User talk:Soulparadox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative. Face-smile.svg

Hello, Soulparadox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

ÐℬigXЯaɣ 07:36, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks DBigXray!--Soulparadox 08:49, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Contents

An invitation to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Soulparadox, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

A belated welcome![edit]

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm! Face-smile.svg

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Soulparadox. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Karl (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Copyeditor Barnstar Hires.png The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Congratulations, Soulparadox, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia!

Thank you so much for all the diligent copyediting you've undertaken and the many articles you've improved. Keep up the great work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 22:33, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Copyeditor Barnstar Hires.png The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Thanks for your help on K-pop and other articles. Drmies (talk) 14:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback[edit]

Well, glad you are! :) Send me a message on my talk page if you ever need any help!

Theopolisme TALK 06:12, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

 

In response to your feedback[edit]

I'm glad that you find editing Wikipedia is fun. Let me know if you need any help.

Salma Vian (talk) 03:08, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

 

In response to your feedback[edit]

Check The Help Page.

Pacman451 (talk) 21:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

 

In response to your feedback[edit]

I am glad that your Wikipedia experience is going well and that you are happy! Thank you for your feedback and thank you for your contributions! For more help on getting started, please look at Help desk and the help pages.

If you need help editing,


Cheers,
Riley Huntley   (Click here to reply)   00:41, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

 

In response to your feedback[edit]

You're welcome

Lectonar (talk) 14:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

 

honest historian[edit]

I thought it was very important to make mention of the influence of the briz cops and the Bjelke regime. I thank you for your kind acknowledgement. Dr.warhol (talk) 09:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

You are very welcome—this was an era that was significantly defined by Bjelke-Peterson's distaste for alternative culture (including policies of suppression) and the Brisbane police's reaction to the city's punk scene, and to omit them would be, at the very least, irresponsible.--Soulparadox (talk) 04:40, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

hoparoundindia.com as a source[edit]

I'm in the process of cleaning up spamming of hoparoundindia.com. I noticed that you've used it as a source in Annavaram and Antarvedi. Do you believe hoparoundindia.com meets WP:RS criteria in any way? If so, how? --Ronz (talk) 22:26, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

To be fair Ronz, when editing the India articles, I had great difficulty locating sources (some of the articles are obscure), so there were occasions where I was glad just to find anything remotely reasonable. I just had a quick glance at the site and it seems promotional, so I appreciate the heads-up.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:21, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I completely understand. I'm fine leaving those references, in the hope that someone will find reliable sources in the future. --Ronz (talk) 04:48, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Cool—I'm not holding my breath!--Soulparadox (talk) 04:50, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Editing Rob Halprin[edit]

I've placed 15 hyper-links of other articles in Wikipedia that link to the above referenced page in the "talk" section ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rob_Halprin ) however, I'm unaware of how to insert them correctly inline. I see you're a respected contributor/editor. Could I trouble you for a little help please? Thanking you in advance for your help, ACAlliedcreative (talk) 22:32, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

No probs—will look at it now.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Briggs[edit]

Thanks for your recent contributions to Briggs (rapper), including adapting the lead, tidying my messy citations, and adding extra info on his tattoo. sroc (talk) 23:32, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

No problems. I'm very glad that the page is finally up, as I am a fan of the man they call "Briggs". I will continue to work on the page, so feel free to provide any feedback or guidance.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Human Nature[edit]

I've done a bunch of extensive edits on Human Nature (band) to get it into decent copy-editing shape. Please take a look :) There are still a ton of citations to fill. AngusWOOF (talk) 05:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Nice one AngusWOOF, as this is a page that required a fair amount of work in this area. I will have a look shortly.--Soulparadox (talk) 05:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
I added some more references. It's looking good now. I've removed the "it's disorganized" and "copyedit" request from the front page. Still need official citations about the chart performances, copies sold and stuff from ARIA. AngusWOOF (talk) 18:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
I appreciate the open communication—I will see what I can add, but it might require sources that are not web-based. I might consider contacting the band's management. Furthermore, removing those tags is a fair call and I am glad that it has been done.--Soulparadox (talk) 05:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again for adding sources. I think I can find the certifications (x platinum) on the ARIA website and maybe some leads on charting from the discography. The sources outside the web are okay to cite. Hopefully you won't need to bug management as that might be considered "original research". Had another question though; should Toby Allen have his own page? The other guys have one, and that can then detail his theatre involvements. AngusWOOF (talk) 18:56, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Apologies for the late response; and yes I agree, this could be considered original research. I guess I would need to ask the band's management if they can direct me to any articles etc. that are not accessible on the Internet; or references that I have been unable to locate. I have not been able to look at this page for a couple of weeks due to other commitments, but I will look at it today and see what I can add. In response to your question on Toby Allen—I am not familiar enough with the band or Allen to know the answer to this. However, if he is an artist in his own right, in the same way that band members form solo careers in other musical acts, then it is likely to be appropriate. Just keep in mind the noteworthy aspect in relation to Wikipedia policy—I can't remember the policy exactly, but I know that he needs to have a significant body of work, at the very least.--Soulparadox (talk) 06:26, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thanks for your ..erm ...thanks :) As some one who's active in WikiProject Graffiti and WikiProject Visual arts I agree, it would be good to have an article about Zoates. The one good news source suggests he has been of some note in the past. I had a look online and couldn't see any other good news/book coverage myself, unfortunately. But obviously if you know of any other coverage yourself, either online or offline, please add it to the article to back up the claims. Best of luck! Sionk (talk) 22:08, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Whataburger copyediting[edit]

Hi, I noticed you added the copyedit tag back on Whataburger. Did I miss some work on the article? AngusWOOF (talk) 19:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi AngusWOOF, I didn't use a specific tag—have changed it now to the Expand article tag due to the tags that are further down the page.--Soulparadox (talk) 01:53, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Copy edit of Michael Peterson (surfer)[edit]

Hi Soulparadox. This is just to draw your attention to the fact that both you and User:HarshAJ have marked yourselves as working on Michael Peterson (surfer) for the GOCE drive. Please could you negotiate with HarshAJ on what to do? I'm putting a similar request on their talk page.

The best way to avoid this kind of thing happening is to remove the {{copyedit}} tag from the article before you start the copy edit. This will remove it from the category list and make it less likely someone else will pick it up. It's also a good idea to put {{GOCEinuse}} in its place (replacing this with {{Under construction}} if you take a break of several hours or more).

Kind regards, --Stfg (talk) 13:50, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up; I will get onto it now.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Just seen your helpful message there. Thanks. Best, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
No problem.--Soulparadox (talk) 15:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Michael Peterson[edit]

Hi! Please go ahead with the copy-edit. I realized I wasn't going to be able to come online owing to a sudden increase in School-work. Thanks! --HarshAJ (Talk)(Contribs) 03:26, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the update HarshAJ.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:43, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Here are a few links if you wish to go through them: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 --HarshAJ (Talk)(Contribs) 03:58, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Sure :-) --HarshAJ (Talk)(Contribs) 04:06, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
WikiThanks

Thank you for the way you've managed this, Soulparadox. Stfg (talk) 10:19, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

No problem.--Soulparadox (talk) 16:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Briggs[edit]

Halfstar Hires.png The Half Barnstar
Here's the other half of the barnstar for your collaborative work on the Briggs (rapper) article. Thanks for helping it become all that it can be! sroc (talk) 06:18, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

FYI, I've adapted the info you provided on the Robert Hunter Cup in the Briggs article and added it into the article on Hunter which was sadly lacking in that respect. Thanks again! sroc (talk) 11:15, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Excellent! Thanks again sroc.--Soulparadox (talk) 02:48, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

September 2012 copy edit backlog elimination drive barnstar![edit]

CleanupBarnstar.PNG The Cleanup Barnstar
Thanks for participating in the September 2012 backlog elimination drive! For copy edits totaling more than 12,000 words (19,242 to be exact), you have earned The Cleanup Barnstar from the Guild of Copy Editors. Great job! We hope to see you again in November! —Torchiest talkedits 16:34, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Da Nang[edit]

Hi—thanks for your contributions to Da Nang! I've replied to the note you left on the talk page about sister cities. --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 14:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification; I have checked the Talk page and have responded accordingly.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:46, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Racism in Israel[edit]

Hello Soulparadox. Racism in Israel, like all articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict broadly construed, is subject to a one revert restriction (1RR). That means no editor can make more than one revert in any 24-hour period. See the box at the top of Talk:Racism in Israel for more information.

