User talk:Tassedethe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

You are welcome to leave messages here. I will reply here rather than on your talk page, unless you indicate otherwise. Conversely, if I've left a message on your talk page, I'm watching it, so please reply there.

Contents

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Tassedethe! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gimme danger (talk) 12:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Amusing juxtaposition?[edit]

(WPCleaner v1.27 - Repaired 1 link to disambiguation page - (You can help) - Kevin Foley) (I don't think anyone can help Kevin Foley ... ) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 06:25, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Welch[edit]

Hi there! You have a redirect away from Jonathan Welch to Jonathon Welch. Both are tenors, but are not the same person. Additional information regarding American tenor Jonathan Welch is forthcoming. InspiringByExample (talk) 01:23, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

OK, thanks for letting me know. Please note that you will need to provide reliable sources for any new information you add. Tassedethe (talk) 01:37, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Joe Preston (bassist) may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:06, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Greg Anderson (guitarist) may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Smile (Boris album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • guest musicians Michio Kurihara of [[Ghost (1984 band)|Ghost]] and [[Stephen O'Malley]] of [[Sunn O)))]], both of whom have collaborated with Boris in the past.<ref>{{cite web | last = Maher | first =
  • | note6 = from ''[[Altar (Sunn O))) and Boris album)|Altar]]''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stephen O'Malley may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:08, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vein (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | Next album = ''[[Altar (Sunn O))) and Boris album)|Altar]]''<br/>(2006)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Via Mala (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ''[[Viamala]]''' is a section of the river [Hinterrhein in Switzerland.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:39, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scarecrow (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Shane Schofield, known as Scarecrow, protagonist of the above, and four other novels by Matthew

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:38, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Douglas Karpen[edit]

Douglas Karpen[edit]

This article was placed on the dispute resolution board due to some questionable edits.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#douglas_karpen

Unfortunately, it's now been nominated for deletion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Douglas_Karpen

Your input would be greatly appreciated since you've made some edits to the article in the past and could provide some unbiased input. Thanks! Lordvolton (talk) 08:44, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Well done![edit]

Well done! This was a good edit. Leela Bratee (talk) 02:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Flag of Bangladesh.svg Hello! Tassedethe,

Behalf of WikiProject Bangladesh I am inviting you to join our WikiProject. To see what is happening now in WikiProject Bangladesh, follow our noticeboard. If you are not a member already, you can add your name here. Thank you. -- Leela Bratee (talk) 10:17, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment and the invite. Tassedethe (talk) 14:44, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

WP:MOSDAB for George MacDonald (disambiguation)[edit]

Could you help me find the standard for inclusion of entries on person-name DAB pages? All I can find at MOSDAB itself or Wikipedia:WikiProject_Anthroponymy/Standards still mention notability as a key criterion, which I assume means WP:BIO. DMacks (talk) 04:53, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Please specifically see WP:DABMENTION. Tassedethe (talk) 05:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. DMacks (talk) 05:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Witchcraft[edit]

Why did you move Sinatra's Witchcraft? It's certainly the primary topic for Witchcraft (song). I admire all you other hard work, btw :) Gareth E Kegg (talk) 20:05, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

If a page needs a disambiguator it should be totally unambiguous per WP:PDAB. As there are other articles about songs called "Witchcraft" I moved it to an unambiguous title. Thanks. Tassedethe (talk) 20:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
I think that page is itself ambiguous. Do you not take any external validation into account like internal links or Google hits? Your recent move of "That's All" showed a similar lack of foresight. So many jazz standards have albums and songs named after them, that is why they should serve as the primary topic. They shouldn't be ranked alongside non notable songs as equal. The recent discussion on "The Best Is Yet to Come" could provide a guide [1] Gareth E Kegg (talk) 22:16, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
The Genesis song That's All (Genesis song) is hardly non-notable. In fact it is gets more hits than the "standard", ~9000 versus ~5100 over the last 3 months. Just because something is named after another thing doesn't make the first thing the primary topic. Compare Boston and Boston, Lincolnshire. Tassedethe (talk) 22:26, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry to be a nag. What was your rationale for moving "Come Fly with Me?" Best wishes. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 18:05, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Very much like the other moves. We have two articles on songs Come Fly with Me (song) and Come Fly with Me (Foxy Brown song). Disambiguating with just (song) isn't enough, it is still ambiguous. It's obvious that the first is much more notable so in line with the move of Thriller (album) to Thriller (Michael Jackson album) I haven't redirected Come Fly with Me (song) back to Come Fly with Me but left it redirecting to Come Fly with Me (1957 song). Unlike the song "Witchcraft" I think there might be a case for moving the song to Come Fly with Me as it could be regarded as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Tassedethe (talk) 18:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Also, here the link to the naming conventions for songs WP:SONGDAB. Tassedethe (talk) 18:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

aong?[edit]

