User talk:Shrikanthv

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

4 April 2014 Modi[edit]

What did i remove from the Narendra Modi page? Tri400 (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

About Talk:Arvind Kejriwal[edit]

Hi, I have merged your original entry sub-headed NEWS to another main section headed Merged entry on a specific news incident. However, no alterations have been made to the original post and replies. Talk:Arvind_Kejriwal#Merged_entry_on_a_specific_news_incident


About Katikala Siva Bhagya Rao[edit]

You have deleted the page Katikala Siva Bhagya Rao. The man runs an NGO offering free services to over 22000 backward caste people in Andhra Pradesh, India. The work this man does may not reach the elite media because all his work is in the villages at the grass root level. The man needs commendation and a wiki page is the least one can do for him. I also have given newspaper articles about his service work. The language could have been more simplistic, agreed. But certainly isn't 'instant delete' worthy. Whilst, movie stars with mere 1,2 movies have wiki articles, why should a government servant who spend the last three decades in helping people through his NGO not deserve a wiki page? Can you please help me put up this page again. -- Hunking Hunk

Deletion[edit]

Okay, this needs to stop. Whilst occasionally you make a good call on articles which need to be deleted, the signal-to-noise ratio is so low that it verges on the disruptive. This isn't a new development, either; since you started here, you have demonstrated consistently poor judgement in the application of CSD, PROD, BLPPROD and AFD tags, and the last month or so has shown that there has been little improvement in this area. I'm therefore, regretfully, laying down a final warning: if you make another inappropriate deletion request, via any deletion mechanism, I or another administrator may block your account without warning. This has gone on for far too long - turn your attention to other areas of Wikipedia (I know you were looking at GA recently) and leave the whole sphere of deletion alone. I'm sorry it's come to this, but enough is enough. Yunshui  08:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


I take your Advice Yunshui, will give up deletion handling until you ask me back into it , & let me create something good from now on .. (do I have to take back my current AFD's ? , do let me know ) , yes finally got a GA for article but had to rework again with senior editor to keep it that way Shrikanthv (talk) 08:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
There's no need to withdraw the AFDs you've already done unless the !voting is entirely against you (if anyone else has !voted for deletion, the discussion should be allowed to run for the full week). Let me know if you need any help with article creation. If you do happen across something that's incontrovertibly deletable (don't go looking for it!), please feel free to ask me for a second opinion - I'd rather not block you if I don't have to! Yunshui  08:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Narendra Modi Poll projection[edit]

Dear Mr Shrikanth. THe discussion talk page on polls projections regarding Narendra Modi is waiting for you. Please do not show so much desperation to delete what all opinion polls are projecting. Have an open mind and face the reality of poll projection outcome.210.212.144.133 (talk) 09:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

GA reassessment[edit]

Sri Aurobindo, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. - Sitush (talk) 19:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Aurobindo[edit]

Hi, regarding the GA delisting of Sri Aurobindo, you say that there was no consensus for it. WP:CONSENSUSis not a vote but rather a decision based on assessment of arguments that in turn are based on policy compliance. Even you have said that the article has many faults, and others (including me) have said the same. It is not GA standard & I think it will take quite a bit of work to make it so. - Sitush (talk) 23:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

I happened to click on the article and was surprised to see his birth name three times in the infobox, but the article name not once. Is there a reason I might understand? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
hi, I really did not notice that, corrected it. there was disscussion previously on this , he started to use Sri in front of his name without ghose on later stage of his life, so had to correct this. thanks for noticing Shrikanthv (talk) 06:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Revert in Cytus[edit]

Hi. In adding to the playable song list, I have effectively manually reverted your revert in Cytus. This uses citing to the version 6.1.0 of the game, hopefully addressing your "unreferenced addition of data". 野狼院ひさし Hisashi Yarouin 06:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Mir Mandow Rind[edit]

Mir Mandow Rind is nominated for deletion. Discussion is possible here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mir Mandow Rind. The Banner talk 17:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Hooray![edit]

Good Article Barnstar Hires.png The Good Article Barnstar
Sri Aurobindo finally made it! Congratulations - all that hard work finally paid off. Yunshui  09:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Congratulations from your GA reviewer. I am pleased to see the article so much improved. I am sure you will have noticed that there is still room for improvement beyond the GA criteria; I have listed some of these areas at the end of the GA review. Be aware that many editors believe that GA status requires perfect formatting of citations: the fact that the criteria quite plainly state that this is not a requirement is easily overlooked. Editors are of course quite right to push for references to be tidy and well-organised, and it will probably save you trouble if you take time to tidy these up further. After that, I am sure that further development of the Influence and Reception sections will prove interesting and productive, and will certainly make the article stronger. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Of course, no article is perfect. Congratulations Shrikanthv! Bladesmulti (talk) 10:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality of sources[edit]

