User talk:Shirt58

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A Shirt58, yesterday "The superfluous, that very necessary thing..." - Voltaire

User talk:Shirt58/Archive 1
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 2
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 3
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 4
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 5
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 6
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 7
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 8
User talk:Shirt58/The Cockatoo Incident
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 9
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 10
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 11
User talk:Shirt58/September 2012 book cover deletions
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 12
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 12A
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 13
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 14 (up to early December 2013)
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 15 (December 13 to April 2014, though I have mostly lost track of what is and what was not
archived)
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 16 (May 2014 to December 2014. Probably. Sort of.)

Asert Airways[edit]

Bold text BRING BACK KEVIN THE BIRD! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.112.106 (talk) 11:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC) http://asert-airways.webnode.hu/ no hoax The Asert Airways an existing Hungarian airline. What makes you think that hoax? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.182.67.154 (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Well Done![edit]

A very manly man, just like you!

You have been awarded the Manliness Award for helping to construct a great encyclopedia.

Keep up the great work! A Very Manly Man (talk) 10:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Threats?[edit]

Threats? Put "welcome" in ass for own usage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.29.84.132 (talk) 03:20, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

  • WØØt! This is almost as good as the "manly man" award.--Shirt58 (talk) 07:46, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


Who asked you[edit]

Hey random guy who is not an admin and didn't participate at all in the debate about my comments. Nice try exerting your male dominance as I say goodbye thinking his comments won't be noticed. Your opinion is moot, unwanted and irrelevant. Nobody cares what you think. Now it's time for YOU to be quiet. MiracleMat (talk) 07:55, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Whatevs[edit]

Whatever you may mean by "dancing on a grave". I'm a longterm wikifriend of Jack's. I am the least person to be dancing on his Wikipedia presence's grave, and nothing in my comment even remotely implies that I do. So why don't you just mind your own business instead of mis-citing unrelated policy kthxbai. --78.35.245.203 (talk) 13:28, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Tooth problems now fixed[edit]

Hello talk-page stalkers. Problematic wisdom tooth now extracted, with no complications at all. Pete --Shirt58 (talk) 15:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
Congrats bud, you're famous! Keep up the good work :D Ishdarian 10:22, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Good job!!!
RenRen070193 13:42, 16 October 2013 (UTC)


An award for you.[edit]

Tasmanian devil head on.jpg The Are You Sure Tasmania is a Real Place? Award
For the comment in your user page giving me a little laugh at the end of a long day. Sulfurboy (talk) 09:20, 29 October 2013 (UTC)


My RFA and two points[edit]

Hello,
I came to talk on one thing, and now I have two things to tell you. First) the non-important point: your talk page is too long. Slow internet users like me face difficulties to open such pages. Could you archive older messages? (it is just a personal request) Second) I can understand both Andrew's comment and the people who replied to it. Please see this attempt. There I did not argue for India, nor I supported those Indian proposals too. I just told them that "these are the problems". Please see this move or my "oppose" vote at here. It is almost the same thing what he is talking about. I generally do not move an article directly, and try to take community opinion first using WP:RM process. I have started "requested move" discussion many times only because I felt that those articles had honorific titles. It is the same thing what they are suggesting.
Before starting this RFA, I had a resolution, that I'll allow oppose voters to talk, and try my best to avoid debates and personal attacks. Let them express their views (eg. Titodutta is the worst guy of the entire Wikipedia), and let people reply to it too. That is the beauty of Wikipedia. Regards. --TitoDutta 12:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
(PS. to you only, I'll not write it on that RFA page so that people think I am trying to gather sympathy. My two relatives (grandmother and maternal aunt) are hospitalized at the same time, that's the reason it took me a long time to reply to your question) --TitoDutta 12:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Antiflame-barnstar.png The Anti-Flame Barnstar
For your levelheadedness in RfA.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 18:55, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your intervention under Q14[edit]

Shirt58, I take very strong exception to that. If you want to clarify Q11, you should do so under Q11, not under Q14. In Q14, I addressed a question to Tito, not to you, and his reply is his, not yours, to clarify if he wishes. Your intervention is out of place there. It's telling people what to think, it's partisan, and you've placed it where it is difficult to reply to it without disrupting the RfA by turning the questions for the candidate into a free discussion for all. I have reverted it. Put it in a more appropriate place if you want, but not there. --Stfg (talk) 13:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

lazord00d hater community[edit]

As a married father with a job and a life, I don't have time for whatever you are referring to even if i did care enough to be a part of it. It's clear to me that a subset of Wikipedia editors dictate what happens on Wikipedia, regardless of the supposed fact that this editing is open to the public. I've already defended my images and position numerous times, the strategy here is to wear me down, but only if I let it. You can pass this on to whatever complaint thread you speak of or not. I really don't care at this point. Regardless thanks for the heads up.

