User talk:Supersaiyen312

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello, Supersaiyen312, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Crystal Clear app ksmiletris.png   Introduction
 5    The five pillars of Wikipedia
Crystal package utilities.png   How to edit a page
Crystal khelpcenter.png   Help
Crystal Clear app ktip.svg   Tips
Crystal Clear app ksokoban.png   How to write a great article
Crystal Clear app kedit.svg   Simplified Manual of Style
Nuvola apps konquest.svg   Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Abductive (reasoning) 02:50, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, Abductive. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 09:18, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Supersaiyen312. You have new messages at Titodutta's talk page.
Message added 01:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tito Dutta (contact) 01:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Suicide in Greenland[edit]

Harrias talk 16:02, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your cooperation to expand the article. After "Greenland", here comes Suicide in United Kingdom. Another potential DYK candidate (just created, only common causes and methods section need works)! --Tito Dutta (contact) 00:59, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tricorn band[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tricorn band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talk) 00:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 18 May[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 19 May 2014 (UTC)


I violated the spirit, not the letter, of the 3RR; you violated the letter of the rule.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 00:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

What exactly do you mean by the spirit? 3 reverts is still 3 reverts, which is exactly what you did. I technically did not revert you on that 2nd and 3rd edit, not really completely anyway. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 01:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
I went up to the limit, not over it. Your argument over technicalities is of a similar nature. Indeed, edit warring can result in sanctions even without going above 3 reverts.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Okay, I guess I get it now. But that also means I also went up to the limit, not over it (the self-revert was going over it however). Indeed, I wasn't the one that started or initiated the edit warring either so now lets leave it at that. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 02:42, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
I guess you're right; for some reason I thought you did four reverts.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:58, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Request regarding recent edit[edit]

Thank you for improving the lead section to Rola (model). Recently, there has been a lack of consensus on the specific details regarding her mother's heritage due to an issue I have raised in the talk section. A quick justification of your recent edit in the talk section would be greatly appreciated in order to form a consensus and hopefully bring this minor issue to a close. Thank you in advance, sorry for the inconvenience JTST4RS (talk) 23:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Discussion involving the Yasukuni Shrine lead[edit]

Hi, I've opened a discussion at the Yasukuni Shrine talk page about the lead.Zmflavius (talk) 16:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Would you kindly[edit]

stop making major edits to the 2014WC without even bothering to discuss them on the talk page? Nergaal (talk) 09:00, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

It's not a major edit, it's already on its own relevant article along with others similar to it. This should be no exception. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 09:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
OK then, so we should also add the images of the other referees and players too. The Nishimura image for example is from 2010 of a different match. Regarding Luis Suárez (which is an image from 2011), the Igor Akinfeev's image should also be added, along with Serbian referee Milorad Mažić. But we should use images FROM the 2014 game, not unrelated images from different occasions in the past. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 12:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
You raise a valid point in that those images are from unrelated games. Sorry if I sounded angry in my attitude. I agree with you. I've removed factual information per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Avoid entering textual information as images. Heymid (contribs) 12:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Alright, much better. Thanks. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2014 FIFA World Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Peter O'Leary
List of 2014 FIFA World Cup controversies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Peter O'Leary

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

"Not what the source says."[edit]

Please explain this edit. Are you denying that Seokwoo says that China "has asserted its claims to the islands since that time"? Λυδαcιτγ 18:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

@Audacity: Actually, I just reread it. No, that's not what I meant, although the previous version is misleading regarding to the point. I will revert it back for now, I don't have time to argue about this, and I have no intention to edit war on this. I have other things to do. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 21:12, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
However, I am keeping consistent with Lee Seokwoo. One of the source failed to verify the misleading claim of the supposed US "proposal" to handover Ryukyu Islands/Okinawa in the 1970, which is what it was administered as. First of all, look at the cited date. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 21:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
All right, thanks. I'm not familiar with the obviously contentious history of the article, so I'm sorry if I missed something that's been talked about already in the past. I also didn't mean to revert your linking of the countries in the lede, so I'll redo that. Cheers, Λυδαcιτγ 07:13, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jesus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Refactoring talk page[edit]

Did you read any of the links? Try WP:REFACTOR. So far I'm not convinced you've got the point. Actually, you not only removed duplication (which is fine) - you removed the question I answered, and "I agree. I've moved this thread down to try and get more replies. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 4:41 pm, Today (UTC+1)" - don't move sections down. Do not do any of those again, as none of them are allowed per WP:TPO "Removing or substantially altering a comment after someone else has replied may deprive the reply of its original context". OK? Pls restore the question. Widefox; talk 18:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean by removing the question I answered. Like I said, I mostly removed my own comment (which was duplication) which you just said was fine. And a part of your comment which was a reply to my own comment. I actually never altered or removed your comment (other than my own part of the comment, which didn't need to be said twice). I think you might misunderstanding this somehow. Maybe it was better if you didn't move the discussion from your talk because again, it didn't need to be said twice. But okay, it's already over already - I understand. Thank you. By the way, what question are you talking about though? Supersaiyen312 (talk) 21:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Still not getting the impression you're listening WP:HEAR. Somehow I have some part in your edits now?
Not sure if I follow you.
Where's this [1] ?
Are you aware that you posted it twice? (talk page and my page). I wasn't gonna check they're identical, so I just put them together - article discussion goes on its talk page. Widefox; talk 02:51, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
@Widefox: Look again, it's still there.[2] I mostly removed my own comment. Yes, I'm aware that I posted it twice because I wasn't sure if you were going to check back at the article's talk page, so I posted on yours just in case. It was just a comment, that's why I said "I just wanted to point out", it wasn't supposed to be a long conversation or anything (which it wasn't). This is my original comment on your talk page[3] Maybe you shouldn't have moved it,[4] because I just wanted to get my message across, not discuss or argue. Once I made my short comment, I was done; that's why I barely replied to you afterwards. That's all I wanted to comment or point out, I was done. No, you don't have half of my comment. This was my first comment on the article's talk page.[5] I re-posted it on your talk page because I wasn't sure if you would have gone back to check it. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 03:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
That diff [6] shows you removed my comments whether you agree or not "(moved from my talk page here.." and "::Don't know your point about the box - layout is fixed.". "mostly" doesn't yet give me the impression you understand that. Should other editors have to painstakingly argue this with you to have their own edits restored? Also, needlessly rearranging talk sections is the bigger point.
I've already asked you to restore it. Will you? You're not allowed to remove your question if it's been answered. OK? I'm looking for some indication that you understand that this is explicitly not allowed, and if you repeat, eventually you will be blocked. Clear?
"Mostly" as in you think it's OK to remove other's comments as long as you remove more of your own? Ridiculous! Did you read WP:HEAR? Widefox; talk 10:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
@Widefox: Seriously, you're actually trying to make a big deal/argument over this? OK, I understand. It's already over. Go ahead and restore it, I have no intention to needlessly argue or fight with you over something this small/irrelevant. I'm done with this; I'm going to nicely ask you to please stay off my page now, especially since you didn't even care about it at first before you found out that I agreed with those who wanted to add the flags back when you didn't. Again, you shouldn't have moved my comment in the first place, it didn't need to be said twice.[7] I advise you this one time to leave me the f--- alone now. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 21:11, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Iran Air Flight 655[edit]

Except for housekeeping, such as spelling fixes or citation cleanup, a page under full protection shouldn't be edited unless people agree at the talk page. Please start a discussion at the talk page, and I'll happily add it if people agree with your idea. Nyttend (talk) 00:04, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 00:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)