User talk:Sdorrance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Sdorrance, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Jacqui 01:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Aletheia pages[edit]

At some point in the past a confused anonymous editor conflated "Althea" and "Aletheia", two unrelated entities from Greek mythology. I tried to restore what I believed to be the right situation, but then User:Lucaas undid all my changes in a not particularly careful way, creating a bit of a mess. I corrected some of that, but as I had recently been in what seemed like the beginning of a revert war with this same editor before, at Modern geocentrism, I did not want to go about it in an aggressive way. Apparently User:Lucaas thinks "Aletheia" should be only about Heidegger's use of the word, and should not even refer to any other use of the term. Personally, I think that Heidegger's use is obscure, and that "Aletheia" should be, or should redirect to, a disambiguation page, like Aletheia (disambiguation). I don't know a mechanism for resolving this issue; I don't think the page attracts enough attention to have a meaningful discussion on its talk page. --LambiamTalk 23:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

What's wrong with Plato?[edit]

Why do you not like Plato? Heidegger's comments in Was Heist Denken? are that he writes in dialogue: should not be taken literally; much of what he means is unthought. I'm not some sort of Sarte-fan who gets pissed off when my favourite philosopher gets bagged, I just think that Plato has merit, and shouldn't be denigrated by co-incidence with Ayn Rand; at least he should be repatriated amongst his fellow brethren... Additionally, I heard somewhere that Heidegger's etymological use of Aletheia is apocryphal. Know anything of this? ```` —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tsop (talkcontribs) 13:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC).

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for finding all of those sources; actually, I've posted a lot of those before, but some people just don't accept them as valid. LaszloWalrus 04:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

some are not valid, the rest is a very very tiny part of a large literature that either says nothing, or dismisses the merit of rand's work. so you see, it does not matter that you put forth a bunch of citations, unless there is conclusive evidence. if rand is in a reputable universal source on the topic, such as several published encyclopedia of philosophy. the only encyclopedia that i found that clearly identifies her as a philosopher is encarta, and we know that encarta's editorial practices in this matter are suspect. britannica calls her a writer with a philosophy, columbia calls her a writer, etc. etc. most say 'writer' you can find probably 15-20 books that deal with her philosophy, one or two written by people who are open and clear proponents of her promotion as a philosopher, but given the huge amount of information in philosophy published each year... a few books and a few articles does not in any way show she was a philosopher, all that shows is that some philosophers have addressed her work, much like some philosophers have addressed orwell's work, jack kerouac's work, and other things. the question is whether she is a philosopher and whether she did philosophy, the first is unresolvable because there is no agreement in the world at large, any positive evidence has to be weighed in kind against the negative evidence, but also by the immense number of philosophers that simply ignore the work, which is an argument against her inclusion in itself. did she write some books that are philosophical, yes, are they highly cited, no, are they disputably philosophy, yes. if there is a standard they will be disputable. if there is no standard, then there will be no dispute. on most of the pages, i have proposed standards that very clearly dismiss rand, because as I have argued elsewhere, the positive evidence is crushed under the weight of the negative evidence of 'people just are not writing about her as they do other philosophers as demonstrated in the citation indices'--Buridan 14:32, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Categorical imperative vs. duty[edit]

Dear Sdorrance,

I just took a look at your grammatical and technical cleanup of deontological ethics. For the most part, it's a huge improvement. I'm glad you could help. One edit I disagree with is your assertion that "a course of action that should always be carried out is a duty..." I think this begs an important philosophical question. Should duties always be carried out, or are there exceptional circumstances that justify the non-performance of duty?

I think that part of Kant's contribution to philosophy was the way he distinguished between contingent duties, ie duties that only need to be carried out under certain empirical circumstances, and categorical duties or categorical imperatives, ie duties that always need to be carried out, because they are based on a priori reasoning about the general nature of things, and thus apply no matter what the circumstances are.

I think the way you've phrased the definition of duty makes it difficult or impossible to explain this train of thought to the reader, and I think that this train of thought is a key stage in the historical evolution of deontological ethics.

Would you consider re-writing this particular sentence, or allowing me to do so?

Invisible Flying Mangoes 18:39, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know, and for the suggestion! I think you are absolutely right, and I breezed right by an important distinction. I dont really have the time today to fix the mistake, but please correct it yourself. Perhaps both you and I could go through the rest of the article and collaborate like this? - Sam 18:51, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
in fact, after reading over it quickly, maybe just changing the sentence to say "ought", instead of "should always", and then make the necessary distinction... - Sam 20:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay; I'm new to Wikipedia and I forgot to check your talk page...I like what you're saying, and we'll definitely go over the page and fix it the way you say. Invisible Flying Mangoes 14:41, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Distributive justice[edit]

