If living people can not be added to a fictional character category then make a separate page for the character that the wrestler portrays. The real person and the character share the same page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stigler (talk • contribs) 00:58, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
John Legh, &c.
Hello. I appreciate that John Legh needed disambiguation, but John Legh (18th century MP) and John Legh (14th century MP) strike me as very awkward titles, and I suppose more in the same vein are in the pipeline. I admit I don't like "MP" in page names at all, but in the 14th century the role of a member of parliament was so limited (and filled so little of a year) that membership of parliament was only a small part of a member's identity. And even for most 18th century members there is some more critical distinguishing factor. Moonraker (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
top software companies in india
hi i created a article top software companies in india in wiki but it was intended to delete
Hi. When you recently edited USS Sabalo (SS-302), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sábalo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Reply on talk page
Stop everything (Turn! Turn! Turn!)
ACCCCHT... can't wrap my head around why folks won't let things flow organically here; "As World Champion, Bryan's behavior gradually showed signs of overconfidence and arrogance" is easily accessable and understood by your average reader without bumbling into "thus leading to his Heel turn" jargon lingo-ese. You'd think they were writing Raw for Eve Torres.
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
What are you talking about? Místico and Hunico are the names of their respective articles, not their real names. All I did was make it redirect correctly, it still said Jorge Arias and Luis Urive on the Sin Cara article after I edited it, so I have no clue what you mean by "disruptive edits." I changed absolutely nothing, how hard is it for you to understand that their articles are NOT named Luis Urive or Jorge Arias, but Místico and Hunico. You need to look at my last edit and recognize that it looks exactly the same as it does now, except that when you click on their names and load their article, it no longer says "redirected from Jorge Arias" or "redirected from Luis Urive." That's the only difference, so what you're saying makes no sense at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daren420c (talk • contribs) 20:08, February 26, 2012
I'm writing on behalf of Bob Holly - I'm the chap working on his autobiography with him.
We're a little concerned about his Wiki page because there is some palpably untrue elements to it. Most notably the notion that he was married to Cathy Dingman at any point. Both Bob's wife and I have attempted to edit this several times, it has been removed and then, a day or two later, it finds its way back there. Not sure why...
Obviously it's within Bob's rights to not have untruths about him reported as fact on Wikipedia!!!
Please advise how we can go about making sure the erroneous sections of his page are altered and stay altered. If you need me to validate my claim as to being Bob's autobiographer, please contact me on the following email: rw (@) therecruitmentor dot com.
why you think that i am posting my believes. those who will see the page can increase their knowledge and understanding — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boyalone (talk • contribs) 09:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Carlos "Caique" Elias
I believe you have incorrectly marked the Carlos "Caique" Elias page for speedy deletion. I have noted in the talk page why the subject of this page is significant enough to warrant a Wikipedia article. He is one of a very small number of BJJ red and black belts in the world and one of the original students of Helio Gracie. He has placed and competed in the Brazilian nationals. He is one of only a handful (fewer than 5) red and black belts actively teaching in North America and he has spawned a network of over 15 BJJ academies world wide. He is already mentioned in the Gracie Humaitá article as a famous student of this original academy. Cjjusa1 (talk) 06:41, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Since you participated in earlier CfDs about related categories, I want to make sure you know about Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 May 12#Category:Church buildings in the United States by state. --Orlady (talk) 22:41, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello Suriel 1981,
i just saw that you are about to delete JetDownloader Article and i cannot understand the reason. This is an informative article about an application and not an advert. I read similar articles about other downloaders, and based on the information these articles provided about these softwares i created one JetDownloader. I cannot see the difference! Though i am interested to learn what kind of review is needed in order to be acceptable. Also, wiki's info guide is a bit confusing.
That one you reverted was to a bit of art spam - an article that carefully led to a link to a particular company. I deleted the article, and gave a level 1 promo message to the user. Peridon (talk) 12:57, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
That article is not scholarly and makes a poor attempt at sensationalism...for example "many victorian era mental institutions treated nymphomania as an exclusively female mental illness"...by definition it is for women, there is a different word for men: "satyriasis"...it's not some sign of prejudice on their part that they never diagnosed men with nymphomania. The rest of the quoted bit does not explain the details of why doctors believed the weird things they did in that time nor why their patients believed in it...and for some bizarre reason the line describing women being released from the institutions was removed..it clearly has some kind of political motivation rather than an interest in historical explanation.