Please be more careful when making moves that affect a large number of links. Cheers! bd2412 T 15:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

I can't believe I didn't spot that. Thanks for cleaning it up. Tassedethe (talk) 18:31, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Moving articles.[edit]

You might like to review this move]. Moving from one wrong place to another is not a solution to any problem! Cheers --Richhoncho (talk) 15:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Sorry, I need to read more carefully. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:11, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Yeah the article itself is confused about whether it's a song (single) or EP. I'd say 3 songs isn't an EP. Tassedethe (talk) 15:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Policy development[edit]

You are more than welcome to comment on Ground rules.HotHat (talk) 07:29, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

"Insert name here" novel[edit]

I see you have moved countless articles about books to "Title ("insert last name of author here" novel). I haven't encounted this form of article naming before, and in none of the instances I've got on my watch list is there any competing articles with similarly named novels which could be confused by the current existing one. To cut a long story short, are you sure this spate of renamings which includes the authors name was necessary? --Saddhiyama (talk) 00:08, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

All the page moves of articles ending (novel) to (Author1 novel) have occurred as there is another article ending (Author2 novel) (sometimes (year novel)). If you have an example where this is not the case please let me know. Tassedethe (talk) 00:18, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Talk:In the Presence of Mine Enemies[edit]

Hi. Thanks for fixing new User:Paul Macciato's unlisted RM. FYI I was moved by the seemingly greater significance of the Warsaw Ghetto and American POWs in Vietnam, both subjects I am interested in anyway, to create stubs. This is just FYI, and because you bothered to list the RM rather than canning it. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Framed may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Framed (2009 film)|''Framed'' (2009 film)]], BBC made-for-television film starring Trevor Eve]], [[Eve Myles]], and Robert Pugh, based on the Frank Cottrell Boyce novel

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:20, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Old Habits may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {for|the unreleased album by Smash Mouth album)|Old Habits (album)}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:19, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Angel in Disguise (McCartney–Starr song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *"[[Beautiful Night (Paul McCartney song|Beautiful Night]]"

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:21, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Flaming Pie may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:24, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Once Upon a Long Ago may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • as "too sentimental" the two songs Paul submitted: "Once Upon a Long Ago" and "[[Beautiful Night (Paul McCartney song|Beautiful Night]]" and contracted with [[Mark Knopfler]] to complete the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:24, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Questioning edits to Larry Miller[edit]

I'm not quite sure of the logic behind the changes in [/w/index.php?title=Larry_Miller&diff=567160102&oldid=567101589 this revision].

There are three:

  1. Adding the final comma in "Larry H. Miller (1944–2009), American businessman, owner of the Utah Jazz, 1985–2009". Er... I don't think that comma should be there. Since it's an abbreviation of "owner of the Utah Jazz from 1985–2009", which doesn't take a comma, I think it's more readable without.
  2. Changing "Laurence "Larry" Miller (guitarist)" to "Larry Miller (guitarist)". This reverted my change to the former, which I thought was more informative without being overly verbose. I'm willing to be enlightened; can you explain why one form is preferred?
  3. Changing a hyphen to a dash in a comment. Yup, that's an improvement. I was lazy in the comment. Face-smile.svg

71.41.210.146 (talk) 12:23, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

1. I like the comma, it clarifies that the entity is the "Utah Jazz" not the "Utah Jazz 1985–2009", cf BSC Kickers 1900 etc. However I'm not going to demand it remain. 2. The MOS (WP:MOSDAB#Piping and redirects) clearly states, "...piping or redirects should not be used in disambiguation pages". There are some exceptions but this wasn't one of them. 3. Great! Thanks for your comments. Happy editing. Tassedethe (talk) 13:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
1. Huh. To me, the comma makes it part of the list, as in
  • American businessman
  • owner of the Utah Jazz
  • 1985–2009
which is hard to understand. If you like the comma, maybe change the preceding one to a semicolon? I'm tempted to put it in parentheses, but I worry about the similarity to birth/death years.
2. Um, if I want to get legalistic, it also says "Articles only listing persons with a certain given name or surname, known as anthroponymy articles, are not disambiguation pages, and this Manual of Style does not apply to them."
However, I don't want to get legalistic, I want to follow the spirit. The section you quoted says, in full,

Subject to certain exceptions as listed below, piping or redirects should not be used in disambiguation pages. This is to make it clear to the reader which article is being suggested, so that the reader remains in control of the choice of article. For example, in the Moment disambiguation page, with the entry for Moment (physics), " (physics)" should be visible to the reader. In many cases, what would be hidden by a pipe is exactly what the user would need in order to find the intended article.