A copyvio has been detected and removed from the Sri Aurobindo article, and another source needs to be verified. It will be necessary to address any concerns people may have about the reliability of the sources used, or the article may be delisted. There is discussion on the talk page. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Please could you address the Heehs citation as the most urgent issue. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Bharatiya Janata Party.png[edit]

Hi

I replied to your discussion here: [1]. Thanks for reporting the file, but WP:AFD was the wrong process. I tagged it as orphaned fair use. If you think it is copyvio/incorrect source you should tag for that additionally, using WP:CSD:F3, F7 or F9, and given the history of the uploader I have to say that seems likely to be the case. If you need help, let me know, but I only come here once a week or so now, so might not reply immediately. Cheers. Begoontalk 18:17, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

List of United States presidential elections in Pennsylvania[edit]

Hi! Just noticed you patrolled and tagged this article. Would you care to clarify some of the issues you see with the article? Thanks, Tyrol5 [Talk] 19:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dahlander pole changing motor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cranes and Fans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Sauer article[edit]

Hi. The football player Maximilian Sauer meets the notability criteria for football players, and it's sourced by reliable third-party sources. So, what issues do you see with the article? Alexpostfacto (talk) 10:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Albert Samuel Twort[edit]

My brother, who created the article, asked me what to do about it. I've no issue with you placing the csd tag on the article, but have userfied it to allow him to work it up. It may be that notability cannot be asserted, but let's give him a chance. Best, Mjroots (talk) 22:57, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

surething no probs Shrikanthv (talk) 07:08, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Dahlander pole changing motor[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Dahlander pole changing motor at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 17:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 17:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Zināt. Raudāt. Dziedāt.[edit]

Hi. I have declined your speedy deletion nomination - WP:CSD#A9 only applies if the artist has no article, but Raman Jaraš has one. JohnCD (talk) 15:40, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

oops! did not notice that Shrikanthv (talk) 07:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

BNA access[edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Shrikanthv. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Chris Troutman (talk) 00:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Canvassing[edit]

Hello Shrikanthv, It appears that you have been canvassing users to participate in your AfD for saffron terror. You should note that there are guidelines for WP:Canvassing, which you are expected to follow. If you do not follow them, all the votes that you have canvassed will be in danger of being discounted. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 11:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

@Kautilya3: read the policy you are heavily mistaken. But if you are convinced report to WP:ANI, beware of WP:BOOMERANG though. Cheers! --AmritasyaPutraT 12:15, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Kautilya, note my comments it is not biased and does not carry any remote influence nor indirect suggestive measure of what has to be done , if this was the criteria and I even posted in Indian community for involvement and does not carry an ounce of suggestion on what has to be done. Shrikanthv (talk) 12:17, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
The guidelines are quite strict: "The audience must not be selected on the basis of their opinions—for example, if notices are sent to editors who previously supported deleting an article, then identical notices should be sent to those who supported keeping it. Do not send notices to too many users, and do not send messages to users who have asked not to receive them." I thought I should let you know. That is all. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 13:14, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Tagging[edit]

Earlier this month you tagged Uygar Aktan with 9 problems, about half of which were relevant. If all of them were relevant, then it would still not be useful because the relevant tags could be overlooked. For more information, see WP:TAGBOMB. --AmaryllisGardener talk 02:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)


AmaryllisGardener thanks, Did not know about WP:TAGBOMB, intention was only to be comprehenisive Shrikanthv (talk) 06:33, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Tagging 2[edit]

Why did you revert my edit? All the tags removed applied to the page. Explain how they don't. Speedy Climber (talk) 06:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

again can you see the message above , refer to . wp:tagbomb , Also check I was the one who added all tags before Shrikanthv (talk) 06:25, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Again, why did you remove them? The issues are still present, and yet you removed the tags. Speedy Climber (talk) 08:52, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
again please read by clicking on the link here wp:tagbomb, and I have not reverted you Shrikanthv (talk) 09:05, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Yes you did and I reverted it back. I am not tag bombing because each and every tag is valid. Tag bombing is only valid when the tags are not valid. Show how the tags you removed are not valid. One by one. Speedy Climber (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) (Comment from uninvolved editor) Can I just say that yes, WP:TAGBOMB mostly applies to adding a load of irrelevant tags to a page, but it's not recommended that you add a load of tags to a page even if they all are relevant, as you would want the biggest problems with the page to get the most attention. I'm going to watch Patu Keswani and maybe sometime I can improve it, so then most of the tags can be removed. Regards, --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Maybe it's not recommended, but that's doesn't mean it's not allowed. Anyway, I see that you took care of two of the tags correctly - which is what I wanted to see. Speedy Climber (talk) 00:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)