User talk:SQGibbon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search



I don't understand why you consider linking to a website with information about a TV show as promotional. RE: Candy Candy editing. Skolpopia (talk) 10:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

13 june 2013 Removal of Selmer guitar post: I've posted a link and details of Selmer 647 for fellow enthusiasts to enjoy, why you think this might be unsuitable is beyond me. Please reinstate the link. These are pictures of a very ate and unusual instrument. The blog in which it featured is a non commercial information blog. NKForster — Preceding unsigned comment added by NKForster (talkcontribs) 18:02, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Anthony Pettis[edit]

I'm not sure if you reverted it based upon having never seen Anthony Pettis in action but Showtime IS his nickname. He has it tattooed on his back, is referred often as only "Showtime", and has it announced as part of his time everytime he fights. CMCyantist (talk) 21:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

I see, I even agree on your point on the positioning of the nickname, to clear up a few things, I wasn't edit warring, the person previously added a nickname he had never used, thinking it was vandalism and that style of positioning was the norm on those articles. Thanks for clearing this up and will use your suggestion in future :) CMCyantist (talk) 22:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC) (vandal)[edit]

I have reason to believe that the person with the IP is a vandal. He recently erased the entirety of the MasterChef Season 4 page for no reason (thank goodness for the undo option). I saw that you had had a similar problem with him in the past and I wanted to make you aware that it was not an isolated incident. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:06, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Lee Harvey Oswald[edit]

I'm a little unclear on why you felt Lee Harvey Oswald didn't belong on the Wikipedia list of different Oswald's. There was a section specifically about people associated with the name Oswald, which was where I added him. You wrote, "These are both contained within the disambiguation pages linked to just above." But I wasn't able to find the link that I believe you're saying already exists somewhere on that page. Currently, anyone typing in "Oswald" (who might be unfamiliar with Lee Harvey Oswald's first name) gets taken to that page, and yet that page has no clear link to, arguably, the most infamous Oswald. Ideas, suggestions, comments would be appreciated as I definitely feel that there needs to be some kind of clear link to Lee Harvey Oswald's wikipedia page from the Oswald page. Thanks. Chrisbat92024 (talk) 14:20, 13 June 2013 (UTC) Chrisbat92024 Chrisbat92024 (talk) 14:20, 13 June 2013 (UTC) -- PS. I'm not totally familiar with how users are supposed to discuss edits on wikipedia. If you have a page to some kind of standard protocol, please feel free to write it on my talk page.

Continuum and TV:MOS[edit]

Hi, you reverted my edit with "As per MOS:TV we should only list English-language broadcasts. If this is in English then please add it back". The broadcast is indeed in English (with optional subtitles), but MOS:TV seems to actually say "Apart from the channel of origin for the series, editors are encouraged to instead detail English-speaking countries that the series appears through prose form.". Doesn't this mean that it should not be added back and instead even the already-existing Belgium-specific sentence be removed, since Belgium is not an English-speaking country? Please advise on whether to add my edit back or remove the 2BE mention. Thanks. Anssi (talk) 16:47, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

American vs. British[edit]

I do agree that the symbols to set off quotes (" vs ') can be stylistic, but I think this paragraph was specifically speaking of styles of punctuation (i.e. whether to place the periods or commas inside the quote or outside of it) rather than styles of quotation. On an unrelated note (unless this is what you meant), David Foster Wallace taught at my college, so I do wonder what style he graded his students on (and what style he was published in)! When I took my freshman seminar at Pomona College (a class he would have taught as a Roy E. Disney Professor of Creative Writing and English Professor), my Canadian professor stressed that even the international students had to get used to American standard and lectured us on the differences. I really think that in formal writing, we have one standard. JustAMuggle (talk) 19:50, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

