User talk:Scottywong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Wiki Loves Pride[edit]

You are invited! Wiki Loves Pride

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride, a global campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia during the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. The project is being spearheaded by two organizers with roots in the Pacific Northwest. Meetups are being organized in some cities, or you can participate remotely. Wikimedia Commons will also be hosting an LGBT-related photo challenge.

In Portland, there are two ways to contribute. One is a photography campaign called "Pride PDX", for pictures related to LGBT culture and history. The Wiki Loves Pride edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, June 21 from noon–4pm at Smith Memorial Student Union, Room 236 at Portland State University. Prior Wikipedia editing is not required; assistance will be available the day of the event. Attendees should bring their own laptops and cords.

Feel free to showcase your work here!

If you have any questions, please leave a message here. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Oregon-related events and projects by removing your name from this list.


You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Gender Gap Task Force Issues and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—


Impressive approach[edit]

re Pigsonthewing you wrote: "but my first impression of you is that you are a textbook wikilawyer." Thanks for your careful observation.

First you try to dig up any error by my (did not work eh), then you state "correct me if I'm wrong" but when I do so you leave that argument, you change your position, you want to have a merge-discussion at the ANI page, you blame me for not talking everything in my first post (but you say nothing about Pigs who did not Talk at all -- but sorry, noting that must be my wikilawyering), you have nothing —nothing— to say about a double untalked revert, while I actually acted upon the closing admins es, you also "forgot" to weigh or mention.

I find your approach dishonest, because you leave each and every point I made. You have to resort to your "impression" (how to argue with that?) to maintain your point. You did not realise that whatever your point against me is, Pigsonthewing did not mention that. That is plain whitewashing in hindsight. Talking for someone else. And of course, next time Pigs will do the same, knowing they're covered afterwards by someone excuse-plastering like you. (I repeat, Pigs themselves did not use any of the excuses you made up).

All I did was report a double untalked revert (an edit war I stepped out of), and you evade that core like the plague.

Next time, why not save the trouble of "discussing" and "arguments", just state your preoccupied outcome ("first impression"). I find your approach dishonest. -DePiep (talk) 08:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Let's not forget: you exposed your thoughts when writing "Pigs is not going to be spanked". So punishing is your spirit. How did you became admin without knowing that you're supposed to prevent not spank? And exactly in that prevention you did fail, by giving Pigs a completely free pass. I find it offensive, and your lame writing "I'm not trying to insult you" does not help: at the same time you smear me with the tar of "punishment request". You could use reading some wiki laws. -DePiep (talk) 08:24, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Feel better now? ‑Scottywong| yak _ 00:18, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
As predicted, your friend stepped into stalking. -DePiep (talk) 22:23, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
calling Spiritmywaywodly (talk) 22:34, 29 November 2014 (UTC)