User talk:Seppi333

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello! You've reached my talk page. Please leave an angry trollpost, a message, or a cookie, depending on your mood – I'd prefer the latter two.

If you would like to reply in a thread that I placed in the collapse tab below, please move it out of the tab when replying or simply create a new section. Thanks!


Hi! My apologies (again...) for not reacting to your ping. I've been more or less off-wiki lately, and I'm of course completely out of sync with your FA review. Anything I can do? Cheers, ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 08:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

@Anypodetos: Hey! Thanks for leaving the note; the FA reviewers suggested I contact everyone from previous nominations for any input on the article for feedback. The article is more or less the same since you reviewed it, with exception to the overdose section which has a lot of new content on the mechanism of amphetamine addiction and behavioral treatments. If you have the time, it'd be great if you could do a short review of that at the current FA nomination page; don't worry about it if you don't have the time though! Also, thanks again for your thorough review in the earlier FA nomination! Seppi333 (Insert  | Maintained) 07:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

October 17, 2014[edit]

I'm glad to see that you haven't disappeared off the face of the earth. :) Unfortunately, I am really busy with schoolwork at the moment, so I won't be able to take another look at the article or your changes until next Friday, after my second biochemistry test. AmericanLemming (talk) 15:27, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

@AmericanLemming: No problem! Good luck on the exam. Seppi333 (Insert  | Maintained) 19:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
I don't know how to say this, Seppi, but I've come to the conclusion that I don't have the time to both do justice to the article and keep up with my studies. I would be be happy to pick up the peer review in mid-December once my semester's finally over, if you'd still be interested in working with me. Again, my apologies, but I thought I'd be upfront about it rather than leaving you in the dark. You've chosen an extraordinarily difficult article to try to take to FA status, and the lack of interest from reviewers at FAC recently hasn't helped matters much.
And until somebody (that is, me, since I don't think anyone else will step up to the plate) goes through it line by line, taking it to FAC again likely won't be successful. (BTW, I should mention that I've really enjoyed working with you and would be happy to do so again once I have the time.) Anyway, just a heads up, and hopefully you can find some other articles to improve in the meantime. :) AmericanLemming (talk) 11:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
@AmericanLemming: No problem; I can wait. Seppi333 (Insert  | Maintained) 13:17, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Adderall[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Adderall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tea with toast -- Tea with toast (talk) 23:40, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Re: your edit[edit]

With regards to your good faith edit here[6]. The things that you considered uncontroversial aren't really :) The aerosol vs. vapor discussion can be found here. The "likely small risk" i've changed into something that actually is verifiable from the reference[7] --Kim D. Petersen 17:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

@KimDabelsteinPetersen: Ah. Sorry - my mistake. Seppi333 (Insert  | Maintained) 19:25, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Np, just wanted to explain it. :) --Kim D. Petersen 19:43, 15 October 2014 (UTC)


Thanks for your note. I appreciated your comments regarding the MEDRS issue over at the cannabis or THC page (I forget which one it was) as well, and your work on MDMA. You are clearly a friend of MEDRS, so I'll consider you a friend of mine as well. Keep up the excellent work. Formerly 98 (talk) 23:27, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

No problem - Wikipedia has enough badly written/sourced drug articles; deleting crap sources is the least I can do to fix it. Seppi333 (Insert  | Maintained) 12:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

A cookie barnstar for you[edit]

Sugar Cookies Star Shaped with snowflake decoration (2).jpg Barnstar of good editing
Thanks for your work at MDMA. I'm glad that you were willing to undertake the much-needed cleanup work there. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:46, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Face-grin.svg Seppi333 (Insert  | Maintained) 12:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Neurotransmitter Edits[edit]

Hello Seppi333 !

I see that you've been active in editing the Neurotransmitter page on Wikipedia. I just wanted to give you a heads up that my group and I are currently updating this page as well as part of a PSYCH course assignment. Edits will continue throughout the current academic semester, so don't be surprised if you see tweaks/edits in the content and format of the page. Any recommendations/suggestions/comments are most welcome, as we're all beginner-level editors here aiming to improve the quality of the information on this page.