It's time that we stop using the unsourced and ambiguous phrase "some Americans use British style" quotation punctuation (a.k.a. "logical quotation"). In English-speaking North America, British style quotation punctuation is a decidedly minority practice, the overwhelming majority of American and Canadian style guides endorse the continued use of American style, and you count the number ofi American professional publications that use British style on one hand (at last count, two -- the journals of the Linguistic Society of America and the American Chemical Society). Because virtually all American and Canadian newspapers follow either the AP Style Manual or the CP Style Book, finding an English language North American newspaper that uses British style quotation punctuation is nearly impossible. British style quotation punctuation is not taught in American secondary schools and universities, most Americans are unfamiliar with it, and the overwhelming majority of American academic publications follow either The Chicago Manual of Style or one of the various MLA style guides. In short, the use of British style punctuation in American English is eccentric, odd, and quirky, and does not represent mainstream American or Canadian usage. Any statement that implies that British style is somehow a mainstream or acceptable alternative usage in American English needs to be supported with a sourced footnote or deleted per WP:V and WP:RS. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:44, 17 June 2013 (UTC)


Your nothing but a spambot, don't follow their contributions and then remove necessary content as Original research and needs citations. Not everything has to have those things unless it's available. If you can leave their contributions alone, I'll give you a gift.--HappyLogolover2011 (talk) 15:04, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Top Chef and "hair-gate"[edit]

Hi SQGibbon, thanks for your message on my talk page. To keep the conversation cohesive, please leave further commentary on the talk page of the subject in question (in this case, Marcel Vigneron). That's where you'll find my response. Thanks. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Future fights in MMA records table[edit]

I replied on my own talk page regarding this topic. Would you be so kind to check it?SiMntjMMA (talk) 19:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Bill Hicks is Alex Jones Hoax Conspiracy[edit]

you are correct that was probably a primary source but the problem is that the secondary source, (lunatic I heard about this first today, was also rejected before as an article source although it is not black-listed per se. There are many references to this idea, and seeing as how Hick already had a conspiracy area on the article, I thought that it would fit there.
Here is my problem---what is considered a good source when talking about conspiracy? Do you think that this would be acceptable? When I searched earlier, I did find many references to Hicks/Jones death-hoax, and the story appears to have started at a 10th anniversary of Hick's death, where Hick's friends gave Jones an award. That version is also referenced on YouTube and elsewhere but I am wondering what kind of source will be acceptable here?
I don't really care about the teeth business except but that is the most recent variation to the hoax-story. There is older stuff (the award, 10th deathaversary), but I think that the fact that someone who dealt-with conspiracy, is now the subject of one posthumously, is good encyclopedic content for that article.-Thanks for any help you can give with this (talk) 06:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Heads up on Pakistani-related socks[edit]

Thanks for the work on the Pakistani-related articles. I thought you might want to be aware that there appears to be a large amount of pr-related sockpuppetry going on with these articles, and accounts are being routinely blocked. Because of the large range and dynamic nature of the ip's, not much can can be done about them. See Talk:Humaima_Malick#Note_on_the_edit-warring_by_the_ip.27s_and_new_accounts. If you are aware of any discussions about this on noticeboards or elsewhere, I'd like to know. --Ronz (talk) 01:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar for you![edit]


Are you really against King having its own article? Because i had posted in its talk page but it seems pretty abandoned now. Turgeis (talk) 22:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


can you go back and make sure what i just edited on the is right

i change the picture because it did not match digimon world 2 or 3 i think i got it right but i need a second opinion --Wjmdem (talk) 04:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


How was the manner in which I presented the information any different than what's already been posted using Encyclopedia Iranica articles? I put the reference link in my post. The information preceding mine was from the same web source and it didn't have quotation marks either. And I was only repeating it because it was in the same context as the other historical information. There's a lot of repetition in the Hookah article, in addition to being poorly written. If I re-post the information with quotation marks, I assume it will be acceptable, correct? --Foreverknowledge (talk) 02:13, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Do you have no life ?[edit]

Do you have nothing better to do other than stalk me on here and revert all my edits for no reason ? (talk) 22:58, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok i guess you dont have anything better to do must be lonely sitting there in your parents basement fat, alone and still a virgin maybe instead of stalking me you should get a job or a girlfriend...something just stop stalking me please. (talk) 23:21, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Get off your fucking high horse the only reason you keep reverting my edits is so you can push someone around for a second and my edits ohhhhh! goodness i added the fighters reach to the fucking page oh my how controversial like i said stop stalking me it seems i was right about you well everything but the basement as it seems you are homeless you're parents must have thrown you out. (talk) 23:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Damn sounds like you have it rough maybe you should quit i can handle things from here on out. (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Ermahgerd da REACH WARS its a conspiracy oh noes !!! whatever will we do against the coming armageddon. (talk) 00:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Seriously try not to be a Dick in the future then we wouldn't have to talk at all. (talk) 00:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)


