again. Cheers, Jujutacular talk 00:36, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] May 21-27, 2011 outbreak sequence

Rather than getting into a messy revert, I'll discuss here. The two tornadoes listed at the end are merely a continuation of the previous event rather than a separate outbreak. The front stalled out near the East Coast, creating continued severe weather events, including those two tornadoes. Since it's synoptically the same system, there's no real reason to exclude them. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:20, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Alright, no argument here now. Thanks for the clarification. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:36, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Radar Blue Circles Continued

See Alabama, Geogia and South Carolina

I'm back from Hilton Head. Sorry for the delay on this subject. I have already captured an image from http://radar.weather.gov/ridge/Conus/full_loop.php that shows the expanding circles (always in the morning and at a distance from the radar sites). I can provide the screen captured images but I’m not sure how to attach the images in this forum. Thanks, John

I’ve read a little about you and it seems that we have much in common. I majored in physics and also have an interest in meteorology (and space weather). I once considered majoring in meteorology. It is because of our common interests that I prefer to work with you on this phenomenon - If you are okay with that. 216.49.114.77 (talk) 14:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
  • If this is what you call a forum, them this is how you include an image. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for helping with the over-tagging.

Hi Runningonbrains, thanks for helping with the over-tagging on the article, Ahmed Abdel Azeem.

  • Recall: 04:31, 19 July 2011 Runningonbrains(talk | contribs) (6,874 bytes) (Holy over-tagging Batman!)

I have been quite active trying to rescue the article and did not feel it would be appropriate for me to remove the tags which had become irrelevant. So, thanks for taking it in hand. DonaldRichardSands (talk) 21:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] tehelka edit

You must take some time and read through the the tehelka wiki page, especially major stries and tell me if yo can spot even one story incriminating the UPA govt. which has been in power since 2004 and it can be safely assumed (if you bother to open your eyes sometime) has been involved in a far lot more scams,corruption and wrongdoing.As i wrote,in popular paralance referred to as the most corrupt govt this country has ever had (seeing the record of politicians in this country, its no mean feat). I'm no Congress or B.J.P fanbooy ,just a citizen severely disillusioned by the nexus whixh exists betwen the media and the politicians and how the press has been infiltrated and severly diminished. Blaming the poor ethics of the magzine on biased versions and then indulging in semantics over the word vandalism is a cheap and hollow shot.Bit of bland babble. Infact the tehelka page as of now is severely biased and is a self indulging eulogy. As for evidence, unless you are blind or have burried your head in the sand, i think i have provided the link to the debate for the reader to judge and decide on the neutrality of the tehelka jounalists.I paraphrased what happened.There was no personal opinion involved. Your act basically calls into question your prejudice,ability to think neutrally and seperate your own political opinions and whether you are competent enough to responsibly execute your duties.

cheers, nisargstar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nisargstar (talkcontribs) 07:58, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Nisargstar has also posted to me about this. I have replied at User talk:Nisargstar. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Annular Typhoons

I found information on the article on Typhoon Rusa that mentions annular structure in the storm's meteorological history section. I don't know if that is enough to make a annular typhoon section but just a thought. Stormchaser89 (talk) 9:45, 22 July 2011 (US Central)

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Comma (2nd nomination)

Polygonia c-album qtl2.jpg
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Polygonia c-album qtl2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 04:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Opposition to the legalisation of abortion". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by February 16, 2011.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 01:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Nahum Gergel

Hello, Runningonbrains,

I've just finished adding references to the article about Nahum Gergel and wondering is this enough or I shall look further?

Also, I've started to work on the Russian translation of the article - as soon as translation is finished I'd like to contribute it and to link it to the original English article. Is there an easy way of doing it (providing there is an already existing article in English)?

Your help is greatly appreciated!

VRaykin. VRaykin (talk) 02:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Opposition to the legalisation of abortion, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK [] 21:33, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

[edit] News and progress from RfA reform 2011

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 16:01, 25 September 2011 (UTC).

[edit] Proposed deletion of Steven Joseph

Hello, Runningonbrains, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Steven Joseph, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! ... discospinster talk 21:51, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion discussion about Steven Joseph

Hello, Runningonbrains, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Joseph whether the article Steven Joseph should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Steven Joseph, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! ... discospinster talk 22:09, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Question - Mass Updates of Climate Data

Hello...

I posted a request regarding climate data here WikiProject Meteorology. In going through this section, it looks like you've got a meteorological background. I would love your opinion if you get a moment. I committed a newbie faux pas by posting without properly reaching consensus.

Right now, just looking for feedback. If I touch a page, I get plenty of feedback :-). Seems like things are a bit slower in the talk project pages, so thought I'd get more active in asking folks to sound off.

If reaching out is a Wiki faux pas, please chalk it up to not knowing the community. I know weather normals and averages, but I'm still new on Wiki.

Thank you.

Frisch1 (talk) 05:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Frisch1

[edit] Fixing a deleted page

I would like to put a corrected entry for "Mark Daniels." I have gone through the article and have added sources and links to verify the information for the entry. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mark_Daniels&action=edit&redlink=1 I think the website directed me to talk to you before added similar content back to the page. Can you please help me?

hawkeye (talk) 07:41, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Your best bet is probably to create a new article afresh, since the prior version was deleted for failure to assert any credible claim of notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export