User talk:Andrew Gray

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Shimgray)
Jump to: navigation, search


Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.

Wikidata weekly summary #155[edit]

Tech News: 2015-18[edit]

15:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Barelvi[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Barelvi. Legobot (talk) 00:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
18 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B 56th (London) Division (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Edward Aglionby (died 1553) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1,595 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B QWERTY (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
41 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: GA 52nd (Lowland) Infantry Division (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
18 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Nicholas Bacon (Lord Keeper) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
48 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Sherwood Foresters (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
28 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B 42nd (East Lancashire) Infantry Division (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cleanup
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Hampshire County Division (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
40 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Evil May Day (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
50 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Cutter Expansive Classification (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Alvania verrilli (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
9 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub 20th (Light) Division (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
15 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Max Launch Abort System (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
109 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: A Consequences of Nazism (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
46 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA History of Nagorno-Karabakh (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
23 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Clean Energy Act 2011 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
1,016 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Keloid (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Havasupai–Hualapai language (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
25 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 79th Armoured Division (United Kingdom) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
21 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Sikkim Expedition (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Broom Hill, London (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
0 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Rissoia (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: List, Predicted class: Start British Land Units of the First World War (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ó hAnnáin (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub 59th (2nd North Midland) Division (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
31 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Carny (1980 film) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Norfolk County Division (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Onoba schraderi (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
0 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Boreocingula globulus (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
20 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Schongau, Bavaria (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Support request with team editing experiment project[edit]

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.

The Signpost: 29 April 2015[edit]

Please comment on Talk:Hapa[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hapa. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #156[edit]

Tech News: 2015-19[edit]

15:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 May newsletter[edit]

C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) is a long-period comet discovered on 17 August 2014 by Terry Lovejoy; and is one of several Featured Pictures worked up by India The Herald (submissions) during the second round.

The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was Belarus Cas Liber (submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.

Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) 16:21, 4 May 2015 (UTC)