I didn't ping you in particular but we're at ANI. Stalwart111 05:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm also at 3RR at Freeboard trying to revert yet more of his crap. Stalwart111 06:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

for the helpful info, which I was unaware of previously. It is very much appreciated. Grammarspellchecker (talk) 21:16, 31 August 2013 (UTC)


I request you to block user Briosys, because he keeps adding the unreliable source iFlickz, despite repeated warnings not to do so. In fact, he copies text from the source without even rewording them. Due to his adamant nature, I think we better block him. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

An Invitation to Wikiproject Traditional Medicine[edit]

I would like to invite you and anyone else whom might be interested, to support wiki project traditional medicine in getting started. The projects goal is to improve coverage on topics of traditional medicine practices; using primarily ethno medical and anthropological journals. Though mostly of anthropological value the support of anyone with biological or cultural knowledge is welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CensoredScribe (talkcontribs) 22:32, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Voice Cast Vandal[edit]

Hi, SQG, I saw your edit here, and I thought that it might be worth mentioning that there is a vandal dubbed "The Voice Cast Vandal", not saying it's the guy you reverted, just heads-up! (Although I know that you've been around a lot longer than I and may probably be well-aware of this dude.) :) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

In retrospect, since there's little similarity between the two, I think I totally just wasted your time with unnecessary info. Sorry about that.  :/ Sigh... Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Correct me if I'm wrong[edit]

  • Good catch on this revert~! For the record, it is nothing short of that anon IP adding his/her personal opinion without stating any reliable & verifiable sources to back up them in pushing their own agenda. After re-checking, it is my opinion that someone is playing a good hand/bad hand game whilst at it, thus making a sort of sneaky vandalism. And as a side note, I've observed that these clowns' input happens usually around times of CHC's own trial/tribulation (if one can call that that!). Facepalm3.svg Supreme facepalm of destiny... --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 06:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
This article, and the people involved in the church, has been a constant target of positive and negative POV-pushing. So much so that now it's not just in my watchlist but I also subscribe to the RSS feed so I don't accidentally miss any changes. It's tiring and a subject I have absolutely no interest in but it's just a magnet for crap. Thanks for catching the other IP edit I missed, usually I'm savvy enough to check all IP edits when reverting but I guess this time I was just lazy or got sidetracked by how hard the latter IP editor tried to make their POV-pushing look legitimate. In the past the article has been a target off-site canvassing on at least a couple of occasions and I think is constantly on the minds of its supporters and detractors. It will never end. SQGibbon (talk) 12:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
  • FWIW, I'm not worried about them supporters (I assure you I've got this covered!), its the fake supporters (the real difference is in the mindset) who are making life difficult in the cyberspace world. --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 16:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

All Growed Up as copyright violation[edit]

As Psychonaut said, stop removing the deletion template. YouTubeFan43 (talk) 19:17, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


If you think an article I've created isn't notable, please take it to a deletion discussion. There is no need to clutter up these articles with nuisance tags. Thanks. As far as your merger proposal, would you merge Switcha to lemonade or limeade? What about the soda involved? I think it's best left as a stand alone. Candleabracadabra (talk) 17:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Nina Dobrev[edit]

You delete, before you read, again. The Talk page is mean nothing about you. Please, read, before to use totalitarian methods! Thank you in advance! - JanHusCz (talk) 19:31, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

vaibhav Choudhary[edit]

Yesterday you removed a comment from Subhash k. Jha, there was a change of rating in grand masti review and he actually gave no star whereas earlier it was stated 2 stars, i changed it to no star and you remove whole link marking it as spam, please don't edit without even reading it

With due respect i agree with you on this but how can u judge that is not a reliable source, it is headed by veteran journalist Subhash K. Jha and all of the reviews are his, i didn't add anything which is spammy or out of context. Adding reliable source and comments are of what wikipedia is all about, you can't just consider anything spammy as per your opinion. I with due respect like you to take notice of all the reviews done by Subhash K. Jha and try to verify the fact before considering something reliable or not. You have full authority to delete anything anytime but considering a reliable source spammy doesn't solve the purpose. Final decision rests on you. With warm regards vaibhav — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaibhav.times (talkcontribs) 15:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Again thanks a lot for guidance but as i said it is the most reliable site as far as subhash k. jha is concerned because he is one of the senior journalist of bollywood. I respect the fact that anyone could have mistaken it as spam but it is not in true sense. Anyways thanks a lot for your concern and will be needing more of your guidance in future..