Re: 2065 in Australia[edit]

The reason is a little bit ridiculous/weird. I have found that 22nd century, 23rd century, even 24th century can be created. Therefore, I thought it is OK to create a page for 2065 in Australia. I made the redirect, because I currently don't have time to write sth in this page --Coekon (talk) 11:56, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

ANI[edit]

As you thanked me for staring the ANI on the disruptive editor, any input there would be appreciated.--Oakshade (talk) 17:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Uncategorized tags[edit]

I do add categories to an uncategorized article instead of the maintenance tag sometimes — the operative distinction being that I do so when, because of familiarity with the topic and/or the particular subject area in question, I already know what the appropriate categories are, whether the categories in question actually exist or not, and on and so forth. But for various technical reasons that have prevented Wikipedia from being able to stay on top of the untagged uncategorized articles as promptly as needed for several weeks now, I was (and still am) working with a batch of almost 2,000 uncategorized articles — and it's not realistic to expect one person to be able to directly categorize over 2,000 articles by hand (it's not a task that can be done in AWB.) And par for the course on Wikipedia is that another 100 or so new uncategorized articles get created every day, meaning that the list is never actually clean for more than 24 hours — by the time I actually get through the nearly 1,000 articles that are still there as of right now, there will be another 400-500 new ones on top of that, and on and so forth.

That's why the categorization project exists as a maintenance queue that a lot of people work on: so that it's not all falling on one single person to manually categorize 2,000+ articles at once. And because that project exists, expecting an editor to bypass it by immediately manually categorizing every untagged uncategorized page that exists is both unrealistic and unfair. That's precisely why the project exists: so that as many people as possible are getting the work done. Bearcat (talk) 18:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

No worries. Trust me, you're not the first person who's ever wondered or asked — I've even occasionally had to contend with people labelling the categorization tagging as outright disruptive, as if it were somehow any more "disruptive" than any other maintenance tag that Wikipedia uses. Bearcat (talk) 17:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

KuhnstylePro salt[edit]

Hi Shirt58, Tattle Cartoon! is the solution the banned sock operator KuhnstylePro created as a workaround to the Phibian Mike salt that I recently requested at ANI (and that you were kind enough to perform). I'm sure that it'll get taken care of through normal channels, I figured I'd mention it to help another admin understand the scope of this kid's disruptions. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Warning understood[edit]

Hi Shirt, your warning is understood 100%. In retrospect, it was a childish statement. I understand the importance of protecting the kids. My comment was made in the interest of protecting the project from disruption. Shan't happen again and I have not divulged any of this information to anybody, nor will I. Thanks for the correction and I apologize for my stupid comment. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the Sampernandu Redirect Deletion[edit]

Thank you Shirt58/Peter! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thenonhacker (talkcontribs) 10:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard discussion notification[edit]

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Please review my deletion of Sampernandu". Thank you.--Shirt58 (talk) 10:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
21 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Andhra Pradesh Open University (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
34 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start M. J. P. Rohilkhand University (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
101 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B E-Rotic (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
15 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Pandit Sundarlal Sharma (Open) University (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
28 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Uttar Pradesh Rajarshi Tandon Open University (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
25 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Pharmacy Council of India (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
121 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Washington Project for the Arts (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
40 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Dr. Hari Singh Gour University (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
216 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Pretty Rhythm (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
33 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Prizmmy (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
19 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Manipur University (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
4,617 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Exodus: Gods and Kings (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
79 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Arjun Singh (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
179 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Indian Institute of Technology Madras (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
127 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Erasmus Mundus (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
193 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Merge
29 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Pressure carburetor (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Amiya Pujari (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
33 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Vargas de Tecalitlán (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
14 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Education in Chhattisgarh (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Lindy Barber (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Arun Bhatnagar (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Institute of Engineering & Technology, Bareilly (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ken Cameron (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
13 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
15 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Xmas Party Album (Vengaboys album) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
9 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Atraulia (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
64 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Bharathiar University (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
33 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start The Platinum Album (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Frederick Jackson (singer)[edit]

Hello Shirt58. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Frederick Jackson".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Frederick Jackson (singer)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ~KvnG 22:23, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Samir Becic (subject of a delete in 2012. Has literally 50 sources independent of him in major US and German newspapers and fitness trade journals)[edit]

Hi Shirt58,

In short, Kino is wrong about Samir Becic in 2015. He was correct to delete in 2012 due to non-notable. But I'm no idiot putting this page up, and you weren't a fool and neither was APC to move it.

Please lobby to get this thing live. I put it in AFC. I left this note below for Kino. I found the "let me delete rapidly because it's some "SPA"" to be so so rash. There are literally 50 or so sources that are third party, indepedent journalist, clear editorial oversight-- some of which SB is directly the subject of the article-- that have been published in the EU and US since 2012. Thanks.

2601:E:280:1C00:4D5E:4F3A:560A:36D9 (talk) 02:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Kino,

I am politely requesting that you review the Samir Becic article at AFC and bring it live. You correctly deleted in 2012. However, literally 50 different new sources are avialable on him from LAT, WashT, and german pubs.

I get it. Some people are legit and not legit. Some people are "Too Early." But this warrants a review. I'm a fellow Ivy Leaguer-- no I didn't go to Yale-- but you're not working with an idiot here. I'm a lot more like you than the rest of the general public. Thanks for handling.2601:E:280:1C00:4D5E:4F3A:560A:36D9 (talk) 01:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Samir_Becic#Samir_Becic_.28subject_of_a_delete_in_2012._Has_literally_50_sources_independent_of_him_in_major_US_and_German_newspapers_and_fitness_trade_journals.29

Template:1950s-Kannada-film-stub[edit]

Hello, I don't understand 'fix articles first' for the request of speedy deletion for the above template. I have created the template for organizing stub articles and per Wiki if the articles are less than 60 then there may not be a category required. So I have requested the Category for deletion and it got deleted. So the template is the last thing to delete. Sriram V. (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2015 (UTC)