hi there, how are you sir i hope you will be fined and i have received message from you regarding http://gameschotabheem.com/ at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chhota_Bheem . i think you are very angry about this site, if you think that this is not liked by Indian user then remove from that page. but i just told you brother many Indian love this site and i am big fan of chota bheem games, cartoon and one think more if i am not from India then i cant love this character if you think its ok then remove from there if you think its right then i appreciate your justification.
For placing 3rd on the June 2014 Wikiproject Wikify Backlog Elimination Drive leaderboard, Skr15081997 is hereby awarded the The Greater Working Wikifier's Barnstar. Congratulations! ~ Anastasia (talk) 18:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
The Iron Wikification Barnstar
For wikifying a total of 27 articles during the June 2014 Drive, you are also awarded the Iron Wikification Barnstar. Thanks so much for helping out! ~ Anastasia (talk) 18:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Disambiguation link notification for July 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tansen (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Raag and Muslim League. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Great job! I'll try to look at it later when I have time. Yoninah (talk) 14:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, just to say I started working on it. There is a bit of overlap in the text and the sequence of events isn't clear. I'm looking at the sources and editing and adding. Stay tuned. Yoninah (talk) 23:20, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, a lot of hours later, I finished the work. I think it looks great, and I'd appreciate a DYK co-credit on the 5x expansion. Comparing this to the other articles that you nominated, only Dirk Keetbaas (which I also worked on) looks at all promotable. Steven Staryk (who has a lot written about him in books and media) looks terrible – many paragraphs are not even sourced. Ruth Budd and William Kuinka are borderline start articles. I'm wondering if you want to work on improving and sourcing the latter three articles, or just go ahead and nominate the Symphony Six page on its own. (I could offer one of my many QPQs). Please let me know. Yoninah (talk) 21:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
@Yoninah:Many thanks for working on the article and yes of course! the article looks great and you can have the co-credit. It would be a sort of honor for me to share the credit with you. My only concern is the DYK checker's eligibility scan results; it say that the 5x expansion began in 2006. The Staryk article wasn't nominated along with the rest. If you feel that 5x expansion is possible then please tell me. The Budd and Kuinka articles were nominated along with the Keetbaas article and I personally feel that they should not be left in this state. I will work on them. Thanks for offering the QPQ but I have already reviewed another nom and listed it on the Symphony nom page.Thanks!--Skr15081997 (talk) 09:40, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you're referring to in 2006. Even if there was an expansion in 2006, we did a 5x expansion beginning with your edit on July 15, 2014, which is during the course of the DYK nomination. Since the article was never nominated for a DYK creation or expansion, we can certainly nominate it now. Yoninah (talk) 10:36, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Written from a decidedly pro-Indian viewpoint. Most sources covering topic will have this view, so it is understandable, but more neutral language would benefit the article
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. 78.26(spin me / revolutions) 17:10, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brønsted–Lowry acid–base theory you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- Tezero (talk) 07:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Akshay Kumar filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tashan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'm happy that you nominated it for GA; it certainly qualifies. Did you see BlueMoonset's note on the 5x expansion? I'm sorry, I haven't had time to look over the close paraphrasing on the other articles; I hope to get to it soon. Best, Yoninah (talk) 17:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Congratulations, Skr15081997! You're receiving the The Tireless Contributor Barnstar because you reviewed 122 (including 8 copyvios) articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive in June 2014! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! (t) Josve05a (c) 23:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I've done a quick copyedit through the article, will probably need to a more thorough at a later date.
I added Khiladi as being his breakthrough role which to me knowledge it was but it would be great if you could find a source for it.
We have added sources.
What metric does box office india use to name actors as being the top actor of the year? Is it just total box office gross for that year?
Probably it's the box office records, but the article says that he was one of the most successful actors of that year.
Was Ajnabee his first negative role?
A reliable source supporting this fact has been added.
I wasn't sure what the source meant my highest grossing English film in Canada. Surely Titanic or something like that would have made much more.
You have made the necessary corrections.
In the article, it's said that Once upon a time was highly anticipated, is there a source to back this up?