Disambiguation link notification for September 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mistresses (U.S. TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Raja Rani[edit]

Hey! The film released today. I don't know why you reverted edits by anon. If there was any copyvio, you could have cleaned up. [1] Please look into it. -- Sriram speak up 17:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

its out of control.[edit] — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I cleaned it out again. SQGibbon (talk) 18:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

thats great. what a mess. lots of disambiguation links as well . I can get rid of this ok please. cheers.

Hi, there isnt One band in fourth wave 2000-2008 or fifth wave 2009-present that is a band with a link. those all link to names of songs, tv shows, fictional characters etc. Not one is a band. Just wanted to pass that along. cheers. after a while lets delete this section. if thats possible . cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:39, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

one more if you dont mind[edit]

what is this person doing. they have a page "forward slash" band page ? putting links in to articles . just saw that wanted to share thanks for your help. cant make sense out of it. have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 04:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC)


hi can you stop deleting my entries im trying to contribute to the comunity thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Userofthedecade (talkcontribs) 03:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC)


I just wanted to thank you for reverting that vandalism on my talk page. In gratitude, I returned the favor. Paris1127 (talk) 07:22, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Demi Moore, birth name Demetria[edit]

Why would you remove reference to her given first name from her page? It is otherwise currently not noted anywhere there, with the lead introducing her only as Demi Guynes Kutcher. She may have formally changed her first name to Demi at some point, but that was not her birth name. Shouldn't that be noted? Otherwise, leaving it out is misleading. (talk) 17:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Em

hi y u remove this content?[edit]

hi y u remove this content?

Madha Yaanai Koottam Audio Launch function held at Chennai Sathyam Cinemas. The Audio has been released by Director Bharathiraja and received by Director Bala. The Trailer has been released by Director Balu Mahendra and received by Director K.R.[1]


[2] - ? Vyacheslav84 (talk) 03:05, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Shraddha Kapoor[edit]

Thank you for your contribution on Shraddha Kapoor, i feel you should intervene/dispute on the talk page before you impose your edit, please feel free to justify/clarify your actions. Sorry i am reverting your edit once again due to inappropriate tag. Showing the concern, i am currently the major editor of the article, i will submit sources to prove the actions you still can dispute about the facts, thank you so much --- L'Oréal Smauritius Parce que vous le valez bien! 13:25, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Sidharth Malhotra[edit]

I know that no one had the ownership of any page, but still refering to fixed some of the unencyclopedic tone style, you should be aware of your acts, as by removing summary make a page seem in an unencyclopedic tone, see for Sidharth Malhotra when you had reverting many section had disappeared, you should think twice or even thrice, view the history check each actions before reverting. The talk page are here to talk, you can leave a note/message before reverting them. --- L'Oréal Smauritius Parce que vous le valez bien! 13:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Patema Inverted[edit]

This was an unnecessary change, the announcement came directly from the publisher, if you want to help you could instead help me put the link in as I don't know how to work the sources. This will be released next summer and I see no reason why I should have to go and find another source closer to the date just to put the same information back on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DreamsDreams (talkcontribs) 16:14, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Goldust and Kane[edit]

The only reason Gregorian Calendar added that Kane is Jewish is, with a surname like 'Jacobs', the name 'Jacob' is Jewish. As for Goldust's year of birth, I've found websites that say he was born in 1966.Ofcdeadbeat (talk) 21:03, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Ofcdeadbeat


You must change the Lil' Jon back to the way it waz. It helps people understand what (WATTT!?!?) Lil Jon and his boyz are about. I feel like many people would agree with me. You have to think a little bit when making wikipedia pages, not just find mass information and randomly put it in there like you. Get a life senior wikipedia editor. CHANGE LIL JON BAK TO DA WAY IT WAZ!!!!

