Hello, I was wondering why you deleted content recently added to Lindsay Lohan's page. It was well-written, and now there is no flow; it jumps into how she announce a new film without background information. Could you please revert these changes you've made, or at least improve the edit? Thanks!--Mpo90 (talk) 21:27, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Unoabjd.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Unoabjd.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
No good deed goes unpunished
You seem to know much about dolls and the various doll communities online. However, in this case you have incorrectly assumed my contribution is "spam". I want to make some things clear to you. I'm not using Wikipedia as a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Also, I'm really not interested in altering search engine ranking. My contributions were appropriate. All contributions from "IP" numbers are not spam. People can have something beneficial to add even if they don't have an account. I realize there's a lot of gray area when it comes to deciding which content is spam. So, I sure don't expect you to reverse yourself. It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong.
The Bradford Exchange
I am contacting you regarding the current Wikipedia article for The Bradford Exchange.
Prior to February 2014, the article in place contained outdated information concerning the company's management, affiliated brands and history. In an attempt to update this content with more current information, Brayfrizzell (we) uploaded a change to this article on February 5, 2014. This change remained in place until the most recent edits, made on March 23, 2014.
From what we can see, it appears that the most recent edits are not a complete reversion back to the original pre-February article. Instead, they seem to be more of a hybrid of the original article and the one uploaded on February 5.
We truly appreciate your commitment to represent The Bradford Exchange with true and unbiased content, and we would like to make a request concerning the evolution of this page.
From studying the Wikipedia standards, our assumption of the changes made on February 5 were an attempt to: Bring the information up-to-date Expand the content to make it more robust Remain as unbiased as possible
With these goals in mind, we would like to work with you, if possible, to keep this article up to date, e.g., the current article lists a couple of our brands that have been retired a few years ago. There are also many historical resources that we can make available, if needed, to give the article more depth. Our ultimate goal in this is to stay accurate and relevant concerning The Bradford Exchange brand. We know that Wikipedia has become one of the most important information resources in the world and we value our place in that resource.
Please feel free to e-mail me at email@example.com to let us know how we should proceed. I look forward to hearing from you and thank you in advance for your help.
If you are a representative of a person and they have asked you to change information on their behalf, yet there is not a cited source, HOW do you get it stay? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by EditNYC1102 (talk • contribs) 14:33, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Pride 2014
Hi Siawase. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! --Another Believer (Talk) 16:29, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Monica Raymund - Bio UPDATE
Hello. We are trying to update the page for Monica Raymund. According to her Official Bio on IMDB, Monica separated from her husband in early 2013 and they completed their divorce in 2014. Why can't this change be made with this cited source?
Below is a link to the bio