# User talk:TakuyaMurata

See the page history to retrieve old talks.

Dear Takuya Murata,

thanks for your edits of the Wikipedia entry "Urs Schreiber"!

I was wondering if you might have some energy left to edit. There is a Wikipedia page for the "nLab". As you probably know, this is a wiki for research mathematics which I had once created (on November 28, 2008). Maybe it would make good sense to link to that from the page with my name?

Also, if people wonder about book publications, maybe this here would help to point to?

In any case, many thanks for your time. With best regards, Urs Schreiber (talk) 15:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello,
It's cool to be contacted by the actual subject of the article. I've added a link to nLab, and started a publication list section, which should establish the "notability" (inclusion criterion in wikipedia), using a link you provided.
Thank you for the suggestion!
-- Taku (talk) 13:46, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks that you found the time to do this. I know that you have better things to do. Let me know if I might ever return the favor in some way.
Urs Schreiber (talk) 16:28, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
(Since you asked). There has been a speculation as to your nationality, something wikipedia editors care about :) It would thus help if you tell about your nationality somewhere, say, in your website. -- Taku (talk) 17:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

## Greetings

Hi Taku: I'm hoping to ask you for some feedback on an ad-hoc chart I'm drawing. Don't worry, it's not for Wikipedia. I just need someone who is well versed in commutative rings! If you find the time, take a look at this googledoc pdf. I have charts like this which are even more extensive for noncommutative rings, but these nice commutative conditions like Gorenstein and Cohen-Macaulay did not fit well there, so I'm doing a more dedicated chart.

I'm sure I've left out implications and/or things that are worth including. Whatever suggestions you can make about additions or omissions, I'd be interested in hearing. One thing I'm curious about is if regular rings are Gorenstein. The only information I found was that regular local rings are Gorenstein. Another thing I wonder about is if you can connect Cohen-Macaulay downward to other conditions on the chart. I just have no feeling for these types of rings. Please also browse that family of domains over on the left. That is also a new addition. Thanks: Rschwieb (talk) 01:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Ah, ok! I'm glad it is not a rigid thing in commutative algebra. Exclusive definitions are certainly aesthetically unpleasing. I do indeed prefer the definition of "commutative hereditary domain." I've been taking a long look at the list of rings above that I didn't incorporate yet. The excellent-catenary-G-J2-Nagata-geometrically regular cluster looks very cohesive and makes a good chart, although I have no idea how it connects to the other things (except "Noetherian"). I haven't placed Zariski or Henselian rings yet. I've started a local chart too, and that needs a lot of work. I'll have to remember to push them out soon for feedback. Rschwieb (talk) 15:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
It just occurred to me "dimension theory" might be a reason you want to exclude a zero-dimensional ring (since a Hilbert polynomial will have negative degree.) "Geometrically," curves and points are fundamentally different after all. Anyway and by the way, are you interested in creating a chart for Nagata ring and such for Wikipedia? I found this stuff very confusing and I and some other readers can definitely use such a chart to make sense of a big picture. -- Taku (talk) 00:14, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Here are some updated charts for you to look at. I'm not sure I could make a chart small or pretty enough for use on those pages, but I would be perfectly willing to make one if the right subgraph was worked out.
The cluster I haven't included yet: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BycNM32IN1JBMUNXelVIUEhuc1k/edit?usp=sharing Rschwieb (talk) 18:06, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Wondering if you overlooked this update or not! In the meantime, I've added complete intersection rings between regular local and local Gorenstein. Rschwieb (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

## Speedy deletion nomination of Goop (newsletter)

Hello TakuyaMurata,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Goop (newsletter) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ging287 (talk) 00:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

## Nomination of Law of Economy of Characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Law of Economy of Characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law of Economy of Characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brainy J ~~ (talk) 17:07, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

## Notice

Actually, I think that the thing for you to notice in that thread is that "the WMF" hasn't answered at all. Every person speaking in that thread is speaking purely as fellow volunteers—some to notice that the development of math software is controlled by volunteers; others complain that, despite being good at math, they still can't understand most math articles; still others to suggest ways and means of improving the situation. But there is no reply from "the WMF" anywhere in that discussion. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:15, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