-Luke P.S. You are most definately not the king of crunk. So you do not have control over the king of crunk's page. Change dat shyt back dawg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukesaylor (talkcontribs) 17:42, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Marty Munsch[edit]

Everything About Marty Munsch in the updates were sourced and correct. Let it be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Matt Wiman[edit]

I'm curious why you changed my recent edits on the subject page? The comment refers to copyright issues. Matt gave me express authorization to use his picture and specifically requested that I update the page. I'm relatively new to the edit side of Wikipedia and would appreciate any feedback. Regards, Justin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cavemanosu (talkcontribs) 03:15, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Zarine Kahn[edit]

Regarding this edit [[3]], good catch. I didn't see that had been snook into the article again. Nice work. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 05:49, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Stop editing factual submissions based on your fan opinions with such ludicrous accusations as vandalism.[edit]

That you labeled a factual breakdown of events in a boxing match as vandalism is ludicrous at best. Stop changing the submission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:56, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

El Cata[edit]

Thanks for your work on the page; I have left a note on the user's talk page and blocked him temporarily for a username violation. I suspect the user will return, either after verifying his identity or by switching usernames. If you want to keep an eye on the page, feel free to drop me a line if things seem to be getting out of hand (do keep WP:3RR in mind, of course). Thanks again, --TeaDrinker (talk) 20:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

List of Free and Open Source Android Software[edit]

Ok, thanks for the clarification. Sorry about adding AntennaPod back in. I did that before reading your message. --WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Jonathan Pollard[edit]

Thank you for contacting me. I greatly appreciate it. I am reporting accurate information. Israel had to release these prisoners based upon American pressure.

Many of the prisoners have murdered Israeli civilians. In the New York Times, please go to

Most of the prisoners have been serving between 19 -28 years for murder. Unfortunately, these murderers are not only free but are allowed to live anywhere in Israel,Gaza, and the West Bank. As stated in the NYT “These people will be neighbors of the families of the victims they murdered.”

Israel has been constantly asking for the release of Pollard. The truth is that they requested Mr. Pollards release after each and every time Israel has released its own prisoners.

The statements that I stated Unfortunately, were 100% true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcepeci (talkcontribs) 04:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


The following article from the guardian also talks about American pressure to release — Preceding

Please tell me your opinion. Thank you for listening. Also, please go to

unsigned comment added by Mcepeci (talkcontribs) 05:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Please tell me your opinion. I would like to know what you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcepeci (talkcontribs) 05:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Portable photoshop[edit]

Those portable programs were not created by us and come from the previous versions of the adobe photoshop website. They made the portable programs to the photoshop so that people who can't purchase the software can use them for as long as they want. Their original install-able versions have a limit of 30 days until they have to purchase and I noticed it in their blogspot websites. Why are you thinking those links contain pirated software from their companies?--HappyLogolover2011 (talk) 21:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Domino masks[edit]

Why did you remove the 'Notable fictional users' section in the Domino mask page? What does the 'review button' have to do with the removal of this section?

Ofcdeadbeat (talk) 12:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Ofcdeadbeat

Bye Bye Love (The Everly Brothers song) and Honey (Bobby Goldsboro song)[edit]

Please explain what this means 'It's not about an actual person but a fictional account' (regarding 'Honey (Bobby Goldsboro song)' and 'Article does not support this category' (regarding 'Bye Bye Love (The Everly Brothers song)'.

These songs, to me, are in memory of deceased persons, as they're both about loved ones who've died.Ofcdeadbeat (talk) 17:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Ofcdeadbeat

i just do for fun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sot plug (talkcontribs) 11:13, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Category:Songs in memory of deceased persons[edit]

So what you're saying is 'Bye Bye Love' is not about someone dying but rather the lover leaving the narrator (even though the lover is still alive).

As for 'Honey' (Bobby Goldsboro song), when you say 'account of someone dying', does this mean someone thinking a story of someone dying? I know said category is for people who have actually died, not for people who others think of dying.

