User talk:Schmock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome from Redwolf24[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (Redwolf24 10:40, 10 July 2005 (UTC)) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (Redwolf24) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 10:40, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

P.S. I like messages :-P

Welcome[edit]

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 10:55, July 10, 2005 (UTC)

Maths[edit]

Hi. You seem to enjoy editing the Wikipedia articles on mathematics. So do I and a bunch of other people. Together we formed the so-called WikiProject Mathematics. Its associated talk page is a good place if you have a question related to maths on Wikipedia. Feel free to add yourself to the list of participants. Cheers, Jitse Niesen (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Fatou's lemma. The article is much improved now. Cheers. -- Timhoooey 01:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query On 15 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Schuette-Nesbitt formula, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--EncycloPetey 23:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Rolle's Theorem[edit]

Hi Schmock. I've noticed a couple of problems with the examples in Rolle's theorem. I see that the examples were mostly your creation. I wonder if you would contribute to the discussion on the corresponding talk page. Thanks, reetep (talk) 11:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Non-analytic smooth function[edit]

Thank you for changes to this article, I agree that the new example is simpler and better. I modified the "The function is not analytic" section to make it consistent with the changes above it (so we talk only about f now, I removed the function g altogether). Perhaps you can take a further look at the article to see if I did got right. Thanks. You can reply here if you have comments. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 19:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Grönwall's inequality[edit]

Are you watching the talk pages of pages you edit? I think you should. Please visit Talk:Grönwall's inequality and respond to the issues raised there. Hanche (talk) 15:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)


Can you actually provide some reference to the integral form with locally finite measures ? It seems that the reference for this form is missing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.185.96.91 (talk) 08:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

A reference is now added. Schmock (talk) 09:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Hahn decomposition theorem[edit]

Thanks for making the proof structure clear. This is definitely an improvement. Oded (talk) 04:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Extremal equality[edit]

Nice job you have done there. I see that you didn't find a better name for the section, or else you didn't bother to change it.

To be extremely consistent in the level of given details, you may add in the proof of case p = ∞ that you may assume ||f|| > 0. Bdmy (talk) 11:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

"In particular"[edit]

Please see this edit. The phrase "in particular" makes no sense. If a function G has a finite sup M and a finite inf m on an interval and does not attain them, then it is still true that m ≤ G(t) ≤ M on that interval, and it's easy to exhibit such examples. Whether the inf and sup are actually attained is a separate question. Michael Hardy (talk) 23:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The use of fields mr and zbl in the {{Citation}} template[edit]

Hello, Mr. Schmock, is it yours the splendid idea of introducing the fields mr and zbl in the {{Citation}} template? I praise it since increases very much the easiness of usability and the usefulness of the template itself. :D Daniele.tampieri (talk) 13:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Well, maybe you're busy now, but I anyway want to award you this barnstar:

Vitruvian Barnstar.png The da Vinci Barnstar
To you, Mr. Schmock, and your collaborators for the introduction of the fields mr, jfm and zbl in the {{Citation}} template. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 07:27, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for the barnstar. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 19:18, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Again thank you![edit]

Hi Uwe (can I call you so?), thank you very much for simplifying the proof of lemma 1 of the "Locally integrable function" entry: however, it seems to me that it is possible to simplify further the proof using lemma 1.2 (pp. 2–3) of Bahouri, Hajer; Chemin, Jean-Yves; Danchin, Raphael (2011), Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 343, Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer Verlag, pp. xvi+523, ISBN 978-3-642-16829-1, MR 2768550, Zbl 1227.35004 . Could you give it a look and tell me if it could be a viable option? An advantage of this approach is that we can quote a reliable source. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 19:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Pages using MathJax[edit]

On wikipedia I don't know because I really don't know it's mathematics coverage.

On other sites, one I've seen which is firmly wedded to MathJax is ProofWiki, but don't take it too seriously because it really is seriously the shittiest website in the history of the universe. And it has egregious political power-squabbles which make Wikipedia look like a teddy-bear's tea party. --Matt Westwood 21:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doob decomposition theorem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Complex vector space (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cauchy product, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harmonic series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)