I did notice that the comment in that thread was from User:WhatamIdoing rather than User:Whatamidoing (WMF). But I didn't notice any comment in the thread to the effect that "the development of math software is controlled by volunteers". Who said that? Deltahedron (talk) 17:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
You did: "that currently WMF allocates essentially no resources to this and it continues entirely on volunteer effort". WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
I nowhere stated that volunteers control mathematical software development: indeed I specifically wrote that volunteer effort is less effective through not being integrated into WMF development. This is a reference to the complaint made here for example. Deltahedron (talk) 19:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
The volunteers are the ones doing the work, and therefore they are controlling the work. The WMF does not and (in practice) cannot control WP:VOLUNTEERs. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Not what I said, not what I meant and not correct (see the diff). Deltahedron (talk) 21:01, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Ok, maybe it should have been "non-answer non-answer". I also missed the distinction between WhatamIdoing and WhatamIdoing (WMF). In any case, my point still stands: Deltahedron asked a rather pointed question about the math rendering issue and got no-answer. We should continue the discussion at Jimbo's talk but I would say for the record Deltahedron's inquire "represents" to a large extent the voice of the math editor community if I understand correctly (certainly mine.) -- Taku (talk) 20:28, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Or perhaps even more accurately: "There has been no official answer yet, despite this thread being open for an entire day and a half already". WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Or even more accurately still: Jimbo Wales has answered with an interesting challenge which I have relayed to WT:WPM. Deltahedron (talk) 20:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

## Example in article on Finitely generated modules

Hi, I recently posted a question about an example in the article on Finitely generated modules. I think you originally contributed this example (along with a ton of great additions to the article overall!), so I thought you might be able to clarify my confusion. Thanks! Tesseran (talk) 18:09, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

## Proposed deletion of Narabunka Women's College

The article Narabunka Women's College has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not comply with notability guidelines for schools.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 08:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

## Narabunka College

You're right. I must have confused it with college in another language, a primary school. Regards. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 11:21, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

## Fine tuning

I look forward to hearing your reasoning here. Deltahedron (talk) 20:02, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

## Thanks

for your prompt response on Central polynomial and Posner's theorem! Deltahedron (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

## July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lie group–Lie algebra correspondence may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
• 'U'' is a neighborhood of the identity element in a topological group ''G'', then $\bigcup_{n > 0} U^n$ coincides with ''G''. Now, $\operatorname{exp}: \operatorname{Lie}(G) \to G</ • a representation of a Lie group ''G''. [itex]d\pi = d\pi_1: \mathfrak{g} \to \operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C}$ is then a Lie algebra homomorphism called a [[Lie algebra representation]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

## Re:Formatting Improvements

The page in question was improved by my edits. So please be more specific about your criticism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.166.168 (talk) 01:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

I was thinking of the format change in the articles like Divisor (algebraic geometry). -- Taku (talk) 20:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

## Speedy deletion nomination of Alisa Matviychuk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alisa Matviychuk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

## Mark project defunct?

TakuyaMurata, I see that you have been a contributor to WikiProject Citizendium Porting. I am inclined to mark it as defunct, as there has been no work on it in a couple of years and it seems unlikely that Citizendium will be a useful source of content for Wikipedia articles in the future. Is that o.k. with you? RockMagnetist (talk) 18:00, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

I can totally understand. It's ok; it served its purpose by now. -- Taku (talk) 20:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

## Orphaned non-free image File:Alisa Matviychuk.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alisa Matviychuk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:54, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

## Replaceable fair use File:Alisa Matviychuk.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alisa Matviychuk.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:55, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

## Edit discussion.

Hello User:Takuya, Thanks for your many edits at the Wikipedia page. There is a BRD which I am trying to start at the Wikipedia page which someone is trying to oddly remove from the Talk page. Could you take a look at this when/if time allows? LawrencePrincipe (talk) 15:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

## Krull dimension zero

In section Examples of Krull dimension, you have added an item about dimension zero. It is the fourth item about this dimension. IMO, the items deserve to be sorted for regrouping those related to dimension zero. Maybe, a section devoted to dimension zero could be useful. Also there is another property of dimension, that is yet lacking: "A finitely generated commutative algebra over a field has Krull dimension zero if and only if it is a finite dimensional vector space (over the same field). D.Lazard (talk) 08:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Too be clear, I didn't add anything new. I made a minor formatting so that the item was not buried. Anyway, I do agree on the regrouping. We should also spell out zero-dim means possibly zero prime ideals are maximal and consequently for example Jacobson radical and nilradical are the same. I'm having a trouble with a non-Noetherian case, since a zero-dimensional Noetherian ring is just an Artinian ring and the article on the topic lists several equivalent characterization. -- Taku (talk) 11:36, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

## Removing Tag from Noncommutative projective geometry

You've removed the tag More Footnotes tag from the article Noncommutative projective geometry without adding any footnotes. Since the article has zero footnotes for the statements you've made in the article, why did you remove the More Footnotes tag? Thanks! Stesmo (talk) 17:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

I removed the tag because it didn't make much sense. Not every article needs footnotes. If you were to add a cleanup tag and if the reason for doing isn't obvious, it is necessary to explain say in the talkpage to explain why the tag is needed. -- Taku (talk) 23:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