You might have seen that I gave this category to the song 'Everything I Own', and are OK about that since that song sort of is about a person who has actually died.Ofcdeadbeat (talk) 23:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Ofcdeadbeat

Domino masks (Notable fictional users)[edit]

A lot of those fictional characters do wear Domino masks, for instance:

the Beagle Boys Darkwing Duck Dumping Jack Trash The Lone Ranger Repo Man The Riddler Robin The Spirit all four of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Yosemite Sam Zorro

Oh and The Hooded Claw wears one.Ofcdeadbeat (talk) 23:44, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Ofcdeadbeat

Protect article[edit]

Hey man, how are you? I know that you take a look at a lot of MMA articles and do a great job with it, but I need some help. If you have contact with some of the moderators that cover MMA articles to protect some articles or maybe a better way out by stopping the IP Check his updates on The Ultimate Fighter: China and List of UFC events. He's simply messing around with updates and it's awful to correct those things all the time. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 19:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Category:Songs in memory of deceased persons[edit]

It does make sense that this category doesn't apply to songs that are about people who have just left their lover for someone else, as the person obviously hasn't died (I know this is why you didn't appreciate me adding this category to 'Bye Bye Love'). I now know what you mean by 'account', regarding the song 'Honey'; again, this category doesn't apply to songs that people sing when thinking about someone dying, since the person hasn't actually died.

As for 'Everything I Own', you might have seen that excruciatingly distressing commercial - 'Share the Road to Zero', where it's sung in a monotonous sort of way, as such a song makes sense for commercials about loved ones dying (it even says that 'David Gates sung it as a tribute to his late father'). This is why I added that category to that song.

I know songs like 'I'll Be Missing You' definitely belong to this category, as everyone knows that this song was in memory of a deceased person, namely 'The Notorious B.I.G.', who was murdered on Sunday 9 March 1997.

I do know a song I could add to this category, but I know I can't if only I think it's of this category, and no one else does.Ofcdeadbeat (talk) 11:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Ofcdeadbeat

Old Fashioned[edit]

its not letting me post links but if I could email you I could show you my books on amazon and my paid articles and my podcast etc.... you are making things difficult for me to progress my career, but I am not doing that for you, what have I done to you?

whats your deal? be real, what did I do to you for you to discredit and disrespect me so greatly? I do not wish ill on anyone intentionally, so help me help you and stop removing my edits. I written 66 books on the subject. or what about the 250 articles I was paid to write? or maybe the online bartending school I run or perhaps one of my many youtube videos or maybe my podcasts? or work history? really bro?

So wouldnt it be safe to assume if I was not the worlds leading expert that I atleast am one of them and my edits should be added and my information is valid. Infact, many of the books listed on the old fashioned page are used as references in my books, so BY YOUR LOGIC the page must be removed. You see? So either let me post, or remove the page, otherwise you're just being childish and holding some personal grudge. I have written more on this subject than any of the peoples books listed in the references COMBINED! show me some respect huh? (talk) 00:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)r

  • SQGibbon, for the record, I don't think you're fat at all: you are just the right weight for a person your size. Drmies (talk) 15:59, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Mixed-martial artists[edit]

Please see the "Mixed-martial artists" section of WP:ANI. Basically, I couldn't understand why you considered edits by to be blockable vandalism (especially without warning the user), but I know that MMA is contentious in ways that I don't understand, so I've asked for outside input. Your actions are basically a side item; I'm not objecting to anything you've done. Nyttend (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I misunderstood your rationale, not understanding the connexion with the blocked user. Your explanation helped me realise that this was a sock of a blocked user (I thought you meant that he was returning to vandalism immediately after the block), so I've blocked the IP address. Nyttend (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Mai mai Miracle[edit]

Wikipedia for sometime has had what they call reflist, try as I might I have no idea how to add references to it. The reference I had added was of a kickstarter campaign if you want to help then would you please add it. Do not just remove with it without reason. DreamsDreams (talk) 11:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)DreamsDreams

User:HappyLogolover2011 again[edit]

Look what I just reverted at the Clitoromegaly‎ article. Flyer22 (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

I also left a note about it in the edit history. Flyer22 (talk) 23:32, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


Ok sorry man! --Punk35showoff (talk) 15:25, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

No Spam Barnstar Hires.png The No Spam Barnstar
Hi! Just want to thank you for contacting me and getting me involved in the community. For my time editing to be considered potential spam means that you must be exceptionally diligent! Thanks for making wiki better! :) Marajade75 (talk) 00:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Educational Game[edit]

Thanks so much for your work on Wikipedia and for your attention to this entry. Just wanted to let you know that the edit was reverted because this was done in a Wikipedia Education Program class project [Technology & Pedagogy graduate school class] by a graduate student Cshanesimpson (taught by Theredproject) working in this academic area. Your comment about the need for summaries rather than primary sources is a good point, but in this case (and since we couldn't immediately identify any suitable source to fit this), for now, I think it would be best if the references to current research studies remain. These are really useful to people investigating this subject so it would be helpful to have this available. Later on we can change this. But in the meantime if you have any suggestions for Cshanesimpson (talk) and me please let us know. Greatly appreciated!!! Mozucat (talk) 15:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)


Hello! can i uploaded this image of wikipedia? this is the image: Let me know goodbye --Punk35showoff (talk) 19:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Frogs run over by tires of vehicles[edit]

You've reverted an edit to Kermit Swamp Years. Croaker has organs and stuff including the body fluid and blood in his body to keep him alive. If frogs like him get run over, he can die and destroy his body and organs because that tire is larger than a frog.--HappyLogolover2011 (talk) 22:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Revert to Peer Pressure[edit]

I apologize, I am new to Wikipedia (I created an account for a graduate school project), and I did not notice your revert or comment the first time. When I returned to the article a couple of hours later to correct a grammar mistake and noticed my edit was gone, I thought that I must not have posted correctly the first time, and so I posted again.

However, I do feel that all of the information which I added was relevant. There was only one reference, but that reference was a textbook, which contains ideas and information from numerous sources. There is hardly any information on that page as it is, and I feel as though the forms of pressure might require a more in-depth explanation for some people to understand them. - spayne0870 (talk) 14:03, 26 March 2014

Missing white woman syndrome[edit]

There have been some edits and reverts to Missing white woman syndrome that you have been involved in. I have started a discussion at Talk:Missing_white_woman_syndrome#Madeleine_McCann and it seems the other editor and I are in a deadlock. I think an extra opinion would help resolve the dispute, so would you be willing to review the comments on the talk page and perhaps offer an opinion? Betty Logan (talk) 18:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Child Recovery[edit]

I have attempted to enter factual news-based information regarding ABP World Group. Because this organization exists outside of the US and acts outside of international law, nothing posted about their actives should be considered personal. Just as you would not sensor a post about an entertainer being sent to prison, you should not censor factual information about this well known figure.

I also attempted to post reference links, but apparently the information provided was not satisfactory. Do you have suggestion as to a better means of citation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 04:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

ZZ Top[edit]

Information about city in which ZZ TOP was formed was provided in first half of 90's in one of the "MTV's Coca-Cola Report" program if I remember correctly. It is also listed as El Paso in Wiesław Weiss "Rock Encyklopedia" (Iskry 1991) (in polish) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beyo (talkcontribs) 21:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Yes but this source in Poland was done by competent music journalists and was based on several other sources written in english. Since I saw this both in encylopedia and MTV it must be something more into that. I may try to contact author if he is still alive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beyo (talkcontribs) 22:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


Sorry to step on ones toes but it has been stated for quite some time in the talk section about the origins of the word. It should be mentioned in the article somewhere. Possible making in the article with both origins. The OED does say it came from 1909 but History Channel and other sources have found letters using it going all the way back to 1737. The History Channel does nothing but find information like this for the documentaries so I do have some faith in them. The OED does as well but they might not have found these writings when they put it in the dictionary. Generally a contraction replaces one letter so thinking that Y'All is shorthand for You All doesn't make any sense. The middle English word Ye means you so it makes far more sense it came from Ye All instead of You All. It is okay to put both meanings in there instead because when one does a Google search the top articles are staying it came from Ye All and then there is Wikipedia that says other wise followed by user forums. -- (talk) 20:57, 15 April 2014 (UTC)Travis Smith
Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist}} template (see the help page).