Previous comments archived to:
Regarding User:JoshEdgar and User:126.96.36.199
Hello, I noticed you left a comment on User:188.8.131.52's talk page regarding vandalism to User:JoshEdgar. As you can can read in my exchange with User:184.108.40.206, he/she claims to be User:JoshEdgar but refuses to log in to verify. He/she has since been blocked for his/her disruption. Cheers! Ratiocinate (t • c) 02:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. SparrowsWing (talk) 02:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the vandalism to Fox. I was trying to show a friend that he really can edit a page without logging in, if he so chooses. I did undo the change myself immediately afterward. I've yet to familiarize myself with the sandbox, but will try using it in the future. I'll be showing him the message you gave me, to let him know that vandalism is not appreciated here.
Thank you, 220.127.116.11.
I want to say "good job" on your speedy edit on God by Pyromancer102. I think he might have made more of an effort with the word choice and thereby created something worth keeping. As it was I believe you were correct in the quick removal. Thanks, Hu Gadarn 22:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Great, thanks. SparrowsWing (talk) 22:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't think I'm the guy you're looking for. I found a message from 26 February '07 waiting for me, but I should have a static IP - and it shouldn't be 18.104.22.168.
Kudos on the tone, though. Your message said "Hey, knock it off" without being offensive. :)--Legomancer 05:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about that - I might have just clicked on the wrong link to speak to someone. SparrowsWing (talk) 23:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism of this article in which an IP editor made random changes to dates. That is the sort of vandalism which might persist for a while if not caught. Edison (talk) 04:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
im really sorry
Quick on the draw, there.
- You beat me to that vandalism on Neopets by roughly a second. Nicely done. ----Jump! Slash! Dash! Ouch! Super Mario SonicBOOM! 00:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about that last revision, I meant to undo the vandalism but I accidentally undid yours because I didn't notice that you had just taken out the vandalism. Sorry for the confusion.RPlunk2853 (talk) 00:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
A successful wikipedia article
I am doing a project for class and need to write a wikipedia article I was wondering if you could describe to me what goes into an article to make it successful on wikipedia.
Hi, I see this user made two naive edits to black hole, which I think should be accepted as good faith rather than vandalism, though not up to standard. Also, there have been only these two recent edits since October 2007, so I think he deserves a little more slack before a block. I left a welcome note with some links and suggestions for him. Cheers, Wwheaton (talk) 03:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)