User talk:Ryulong/Archive 71
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 65 | ← | Archive 69 | Archive 70 | Archive 71 | Archive 72 | Archive 73 | → | Archive 75 |
Noticed this page got moved, took initiative to make it a disambiguation page based on other series, thought it'd be good to run it by you. There are a couple series with this in the title (conceivably shortened) which I can't find articles for yet. Based on having 103 episodes they seem notable enough to have an article, but I don't know the first thing about starting one. Am wondering if you might be able to help with "Mecha Mote Iincho"? Y12J (talk) 07:36, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- No.—Ryulong (竜龙) 07:49, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Persona 4 Anime
I noticed you just split off the top and bottom bits of List of Persona 4: The Animation episodes into Persona 4: The Animation. Do you think it might be more effective to restore them and simply have List of Persona 4: The Animation episodes moved to Persona 4: The Animation? It looked a lot like a main anime page already and would make both articles stronger by staying together. Axem Titanium (talk) 02:07, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- It is actually better to have the episodes on their own page and the content about the anime as a whole on another. I do not know why it was originally set up the way it was, but Persona: Trinity Soul is set up in this manner so I just made things fit the proper status quo in how articles should be kept.—Ryulong (竜龙) 02:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- That's not necessarily true. Many single-season anime pages have the episode list on the main article (e.g. Kamichu!). It's always best to keep information together and only split when necessary. That avoids repetition and helps with readability since the episodes would be positioned better for flow. Axem Titanium (talk) 03:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I thought it was better to keep the content separate because I can't seem to write short summaries and no one seems to have bothered to even try to trim them.—Ryulong (竜龙) 04:26, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'd say give it some time. I'd love to give it a try but I haven't seen the show yet (it's on my list). I'll definitely have a pass at it after I do. Axem Titanium (talk) 04:57, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- I find it hard to decide what should not be covered because everything's interconnected.—Ryulong (竜龙) 06:07, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'd say give it some time. I'd love to give it a try but I haven't seen the show yet (it's on my list). I'll definitely have a pass at it after I do. Axem Titanium (talk) 04:57, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I thought it was better to keep the content separate because I can't seem to write short summaries and no one seems to have bothered to even try to trim them.—Ryulong (竜龙) 04:26, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- That's not necessarily true. Many single-season anime pages have the episode list on the main article (e.g. Kamichu!). It's always best to keep information together and only split when necessary. That avoids repetition and helps with readability since the episodes would be positioned better for flow. Axem Titanium (talk) 03:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
I need your assistance.
User talk:Lucasmoura keeps on introducing his own made categories as well as factual error to the Pokemon series. I have continued to revert him/her but they keep adding it back and I am dangerously close to breaking WP:3RR. Especially on the 4th Pokemon Movie. Your help would be appreciated.—cyberpower Happy EasterOnline 17:59, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know why you're asking me.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:21, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Because if I revert once more, I break WP:3RR.—cyberpower Happy EasterOnline 19:47, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- There's no 3RR for vandalism.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- It may or may not be vandalism and I go by when in doubt, don't do it.—cyberpower Happy EasterOnline 20:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- There's no 3RR for vandalism.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Because if I revert once more, I break WP:3RR.—cyberpower Happy EasterOnline 19:47, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
List of Never Mind The Buzzcocks episodes Series 22
hI Ryulong,
This is just a note to let you know the reasons for my edit for Series 22. First of all,another column for "guest captains" is not needed as it is clearly stated at the top of the series grid and the captains are bolded and it does create a bit of a disbalance with the rest of the page. Also it's been like that since the Series 22 airing. It is perfectly fine the way it is. I have asked around for other registered people's opinions. Please message me and don't revert immediately before coming to a consensus. Let's discuss this rationnally. Thanks.174.89.240.181 (talk) 21:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)samusek2
- We have the guest hosts separate and they're screwing up the grid. So why shouldn't we have the guest captains separate?—Ryulong (竜龙) 00:08, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but I wish you would add comments on the List of Never Mind the Buzzcocks talk page or mine like I did on your talk page to see what people feel rather than just revert edits like mine to suit your needs. Perhaps other people would be able to help come to a consensus. I've also noticed your little edit war about the reference spaces with CWXMII where you just revert each others reverts. (I don't understand what that's all about) I'm not trying to be difficult, I just wish you would listen to other peoples opinions before enforcing your changes. That's what talk pages are for, or at least that's what a mod once told me. 174.89.240.181 (talk) 00:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)samusek2
- There shouldn't be spaces before reference tags. And Cwxmii changed the numbering for the Russell Brand episode for no stated reason. Should the issue continue with someone else, I will bring it up on the talk page.—Ryulong (竜龙) 03:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but I wish you would add comments on the List of Never Mind the Buzzcocks talk page or mine like I did on your talk page to see what people feel rather than just revert edits like mine to suit your needs. Perhaps other people would be able to help come to a consensus. I've also noticed your little edit war about the reference spaces with CWXMII where you just revert each others reverts. (I don't understand what that's all about) I'm not trying to be difficult, I just wish you would listen to other peoples opinions before enforcing your changes. That's what talk pages are for, or at least that's what a mod once told me. 174.89.240.181 (talk) 00:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)samusek2
Power Rangers Miracle Force Speedy
Howdy, I was curious on your request to delete Power Rangers Miracle Force redirect. It seems to be the name of the name of Tensou Sentai Goseiger in Korea (or so says that article). Is there something I am missing? Thanks, --TeaDrinker (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- It's not a valid search term. Just because it's the name of an almost unknown adaptation in another nation does not mean people are using that name to look for it.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:41, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Science lovers wanted!
| Science lovers wanted! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 18:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC) |
User:118.137.73.76
As I indicated to Nanami, I have restored the rangeblock for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- I did not see. Thank you.—Ryulong (竜龙) 04:22, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Toonami
You should probably just semi-protect it again for a month. - M0rphzone (talk) 20:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Go request it at WP:RFPP. I can't protect it myself.—Ryulong (竜龙) 20:19, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
RfC on WP:NSONG
Considering how long you've been here, would you think any good would come of an RfC on WP:NSONG specifically referencing WP:CHARTS?Newmanoconnor (talk) 19:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- I do not know. I rarely work with notability guidelines. All I know is that Only the Horses meets our general notability guideline because of all of the coverage it has received, even if it has not yet been released to British radio to chart.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC)