User talk:Smchase

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Smchase, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Infrogmation 17:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam[edit]

I just noticed you've been adding a huge number of external links to http://www.wibeaches.us . Is there any good reason for adding these links? To me it just looks like good old spamming.
Regards
/ Mats Halldin (talk) 17:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I am adding a link to a site that contains information on beach health for only those places where is applicable. Like, beaches in douglas county are monitored and there is good historical data on the beaches. The site also provides info on the program. This program has an affect on the health of the beaches and also tourism I imagine. Its as applicable as the county pages. The program is run by the DNR and the local county governments. Check out the website and you'll see its actually an informative site. Its managed by the USGS.

Not trying to add "spam" but trying to add helpful info. I think its more helpful than say in the US Hwy 12 page where they list WisconsinDells Attractions... basically a cheep form of advertising for companies. At least the Beach Health Website gives people info they can use to make informed decisions or use in school reports/research.

Cheers. ~Smchase

Fine Smchase, sorry if I caused any trouble.
I'm writing on parks and lakes myself -- I live in Stockholm and recently wrote about Lake Gömmaren and Gömmaren Nature Reserve. Nothing like Wisconsin I guess, but I must admit I know very little about your part of the US.
However, you did add dozens of link to a single site, which typically is referred to as spamming no matter if you are directly affiliated with the site. Wikipedia guidelines on external links are detailed on Wikipedia:External links. The section "Links normally to be avoided" clearly includes "Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject". Links to local weather forecasts and such should typically not be included as they are not directly related to any specific location. I did a quick test on a few pages were you added the external links to see if this guideline applies:
When I saw you adding dozens of external links to a single site I was still hesitant about it being spam. So instead of just reverting you, I dropped a question here on your talk page. Instead of replying you kept on adding links, so I turned to an administrator for advice which resulted in the warning below.
Hope my poor English isn't causing any confusion.
BTW, nice work on Badger Army Ammunition Plant (external links should always go on the bottom of the page and be limited to a minimum).
/ Mats Halldin (talk) 17:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't respond until I did because I didn't see the comment by you until just the other day. Just not familiar enough about how messages are recieved I guess. Sorry for confusion. If you select the county on the beach site you get the info on beach quality. ~Smchase

February 2008[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 20:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Not trying to spam. Trying to add helpful info. ~Smchase

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]