Please consider self-reverting your latest edits to the article, because they seem to be in violation of the 1RR restriction. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:24, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi again, I am presuming that you are referring to the manual reinstatement of the Chomsky citation, which I immediately removed. I tried to undo the initial insertion anyway, but the system requires me to do it manually and, given that I have already removed it, I guess that the point in moot. Please let me know if there is anything further required.--Soulparadox (talk) 04:33, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Australian music WikiProject[edit]

Just wondering if you've considered joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian music. I reckon you could make some great contributions. sroc (talk) 04:59, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you kidnly for the recommendation, asd I have gladly joined the group!--Soulparadox (talk) 06:36, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

GOCE October 2012 Blitz Barnstar[edit]

Modest Barnstar.png The Modest Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Soulparadox for copy editing articles with a total of 2,041 words during the Guild of Copy Editors October 2012 Copy Editing Blitz. Thank you for your contribution. --Stfg (talk) 14:32, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Live insect jewlery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Northamerica1000(talk) 11:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Bob Ezrin Page[edit]

Hi, I saw your comment about putting a lot of work into improving Bob's page, and it needing a rewrite. I'm happy to work on that with you. Where/how would you like to start? Bill G. Evans (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Bill, I think the best way to proceed will be if I do an overall copyedit of the article as part of the November Drive (including repairing the bare URLs), and then I think someone like yourself, who is knowledgeable on the topic, can fine-tune the article (e.g. updates, correcting accuracies, etc.). I will start on the copyediting today.-Soulparadox (talk) 02:00, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Sounds great, man. You contribute a lot of writing, here...Bill G. Evans (talk) 23:43, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
It's in the blood :-)--Soulparadox (talk) 02:17, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

I fact-checked the article; everything was correct. Nice! I showed the year on two recent projects, and cleaned up the wording on a line. That's all I can think of, unless you think other content stuff be written about. (If so, let me know.) Looking at the remaining warning tags, I don't see how any of them apply to the article. What do you think? Bill G. Evans (talk) 21:31, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Bear with me Bill, as I have had a lot on this week, so I will get around to looking at this article during the next week. Thanks for your patience.--Soulparadox (talk) 16:07, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
I can see you do a lot of work here; please excuse my tenacity. In the mean time, I removed the remaining warning tags, and started a talk section for discussion thereof. Bill G. Evans (talk) 14:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding Bill. I will have a look at the page now.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:54, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Bill, as I replied to your message on the article's Talk page, I have reinstated the "refimprove" tag as there are further citations that are needed (and that have been identified with tags throughout the article). Also, the section on the list of music that he has been involved with will need citations, in line with Wikipedia policy. I also edited the layout for consistency and Wiki standards.--Soulparadox (talk) 15:29, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Great work, as always. Thank you for showing how it's done. I'll get on those citations. Bill G. Evans (talk) 17:09, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi, just a note that I further replied on the page to your message. (Is there a way to PM in Wikipedia?) Bill G. Evans (talk) 23:57, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
I realize you're busy—I went ahead and changed the name of the discography section and removed the personal section (since it can't be referenced). Is it cool to then remove the reference tag? Bill G. Evans (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, again. Hey, I referenced all the citations you flagged...hopefully all is good. Could you please have a look when you have a chance? Cheers and thanks. Bill G. Evans (talk) 20:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
I have reviewed the page and have made a few changes after a little bit of cleanup—see what you think. Great work by the way.--Soulparadox (talk) 22:25, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Copyeditor Barnstar Hires.png The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Fast and furious! Bill G. Evans (talk) 23:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

GOCE November 2012 drive barnstar[edit]

CopyeditorStar7.PNG The Copyeditor's Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Soulparadox for copy editing 8 articles for a cumulative score of 30,985 words during the Guild of Copy Editors November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thank you for your fine contribution. --Stfg (talk) 14:24, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Skateboarding[edit]

Skateboard-cast-broken leg-690475-l.jpg

Howdy! I'm getting in contact with those members of WikiProject Skateboarding who seem to have been recently active on Wikipedia generally.

The project seems to have been fairly inactive over the last year or so and I was wondering if anyone in particular would have any interest in helping me "re-activate" it?

If you still have an interest in the Project and/or an interest in a bit of a Project-related editing drive, let me know.

Cheers, Stalwart111 01:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Would love to do this, as I am continuing to copyedit skate-related pages anyway. Let's do this!--Soulparadox (talk) 07:36, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Awesome! Thanks for getting back to me. I've posted a note about getting the project restarted on the Project talk page. You might want to suggest some things that need work or point out some things you're working on. Once we have a good list we can add everything to the general {{to do}} list on the Project page. Stalwart111 22:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar! Very nice of you! Stalwart111 06:47, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
No problems—let's get this thing back up-and-running--Soulparadox (talk) 06:54, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

DVS[edit]

No worries mate! Both were me - the new page and the redirect. The older DVS Shoe Company goes to the new DVS Shoes article. So the old link still works; just thought it would be worth updating them. But you should feel free to use whichever you think works in each article. In many cases it was the "old" company that was the sponsor so using the new name might not be accurate. That's why I "recreated" that title and redirected. Feel free to revert/edit as you see fit. You'll get no argument from me! All good! Stalwart111 08:39, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Whoa!![edit]

The blitz starts tomorrow. --Stfg (talk) 14:20, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

It is Saturday evening where I am, so I thought it had started from the "this weekend" that had been written. My apologies, I will start again tomorrow, but it appears to also be Saturday in your part of the world, based on the time of your comment?--Soulparadox (talk) 14:27, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Aha! I have just read the finer details, stating that the Blitz begins on Sunday, December 16, 2012. My apologies. Should I remove the article from my section, or can I just finish on Friday?--Soulparadox (talk) 14:29, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Let me think about that. Please note that blitzes and drives start and finish at UTC times. This matters because we want to be able to close them promptly, without considering when days of the week may start and end in different locales. I'll get back to you later. --Stfg (talk) 14:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank kindly :-)--Soulparadox (talk) 15:14, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Torchiest and I both think you should count today's edits, which are very useful after all, and your idea of finishing on Friday is good. As an alternative, you could also miss tomorrow if you prefer. Good luck. --Stfg (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
I appreciate the support and will finish on Friday, as I had planned to edit for the entire day today. Thanks again and I will ensure that I pay attention to the details for any future Blitzes or Drives.--Soulparadox (talk) 00:54, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

December Blitz barnstar[edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Please accept this barnstar for copy editing articles for a grand total of 13,971 words during the Guild of Copy Editors December 2012 Blitz. Merry Christmas! --Stfg (talk) 15:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Working out the details at Wikipedia:Today's article for improvement[edit]

The RFC for TAFI is nearing it's conclusion, and it's time to hammer out the details over at the project's talk page. There are several details of the project that would do well with wider input and participation, such as the article nomination and selection process, the amount and type of articles displayed, the implementation on the main page and other things. I would like to invite you to comment there if you continue to be interested in TAFI's development. --NickPenguin(contribs) 02:32, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar![edit]

Cleanup Barnstar Hires.png The Cleanup Barnstar
Awarded for your impressive efforts at The Berrics. Keep up the great work! Stalwart111 11:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: Lewis Marnell page[edit]

Absolutely, couldn't agree more. Between his entry in the X Games and Maloof Money Cup as well as sponsorship deals and general coverage, I'd say there's more than enough to justify an article. The significant coverage he has received over the last 24 hours puts "significant coverage" beyond doubt and his previous coverage means I don't think we would have WP:BLP1E concerns about his passing. I say go for it - I'm more than happy to help. Stalwart111 04:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Stalwart—I am onto it.--Soulparadox (talk) 06:42, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Had not much else to do so I created a place-holder stub at Lewis Marnell with enough info/refs/cats for it not to get SD'd. I know you were looking into what else could be added. There's at least one "hidden" reference in the code. It's not great but there are others from TWS that would likely give more biography-style info. Cheers, Stalwart111 01:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Wow, this is much appreciated. Will try to start today.--Soulparadox (talk) 02:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Awesome! I have linked to the article from some of the articles where you added a section about him. Might be worth adding at least that info so we can "main" tag across from some while keeping a section in Almost Skateboards and others where he was directly relevant. Stalwart111 02:53, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Got it. Thanks again.--Soulparadox (talk) 02:58, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Lewis Marnell at Nike Skateboarding[edit]

Re. your recent note at my talk page: I'm afraid that I know almost nothing about skateboarding, so I don't know how notable Lewis Marnell is, although I see that his name is redlinked. At the Nike Skateboarding article, he appears as one of a list of 22 professional members of the team, only three of whom are bluelinked. This leads me to question his notability. That being the case, it doesn't seem appropriate to devote so much emphasis to him in the Nike article.

The tone of the subsection on Marnell also seems entirely wrong, like a violation of WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Phrasing like "passed away" and "global skateboard community was shocked by the news", the rather extraneous detail about his recent marriage, and the blockquote from Nike's tribute site all make the subsection read more like a eulogy for Marnell than an encyclopedia entry.

If Marnell played a particularly significant role on the team (as opposed to being 1/22nd of it), it'd be appropriate to include a bit about his part on the team. If his death had a serious impact beyond the emotional on Nike—for instance, if it forced the cancellation of a major promotional tour, or occurred just when a Lewis Marnell shoe was about to hit the market—then it'd be appropriate to include a well-sourced passage on that.

