User talk:Saitek780

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello Saitek780, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Saitek780, good luck, and have fun.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation[edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Saitek780, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:57, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mario Vascellari[edit]

Hello Saitek780,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mario Vascellari for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ziyankhan1 (talk) 11:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Franca Dall'Olio has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kolbasz (talk) 12:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saitek780. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Massimo Chessa, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Massimo Chessa to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, MorbidEntree (talk) 13:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saitek780. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Federica Brunetti, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Federica Brunetti to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, MorbidEntree (talk) 14:34, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Lidia Oppo[edit]

Hi, I'm Chris troutman. Saitek780, thanks for creating Lidia Oppo!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I doubt it makes sense to have an article about an athlete that barely passes our notability criteria for athletes.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:26, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniele Soro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serie A1. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alessandra Meloni has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Onel5969 TT me 22:54, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Pietro Amat di San Filippo to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Astapor12 (talk) 14:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Saitek780. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at List of people from Sardinia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This is your second warning. Wikipedia is not a battleground. Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:08, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did at List of people from Sardinia. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:10, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Edit war? I am defending the work of many users from the summary cancellations made by a single member on an article that does not violate any wikipedia rule, but that is in line with the rest of the "lists of people..." existing in wikipedia.Saitek780 (talk) 19:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, edit war: constantly reverting edits within a short amount of time. The only rule you need to violate is 3RR. And it's obviously not by a single member now is it? Feel free to bring this up on larger scope talk pages. The few lists you mentioned include ancestry, likely wrongly so, but you have also been shown some that do not use that. There's no "specific rule", but by definition you are not from a place unless you are born there or have some other substantiated reason like living a large part of your life there for work for example. You have not attempted to see other editors perspective and have brought up no examples as to how your logic may be right. You may soon find yourself blocked or reported if you keep it up. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:36, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have respected and protected the work done by many users in the last years from the summary erasing of 4000 bytes and the deleting of dozens of names of personalities listed in a "list of people" article, which uses and follows the same methods used in other lists existing in wikipedia and doesn't violate any rule. It's clearly specified "This is a list of famous people from or with origins in the island of Sardinia."- Why should we apply different rules only in one article and not to the rest of wikipedia, if nobody has objected anything before? When will the wikipedia rules change and also the other "lists of people" will be modified i will agree with this, in other case you are using double standards. Saitek780 (talk) 02:22, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Saitek780. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Lidia Oppo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NHOOPS - league isn't listed there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 04:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]