User talk:Studiomusica

Welcome!

Hello, Studiomusica, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 23:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked[edit]

You are now unblocked, as the linkage between you and the other account was not confirmed by a technical evaluation. This does not forgive your edit warring or cherry-picking of sources: if the Metacritic score is 57%, there's no possible way that an unbiased selection of reviews would be unanimously positive.—Kww(talk) 04:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why you think it's appropriate to include only positive reviews? Every review you are including is raving about the album, and you aren't including a single one with a negative perspective, despite that fact that the album received numerous negative reviews. Why do you think that's appropriate?—Kww(talk) 15:43, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

every single review is not positive. it says mostly positive. every album in the history of time has been reviewed both positively and negatively.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Studiomusica (talk • contribs)

What review are you inserting in the article that you think is negative? It looks like you tried to find only positive reviews and make sure that they are the only ones listed.—Kww(talk) 21:27, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This constant edit-warring will eventually result in you being blocked. You keep forcing your changes into the article and not heeding the objections of other editors. No one else is in favour of this list of cherry-picked reviews.—Kww(talk) 21:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Wake Up (Youngblood Hawke album). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for immediately reintroducing the changes you were blocked for when the previous block expired. Any admin can unblock this editor when he agrees to discuss the reviews before changing them again.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 04:58, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]