I'll let you consider this and edit the page accordingly, since I assume that you're far more familiar with the skateboarding world than I. I'll watch the page, and will only stick my oar in again if it looks like it still fails WP:NOTMEMORIAL, or if there's something obvious that needs fixing. Ammodramus (talk) 02:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

This sounds fair to me and I have learned something through this process. Thank you and I will get onto the editing process for not only this page, but others that I have inserted this content into. Regards, --Soulparadox (talk) 02:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. At your talk page, I see that it looks like you and another editor are working up a Lewis Marnell article. Hope that turns out well for you. Ammodramus (talk) 02:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Just looked at the new Lewis Marnell article. I'm afraid that the "Death of Lewis Marnell" section strikes me as problematic. At any time that an athlete or other public figure dies young, there's going to be an outpouring of sentiments such as those quoted—it's a tragedy; he/she had so much to give; we're all devastated; etc., etc. Quoting them doesn't add anything meaningful to the reader's knowledge about Marnell, just because such sentiments, however deeply and genuinely they're felt, are so common.
I'd suggest paring the section down to some very limited details about the date, place, and cause of his death. If some kind of permanent public memorials are created—a park, a statue, or a mural on a public building—it'd be appropriate to mention them. However, an extensive collection of tweets and Facebook posts threatens to turn the article into a memorial website rather than a legitimate encyclopedia article. Ammodramus (talk) 04:16, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
The only reason I entered that content, is to document the public response to Marnell's death. The various publications are the key media sources in the area, SbA is the govt-funded organization for skateboarding in Australia, his Almost teammates are particularly significant due to the position that the board company holds in skateboarding, and O'neill and Rodriguez are not only senior Nike team members, but they are among the top-rated skateboarders globally today. I will remove the Fast Times Skateboarding section, but given that I will be expanding the remainder of the article and the Memorial policy applies specifically to user pages, shouldn't it be okay to keep this? Also, I will review the article again for emotive language, as I have been careful to not avoid the "he/she had so much to give; we're all devastated; etc., etc." sentiment you have mentioned. After consideration, I came to the conclusion that such content would not only facilitate the reader's understanding of the impact that Marnell had in the international skateboarding community, but also provide some insight into the organisations/individuals who published the tributes. I think it would also be useful to include the discussion of the Wikipedia Skateboarding group, so I will paste this into the Talk section of the page. Thanks again for the contribution and I look forward to your reply.--Soulparadox (talk) 04:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Livestrong Foundation[edit]

Hello. This isn't a big deal, but in my opinion, I don't think comments on discussions like this are necessary or helpful. The discussion is more than two years old, and it if happened to be on a talk page of a more heavily discussed article, it would have been archived long ago, meaning that continuing the discussion would have been prohibited. Currently it is still on the talk page but it's not helpful to contribute to very old discussions, since the original participants have long left it and are likely no longer tracking it. Trinitresque (talk) 23:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for choosing to remove it. However, outdated and obsolete discussions can still remain on talk pages. The only way to remove them from the talk page is by archiving them, which means moving them to an archived page. And this should be done only when the talk page is too long (larger than 75,000 bytes; the talk page is about 15,000 bytes now). So for now there is no reason for the outdated discussions can remain on the talk page. Trinitresque (talk) 02:20, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Ah, got it. Thanks again.--Soulparadox (talk) 02:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

My "politically-oriented" thanks[edit]

Thanks for correcting my mis-correction! I wasn't aware of this "no hyphens after adverbs ending in -ly" rule, but it seems to ring true. Not sure how I didn't know this one. Anyhow, thanks! sroc (talk) 03:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Don't worry, someone will probably find information contradicting this before you know it.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:49, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Modest Barnstar.png The Modest Barnstar
I award this barnstar to Soulparadox for copy editing four articles for a total of 5157 words in the GOCE January copy edit drive. Thanks for participating! --BDD (talk) 02:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Seven[edit]

Check out the Teahouse Genie Badge, awarded for solving issues on the Teahouse Wishlist.

Hello again! We have some neat updates about the Teahouse:

  • And...for all of your great work and all of the progress that you've helped the Teahouse make, we hereby award you the Host Badge:


Teahouse Host Badge Teahouse Host Badge
Awarded to hosts at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Experienced editors with this badge have committed to welcoming guests, helping new editors, and upholding the standards of the Teahouse by giving friendly and patient guidance—at least for a time.

Hosts illuminate the path for new Wikipedians, like Tōrō in a Teahouse garden.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here

Thanks again! Ocaasi 02:03, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Pappas brothers[edit]

Hi mate! Given your excellent work at Lewis Marnell, I was wondering if you had any interest in having a look at Tas Pappas and Ben Pappas, two other Australian skateboarders. I've added what I can from "mainstream" sources, but you seem to have a penchant for finding some of the less accessible stuff. Cheers, Stalwart111 08:48, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

More than heppy to do this and they were on my radar too—great kinds, huh? Will start today.--Soulparadox (talk) 01:16, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I figured you might have seen both articles :-) Check out Tas' Albury day-release vid on YouTube. Crazy stuff. Stalwart111 21:51, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Holy skateboard Batman! Awesome; hats off. Stalwart111 08:32, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks kindly, but I still have a fair amount to add. I just wanted to move to some other pages in the meantime to keep myself motivated.--Soulparadox (talk) 08:49, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Even better! I'll look forward to further additions, ha ha. Stalwart111 09:18, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

TAFI[edit]

Today's Article For Improvement star.svg

Hello,
In the past few days, Today's Articles for Improvement has gone through many changes.

  • We have modified the process for adding Nominations, which now uses a template/table format and requires only 3 supports for an article to be selected.
  • There is now a Holding Area, where articles are kept for discussion before being selected for a particular date.
  • The TAFI schedule now involves adding 10 articles weekly, chosen from a variety of topics.
  • We now have an Accomplishments page where we will be highlighting our older TAFI articles which have now become quality articles on the Wikipedia.

The Project is almost ready to hit the Main Page, where it will be occupying a section just below "Did you Know" section. Three article from the weekly batch of 7 will be displayed randomly at the main page, the format of which can be seen at the Main Page sandbox. There is also an ongoing discussion at the Main page talk over the final details before we can go forward with the Main Page.

If you have any ideas to discuss with everyone else, please visit the TAFI Talk Page and join in on the ongoing discussions there. You are also invited to add new nominations, and comment and suport on the current ones at the Nominations page. You can also help by helping in the discussions at the Holding Area.

Above all, please do not forget to improve our current Today's Articles for Improvement

Thank you and hoping to have some productive work from you at the Project,
TheOriginalSoni (talk) 11:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
(From the TAFI team)

The Teahouse Turns One![edit]

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


Teahouse First Birthday Badge Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Would you mind commenting?[edit]

I saw your comment on the talk of Lem Villemin, I have nominated it for deletion. Would you care to comment and help it guide towards a consensus? Thank you. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 14:49, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Chico Brenes[edit]

Given where I linked to it from, I imagine you'll see this in your watchlist. Am struggling to build a narrative - as always your contributions would be welcome! Stalwart111 08:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Demographics quote from the Atlantic[edit]

Thank you for this edit. The statistic is an important one and deserves to be in the article, but you changed it so that it is objective and not misleading. Good job. --GHcool (talk) 18:53, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

re: discography citations[edit]

It's a good question, sorry I don't have a firm answer. Different areas of wikipedia seem to hew to the citations standard in different ways - the fiction sections are rife with stuff that is often uncited but since it's all written by fanboys it is perhaps assumed to be correct. I think your best bet is to hang out with some of the music editors and get their sense of how much they require in terms of citations; I suppose if their name is listed in the album cover, that itself can serve as a citation, so the album itself is citation enough? Honestly I don't know - sorry I can't help more. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 20:34, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for this.--Soulparadox (talk) 04:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Huh[edit]

You need to re-evaluate what you're doing on wikipedia here. In the case of Mark Gonzales or Lance Mountain, a single sentence does not need its own header. Similar biography articles have maybe 4-5 sections, not the 20 you have designed. In the case of Transworld Skateboarding, your additions are just not appropriate for an encyclopedia. The extensive section on only 1 year of the TW awards does not make sense when there is no mention of any other year the awards were given. The 30 most influential skaters too is not appropriate and could even be violating copyrights. Just try to use some better logic. Cosprings (talk) 14:34, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up Cosprings. I have been editing the articles in this way with a view to developing them over time and I thought the sub-sections would help with clarity, but it looks as though I am going into too much detail. It would be great to get further insight into the copyright issue, as I am unsure of where you are coming from with this. Regards,--Soulparadox (talk) 06:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Magazines object to when "top lists" are published publicly. Such is the case with lists from Rolling Stone, etc. Much better. Keep up the good work.Cosprings (talk) 12:35, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Was not aware of this—thank you kindly Cosprings.--Soulparadox (talk) 04:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Happy Easter!!![edit]

Happy Easter!