See here for a better source:
I deleted the section rather than write a new one which was lazy of me I admit, so I'll just leave it as is, but if you have an interest in the article it would be nice if that section could be improved, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 06:18, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
I can't see why, either, except that we had a minor interchange about art spam. Not worth worrying about, and nor were the articles concerned (two, not one...). Peridon (talk) 10:35, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Garbage and Recycling: Opposing Viewpoints
Hey Suriel. I've removed the PROD tag from Garbage and Recycling: Opposing Viewpoints because it has been PRODed and then de-PRODed in the past, which makes it ineligible to be deleted via PROD. If you still believe it should be deleted, your next step is AfD. Best, Jenks24 (talk) 14:34, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Oh please, WILL YOU STOP?! I'm puttin' on mah srs face warning users here.
Your spam whitelist request
Thank you for making a request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist. I am sorry that it has taken this amount of time to attend to your request. Please be advised that we have been unable to close your request based on the information supplied. Please visit the whitelist request page and search for your name or the site you requested where you will see details of what additional information is required. Please note that replies here or on my talk page will not be taken into account. Please also note that if no information is received within two weeks from now, your request may be treated as withdrawn. Stifle (talk) 17:40, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
My Tommyknocker article
Good day, sir. I noticed that you added a bunch of flags to my article. Rightly so, I understand - the article was not well written, nor well edited and I blame myself for not looking it over thoroughly. Most of the information pulled is from Tommyknocker's Bio on the Traxtorm Records page and, as such, it will naturally be complimentary of the man. I cleaned up my article a little bit. There are not all too many citations I can put, however, just due to the fact that the Hardcore (and to a greater extent, the rave scene itself) scene does not garner particularly much news coverage itself. How can I get these tags removed, then? Or can they be removed yet now that I have cleaned up the wording a bit? Thanks in advance for your timely response. --Krakaet (talk) 19:20, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Regarding jargon in section headers
Hi Suriel1981, I saw your edit on Brodus Clay mentioning the "no jargon in headers" rule. I actually brought up this issue in a recently archived discussion in WT:PW that you probably missed. Essentially I campaigned for the removal of this rule given that section headers are getting ridiculously generic in the all too common form of "various feuds (2012-2013)". I did list the articles which I believed do deserve section headers listing their turns because they haven't done much else other than the turn, and it would adequately sum up that period of their career. Three other editors weighed in without much dissent. I was wondering if you could share your thoughts on the matter? Starship.paint (talk) 11:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Hey again, I don't like creating new sections. So here it is, I'm inviting you to respond to my comment on your vote at Talk:Britani Knight. Thank you. Starship.paint (talk) 06:14, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
The original version of the article from 2011 was based upon on old and inaccurate source. Further research shows the project began filming December 2013 and is now in post-production. I made corrections/expansions to the article to address the original author's errors and have added a different set of "Find sources" at the AFD. I think the now-better-sourced and improved article. What you think? Schmidt, Michael Q. 02:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Do you know where I can ask for a ban for this user? He always makes strange editions and don't listen our advices. I removed near 10 times his editions from various templates and he never stops. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:26, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
I'm sure you probably can tell that my hand slipped over the rollback and I accidentally reverted your comments. Just wanted to set the record straight so you didn't think I went crazy on you or something :) LM2000 (talk) 20:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Too good http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=588753357&oldid=588750041 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 16:30, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Read it again
Thanks for this revert I was operating solely on the name of the templates so apologies for not being more thorough. It looks like several of these templates have been merged so there may be numerous articles that have two of the same template. I am not sure if there is an easy fix for them but I will keep an eye out for them in the future. Thanks for your vigilance and your time. MarnetteD | Talk 01:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
got your messages
A redlinked entry can remain if there's a chance someone will write the article, per WP:REDLINK. I put them there as a reminder to me to write the article--something I intend to do this week. It's harmless to leave them red for a few days. Therefore, I reverted your removal.--ColonelHenry (talk) 17:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Hey Suriel, I was trying to get a comment in at the ANI thread and it got closed while I was typing. Here's the gist of what I wrote: Don't misunderstand me here, it's not that ColonelHenry's comment was acceptable, it just wasn't actionable. ColonelHenry absolutely screwed up by saying what he did to you, it was wrong, and nobody here is saying otherwise. Even ColonelHenry (very grudgingly) admitted his comment wasn't the best. It's just that the comment in the context presented at ANI doesn't rise to a level of disruption that administrators can take any action on it. That's what I mean by "an occasional outburst ... is to be tolerated and isn't actionable." We all make mistakes, and general there's no appetite for having admins bring out the banhammer when someone momentarily loses their temper. With that, I hope you're OK with the thread getting closed.
DYK for Diamond Lights