User talk:Shokioto22
|
|
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey![edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host, 16:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Message sent with Global message delivery.
But I had already linked the September 2011 IMF data in my first updating edit! But because I had written “[[International Monetary Fund]]” (with double square brackets), it became rather difficult to see that external link (although it was still there). And as I explained in that edit, I automatically removed the 2012 (and 2011) figures to keep the estimates future (so that they continue falling into the restrictive article title). However, you can still see that missing data in this also recently updated similar article.
Regards from the Argentinian city of Bahía Blanca :-) MaxBech1975 (talk) 19:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion[edit]
The article List of countries by Intelligence Quotient has been speedily deleted under category G4 of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion as being substantially the recreation of an article previously deleted after a deletion discussion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of national IQ estimates from Lynn and Vanhanen (2002, 2006). If you believe that deletion discussion and the deletion following it were in error, then you should pursue the matter at Wikipedia:Deletion review, not by recreating the list as an article. Thank you. Edison (talk) 23:39, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]
Hi. When you recently edited List of national IQ estimates from Lynn and Vanhanen (2002, 2006), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Earl Hunt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Please be advised[edit]
Please be advised on our policy of WP:FORUMSHOPPING.Curb Chain (talk) 17:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
August 2012[edit]
Hello, I'm Anir1uph. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of countries by GDP (PPP), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Anir1uph | talk | contrib 17:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Re:nepal russians[edit]
Hi Shokioto22! Regarding the article of Russians in Nepal you have to understand that there are several reasons people would migrate from one country to another whether's it's rich or poor. Marriage is one of them and there are many people that are unhappy with city life and want something simpler. Also saying that Nepal-based newspapers fabricated stories to make Nepalis feel better and grow self-esteem if they read that "White Europeans" also live in Nepal is also kind of racist as well as saying that India is a poor country even though it's one of the fastest growing economies of the world right now.
Also if you read the article, it stated that these women are of varied ethnicities that constituted the USSR meaning that not all of them are White Europeans and there are photos in that article.DaTraveller (talk) 07:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 16[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IgroMir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nival (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Notice[edit]
Please do not make any relevant information removal from existing articles as you did in this article before at least trying to discuss it on a Talk page first, also try to refrain from adding uncited/unproven claims to random articles as you did here and do not replace existing, valid information with the one that has dubious/questionable validity as you have done in this article since such actions may appear like an intentional vandalism to some editors. Rndomuser (talk) 03:12, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 23[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Internet censorship in Germany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Gema
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Second notice[edit]
Once again, I ask you to refrain from making unconstructive and highly suspicious edits as you did here and similarly here. This article is about intervention by foreign armies, particularly Japanese, it doesn't matter on which territory it occured. If you believe that this information must be changed - please open the discussion on article's Talk page first and see if other people will agree with you BEFORE making any changes like these. Also note that similar articles on different language Wikis also have Japanese translation of the name "Siberian Intervention", for example in German wiki here or French wiki here. I understand that you may have a hidden agenda of heavily promoting everything Russia-related (as well as making Russia always look in "positive way"), but Wikipedia must be more neutral source of information without such excessive bias.
Same goes for your edits here and here. There was absolutely NO need for "citation needed" templates, as both articles already have citations that support the statements in those sentences. Your edits appear to be (once again) caused by your personal "pro-Russian" and somewhat "anti-Muslim" agenda, and once again, there is no place for such things on Wikipedia. Rndomuser (talk) 03:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]
 | This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shokioto22. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:06, 20 March 2013 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)