So a print encyclopedia, a strawberry shortcake, and a sycamore walk into a bar - wait, have you heard this one? (talk) 22:39, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

No I haven't, but thank you all the same!--Soulparadox (talk) 00:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)


Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds[edit]

Please read WP:ENGVAR as to why a plural is needed for collectives, e.g. bands, in British English. Hence "Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds ARE a rock band", "Queen ARE a rock band", etc. Articles in American English treat collectives in the singular (e.g., "Nirvana IS a rock band", etc.) Also, please be more specific about references that you are looking for in the article. CN tags are more helpful than a Refneeded tag at the head, especially for an article with 19 sources. I don't see the lack that you see. CCS81 (talk) 00:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

No, I have read the section (thank you for the link) and in British English the application of the rule is based upon the meaning; that is, if the numerous components of a collective noun are being referred to, then "are" is appropriate. You will see that this applies in a latter part of the Lead section, where "have" is appropriate, as the members are being discussed. However, the first sentence is an explanation of what the title "Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds" is, and that is clearly the single entity of "a band"—otherwise, this would be more appropriate as a sub-section of the Nick Cave page, as the use of "are" implies that the "Bad Seeds" are a separate entity. Also, I am in the process of enhancing the tone of the article (so that it reads less like a fan page) and inserting citations (where I can find them), or tags when I cannot find a reputable citation.--Soulparadox (talk) 00:44, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
I wrote this before I saw your reply: Re: the first sentence of the Bad Seeds article, see also WP:PLURALS and Collective noun. Also, compare the opening sentences in the Queen and Smile articles, British bands with singular noun band names, to the opening sentences of Bad Brains and The Dead Milkmen, American bands with plural noun band names. Trust me, this issue comes up a lot. But I assure you, you have misinterpreted the sentence in the MOS and you are thinking in terms of American English only (which is also what I speak and think in.) Bands are perceived as collectives in British English, it is not singular. Again, please look at some other articles in British English and you will see what I mean. Also recommended: The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, etc. All of these have plural verbs in their opening sentences. As for the Bad Seeds article, fix away. CCS81 (talk) 00:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
All I am asking is that you interpret the MOS excerpt that you sent me and apply it to the band-related issue—is it really that difficult? Apologies, as I considered the request straightforward. Thanks anyway (I will ask another copyeditor for assistance).--Soulparadox (talk) 01:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
I thought I did that. Let me try again: "Some collective nouns may refer either to a single entity or to the members that compose it." This is referring to the possible verb conjugations in American or British English, respectively. A collective noun could be a band name. "In British English, such words are sometimes treated as singular, but more often treated as plural, according to context." This tells us that they should be plural. Your problem is that you are hung up on this issue of context: you think the context here is treating the band as a singular thing. But this does not happen in British English. This is not what is meant by "context". The context is what follows: "Exceptionally, names of towns and countries usually take singular verbs (unless they are being used to refer to a team or company by that name, or when discussing actions of that entity's government). For example, in England are playing Germany tonight, England refers to a football team; but in England is the most populous country of the United Kingdom, it refers to the country. In North American English, these words (and the United States, for historical reasons) are almost invariably treated as singular; the major exception is when sports teams are referred to by nicknames that are plural nouns, when plural verbs are commonly used to match. See also National varieties of English above." So the problem is your hangup on the phrase "according to context." Does this help? CCS81 (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes, this is clearer, but the use of the words "could" and "usually" means that exceptions exist and, as the band matter is not specifically covered, how can you be sure?--Soulparadox (talk) 02:19, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
The exceptions are what follows (beginning with the word "Exceptionally..."). Band names are not listed in the prose that covers the exceptions. The other way to be sure is to step away from the MOS and look at the language in action by reading the other articles. If you're going to be in the Copy Editor's Guild, you're going to need to look more closely at the precedent in articles and also take seriously talk page consensuses, not merely stumble over the opaque wording in the MOS. CCS81 (talk) 02:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

GOCE March drive barnstar![edit]

Cleanup Barnstar Hires.png The Cleanup Barnstar
For your working cleaning up 12,000 words during the Guild of Copy Editors March 2013 Backlog Elimination Drive, please accept this token of appreciation from the Guild. We hope you'll be back in May to help again. —Torchiest talkedits 01:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Soulparadox. You have new messages at Rybec's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Grocon[edit]

If you put the two references together, 7:30 report is stating that MCC did not issue a pocket: "What's unclear is who was responsible for ensuring the wall was safe and whether the attached hoarding had a permit. Early this week, Melbourne City Council said it didn't issue one and sheeted responsibility for the site home to the State Planning Minister." And The Australian states that Planning Minister Matthew Guy said he had approved a permit for the construction of Grocon's "Portrait" apartment development on the site but not the hoarding. Does this not establish that neither the Planning Department nor Melbourne City Council had issued a permit for the hoarding? The CFMEU blog you added is a good reference, but their reluctance to be specific about the permit issue is them being over cautious about stating their case, which is not surprising seeing as they are engaged in such a big legal battle with Grocon. I think based on the first two references it is reasonable to state that there was no permit. Djapa Owen (talk) 22:21, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your Chrissy Amphlett edits[edit]

Hi, I'm curious as to why you reverted the two column format used for the references in the Chrissy Amphlett article, back to one? Not criticising, just interested. I can see you are a very experienced editor, I have only been actively editing for about 3 months & continually learning about layout/formatting etc. Cheers Melbourne3163 (talk) 18:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

I am glad that you have asked this question, as I have intuitively created two columns when the number of references is over twenty. This is based on what I have observed in more notable pages, but I need to find out if a policy exists for this topic. If you find anything, please let me know.--Soulparadox (talk) 10:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Smokey's Haunt[edit]

I see you added the Urthboy#Smokey's Haunt (2012) section to the Urthboy article last October. In November, Jax 0677 created the Smokey's Haunt article as a redirect to the Urthboy#Albums section (curiously, not to the section for the album, but I'll fix that for now). I was wondering whether either of you might be intending to turn Smokey's Haunt into a full-blown article? Someone should, but I thought you might be better placed given the work you've put in to date. sroc (talk) 14:35, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi sroc. I have not given thought to this idea, so I will need to undertake some research and take it from there. I am open to doing it, but will need to find out more on the topic, as I have not even heard the album.--Soulparadox (talk) 17:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
The beauty of Wikipedia — No original research means you don't have to! Adapting the section from the Urthy article should be a good start, add an infobox and the tracklist and we should be there! I'll have a crack if you don't get to it first. sroc (talk) 06:15, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
What about notability sroc?--Soulparadox (talk) 06:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
What of it? Addressing the criteria at Notability:
  • "Significant coverage": your section in the Urthy article already has six citations specifically about the album or the accompanying tour;
  • "Reliable": sources include Triple J and ARIA;
  • "Sources": only one source is Elefant Tracks, and only two citations are from the same source (Triple J), so good diversity;
  • "Independent of the subject": see above;
  • "Presumed": the range of information and sources is comparable with similar articles (e.g., other Urthy albums) and more information/sources may become available over time as the album continues to garner exposure.
Do you agree? sroc (talk) 11:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Anyway, see for yourself! Smokey's Haunt sroc (talk) 11:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Wow, great job! I will continue to add to it if anything else comes up.--Soulparadox (talk) 19:58, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, but I was really just working from the building blocks that were already there and the content you had already provided. Please do keep improving it wherever you can. sroc (talk) 23:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Will do sir!--Soulparadox (talk) 23:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Stephen Hawking[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to the Hawking article. I hope you understand that this is a featured article, and the information about the man's political opinions on this particular issue is a bit of a minor issue and not really due a whole section in the general scheme of things! He has hit the headlines a few times about such things, but based on what we know so far, it certainly doesn't need much of a mention- and a brief mention as been included already. I do appreciate that you have improved the article even after your edits has been reverted a couple of times. Thank you very much !! --Slp1 (talk) 00:41, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

No problem—your reasoning is sound. However, I spaced out some of the paragraphs as there were several particularly long sections.--Soulparadox (talk) 01:24, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Golden Era Mixtape 2013[edit]

I created an article for the Golden Era Mixtape 2013 — someone had to — but I could use some help padding it out and inserting some references. Reckon you could have a looksee when you get a chance? sroc (talk) 11:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes, someone definitely had to—great work! I will look at it this week sroc.--Soulparadox (talk) 11:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Great work, thanks! FYI, I noticed you've replicated an error I was making for ages and only recently picked up on. When using the {{cite}} template (or using the template tool in the editor), put the whole date of the cited page in the date field, not separated over the date, month and year fields.
This:

{{cite web|title=Golden Era Records Cypher - Featuring Briggs, Vents, Funkoars, Hilltop Hoods & K21|url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrlSeKv9AOs|work=YouTube|publisher=Google, Inc|accessdate=20 May 2013|author=GoldenEraRecords|format=Video upload|date=24|month=January|year=2013}}

produces this reference:

GoldenEraRecords (24). "Golden Era Records Cypher - Featuring Briggs, Vents, Funkoars, Hilltop Hoods & K21" (Video upload). YouTube. Google, Inc. Retrieved 20 May 2013.

whereas this:

{{cite web|title=Golden Era Records Cypher - Featuring Briggs, Vents, Funkoars, Hilltop Hoods & K21|url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrlSeKv9AOs|work=YouTube|publisher=Google, Inc|accessdate=20 May 2013|author=GoldenEraRecords|format=Video upload|date=24 January 2013}}

produces this reference:

GoldenEraRecords (24 January 2013). "Golden Era Records Cypher - Featuring Briggs, Vents, Funkoars, Hilltop Hoods & K21" (Video upload). YouTube. Google, Inc. Retrieved 20 May 2013.