## Nomination of Ken Nimori for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ken Nimori is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Nimori until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 13:46, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

## Meaning of gr in Hausdorff completion

Hello, I was wondering if you could add what the notation $\operatorname{gr}(G)$ means as it appears at Hausdorff completion. This is not covered by Filtration (mathematics), nor as a generalization in profinite group. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 10:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Done. -- Taku (talk) 11:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 00:35, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

## Proposed deletion of Toyama College of Welfare Science

The article Toyama College of Welfare Science has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability apparent based on article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:28, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

## WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

## Limits and colimits of rings

In your recent edit of Ring (mathematics), one of the limits has its arrow pointing from right to left. Did you intend it this way? — Anita5192 (talk) 00:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

You mean a part about "projective limit"? Then the direction of the arrow below "limit" is correct (I think). -- Taku (talk) 01:56, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Okay. Thanks! — Anita5192 (talk) 02:20, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

## Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

## Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

## Enjoy!

 Happy Holiday Cheer Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user an Awesome Holiday and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings! Joys! Paine

## Speedy deletion nomination of Kelley Rae O’Donnell

Hello TakuyaMurata,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kelley Rae O’Donnell for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arbustum (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

## Draft:Tautological bundle

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Tautological bundle, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cyclopaedia.fr/wiki/Tautological_bundle.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:30, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

## Proposed deletion of Dylan Scott Pierce

The article Dylan Scott Pierce has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 23:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

## Nomination of Dylan Scott Pierce for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dylan Scott Pierce is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Scott Pierce until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JBH (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

## Just double-checking

Recently I've been working with minimal primes in commutative rings, and online resources send some mixed signals. I figure you probably know the answer offhand.

For example, I see it proven that the zero divisors of a reduced Noetherian ring are the union of minimal primes here, and it's also commented that the converse is true "in Noetherian rings." On the other hand, this link and this link contend that the Noetherian hypothesis is superfluous in both cases. In the past I've learned that the CommAlg wiki is not really the best resource, and I feel like the mathOverflow solutions I linked to are quality. Aren't the propositions (the ones that don't assume Noetherianity) standard commutative algebra fare?

Finally, there is another result I'm interested in: when do the minimal primes in reduced rings have nonzero annihilators? Again, I have read that this is true for Noetherian rings, but my experience above makes me cautious. Let me know what you think: thanks! Rschwieb (talk) 14:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

On the top of my head, this topic is usually discussed in the context of associated primes. So that's why "Noetherian" is a standard and natural assumption. I don't know about the non-noetherian case. One possibility is that a ring need to have at most finitely many minimal prime ideals (for the union of minimal prime ideals to equal the set of zerodivisors.) Maybe the fastest way is to just work out the proof yourself. -- Taku (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
In fact, you actually don't need any assumption. Here is a proof: Let R be a reduced ring, D set of zerodivisors and $\mathfrak{p}_i$ all the (possibly zero) minimal prime ideals.
$D \subset \cup \mathfrak{p}_i:$ Let x be in D. Then xy = 0 for some nonzero y. Since R is reduced, (0) is the intersection of all $\mathfrak{p}_i$ and thus y is not in some $\mathfrak{p}_i$. Since xy is in all $\mathfrak{p}_j$; in particular, in $\mathfrak{p}_i$, x is in $\mathfrak{p}_i$.
$D \supset \mathfrak{p}_i:$ (stolen from Kaplansky, commutative rings, Theorem 84). We drop the subscript i. Let $S = \{ xy | x \in R - D, y \in R - \mathfrak{p} \}$. S is multiplicatively closed and so we can consider the localization $R \to R[S^{-1}]$. Let $\mathfrak{q}$ be the pre-image of a maximal ideal. Then $\mathfrak{q}$ is contained in both D and $\mathfrak{p}$ and by minimality $\mathfrak{q} = \mathfrak{p}$. (This direction is also immediate if R is Noetherian by the theory of associated primes.)
Personally, I'm a bit surprised that you don't need "Noetherian". Good to know!. -- Taku (talk) 18:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Great: thanks for taking a look. Rschwieb (talk) 17:58, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

## Proposed deletion of Atomi Junior College

The article Atomi Junior College has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Junior schools are not notable...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 15:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

## Interested in ring examples?

I'd like to ask if you'd be interested in contributing to a site I've set up for ring theory!

First take a look at how it works: Database of Ring Theory.

I can set up an admin account for you to contribute materials. There are a lot of gaps that could be filled in for the commutative subset.