They're arguing against using piping to abbreviate the link name. The persistent theme is against surprising the reader or concealing information. I don't think expanding it is a problem. If you look at the WP:MOSDAB#Where_piping_may_be_appropriate section, you'll see a number of examples on the general theme of "render more accurately than the article title", which is what I was trying to do. I agree none of the examples apply to what I was doing, but I think it's in the same spirit. Do you disagree?

71.41.210.146 (talk) 13:42, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Yes, piping is allowed for certain reasons, expanding isn't one of them. Hiding or expanding gives a false impression to the reader. Plus, this isn't anthroponymy page as it doesn't list people with a certain given name or surname. Larry (given name) with Larry Miller, Larry Smith etc. is an anthroponymy page. Tassedethe (talk) 13:56, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

The Legend[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Miszatomic. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Legend because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. miszatomic 12:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Really? Please explain. Tassedethe (talk) 13:00, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Kindness Barnstar Hires.png The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you very much for your help and advice. KatiePerrin26 (talk) 21:11, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the thanks! Tassedethe (talk) 23:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for all the moves and re-directs!! Martinevans123 (talk) 19:55, 16 August 2013 (UTC) [2]

Thanks for the thanks! Tassedethe (talk) 19:59, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Policy for changing "from" Upper Case to lower case[edit]

The sources that I've seen referring to the book The Last Train From Hiroshima show the word "From" in Upper Case. See this source in The New York Times and this one in The Washington Post for examples. Can you refer me to any policy that requires that the word "from" in a title be in lower case or provide what evidence you used to determine that the title of the article should be changed? If there is a policy requiring this change, can I strongly suggest that you reference it specifically in the edit summary of your moves? Alansohn (talk) 20:18, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization): "...English titles of books, films, and other works takes an initial capital, except... coordinating conjunctions shorter than five letters (e.g., "on", "from", "and", "with")". Tassedethe (talk) 20:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

I doubt...[edit]

it'll do any good, and I'll not revert any further, lest we be accused of wheel-warring. Thanks for your patience and efforts to do this the right way.
Best,
David in DC (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your input. Just getting a couple more voices into the debate is useful. Tassedethe (talk) 21:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

List of Criterion Collection DVD and Blu-ray release[edit]

I noticed you are a regular contributor to List of Criterion Collection DVD and Blu-ray releases. Could you please add a thought to "Art house column - keep or remove?" I'm planning on leaving the question up for a month or more before deleting the column. --Marc Kupper|talk 02:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Jerry Franklin (disambiguation)[edit]

Greetings Tassedethe, I think you do a fine job with repairing the "disambiguation" pages, could I trouble you once more to assist with the "Jerry Franklin (disambiguation)" pages? Thanks in advance! Twillisjr (talk) 15:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

@Twillisjr:. I'm not comfortable demoting a existing article for a dab page that contains only two article one of which is brand new. If the football player is a starter in the upcoming season then I expect the relative difference in notability between the two will increase. I'm happy to reassess this in a few weeks when the new page has some stats (and football has started). Sorry I can't be more {immediately) helpful. Tassedethe (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

I completely understand, thank you so much for taking the time! Twillisjr (talk) 23:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Benedictus (given name)[edit]

Hello, Tassedethe, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Benedictus (given name), appears to be directly copied from http://dictionary.sensagent.com/Benedictus/en-en/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Benedictus (given name) if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 21:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cream (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Cream the Rabbit]], a ''Sonic the Hedgehog'' character]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cumberland Gap (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Cumberland Gap, Tennessee], town near the Cumberland Gap pass

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jeff Olson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {subst:refer}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Bartlett may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[John Russell Bartlett (naval officer)]] (1843–1904), (American naval officer, admiral, and oceanographer

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Don Martin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {subst:refer}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:29, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

David Hawkes (public intellectual)[edit]