I've bolded the differences so you can see them clearly. I was doing the same thing for as long as I can remember before I realised anything was amiss. The fields in the template tool are rather confusing about this and I've already raised it as an issue elsewhere.[1][2] sroc (talk) 11:26, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
[3] sroc (talk) 12:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
sroc, you have resolved an issue that bothered me for so long that I ended up forgetting about it. Finally! Thank you sir.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Happy to help. It was so obscure I didn't realise what was happening for the longest time. I'm working on getting the RefTemplate tool fixed but I can't fix it myself! sroc (talk) 10:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
This is not my area of expertise, but be sure to let me know if I can help out in any way.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)


Skateboarding Article[edit]

I would like to invite you to assist me with a large comprehensive edit I have been working on for the skateboarding article since Oct 2012 located in my sandbox here: User:Tinkermen/SandboxGH

This edit has turned out to be very large based on the amount of history in skateboarding & I could use some help in completing the edit by having other editors to collaborate with me during this time, as I have have not had any time to work on the edit since around Dec 2012. I hope you will join me in this effort, I will also leave a couple of other editors this same message.Tinkermen (talk) 21:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the invitation—I will try my best to contribute.--Soulparadox (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions[edit]

You asked for a reason for the edit. The reason is WP:BRD, see the talk page for a discussion. The page is under 1RR, would you mind reverting back to my version with the BRD edit summery? TippyGoomba (talk) 21:00, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification, as it was not evident in the Edit summary.--Soulparadox (talk) 21:06, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Renovation and the Athena Institute report[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Soulparadox. You have new messages at Talk:Renovation.
Message added -- Trevj (talk) 10:10, 20 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Urthboy/Smokey's Haunt[edit]

Good pick-up on disambiguating the link Paul KellyPaul Kelly (musician) in the Smokey's Haunt article. I've replicated this in the Urthboy article, which I think is where it came from (I probably copied it without realising). sroc (talk) 09:12, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

No problem. I have made this error innumerable times!--Soulparadox (talk) 11:00, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Boat Arrivals image POV[edit]

A discussion is underway at [4] about whether more detail needs to be added to the boat arrivals image to improve its POV. Please have a look and contribute. Djapa Owen (talk) 04:58, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

IRC office hours for wiki-mentors and Snuggle users[edit]

Hi. We're organizing an office hours session with the Teahouse to bring in mentors from across the wiki to try out Snuggle and discuss it's potential to support mentorship broadly. The Snuggle team would appreciate it if you would come and participate in the discussion. We'll be having it in #wikimedia-officeconnect on Wed. July 17th @ 1600 UTC. See the agenda for more info. --EpochFail(talkwork), Technical 13 (talk), TheOriginalSoni (talk) 18:57, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

LGBT rights in Scotland[edit]

What are the remaining "bare URLs" in this article? You reverted my deletion of the template after I fixed them. AfricaTanz (talk) 10:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Citations 4, 5, 6, 9, and 10.--Soulparadox (talk) 11:06, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps you should review the meaning of "bare URL" for this purpose. None of the citations you listed fits that definition. I am eliminating the template on that basis. AfricaTanz (talk) 11:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
You may find those acceptable, but I will fix them today.--Soulparadox (talk) 05:21, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
What you find acceptable has nothing to do with the proper use of the template. AfricaTanz (talk) 06:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
In which case, you should have inserted the more accurate template, rather than try and over-protect the status of an article in an unusual manner. Did you write the article, or do you have some other kind of connection to it? Over-zealous may be understating it.--Soulparadox (talk) 06:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
That is okay, I have done it for you, as per the last occasion. Keep flying the flag sir!--Soulparadox (talk) 06:32, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Do you know how to check the edit history of an article? Do you know what WP:AGF requires? I suggest you study up before you get blocked for incivility. Cheers. AfricaTanz (talk) 08:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Your tone is not civil sir/madam. That is simply the point I was making.--Soulparadox (talk) 08:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Nike[edit]

Hi! from Adrian. You have reverted my addition to the Nike, Inc. article, where I added a simple pronunciation guide of "nigh-kee". You said that the "IPA hyperlink is sufficient". I disagree, I think my simple guide should be there as well. Why not give the reader the phonetic pronunciation AND the IPA? The more interested reader can check the IPA while the general reader can pass on and not be distracted by going away from the article on a link. I imagined that the reader would be helped by my addition so why was it not acceptable? Best wishes - Adrian Pingstone (talk) 16:23, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the communication, but let's discuss it on the Nike Talk page. I will ask about your query there.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:35, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: Rodney Mullen[edit]

Wow, that was some of the neatest copy-editing I have seen in 8 years of doing this. The shortness of your User Contribs page is nearly confounding. But excellent work, really nicely done. Eaglizard (talk) 00:12, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

This week's articles for improvement - 22 July 2013 to 28 July 2013[edit]

This week's article for improvement is:

Exploration

Kazimierz Nowak in jungle 2.jpg

Kazimierz Nowak on exploration through the Rwenzori Mountains in Africa


Please be bold and help to improve this article!

posted by Northamerica1000(talk) 13:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

I've added an opt-in section for those interested in receiving TAFI notifications on the project's main page, located here. Those that don't opt-in won't receive this message again. Also, a revised notification template has been created, located at Template:TAFI weekly selections notice. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)


Just taking note of some talk going on in the background...[edit]

User talk:Minphie#Just a reminder, whatever you doStigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 09:45, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Good Gracious[edit]

FYI, I've created the article Good Gracious. Any contributions you could add would be appreciated, as always! sroc 💬 13:19, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

It would be a pleasure as always sir.--Soulparadox (talk) 15:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: Proposal for deletion due to notability issue[edit]

Yeah, agree there are some major notability issues there. I just can't see how the subject might be considered notable for having won one minor award. There certainly doesn't seem to be enough coverage to substantiate a pass against WP:GNG. Probably best to take it to AFD. Stalwart111 04:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for this Stalwart. However, I am uncertain on how to proceed (also, there are a few other articles that are at a similar stage).--Soulparadox (talk) 06:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm more than happy to nominate it for deletion if you wish. I'm comfortable enough with the subject matter to do so. Stalwart111 07:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
That would be wonderful sir!--Soulparadox (talk) 01:32, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done - please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braydon Szafranski. Cheers, Stalwart111 06:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
WikiThanks
Thank you for the way you've managed this, Stalwart111.--Soulparadox (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

KFC[edit]

Hi. You reverted an edit at KFC. The removal of material actually isn't unexplained - if you take a look at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/KFC/archive4 you will see why it was done, though i don't think the editor's edit summary may have flagged it clearly. Can you take a look, and consider whether you want to self-revert, or alternatively you might want to put a different view at the FAC? Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 06:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Ahh, thank you. I tried searching for what "c/e" means, but I had no success. I think your points are valid, but I think it is worth revising the content, as the concept store seems to signify a turning point for the corporation. If the consensus after the revision is the same, then I have no problem with a deletion. I appreciate the clarity.--Soulparadox (talk) 06:35, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
I think they may hope it will be a turning point, but at the moment it's a marketing label, a patio, and a dunny ;-). Anyway, thanks for the input. Oh and c/e = copy edit. Really removing a para is more than a copy edit, so even if you knew what it meant, you would have been confused! Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 12:23, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
WikiThanks
Thank you for the way you've managed this, Hamiltonstone.----Soulparadox (talk) 03:13, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Symbol opinion vote.svg- re:"... What c/e means..." see Wikipedia:Edit_summary_legend which has this and other similar crptic contractions. Regards 220 of Borg 16:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you!--Soulparadox (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

CCS.com[edit]

I merged it to Foot Locker#CCS the other day, but didn't change it to a redirect. I'll do that now. —rybec 23:42, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Toby Zoates concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Toby Zoates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

You need to become familiar with the guidelines[edit]

