User talk:SlashFox14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

At World's End[edit]

Do not ignore article notes. Box Office Mojo did not cite its source: Disney has never given the exact budget for the Pirates sequels. Alientraveller 10:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Information.svg Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. Alientraveller 17:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to wikipedia[edit]

Hello and welcome. You are welcome to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Films if you're interested. I could really use a hand on the List of American films filling in the data. Welcome aboard! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 12:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Spider-Man 3[edit]

First, please do not add information without verifiable, reliable sources. Second, if you would please read the last couple sentences of the first paragraph of Spider-Man 3#Release. The information you are trying to add is already stated there.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 22:48, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, when you add information, you must always bring the source with you. Check out the rest of the article and how things are sourced. It also helps to check out what is already in the article to make sure you are not adding duplicate information. If you come across a large article and are not sure if it is in there, you can go to the talk page and ask the active editors of the page if it is included, or if it needs including.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 23:19, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Likewise for Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer. Personal speculation is disallowed. Please desist from reverting edits contrary to Wikipedia guidelines and policies, as you already have once this cited page.--Tenebrae 00:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks and a request[edit]

Thank you for keeping box office statisitcs up to date in the various movie articles you work on (I see most of your handiwork at Iron Man). Keeping these up to date improves the quality and factual accuracy of the articles.

However, I would like to request that when you update the figures, would you be able to also update the date in the "|accessdate=" field of the associated citation? To the reader, it seems a bit suspect when the article claims a figure for July 20, but states that the source website was accessed on July 10.

Any queries or comments, feel free to drop me a line. Thanks in advance. -- saberwyn 22:56, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

April 2009[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads, such as the file you uploaded at File:SSBB Cover.jpg, did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. « ₣M₣ » 01:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Sports transactions[edit]

For players like Aaron Brooks, we avoid WP:CRYSTAL by waiting for an official announcement. If you look at this source, it is prefaced by "person with knowledge" and later says "has not yet signed a contract". A report would just say something like "Aaron Brooks signed with Houston" with no preconditions or the "according to sources" caveat if it really went through. If you really wated to add something to an article, you would have to follow WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV and say that "XYZ reports that ABC has signed ...", but youstill should not update the infobox until it is official. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 18:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Twitter as a source[edit]

Thanks for your updates on Brooks' jersey number. When using Twitter as a source, you can give a reference to the URL e.g. https://twitter.com/HoustonRockets/status/309091844615200769 in the edit summary by clicking on the tweet, then click "details" and getting the URL. It makes it quicker for others to verify. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 16:23, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nothing to Lose (Emblem3 album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | Length = 38:22 (Standard)<br/>53:23 (Deluxe

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ratchet & Clank: Into the Nexus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • game, as it is used to travel to hard to reach places. Characters such as Zephyr, Cronk and Talwyn (all from ''[[Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction]]'' (2007) will return, not forgetting

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

God's Not dead box office gross[edit]

Hello SlashFox14. Recently you edited the gross of the film God's Not Dead as $55,564,000. This however is not the worldwide gross but the domestic gross of the film (ie., gross in USA which is the domestic market for the films since they are made here mostly). The worldwide gross is the sum of the domestic and foreign gross. You can see here that the domestic gross of the film is $57,528,000. However, the foreign gross is shown as n/a. But if you click on that foreign link which is marked in blue or on the foreign tab, the foreign gross for the film is given for 2 foreign countries which you can see here. However BOM has not included this foreign gross in it's worldwide gross. It is showing $57,528,000 as the worldwide gross of the film which is incorrect, The true worldwide gross of the film upon adding the foreign gross of the film to the domestic gross comes out to be $58,383,111. The box office of the infobox of a film is for the worldwide gross. The $57,528,000 figure you added is the domestic or American gross and not the worldwide gross. Your edit is therefore incorrect. Please stop doing this. I hope you will understand. Thank you. KahnJohn27 (talk) 09:00, 12 May 2014 (UTC)