User talk:Salvatorebruno

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Salvatorebruno! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 17:16, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice, Marek69 I hope to be a good Wikipediano ... Thanks for the welcome, a hug Salvatorebruno 22:28, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parco Archeominerario di San Silvestro[edit]

Hi Salvatore, and thanks for this article. You can look for possible images for your article here. Have a good day. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of SO.F.T. - Sorgenti di Firenze Trekking[edit]

I have nominated SO.F.T. - Sorgenti di Firenze Trekking, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SO.F.T. - Sorgenti di Firenze Trekking. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Timneu22 · talk 15:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi...[edit]

...And welcome from me too; I was trying to clean up the article about Buccellatom because it look like it's an automatic translation and some points are extremely hard to understand. Would you mind, please, telling me where the original version is, so that I can see to cleaning up the article? Thanks! Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 22:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Language[edit]

Ciao, vedo che sei italiano e stai traducendo alcune pagine dall'italiano all'inglese. Ti prego però di non utilizzare google traduttore, in quanto si vede che le traduzioni sono pessime ed irrazionali (la pagina su Formiche di Grosseto è illeggibile). Inoltre ricordati di mettere le categorie alle voci che crei, devi scrivere Category: e poi aggiungi la categoria, dopodiché metti il tutto tra doppie parentesi quadre (ad esempio, sempre Formiche di Grosseto, la categoria è Category:Islands of Italy, oppure della voce su Egisto Macchi la categoria è Category:Italian composers...). Inoltre dovresti inserire anche le rispettive traduzioni, basta che in fondo alla voce tu scriva it:Formiche di Grosseto, ovviamente tutto tra doppie parentesi quadre, per rimandare alla voce in italiano. Per le due voci sopracitate ho provveduto io, ma ti chiedo da ora in poi di fare del tuo meglio per le prossime! E ricordati di non usare Google traduttore o simili!

Ciao--Alienautic (talk) 16:30, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

(in English) To create new articles is always a good thing and, for that, I thank you; however, when you do so, you should make sure to write in intelligible English and not to use Google Translate or another automatic translation program, because, doing so, you obtain a very poor translation and you make it very hard (even for an Italian mother tongue) to understand what you meant and to clean up your article. Also, please, try to provide reliable sources and to add the article in at least one or two categories (to do that, you can use WP:HOTCAT). Please try to take my suggestions on board, or I'll be forced to report you to WP:ANI as a case of competence is required.
(in Italian) Creare nuovi articoli è sempre cosa buona e giusta e, per questo, voglio ringraziarti; ciononostante, quando crei un articolo, dovresti assicurarti che sia scritto in un Inglese intelligibile e non dovresti mai usare un programma di traduzione automatica o Google Translate, perché, usando questi programmi, ottieni soltanto una traduzione approssimativa, che rende molto difficile (anche per un madrelingua Italiano) di capire che cosa intendessi e, soprattutto, rende difficile ripulire la detta traduzione. Inoltre, per cortesia, cerca di fornire delle fonti attendibili e di aggiungere l'articolo in almeno una o due categorie (puoi farlo comodamente usando WP:HOTCAT). Ti prego di cercare di seguire i miei consigli o sarò costretto a segnalarti in WP:ANI come un caso di si richiede competenza. Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 17:07, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao! Unfortunately I had to revert many of your additions due to their poor language, problems with Wikipedia editing rules, etc. If you check histories of the articles involved you can have an idea of the changes you need to your style. Let me know for any help! --'''Attilios''' (talk) 21:39, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's seems there's not way to induce this robotic editor to respect any of the conventions of Wikipedia, or to understand that he should write in an understandable English. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 17:37, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Compagnetto da Prato[edit]

The article Compagnetto da Prato has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 11:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the proposed deletion template because this is not a living person; in fact your original version stated that he was 13th-century. But the article does need sources. Do you have any you could add? --Yngvadottir (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bure (stream)[edit]

The article Bure (stream) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2010.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 17:51, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valico della Crocetta sul Mugello[edit]

The article Valico della Crocetta sul Mugello has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced stub about a hill on a cycling course with no indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 08:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]