Your reverts and your tendentious attitude about trying to be right needs to be checked. Please read the guidelines before reverting. Your reverts imply that you are unfamiliar with them. JOJ Hutton 00:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Can you please use a respectful and polite tone. Otherwise, I would appreciate that you refrain from posting on my Talk page. Especially if your intent is to make unfounded, emotional accusations. Warm regards,--Soulparadox (talk) 00:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Then become familiar with the guidelines before you start using them to revert edits. It shows a lack of competancy. JOJ Hutton 00:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Not only have you put forward another unfounded accusation, but you misspelt "competency". Please refrain from this disrespectful form of communication as of now, as Wikipedia is not the forum for you to vent due to underlying problems you may be experiencing in meatspace. Or, if that is not the case, then please show me the respect that all humans are entitled to. Manners and politeness are important attributes; even in the 21st century. Thank you kindly again.--Soulparadox (talk) 00:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
If you wish to have respect on Wikipedia then learn you need to earn it with competent editing. And why does it matter how I spelled a word? Editing on a iPhone is a pain in the ass enough, without people pointing out minor spelling errors. Sorry if a minor spelling error on a iPhone wasn't good enough for you. Undoing edits is disrespectful to begin with. Especially when the reasons are wrong. So if you want respect then earn respect. JOJ Hutton 00:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
In response to your inquiry on my talk page, in the lead of the guideline it says it applies to all articles using the name. Through various conversations, "United States" is ok in the infobox, but its redundant and unnecessary in the body. JOJ Hutton 00:46, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear sir, I have earned more than enough respect on Wikipedia. Given that we have never interacted before, don't you think it is best to START with respect and then proceed? I can see you have health issues, so I wish you all the best with them and I hope that you can find more suitable forums to achieve release from pain, or whatever it is you are experiencing. Kind regards,--Soulparadox (talk) 02:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
You may notice that not many articles put "United States" in the body of the article. It's ok as it is in the infobox, but not in the body of the article. None if her other family members are formatted as such. This article wasn't either until you added it. JOJ Hutton 03:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
I guess consistency means that it is best to write the article in line with the other family member articles; however, I am a firm believer in the "world view" aspect of Wikipedia and I would like to think that readers in remote areas of China or somewhere in northern India, places where there are so many of the world's people, can come across a city and find out that it is in the US or Australia, or wherever it is, without needing to do a search. Of course, 90% of people in our nations of birth would immediately know what "New York" is referring to, but I don't wish to make that assumption for the billions of others on the planet who may not possess such familiarity with Western bodies of knowledge.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
@Jojhutton: and Soulparadox: you seem to be having trouble agreeing on this. How about dispute resolution instead of just reverting each other? —rybec 06:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the suggestion, but I am happy for the other copyeditor to prevail in this instance. I never joined the Wikipedia community to lose my ability to healthily detach from all things. While Wikipedia is related to my self-esteem, it does not underpin it and there are millions of other articles for me to assist with. In fact, I am proceeding with the improvement of an article right now.--Soulparadox (talk) 06:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Royal Mail[edit]

Hi, thanks for your help with Royal Mail. Having identified where citations are needed, would you mind helping me out by finding some references to put in place? Cloudbound (talk) 14:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Sure thing. No-one ever asks, so I commend you for doing so. I have plenty of other pages on my Watchlist, so bear with me in terms of pace. Regards,--Soulparadox (talk) 04:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

You are at three reverts[edit]

One more may result in a block. Please discuss Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


Needle exchange programme on dispute resolution noticeboard[edit]

Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Needle_Exchange_Programme:Talk Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 03:23, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your update - Essendon Football Club Supplements controversy[edit]

Hi, I just read your update and thought I would let you know that the AFL CEO totally refutes the article you have referenced. I live in Melbourne and I heard him on radio 3AW this morning and he was damning in his condemnation of the article's author. Just thought I would let you know. Regards Melbourne3163 (talk) 08:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Lorde: Early life - edit clash?[edit]

Hello :) I was editing Lorde#Early life, whilst you were editing Lorde overall. Upon saving, I checked your diff's, in the section, and it seemed we were editing from a similar PoV and that your changes were, broadly, a sub-set of mine. Thus, I've overwritten the section with my edit, en mass. Please check the section, to ensure that none of your contributions have been mistakenly obliterated. — Best, DjScrawl (talk) 19:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

2013 Korean crisis[edit]

Why are you deleted my edits in the article of 2013 Korean crisis and there is a source here, Thanks. --Mohatatou (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Done![edit]

Space has now been established at Wikipedia:WikiProject Skateboarding/Notability / WP:NSKATEBOARDER. Strangely, someone had already posted to the corresponding talk page which I will amend into a discussion space for draft criteria.

I put you down as a contact, hope you don't mind. I'm happy to have a crack at it but if you had ideas for an "initial" draft set of criteria, feel free to post them up.

Cheers, Stalwart111 01:57, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyediting request[edit]

Hi Soulp. Thanks for the thanks.

I noticed you are part of the Copyeditors Guild. Wonder if you might be willing to take a look at SpaceX reusable rocket launching system? That is an article that I wrote over the past few months, and following a launch tomorrow morning that does the first high-altitude, high-velocity test of their controlled descent and deceleration technology, I expect that article to begin getting quite a bit more eyes on it.

Thanks for considering. N2e (talk) 04:30, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

I don't see why this should be a problem. Bear with me, though, as I may not move as quickly as you need me to :-)--Soulparadox (talk) 04:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi again, Soulp. I'm still quite interested in getting that article reviewed by a good copyeditor, and would love to have you do it if you can make the time.
I am planning on inviting a review of the article by the Spaceflight WikiProject against the B-class criteria in early December, and then plan to endeavor to move it to a Good article by the time of the first attempted land return of a booster stage—which will be a first-time event in the History of technology—which is currently scheduled for as early as February 2014.
So please do let me know what you're thinking about it now. Cheers. N2e (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey N2e, unfortunately this has become lost in the myriad projects that I have on my agenda at present. Please do not be disheartened this and, I am glad to see the persistence that you continue to apply to the flourishing of the page! At this stage, I can commit to protecting the page against vandalism and will review the new additions for grammar, spelling, etc.--Soulparadox (talk) 15:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know about the limitations on your time and availability. I believe I will make a request over at the Guild of Copyeditors then, so that we can get 'er done prior to an intent to push it to a Good article by a couple of months from now. But remember, you are always welcome to drop by and give a section or two a serious read and copyedit. This is an interesting set of technologies, and is poised to be transformative to spaceflight. Best to you, N2e (talk) 16:20, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for adding newer information to the HTC article. Zach Vega (talk to me) 05:47, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Needle exchange dispute escalated to a request for mediation[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Needle exchange programme

Please add any relevant thoughts or comments. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 19:20, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Tom Schaar article[edit]

Hi. Just wondering what else is needed to improve the this article. Let me know and I can try to help.

Labeach2002 (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for the correspondence! I will post stuff onto your Talk page--Soulparadox (talk) 15:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Amanda Palmer[edit]

I won't hit you with the standard template warning for this, but please take the advice you just left me on my talk page, stop reverting, and take it to the talk page until you can get consensus for your additions. If you keep reverting, you may be in violation of WP:3RR and in danger of being blocked for it. In this particular case, Wikipedia:Recentism would probably also be worth reviewing. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:55, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Vogue[edit]

Just wanted to thank you for your eye on the article. As a newbie it's a great help to see your approach. Best - Hec44 (talk) 18:59, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Terry Richardson[edit]

I reverted your Terry Richardson edit because if you check the article you'll find an update that it is satire/parody and not true. (And there is no such magazine as People With Money.) Box99Tube (talk) 02:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

No need to explain. Check your Talk page!--Soulparadox (talk) 02:27, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Just did, thanks. Box99Tube (talk) 02:30, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

New Balance[edit]

Hi. Thanks for your thoughts on the recent edits I made to the New Balance article! Best Wishes. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc (talk) 14:58, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Alexei Sayle[edit]

Hi. Regarding the cycling, Alexei has always been a keen cyclist. I certainly remember him talking about it in the 80s. The citation provided by Cordless Larry is dated June 2010, but the article referenced talks about "30 years of cycling round London". I appreciate your efforts in keeping the page accurate - along with myself you are the main contributor. I think it would be clearer just to state "He is a keen cyclist", rather than "as of July 2010". I'll change the wording - hope you don't mind!

