User talk:Spawn3000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Spawn3000, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Spawn3000! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Leo Matiz and Casa del Telegrafista[edit]

I created articles on these subjects. I mentioned them on the Colombia Wikiproject page as well, but I'm not sure if you're active there and that page doesn't seem to be very active at the mo. Thought the subjects might interest you. Take care. Dios le Bendiga. Candleabracadabra (talk) 18:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

The article about drug cartels[edit]

Hi, i pretend to moddiffy the drug cartel article with:

  • the article is in english, the definition of BACRIM ("bandas criminales emergentes") must be in english ("emerging criminal organizations")
  • link to the paramilitarism in colombia main article.
  • and the reference for the definition must be added:

  • and as you said "The article only list the criminal organizations", so i will add some more criminal organizations to the list.

Greets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 16:14, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Not vandalism[edit]

Hello, Spawn3000, please do not label reversion such as the ones you made here as "vandalism": [1] Neither of my edits ([2]) were vandalism and were made in good faith. As I said in my edit summary, I was more than happy to discuss my change (i.e. removal of the expert request tag), but you have simply reverted without discussion. That goes against Wikipedia policy of WP:BRD. If you are going to use Twinkle to fight "vandalism" please ensure you are using it only to revert edits that are clearly vandalism, as outlined here: Wikipedia:TW#Abuse. If you disagreed with my changes, you could simply have reverted using an appropriate edit summary, for instance: "revert removal of expert tag: please see my comments on the talk page" (you could then have outlined why you felt the expert tag is still required). Happy to discuss further if you wish. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 20:15, 22 September 2014 (UTC)