Tassedethe, thank you for moving page David Hawkes (Public Intellectual) to David Hawkes (public intellectual). On a similar theme, I was wondering what your thoughts were as to moving the page to David Hawkes (academic)? Xxxartxxx (talk) 03:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

  • @Xxxartxxx: Normally (academic) would be the standard disambiguator. Unfortunately there is David Hawkes (Sinologist) who was a professor of Chinese and also an academic. Perhaps David Hawkes (professor of English) would be a better choice? Tassedethe (talk) 12:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Tassedethe, David Hawkes (professor of English) is an excellent suggestion! Thank you. Would you mind making the changes as they would require wiki skills far beyond my skill set? Appreciatively, --Xxxartxxx (talk) 16:32, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Tassedethe (talk) 23:36, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Escapeposter.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Escapeposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)


September 2013[edit]

Hello I noticed that you had added a category to my article Marc Y Chenevert. I have been targeted by another editor that first didnt like how the copyright on my photos of the article was verified. I addressed that and they have been corrected and then he added a do not move banner to them for a watermark. Once that was all corrected he has now moved on to my article and has decided that I have some connection with the subject and when I addressed that he then added a number or tags and decided that if there were no discussion on the subject that that he would nominate the article for deletion. I think this would be a terrible loss as the subject person is very notable. Would you mind to join in on this discussion and see what you think about the issues that he LGA has brought up? Thanks so much. Mmb777e (talk) 12:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete matches[edit]

   Sorry for my out-of-date insistence that putting them under "See also" sufficed, and thanks for managing to bring me up to date flame-lessly. I had been annoyed by (but grudgingly tolerated) what i think i recall as all-titles-beginning links under "See also", and perhaps i just missed the transition to the actually effective "intitle" searches which (with the aid of redirects-to-section or -anchor) i can see provide a far better solution to the "persistent boils" in the See-also sections. Cheers.
--Jerzyt 03:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

When there are 1 or 2 or 3 partial matches listing them is fair enough, but 10 or 20 is just a bit too far! Thank goodness for "intitle". Happy editing. Tassedethe (talk) 03:52, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Aidan Lynch (footballer) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aidan Lynch (footballer). Since you had some involvement with the Aidan Lynch (footballer) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). JMHamo (talk) 11:23, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Eric Meyer (disambiguation)[edit]

Hi Tassedethe, could you give your opinion in the discussion on Talk:Eric Meyer (disambiguation). Thank you. -- Mdd (talk) 17:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your support. I have initiated a move proposal here, and it might help I you could comment there as well. -- Mdd (talk) 19:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

BLP PROD removed[edit]

What is the procedure when a BLP PROD was removed (again) without providing sources, but it was not noticed for several months after the BLP PROD would had processed the deleteion? [3] ?-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:15, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm not exactly sure but I think if you found such an article then you could add BLP PROD and the 10 day count would restart. I don't think it qualifies for any sort of speedy deletion. In this case it was a valid removal, AFAIK IMDB is an acceptable source for these purposes (i.e it is not Facebook/Twitter etc). However it's certainly not good enough for AfD. Tassedethe (talk) 23:46, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Francis Thompson (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Francis Thompson (bishop)]] ([fl. 1964–1996), Anglican bishop in Africa

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:53, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Richard James may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Dick James]] (1920–1986), [British music publisher

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:52, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Richard Horne (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Richard Horne (cartoonist)]] (1960–2007, British author, illustrator and political cartoonist

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Las delicias del poder may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *Fernando Castro} as Presidente municipal

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:45, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Hello. I have a question about tennis. For example infobox of this article. What's mean of 32S / 24Q / 16D  ? It s mean of 32seeds / 24Qualification /16 ? . Sorry for my bad english. Can you help me? Beyazmavi (talk) 18:47, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry I don't know much about tennis and I do not know the meaning of 32S / 24Q / 16D. Perhaps if you ask at WikiProject Tennis or at the reference desk someone there is more likely to know the answer. Good luck. Tassedethe (talk) 18:53, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Roland Szabó for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roland Szabó is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Szabó (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:50, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages[edit]