Thanks,

Scrabble1968 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your kind message about the Australian KFC picture. Glad you liked it. :) Mr Stan Zemanek (talk) 12:41, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Amy Winehouse[edit]

Please read my note on the Talk page about my reasonings for taking that section out. thanks--Aichik (talk) 14:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks!--Soulparadox (talk) 14:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Ryan Sheckler article[edit]

Hi there. I have just gotten your message. I was reading your talk page and I realized you like skateboarding and languages and I do too. I have a bachelors degree in English education. I used to be a skateboarder , but I quit because of collage. I finished collage and I go skateboarding from time to time since I am married and I have two kids. Spanish is my first language. I learned English when I was a kid. I love speaking English , but I do not speak the language that often due to the fact that I have nobody to speak with .

regards OswaldoTatask89 (talk) 19:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for Your kindness[edit]

Dear Soulparadox, I hadn't been aware anyone noticed me being around. I am as you may have noticed a complete beginner in the savvy world of Wikipedia. Until only recently it was a secret to me how to contact other users directly. You have my admiration and respect for being such a prolific contributor and reviewer. It is only now that I begin to understand how much work needs to be done beforehand when writing an article on a specific subject. And it is only now that I understand that being negligent about the FIVE PILLARS generates a manifold of work for numerous people working behind the scenes to create the Wikipedia I have accustomed myself to take as granted. I cannot see how I could possibly ever write a whole article. Actually, this has never been my goal when I created my Wikipedia account. My intention has been to correct in passing by the little and often undramatic mistakes everybody makes. When I'm already on that page why shouldn't I , hopefully for the benefit of all other users, make the changes instead of leaving the issue to someone stumbling over it by accident, again. As you can see I'm not a real virtuoso in the use of commata. I would really be glad, if anyone had any hints on where to find a concise compilation of the rules of punctuation in the english language(s). Don't bother, I'm already looking for it myself. Thank you very much, anyway. Yours, --Pichanmoesix (talk) 23:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Elizabeth[edit]

Hello Soulparadox, I just wanted to let you know that I deleted the section you added about Holden on the Elizabeth, South Australia Wikipedia page not because the information was wrong but because the Holden factory is in the suburb of Elizabeth South, South Australia and the article is for the suburb of Elizabeth, South Australia. Maybe you could add the information to the Elizabeth South Wikipedia page. Mirrabooka (talk) 17:14, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Good to know. Thanks for the heads up!--Soulparadox (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

My proxy has been blocked mistakenly![edit]

{{unblock|I have been editing from my home internet connection for over six months, after I moved in. I don't understand what the problem is, as I am not technically knowledgeable. However, I do use a password to connect to my wifi.--Soulparadox (talk) 01:44, 13 November 2013 (UTC)}}

I've disabled your unblock request since you have resumed editing outside your talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:47, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Thanks for keeping things encyclopedic on the KFC page Mr Stan Zemanek (talk) 1:32, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Dexter[edit]

Hi. I gave a whole explanation of my edit on Dexter on the talk page. Why did you revert it without a single word as to your motivation? PizzaMan (talk 07:31, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Wow, I am unsure of what you mean, so give me some time to check it out. My edits are always with good faith, so I apologize if I have been unfair.--Soulparadox (talk) 15:41, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

IMDb is not a reliable source.[edit]

Please see WP:FILM/R. IMDb is specifically cited as an unreliable source that can not be used on Wikipedia. Please do not add these unreliable sources back. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the reminder. After first reading about this policy, I did not use IMDB, but then encountered its use far too may times to discount it in further edits. I will be more careful from now on.--Soulparadox (talk) 18:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I agree that it's easy to get confused, especially when you see it done so extensively in other articles. The same thing can happen to your grammar when you read too many Internet forum posts. Sorry that I was a bit curt. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
No, you were clear and straightforward. No problems at all.--Soulparadox (talk) 22:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Re I Am Kloot[edit]

Hello. Thanks for your message explaining your revert - it doesn't sound pompous at all. It is a major bugbear of mine that lazy writers use plurals when singulars are accurate; it just grates on my sensibilities like a fingernail on a blackboard. Most style guides agree with me. However, The Guardian's style guide - one of the most respected certainly for UK English says:

singular or plural?
Corporate entities take the singular: eg The BBC has decided (not "have"). In
subsequent references make sure the pronoun is singular: "It [not "they"] will press for
an increase in the licence fee."
Sports teams and rock bands are the exception – "England have an uphill task" is OK,
as is "Nirvana were overrated"

I don't agree with that (apart from Nirvana being overrated) - it is, after all, a guide, but to be honest I don't really mind. There are lots of more annoying examples of music journalese that should be stamped out in what is, after all, an encyclopaedia and not a music magazine. Examples are the sloppiness of using "bass" when what is meant is "bass guitar" (if "bass" is ever used it should be following with a disambig tag!); "featured/featuring" instead of "with" or "has" - featured means that something stands out from the rest. (One of the worst examples was an article on an album which said the album featured 12 tracks!) Similarly "debut" (a noun) for "first" (an ordinal number) - I saw one article on a band which had four debut albums (a new one each time it changed label!) and a similar number fo debut singles. Another one is that bands do not form: a band is a collection of individuals and it is they who from the band, hence "the band was formed". There is no need for The Mouth to appear in quotes - I Am Kloot doesn't.

Anyway, that's enough of my pet things. I've put some of these back but I concede the singular/plural issue. Emeraude (talk) 10:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

That was, by far, the best message I have ever received on my Talk page. I am glad that I am not as annoying a copyeditor as I think!--Soulparadox (talk) 05:46, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Elliott Smith Official Autopsy Report[edit]

I provided a reference for you earlier this year at User_talk:Woodywoodpeckerthe3rd#Elliott_Smith_info regarding the fact that the coroner was unable to make a determination on suicide or homicide. The official autopsy report states (in discussing the possibility of homicide or suicide) that 'the mode of death is undetermined at this time', it is available here http://www.thesmokinggun.com/file/rockers-autopsy-doesnt-rule-out-homicide?page=3 Please stop reverting editors who are rightfully removing him from suicide categories. Regards Woodywoodpeckerthe3rd (talk) 09:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

I was unclear, as no reason was given, that is all. I had no intention of distorting the truth.--Soulparadox (talk) 17:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
No worries Woodywoodpeckerthe3rd (talk) 21:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Coral reef[edit]

Given your recent reversion, can you please point me to the guideline which states that academic journal citations must have the access date rather than the year of publication. Thanks. --Epipelagic (talk) 20:06, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

I didn't state that it is a case of one or the other - both sets of data need to be included as part of the citation.--Soulparadox (talk) 20:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
That may be your personal opinion. However, personal opinions don't count. What counts is what is in the guidelines. Where is the relevant guideline which conforms to your opinion? --Epipelagic (talk) 10:12, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
The year of publication is an essential part of practically all journal citations. Use of access dates is not mentioned in the guidelines, but common sense says that access dates should not be necessary if a journal has a permanent identifier such as a doi. On the other hand, references with non-permanent urls to online copies of the article may suffer link rot like any other url, so again, use your common sense on this point.
Also, the copyright status of online copies of journal articles is often uncertain. One difference between journal articles and web pages is that a web page and downloadable documents associated with the page can disappear without a trace (internet archives don't manage to preserve everything), but the great majority of journal articles, especially recent ones, are permanently archived in one form or another; you can access the great majority of worthwhile journals from any university library. The only purpose of an access date would be to document the existence of an online copy of possibly uncertain legal status. Therefore, my preference is to omit access dates as non-essential, but YMMV. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 11:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
My understanding is that the access date is necessary to avoid link rot (and possibly other issues too), but I will consider this an education. I will continue to do both. Thank you to you both!--Soulparadox (talk) 20:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Your understanding is incorrect. Adding an access date does not "avoid link rot". Apart from pointlessly adding access dates, your edit removed the publication years from the citations. Since you have not reverted the mess yourself, I have reverted it for you. --Epipelagic (talk) 06:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for that, as I thought you had sorted it out. I am a lifelong learner, so I'll count this as yet another one learned. Thank you!--Soulparadox (talk) 06:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Okay :) --Epipelagic (talk) 06:13, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
I can see adding access dates when citing an online journal without a persistent identifier such a doi. There do exist some, and I treat these exceptions as I would any other web page. Otherwise, I see no point to an access date. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 09:00, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Enough[edit]

