User talk:Stickulus
 | |
| Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #264 |
April 23, 2011 - June 16, 2011
| ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Welcome!
Nomination of Deerfield, San Antonio, Texas for deletion  The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deerfield, San Antonio, Texas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kinu t/c 00:09, 2 May 2011 (UTC) Nomination of Dwight D. Eisenhower Middle School for deletion The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwight D. Eisenhower Middle School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kinu t/c 00:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC) Nomination of Churchill Estates for deletion The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Churchill Estates until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kinu t/c 00:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC) Wikipedia:Pages That Need Expansion[edit]I have moved this proposed project page to your user space as User:Stickulus/Pages That Need Expansion. The page is empty, and it's unlikely to be useful for the project - it duplicates existing Wikipedia processes, such as the stub notices. If you think Wikipedia needs another one, please go to requests for comment. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Pages Stickulus Had Made 
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion (  This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Joe McKinney (Author), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://joemckinney.wordpress.com/about-joe-mckinney. It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues. If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Joe McKinney (Author) 
A tag has been placed on Joe McKinney (Author) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( Your request
Edit to McKinney I partially fixed your ref. It did not have a title, which is one of the reasons you had an error. Usually, refs are placed in the main text, but appear in the Reference section. You had placed it in the reference section, which seems obvious, but it is sort of not right. I say sort of, because I prefer a reference style in which most of the ref is in the reference section. I'll make the change shortly. In the meantime, you might want to glance through Referencing for beginners--SPhilbrickT 14:18, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Wikilinks to books You have wikilinked some of the titles of the authors books. However, those links do not go to an article about the book, but to something else. I didn't check thoroughly, but I assume none of McKinney's books have an article yet, right? BTW, you might be tempted to add an entry to the disambiguation (dab) page Dead City. Please do not. At such time as there may be an article about the book, it can be added, but we do not encourage red links (links to future articles) in dab pages. They are allowed in article pages.--SPhilbrickT 14:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC) Added section and ref I added a section and a ref regarding the Bram Stoker award. This will help for notability. However, it isn't there yet. Neither reference qualifies as a reliable source. The Bram Stoker award ref is a blog, which is generally not acceptable as a ref. I've included it as a placeholder; I hope you can find a better source, and I can help you form it into a proper ref.--SPhilbrickT 14:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC) ISBN You should add ISBN numbers for the books. I did one for you. When adding, all you have to do is type "ISBN" and the number, for example ISBN 978-0786023608, and Wikipedia will recognize it and convert it for you, like this ISBN 978-0786023608 Order of books It is usual to list books in the (reverse) order of publication, or perhaps alphabetical. I don't see how the order was chosen. Edits to Joe and next steps I added an ISBN for The Weaponer, and corrected the ISBN for Book of Horror 2. I'm not quite sure where you want the reference you added. I guessed at the location, but you should be able to move it if I guessed wrong, or if you can't figure out how, tell me, and tell me where it should go and I'll tell you exactly what to do. FYI, personal information provided by the subject may seem like solid material, but it is not an accepted source (oddly, we want info which can be independently verified). In fact, it may contribute to a wp:coi. IMO, it's a close call whether this will survive - it may be viewed as not notable. However, if you want to give it a try, let me know, and I'll move it into main space. (Or you can do the honors, but if you aren't quite sure what to do, I'll be happy to do it.)--SPhilbrickT 23:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Talkback  Message added SPhilbrickT 01:39, 28 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
June 2011[edit]
- I'm not planning to look closely at the second ref, but a source called "Stupid Celebrities Gossip" may not qualify as a reliable reference.
- Your third ref is to the pro version of IMDB, that is not disallowed, but many people (like me) will not be able to see it. If the same information is available on the non-pro version, you should consider changing the source.
- Frankly, it is pretty thin. Notability is not inherited, so while the marriage to Douglas should be mentioned, it does not contribute to notability. She's been involved in three films? Very thin. I would be surprised if it survived a notability debate, but I won't weight in.
Good Luck--SPhilbrickT 23:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Diandra Luker for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diandra Luker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diandra Luker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AussieLegend (talk) 03:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Spirit of Sacrifice[edit]
A tag has been placed on Spirit of Sacrifice, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 
which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 06:00, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Diandra Luker. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 06:55, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Stickulus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 173.174.209.48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "TwinWin". The reason given for TwinWin's block is: "Personal attacks or harassment".
- Blocking administrator: Bsadowski1 (talk • blocks)
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly for sock puppetry, as 
Confirmed by CheckUser. –MuZemike 07:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- I am not affiliated with this user in any way. This user is or was a friend of mine and is not able to gain access of my computer anymore. I know I can not trust them and will be sure that no vandalism comes from this computer even again. I also got to finish my article about the Alamo Cenotaph