On a general note, it would great if you could find a book on the actor as it would make your job much easier when writing a lead in the future as they'll highlight the key parts of the actor's career. Obviously being careful not to plagiarise. This one came up when I searched:[]. Don't know if it's available in your location. Cowlibob (talk) 11:01, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
@Cowlibob:Many thanks for your useful comments. I consider FL to be the best (say 100% for comparison). You have a lot of experience in this field. I wanted to know whether the lead is in a better state in comparison to what it was when you saw it the first time. Considering FL to be 100%, at what percent is the present lead and do you feel that the lead has been improved or not. At what percent would you rate the lead when you saw it the first time. I intend to work on filmography of many more Indian actors. Your comments would of course, encourage me. After your first comment on the FLC I modeled the present lead on the lines of Christian Bale filmography. The Gbooks doesn't even show the preview of this book. Thanks for trying. Much appreciated. Thanks again.--Skr15081997 (talk) 11:19, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
The lead does look significantly better than when I first saw it. It probably only needs to be tweaked to work, provided some of the stuff I highlighted above is clarified. I only got my first featured list last June so I'm pretty new to this as well. Don't worry the first one is usually the hardest to get right. I'm happy you're looking to work on more filmographies we need more people like you and Krimuk90 to strengthen the Indian film articles.
In regards to the questions I asked above have you found some answers?
@Cowlibob:All questions have been answered. What should be done now.--Skr15081997 (talk) 05:25, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Ok, I went through the article again. Some of the sources may need to be replaced as they may not meet WP:RS: Desimartini, Liveindia, Tellychakkar, Planet Punjab, Ballewood, Glamsham, Gopagoda and Metro Masti. There may be more but that's the ones I identified at a glance. Cowlibob (talk) 16:31, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
@Cowlibob:All of the above sources have been replaced by reliable ones. Desimartini and Hindustan Times are owned by the same parent company HT Media.--Skr15081997 (talk) 11:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
I asked Krimuk to look at the list. He had agreed that it had improved however there were still three main issues. He saw grammatical errors, peacock words and unsourced claims. Looking at the fact that there's probably less than 2 weeks before the nom is archived perhaps the best course of action would be for you to withdraw your nom and post it for copyediting at the Copyeditors Guild: Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests or to put it up for peer review. Krimuk has indicated that he could also help when it's outside of FLC and I've asked him to provide a list of the unsourced claims as they'll be the easiest for you to sort out. After you've withdrawn maybe leave this article for a bit and concentrate on the other articles you're working on so that you don't get too tied down. This is probably not what you wanted to hear but don't lose heart, it's really hard to get it right first time around especially for filmographies. Cowlibob (talk) 16:34, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Some things I did not DYK yet know, but learned from writing the article, were that "Botanists have ranked its July and August floral bloom as one of California's foremost wildflower displays, with flowers of fantastic color and abundance." (I knew that I ranked it as one of the best, but not that others did.) And I did not DYK know that Pygmy Saxifrage (Saxifraga rivularis) can be found growing in damp, protected areas under rock overhangs, at elevations of over 14,000 feet (4,300 m). That's pretty high up there! :) FloraWilde (talk) 00:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
On behalf of WikiProject Lucknow, I am inviting you to join our WikiProject. WikiProject Lucknow is a project which aims to create, expand, and maintain articles that relate to the city of Lucknow. If you are not a member already, you can add your name here. If you are already a member, disregard this message. Thank you. -- Wikiboy2364 (talk) 09:05, 16 August 2014 (UTC).
@Anthony Appleyard:The film's shooting commenced in May 2014. The article was deleted in December because there was no source to prove that the filming had started. I have used a reliable source to support the claim that the filming has commenced and now the subject meets WP:NFF. Thanks.--Skr15081997 (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
This message is to make myself clear that i'm not here to "WAR" against anybody...As a good user, my intention is to make pages better and as long as I know my edits were better, why should I fear to stand for it? The users who disagreed with me were simply undoing the edits without even reading them. I'd request u people to please go check the page and see if I am right. And one more thing, I am not a representative of Box Office India or anything. I only chose what I saw as most reliable and because all pages in the past have cited the same source. If you suddenly change the policy, then completely change all the other pages. Is that possible? Huh? So as long as you don't do that, I'm sure I'm right. Why don't u go and condemn the other user instead.... FireboltLeviosa (talk) 26 August 2014 (UTC)