Hi. I've just had a quick look at this, and it's certainly an improvement. I wonder, though, if it would be better to break out the section of Justice on this topic to this article? The one substantive thing I'd disagree with in what you've said is that you make theories of DJ holist (i.e. concerned with overall pattern of distribution at a particular time) by definition. Nozick's theory is a counter-example. Cheers, Sam Clark 13:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Userspace vs. article space[edit]

Hey. I noticed that you just created something that looked like it was supposed to be a subpage of yours in article space at Sdorrance/box. I've moved it into your user space (User:Sdorrance/box) and marked the resulting redirect for deletion. Zetawoof(ζ) 05:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar![edit]

Barnstar of High Culture.png The Barnstar of High Culture
Thank you for your great contributions to Kyoto school. I placed it on the WikiProject Philosophy Things-to-do list, and less than a month later I see that you have significantly improved and expanded the article. Thank you for all your contributions, and keep up the good work! Nishkid64 17:45, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Heidegger terminology[edit]

Hi Sam, sorry but I just saw your comment on my home page after I had added to the terminology page. Anyhow I added in mainly quotes from B&T and did not do much else. Anyway they may need further updates. It was to Worldhood and Care I added, what was the other areas you were looking at? --Lucas

Yes, I think there may also be a number of terms missing from the page, perhaps: historicity, enframing, presencing, cybernetic, appropriation, 'proximate and for the most part', ownness, solicitude, talk, apophantic, logos, fore-structure, authenticity, anxiety, destruktion, throwness, resolve, falling, temporality, mood. Though of course there would then be some overlaps in the definitions. --Lucas

Singer's Campanion to Ethics[edit]

Hey Sam, sorry for replying only with delay, but I was held up by various things. Now, as for the matter:

  • I think we need to attribute that view unless it is undisputed. AFAIK Singer is a very controversial man. If it wasn't him that authored the respective article, then someone else did and we need to attribute it to him.
  • I would like to see what Thomas actually said before we relate the evaluation of Singer & Co.

Cheers, Str1977 (smile back) 15:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Fair use image in user namespace[edit]

Hello! You have used a fair use image in your user namespace (User:Sdorrance/box). Criterion 9 of the Wikipedia:Fair use criteria states that "Fair use images may be used only in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are not covered under the fair use doctrine." I have removed it on these grounds. Sincerely, --Oden 17:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Template[edit]

Nice template. Are you going to give it a bit size name in template space? TonyTheTiger 21:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Instead of 5 or 10 lines of code it would be nice to just add {{Template:Bus&Econ}}. If you want to try to figure it out it is not that difficult. I could do it for you if you like. Look at the Template:Philosophy page. Make an analogous page starting with Template to indicate template space instead of userspace followed by a colon and the name you want people to use to transclude the template. TonyTheTiger 22:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Once you get it figured out you want to place it here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Business_and_Economics#Templates so it will become popularly used. I sign off at the top of the hour but will look for your work tomorrow or Monday. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TonyTheTiger (talkcontribs) 22:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC).
I was checking in to see your progress before I went to bed. I see you got it coded pretty well and it has a "Bite Size" name. Congratulations. I will be plastering it all over my creations in the next few days. I am trying to clean up a lot of my work so I can run for admin. I will probably self nominate myself Monday or Tuesday. If you use redirects you can make more formal template names that point to it in template space if you don't want such a Bite Size name. TonyTheTiger 07:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
P.S. Here is an example of Template redirects Prohoops redirect and Template:Professional Basketball Leagues. When I am programming I can type {{Prohoops}} instead of the full name. I think WP banners should indicate their affiliation in the name. Here are some names {{Basketball-WikiProject}} {{Baseball-WikiProject}} {{DisambigProject}} {{WPBiography}} {{ChicagoWikiProject}}. You probably can just hit the move button at the top of your template page and it will create the redirects for you. Then you can go back to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Business and Economics page and change the code so that the text reads with a more official name, but you can type the shorter name when programming. Names like {{WPBusiness&Economics}} or {{Business&EconomicsWikiProject}} would make good formal names. TonyTheTiger 15:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
I just moved it myself to {{WikiProject Business & Economics}}. TonyTheTiger 20:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Ayn Rand Edit Wars[edit]

Hi Sam. I made a reply to your reverting suggestion on my talk page - right under your message. I also saw your "blah, blah, blah" message and thought a personal reply was in order. "blah, blah, blah" sums it up pretty well :-)

I tire of saying the same thing over and over. (And I weary of not finding more support - not for Rand, but against the WP violations of deleting valid entries and for manipulation of 'standards' just to assert a personal POV). There are always going to be areas of intellectual contention - politics, religion, philosophy, just to name a few. I think everyone needs to accept legitimate, opposing views into the camp-ground and understand that isn't the same as accepting their principles. You and I both dislike Plato (saw that on your User Page), but neither of us would let our dislike stand as a reason for deleting all references to Plato. Well, I didn't mean to get on the soapbox you were rightfully bitching about. If Buridan were to quit deleting Rand, I'd happily go back to making more positive contributions in the area of psychology and philosophy of psychology. Cheers, Steve 06:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm back again. I just noticed that you deleted the reference to the Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Rand's entry in the List of Philosophers article. How come? Thanks, Steve 06:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
I have left a reply on your talk page. - Sam 07:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining the problem with partial reverts - I get it now. Take a look at my reply on my talk page. Best Wishes, Steve 08:22, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Denmark[edit]

