User talk:Solarpark

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hallo people of the world!

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! JimRenge (talk) 20:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm JimRenge. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JimRenge (talk) 20:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of EXIT![edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on EXIT! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 11:16, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please clean up this poor translation and add attribution to the German Wikipeda where it came from, otherwise it may be deleted in 14 days. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:04, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Translations[edit]

Hi. We appreiate your enthusiasm but the articles you are creating are not your work. They are the work of contibutors to the German Wikipedia and must be attributed. Please note also that poor translations of a standard not acceptable for the English Wikipedia may be deleted if not cleaned up after a reasonable time. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:17, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Solarpark,

most of the content of the article is not verifiable. The linked articles [1] [2] do not even mention Rehm. I was unable to verify any of Rehm's activities or publications in independent, secondary sources. This DNB record of a doctoral thesis in medicine gives the author's first name as "Johannes" with "Christian" just being the middle name. There is no evidence that the author of this dissertation and the political activist and writer are indeed the same person. In your first version you even claimed that he was teaching law at St Gallen University, while this is obviously not the same person, as the one studied medicine and the other is a lawyer. "Christian Rehm" is not a very unusual name, there are obviously several persons who bear this name.

If the notability of this person cannot not be established by reliable, secondary sources, I will request the deletion of the article. Kind regards, --RJFF (talk) 15:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jürgen Elsässer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LordRapture (talk) 10:03, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christian Rehm for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian Rehm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Rehm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PanchoS (talk) 00:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joscha Schmierer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joscha Schmierer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joscha Schmierer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 20:39, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]