User talk:Spicyitalianmeatball

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Post your favorite meatball recipe.

Spicyitalianmeatball, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Spicyitalianmeatball! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ_Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jay Munly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schecter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Comment February 7[edit]

I don't see any mistake, although I guess PolicyMic is not a reliable source... MarieClare however, is, I thought the rules were that everything no matter how personal or embarrassing are uploaded, that in the wikipedia rulebook. I was simply sticking to this rule and came across a reliable source so felt obliged to upload it. Could you tell me what I've done wrong, or how I can improve it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CHARLIEPHILLIPS00 (talkcontribs) 13:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Elon Musk#Founding[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Elon Musk#Founding. Keep in mind we're editing a bio of a living person, so NPOV is very important!  Eric - www.tjosse.me - 17:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


Disruption[edit]

The reason I have undone the edit, is because i provided a list of good sources and reasons fro edits, I put them on the talk page days ago, no reply was given, I changed the article because all my changes were true and had good reasons and were factual, you have reverted that edit, with absolutely no counter-argument against them, all my edits were backed up by a source, the page you have reverted it back to now contains incomplete information and also information that could be easily misinterpreted. I have changed this so that the article is clear and correct, this is NOT vandalism or disruption.

Because I feel this is not vandalism, and actually undoing the edit is, I have postulated a notice board and recommend a third party opinion, potentially outside of the topic i.e. from an administrator. I will happily revert the edit myself, if a counter argument is provided to EACH of the edits. Dirac740 (talk) 11:20, 18 April 2014 (UTC)