Could you put the template on the Denmark page? Thank you! Merry Christmas! Laleenatalk to me contributions to Wikipedia 23:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Greetings Sam. I'm glad to see finally see a project related to Denmark. The template is nice, but if we begin making assessments, I can some more features to it. I worked on {{WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology}} and I know of a few other good examples. I can recommend AWB and Kingboyk's plugin for tagging talkpages, btw. Happy editing and Glædelig Jul. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 00:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Sam. As the designer of Denmark templates, I want you to design additional barnstars for the community. Gratias Te! Laleenatalk to me contributions to Wikipedia 15:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

"Space and Time" section of "Metaphysics".[edit]

Hi Sam, I am all in favour of removing the (pseudo) scientific material form this section. 1Z 22:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

B9 hummingbird hovering[edit]

Sam thanx 4 ur message on my discussion page...instead of deleting intrawikideixes to make the article I iterated "in line" with what is currently status quo, why not refine all other biographies in Wiki to have significant volumes of metatext? Linkages are always of benefit, ambiguities can provide significant insight as everything is polyvalent. Or your valuable time may be better spent on the frontending/backending of metatext to link relevant Wiki articles instead of disambiguation pages. My piece/peace said, I support you/yew (rune)/u to act with integrity according to your nature. Namaste in agape & walk+ing (rune) my talk in beauty [B9_hummingbird_hovering] 17:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

B9 hummingbird hovering (talkcontribs) 17:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Being and Time[edit]

Thanks for your thoughts, Sam. If the situation improves, I'll probably find my way back. Good luck. Mtevfrog 03:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again for your thoughts, which I do not doubt were well-intentioned. I don't really know what makes you think I need to cool down, however. An editor continuously interfered with my own edits on a talk page, and to dissuade him from doing so, and in the hope that the machinery of Wikipedia will lurch into gear in response, I left a description of what had occurred. But that machinery is only other editors, and if they don't see such interference as significant, such is their view. I feel my record of contributing to articles stands pretty much for itself, but I don't think I shall be contributing to the entry in question in the foreseeable future. All the best. Mtevfrog 22:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi!! Please can you help fill in the List of Danish films I am afraid it will be up for afd. I and a few other users are trying to fill the lists by country in. If you can add the details on the films already on wikipedia in year order from Category:Danish films and any others you know of from notable directors etc that would be a great help for WP Film sand Denmark!. THanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" "S.P.E.C.T.R.E" 16:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

List of pubs[edit]

As someone who has contributed to the talk page discussion on List of publications in philosophy and/or that article's previous deletion debate, I thought you might be interested in participating in its new nomination for deletion which can be found here. Thanks. - KSchutte 17:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bertrandrussell.JPG[edit]

Hello, Sdorrance. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bertrandrussell.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Sdorrance/box2. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:06, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Manpukuji temple.jpg[edit]

Hello, Sdorrance. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Manpukuji temple.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Sdorrance/kyoto. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:36, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Manpukuji temple.jpg)[edit]

Nuvola apps important blue.svg Thanks for uploading Image:Manpukuji temple.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States[edit]

Flag of the United States.svg

Hello, Sdorrance! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 04:02, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting[edit]

Wikimedia New England logo.svg
New England Wikimedia General Meeting

The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
Potential topics:
Sunday, April 22
1:30 PM – 4:30 PM
Conference Room C06, Johnson Building,
Boston Public Library—Central Library
700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 08:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard[edit]

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!
Ada Lovelace color.svg
Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields.
Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either.
00:42, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting[edit]

You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18[edit]

NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5
Wikimedia New England logo.svg

Dear Fellow Wikimedian,

You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited: Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March[edit]

Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited!
We Can Edit.jpg
New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston, Northampton, South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page.
Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk)

You're invited![edit]

NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square
Wikimedia New England logo.svg

Dear Fellow Wikimedian,

New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter.

We hope to see you there!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Edit-a-thon invite[edit]

Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial edit-a-thons[edit]

Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England
Wikimania 2012 portrait 102 by ragesoss, 2012-07-13.JPG

As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows:

We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time.

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

New England Wikimedians summer events![edit]

Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!

After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:

Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August:

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

New England Wikimedians summer events![edit]

Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!

After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:

Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August:

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

File source problem with File:HumesFork KantsTrident.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:HumesFork KantsTrident.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC)