User talk:Swagged up steve

March 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm PhantomTech. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Giovanni da Verrazzano— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PhantomTech (talk) 02:48, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Monica Lewinsky. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Monica Lewinsky was changed by Swagged up steve (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931987 on 2015-03-02T03:29:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:29, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 03:31, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]