The site looks pretty stark, but I'm gradually making improvements to it. Either way, I hope you get a chance to look at it. Rschwieb (talk) 01:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

I think this is a very interesting project: the idea of the database of facts and examples certainly makes sense. This might also be used for a sort of automated theorem proving. Also, my lifetime dream has been to write my own algebra text: Bourbaki is closest to my ideal but, for instance, many important stuff like Nagata ring appears only on EGA. Matsumoto wrote 2 books and they don't supersede each other. I didn't like Lang (even if I greatly admire him as a mathematician). The database like that would be helpful in writing the book. -- Taku (talk) 11:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Right now is however not a good time for me. For one I need to complete my thesis (kind of like toric degenration) and for another find a job. -- Taku (talk) 11:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
OK, I understand. The website is certainly in no hurry. In the meantime I'll be making usability and UI improvements, so it should be even better whenever you find time. Just don't forget any good examples after you finish writing your thesis. Good luck with your writing. Rschwieb (talk) 13:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

## Nomination of Atomi Junior College for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atomi Junior College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atomi Junior College until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

## A cup of tea for you!

 Saw your discussion on Talk:Main Page – nice try! 13:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

## Ind-scheme

Hi, I'm translating your article Ind-scheme to Swedish (I've translated earlier many of your mathematical articles, they're very interesting), and I have a question about it: from where does the Ind come? I suppose it comes from the inductive limit, in which case the Swedish name should simply be Ind-schema, but I'm not sure, and therefore ask you. K9re11 (talk) 16:40, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

It's nice to hear you found them interesting. As for "ind", yes, your guess is correct; it comes from "inductive limit". It's the same type of wordplay like "profinite group", which comes from "projevtive limit" of finite groups. This should be noted in the article. -- Taku (talk) 18:14, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! I have read a bit of profinite groups, but I thought the "pro" meant something like "groups that are almost finite", or something like that, as they are constructed from finite groups. Thanks for your help and especially for your articles - I have learnt a lot of mathematics while translating them. K9re11 (talk) 18:51, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
By definition, a profinite is an inverse limit of finite groups and "projective limit" is another term for "inverse limit". So, "pro" really comes from "projective limit". Anyway, yes, I have also learned math by reading Wikipedia. It's a great resource. -- Taku (talk) 19:17, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
I expressed myself unclearly, I certainly believe what you say about profinite groups, I wanted to say that hadn't noted the connection with projective limits. But no problem with that. K9re11 (talk) 19:53, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

## Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Mikagehama

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of Mikagehama, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 1Potato2Potato3Potato4 (talk) 16:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Excuse me for pointing this out Murata san, I am certain this was not a hoax created by you, but you aren't supposed to remove CSD notices from pages you created. However the source is in my opinion, very poor. Openhistory.org is the only mention of the 'battle' that can be found on-line, via Google anyway, apart from Wikipedia mirrors and books that have copied Wikipedia. Most of the Openhistory content appears to not have been updated since 2004 and most of the pages I checked were basically blank, with just headings but no content. 220 of Borg 17:38, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
I wasn't intending to cast doubt on TakuyaMurata's editing, but personally I suspect the source is incorrect, deliberately or not, and it is not a RS. 1Potato2Potato3Potato4 (talk) 17:45, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
It is a bit disappointing that those materials imported from "OpenHistory" have not been significantly updated or expanded. The problem is a lack of editors with expertise in this domain (middle-age Japanese history) and with fluency in the English language. There are really so few Japanese-native speakers working in Wikipedia. (I'm one of them, but my speciality is math not history.) As far as I know, "OpenHistory" is not known for hoaxes. But I guess I admit its "reliability" is not up to the standard in 2015. It was ok in 2003, but time has changed. -- Taku (talk) 18:20, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
I guess standards have changed significantly. I have no idea where OpenHistory gets its info from, so it may have been a victim of a hoax itself (given that it seems to accumulate resources rather than research info.) 1Potato2Potato3Potato4 (talk) 18:24, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

## Nomination of Battle of Mikagehama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Mikagehama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Mikagehama until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 1Potato2Potato3Potato4 (talk) 17:15, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Look I get that you probably enjoy marking your territory but you have to make a case. In each instance you simply say oh stop making changes without explaining what the problems with the change are. For example what were the problems with my edits to the Nash equilibrium page? Did you even bother to examine them?? It improved the layout of the proofs plain and simple (huge LaTeX formulas in the body text, lack of use of align for better formatting etc.)

So unless you have a substantive criticism stop bothering me.

99.241.166.168 (talk) 03:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure how to make myself clearer. I'm just pleading or warning you to stop damaging Wikipedia. It's that simple. -- Taku (talk) 17:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

## April 2015

Your recent editing history at Template:Mvar/doc shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 20:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)