User talk:T. Anthony

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi, you maintain a a list of noteworthy Women who have no English Language wntry: "Women in Red". I am preparing a translation from the Spanish Language page for Esther Ballestrino. NFW1877 (talk) 12:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)NFW1877

Thanks!--T. Anthony (talk) 12:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

My archives[edit]

My link farm[edit]

My smaller link-farm.--T. Anthony (talk) 11:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Formatting Google Books references[edit]

Please use Template:Cite books rather than direct links; you can paste them to [1] and get a nicely formatted link in seconds. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 20:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

I've been here for years and at times I feel I can't keep up with all the changes. Still I may do this in the future.--T. Anthony (talk) 21:54, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


Soliciting comment...[edit]

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 08:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

I may later, although Coleman is not one of the jazz musicians I've followed too much to be honest.--T. Anthony (talk) 12:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Sorry I couldn't think of anything to say. I worried I might not as that's an area of jazz I seem to connect less to.--T. Anthony (talk) 00:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Potentially neat new tool[edit]

I see there's a tool where I can look up more on articles I started. Like how many editors they've had and their popularity. The list articles look to be my most popular, but Marina Silva (which I started, but has mostly been by others) is newsworthy of late and gaining attention. I figured articles I started on TV shows might be popular, but the article on Christy (TV series) was more popular than I expected.--T. Anthony (talk) 03:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Return of the return of the return of whatever, red-linked names in the news[edit]

Edwin Hunt[edit]

Hello T. Anthony,
You may want to add some RS to Edwin Hunt. At the moment the article has no third party references, and the only external link included seems to be broken. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning. I was lucky to find he'd been in a news article just a few weeks ago. I had not known it, as I hadn't really checked the article for awhile, but I guess he was a notable lawyer in addition to checkers. In fact I found more specifics on him as a lawyer in the sources than I did on the checkers stuff. So I altered it to go with the sources with one exception. That being the sources I found didn't have his birth and death dates, but I chose not to remove those.--T. Anthony (talk) 13:20, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for adding the Information and the references.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 22:28, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
You're welcome.--T. Anthony (talk) 23:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

weMen in red[edit]

sure? Victuallers (talk) 08:29, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Is Bartlett a woman? That page calls him a "he" and I put that in Miscellany.--T. Anthony (talk) 08:58, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Robert Lalonde[edit]

No worries. Even a short stub to start is still better than nothing at all — I likely wouldn't have gotten to him for months, if at all, if somebody hadn't started it, and there's still technically a lot more than could still be done to improve it than I did last night. Bearcat (talk) 15:33, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Okey-dokey. I actually know next to nothing about him, I had just put him on one of my lists because he won an award or something.--T. Anthony (talk) 15:42, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Andrew Sesinyi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Sesinyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Sesinyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ivanvector (talk) 22:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cathie Ryan[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cathie Ryan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ridernyc (talk) 04:44, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

I declined the speedy deletion for this one. It could use some more citations to reliable sources, however. Thanks, Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)