Your network problem is not anyone else's problem. The link is archived in wayback countless time check here. I can pull up other users also to whom the link is viewable. But just because it does not appear to you does not mean you can remove and revert a valid addition. This is going borderline disruptive. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 05:22, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Yes, but it goes to an archive page for Much Music, titled "Archive for the ‘News’ Category". I need to revert again - please check again.--Soulparadox (talk) 05:26, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
You are totally lying you know that. The archive link for 2007 clearly states the article. Want to know what it writes?
"Ludacris in new Guy Ritchie Film
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
Rapper turned actor Ludacris scored a role in the latest Guy Ritchie film RocknRolla. The Atlanta native will be starting next to 300 star Gerard Butler, Tom Wilkinson and actress Thandie Newton. Guy Ritchie already started filming last week in London."
You can either revert your own edit since you already crossed 3RR, else I will take this to WP:ANI. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 05:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
I am unsure why you are being so emotional about this, as I don't see the enjoyment in this kind of interaction on Wikipedia. I will leave it and ask people on the Talk page. Please, just calm down, as I don't think even Mr. Ritchie would be this emotional. Take it easy.--Soulparadox (talk) 05:38, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
I can hardly care about what Mr. Ritchie feels or wants, you are being completely disruptive and you know it. I have raised this to both the talk page and the WP:RS noticeboard and this will be answered sooner or later. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 05:40, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
I don't think I can convince you, but the URL I was finding was the faulty one that you identify in your Talk contribution. It appears to be correct now, so are you okay?--Soulparadox (talk) 05:47, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
No, you were blatanly making false claims as I just pointed out in the talk page since I had initially added the correct link only. Own up your mistakes and revert the article to the correct state, else I will revert it anyways since this idiotic thing wasted enough time for me. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 05:52, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Like I said, I cannot convince you otherwise, so I will leave it there. I just made the revert - I didn't do it earlier, as I thought 3 is the limit. Anyway, take it easy and all the best with you Wikipedia copyediting.--Soulparadox (talk) 05:56, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Civility Barnstar Hires.png The Civility Barnstar
For your ability to consistently keep your cool in any situation, no matter how heated the discussion becomes. I forget how I ended up on your talk page again, but I was very impressed with your civility. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you kindly for this. Unfortunately, these kind of interactions remind me of an article I read recently about new Wikipedia editors being treated poorly, thereby leading to a reduction in copyeditors. I think one critic referred to Wikipedia as a "video game" environment for young males. Anyway, thanks again.--Soulparadox (talk) 02:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
One could probably write a sociology PhD thesis on Wikipedia, and I wouldn't be overly surprised to find out that someone already has. Communities with a strong sense of identity often react highly negatively to what they perceive as attempts to change or broaden their identity. Communities may even police themselves and denounce members who stray too far from the group identity. There's all sorts of other stuff, too, like using excessive amounts of technical jargon to confuse non-members and discourage their input. It's all quite intriguing, really, and I'm sure most people don't even realize they're doing it. I didn't really put it all together until I did a bunch of research on fan communities for a Wikipedia article that I wrote. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Which page is that, as I would like to read it. Thanks again :-)--Soulparadox (talk) 03:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Cult film. I was going to write more in-depth about the sociological aspects in Cult following, but I felt too burnt out to write another long article on the topic. One of these days, I'll get around to it. I've certainly got enough sources collected from my research on cult films. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks kindly NinjaRobotPirate. I will check it out now.--Soulparadox (talk) 02:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Personal computer[edit]

Well, I went and did it now. I learned how to use Twinkle. Alatari (talk) 22:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

What's Twinkle?--Soulparadox (talk) 22:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Just found out - thanks for the tip!--Soulparadox (talk) 21:55, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Day Translations (2) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Day Translations (2), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

iButt[edit]

Hi there, Just a thank you for catching my wildly inappropriate edit [5]. I have an extension on chrome that changes every instance of the word "cloud" to "butt". Super sorry.

How unusual.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

-- Tim1357 talk|poke 15:47, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

A Tesla Roadster for you![edit]

Roadster 2.5 windmills trimmed.jpg A Tesla Roadster for you!
Thank you for editing Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 00:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement[edit]

Oseberg ship head post.jpg

An animal-head post found in the Oseberg vikingship, an example of Nordic art

Hello, Soulparadox.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Nordic art


Previous selections: Gopher (animal) • Meal


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...

Posted by: Evad37 [talk] 01:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up!--Soulparadox (talk) 06:35, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Smile![edit]

I thought you might appreciate a little something for your work. :) Best. Acalamari 16:39, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

I am sure that I replied to this last week, but it seems to have disappeared. So, thanks again Acalamari!--Soulparadox (talk) 02:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement[edit]

NasaBenelux.jpg

The Low Countries as seen from space

Hello, Soulparadox.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Low Countries


Previous selections: Nordic art • Gopher (animal)


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 01:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2014)[edit]

Elephant-ear-sponge.jpg

The life sciences involve the study of living organisms

Hello, Soulparadox.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Life sciences


Previous selections: Low Countries • Nordic art


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 02:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Day Translations (2)[edit]

Hello Soulparadox. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Day Translations (2)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Day Translations (2)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2014)[edit]

Impossible staircase.svg

This staircase is an impossible object

Hello, Soulparadox.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Impossible object


Previous selections: Life sciences • Low Countries


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2014)[edit]

SAR-Lupe.jpg

Model of a German SAR-Lupe reconnaissance satellite inside a Cosmos-3M rocket

Hello, Soulparadox.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Reconnaissance satellite


Previous selections: Impossible object • Life sciences


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2014)[edit]

Human-Skeleton.jpg

An example of the human skeleton

Hello, Soulparadox.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Human skeleton


Previous selections: Reconnaissance satellite • Impossible object


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2014)[edit]

Two-point-equidistant-asia.jpg

Because it is so vast, there are a large number of different cultures involved in Prehistoric Asia

Hello, Soulparadox.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Prehistoric Asia


Previous selections: Human skeleton • Reconnaissance satellite


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 03:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Toby Zoates concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Toby Zoates, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Changes to the Millennials page[edit]

Hi, just curious, why make changes to a page that aren't supported with good sources? Isn't it more productive to add high quality references instead? Thank you! 172.250.31.151 (talk) 19:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

I do not prioritize my edits unless a particular need arises. I see each article as a process and, for the moment, I have made revisions to the grammar, syntax and diction, and have also inserted tags in regard to the lack of reputable sources. I will look at the citation issue in due course.--Soulparadox (talk) 04:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2014)[edit]

Xraymachine.JPG

The knee of a patient is examined with help of radiography after an injury.

Hello, Soulparadox.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Injury


Previous selections: Assassination of Anwar Sadat • Rare breed (agriculture)


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 01:28, 25 March 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Your submission at AfC Scarlet Road was accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Scarlet Road, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Libby norman (talk) 10:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you kindly for the speedy review process! Best regards,--Soulparadox (talk) 14:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
A pleasure, and thanks for a very interesting article on a film I now must see – throws up several important issues and, from the trailers, looks very moving.Libby norman (talk) 18:09, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Creating without Afc process[edit]

Hi Soulparadox, thanks for your message. As a registered user you are fine to create articles without going through the Afc process (which can be slow). Obviously, new pages will still be patrolled (checked), but they will be live. Usual rules apply on refs, etc, which you already know about. You can either create in your sandbox and then move into mainspace or create offline, but sandbox is usually easier as you have all the tools and widgets you need to create citations, etc. That said, I tend to like to fiddle about on Word and then upload. It's also possible to create a page from a redlinked reference (ie, linked name or thing in an article that doesn't yet have an article written about it). You can create a redlink for yourself - for instance, if you wanted to create a separate page on Rachel Wotton you could just put two square brackets round either side of her name and save so it showed as a red link. Then if you clicked on the link it would open into a new page to be created. If you do that it is usually best to have your page ready to go live. A useful tool if you do it that way is to add an increation banner to give yourself a bit of breathing space and ensure everything looks as it should before you get patrolled. To do that, write increation with {x2 either side of the word. A rather marvellous please leave me alone for a bit banner comes up on the page. Hope that makes sense, do come back to me if not. Good luck! Libby norman (talk) 15:36, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you so much!--Soulparadox (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 14, 2014)[edit]

Aprilsnar 2001.png

An April Fools' Day hoax marking the construction of the Copenhagen Metro in 2001.

Hello, Soulparadox.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

April Fools' Day


Previous selections: Injury • Assassination of Anwar Sadat


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 03:45, 1 April 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Toby Zoates concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Toby Zoates, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 17, 2014)[edit]

SZ-Lobamba.png

Lobamba is the traditional and legislative capital of Swaziland.

Hello, Soulparadox.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Lobamba


Previous selections: April Fools' Day • Injury


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:22, 7 April 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2014)[edit]

Renfair entertainers.jpg

Entertainers at a festival

Hello, Soulparadox.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Festival


Previous selections: Lobamba • April Fools' Day


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 00:11, 14 April 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Contact request[edit]

Hi Soulparadox, I'm an Australian freelance journalist. I just noticed your recent changes to the Urthboy page, which included some details that came from an interview of mine. I'm currently researching a story on Wikipedia editors and wondered if you'd be interested in speaking with me about this topic. If so, please email me at andrew dot mcmillen at gmail dot com to discuss further. Thanks for your great work here and I look forward to hearing from you. (Feel free to delete this message once you've seen it, if you'd like.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew McMillen (talkcontribs) 07:01, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 17, 2014)[edit]

Kazimierz Nowak in jungle 2.jpg

Kazimierz Nowak on exploration through the Rwenzori Mountains in Africa

Hello, Soulparadox.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Exploration


Previous selections: Festival • Lobamba


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 02:50, 21 April 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions