User talk:Saruman-the-white

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

September 2014[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Spelling, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Queensland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunshine Coast. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)


Your understanding of how the collaborative editing process works seems to be incomplete. Here are some suggestions to improve your contribution and interactions.

1. When you see an edit, don't reflexively reverse it. Other people's edits are permitted.

2. Don't repeatedly reverse an edit that is considered and reasoned. This wastes the other editor's time.

3. Most important: don't try to contribute to articles about subjects or sections outside your expertise. It's one thing to take action against an edit that you think is flawed; it is another (and wrong) to reverse it just because you don't understand it.

For the sake of keeping Wikipedia a friendly and positive environment, please upgrade your knowledge and manners. Pondrumm (talk) 01:27, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Image problem?[edit]

I don't really understand your perspective. It's a gorgeous image, full of light and the city's largest building is easily identifiable. The current image is so nondescript that it could be a decade old. I don't know why representation of the river is so important either, especially when it's covered quite broadly under Geography. I like my proposal because it makes the city look so energetic and illuminated. Ashton 29 (talk) 07:18, 22 April 2015 (UTC)