User talk:ScitDei

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ScitDei, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 00:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! ScitDei (talk) 09:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Makardhwaja[edit]

Hello!! ScitDei. I have posted my opinion wrt merger. Also, always post you comments on User's Talk page and not at his user page, as you did in my case. Cheers!!! Jethwarp (talk) 13:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Also, please note that as you have started merger discussion, it is considered that you support the merger move. Therefore, you are not supposed to again vote like you did at Talk:Makardhwaja - as follows - *Support - Refers to the same person... In any case only one vote per person is counted. This info is for you knowledge for future cases. Thanks. Jethwarp (talk) 14:06, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. I'm new in Wiki and didn't know it. I'll keep it in mind. Thanx. ScitDeitalk 03:35, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:ScitDei/St. Marys Church ,Noida (October 17)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, ScitDei. You have new messages at Aggie80's talk page.
Message added 11:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 11:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Marys Church, Noida (October 20)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

The church does not have any journalist friends I suppose so it is difficult to find citations in newspapers about the church. Could you be more specific about which citations are not acceptable so that I can work to get better resources for the particular point.~~ ScitDeitalk 09:46, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Any citation that is not affiliated with the church will work. Zach Vega (talk to me) 22:44, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
So in this case which are the one which will not work? I have removed the church's official website citations. Any other need to be removed ? ScitDeitalk 03:56, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
@Zach Vega: have you forgotten about this article? Please review it.~ ScitDeiWanna talk? 12:02, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC St. Mary's Church, Noida was accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
St. Mary's Church, Noida, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Shivam Setu (U-T-C) 16:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rajeev Sivshankar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trait (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

February 2014[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Saint Thomas Christians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 12:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Saint Thomas Christians. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 12:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Franciscans[edit]

I don't know if you have Franciscans on your watch list, but I wonder if you could look at the latest edit to the article. An editor added some material to the article that I believe is a positive addition, but it is unsourced. Should a "citation needed" tag be added, or should it be undone with a clear edit summary saying it can be re-added with appropriate sources? CorinneSD (talk) 18:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

I saw the edit. I think as per rule an editor can remove the un-referenced content if he thinks is not a fact or not notable enough. But if the editor thinks its just personal view or WP:OR, he /she can remove it with proper edit summary. Since this edit is positive in nature but un-sourced, we can just add a Citation tag and wait for the references. Since I don't know much about the Mexican area, I cant say for sure if this is his personal view or really a fact. If you have some knowledge of it, you could edit it as you think appropriate. If it had been e I would try to find some source for it and if I dont get it I would add a citation tag. But thats me.:) ~ ScitDeiWanna talk? 06:22, 28 May 2014 (UTC)