Hi Tassedthe,

As I understand it, if there are two people with the same name, the more famous person takes precedence for the main name article. I tried to do this with Christopher Shannon for the fashion designer but for some reason - I don't remember what it was - trying to make the page wouldn't take. Almost the hits on Wikipedia that linked to Christopher Shannon were in reference to the current designer, while the main page was for the aviator, who was only linked from two subject-specific pages and was unlikely to be linked to from many other articles. For some reason, all I could do was turn the page into a redirect to the main C Shannon article. Anyway, it strikes me that rather than a disambiguation page for two people, the page Christopher Shannon would be better off with the fashion designer's page transferred over to it, and a hatnote for the aviator article. The only reasoning I've seen for a disambiguation page with only two entries is if both entries are equally famous or equally likely to be search terms, which I don't think applies in this instance. However, rather than undo your dab page, I thought I'd check with you first to see if the rules had changed or there was a compelling reason for a two-entry dab in this instance. Mabalu (talk) 21:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Done! Happy editing. Tassedethe (talk) 21:44, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Mark Simpson (Ireland correspondent) (and probably more)[edit]

I'll contact you later about other indef. semi-protected pages. In the meantime, what about that BLP? I know that "unprotection" is too soon, so can you lower the level to pending changes instead? --George Ho (talk) 18:00, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

OK I've reset it, let's see what happens. Thanks. Tassedethe (talk) 18:15, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Category renaming[edit]

Hi- could you point to the policy that justifies the renaming of "John Smith albums" to "John Smith (singer) albums"? It looks ugly and unnecessary to me, but if there is a guideline/policy which proscribes it, I'm happy to let it drop. J Milburn (talk) 15:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Well I've had a look round and I can't find it specifically written down. Convention has been to match Category titles to Article titles, and this has lead to it becoming a Speedy criteria: D. A rename to facilitate concordance between a particular category's name and a related article's name. The rename discussion for Tool is typical of the consensus. Tassedethe (talk) 15:19, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
If I may weigh in... criterion C2.B, which includes "disambiguation fixes from an unqualified name", is most relevant, in my opinion. -- Black Falcon (talk) 22:45, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

question about category removal[edit]

Hi, I saw that you removed Category:Denis Diderot and Category:Encyclopedism from Urena lobata. Presuming it wasn't because of perceived irrelevance, as could be imagined, I'm hoping you can tell me why you removed them (and inquisitive "why?" rather than a defensive "why!"). I can't say I have much experience with categories beyond the basics and those two seem quit appropriate for the page. Is it because they're redlinks? Because they were one-item categories? Thanks. --— Rhododendrites talk |  23:15, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your question. The first thing is that they are redlinks i.e. those categories have not been created. Secondly the category system is meant to group articles together with a common theme. In general this means that usually there must be several articles on a subject before a category is necessary. (One item categories can be created if they fall within a established scheme e.g. Category:22 births.) For people it's rare for them to have an entire category to themselves. E.g. there is Category:William Shakespeare but not Category:Daniel Defoe, although there is Category:Works by Daniel Defoe. So for Denis Diderot there is Category:Novels by Denis Diderot and Category:Plays by Denis Diderot. Even if there was Category:Denis Diderot I don't think it would be appropriate to categorize the plant in that way. Diderot wrote about the plant but that is the extent of the connection. For comparison, you wouldn't categorize Elsinore or Verona with Category:William Shakespeare although obviously they have a strong connection to the work of Shakespeare. I hope that's clear. Tassedethe (talk) 23:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
I guess my inclination is to err on the side of more categories. I.e. I wouldn't object to Verona being included in the Shakespeare category so long as it didn't necessitate removal from more directly related categories. If the category became cluttered I'd probably just fork a "Shakespearean geography," "cities in shakespeare," or some better worded but similar idea. I guess so long as it's relevant, not redundant, and not purely rhetorical (like including Scientology in Category:Hogwash) then I don't have a big problem with it. But that's speaking out of ignorance of category policies.
The reason I included the Diderot category to begin with isn't just because he wrote about it, which he barely did. It's an article in the Encyclopedie that's kind of a non-article. It's a commentary about the production of encyclopedias and their audience (directly). Certainly not a novel or play, and not really fit for a Category:Works by Denis Diderot either (another example whose absence boggles my mind). As such Encyclopedism seems an appropriate category, too (perhaps more so). But you're saying it's no good to just add something to a category? That someone categorizing an article also has to create the category page and ensure there are other pages with the same category (otherwise don't add it)? --— Rhododendrites talk |  23:54, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Certainly the role of categories is debatable - and your view of more categories is perfectly reasonable (and I think shared by many others). Although as an aside Category:Places associated with William Shakespeare was created but deleted after a discussion.
It's actually fairly easy to create a new category (much easier than articles), all it needs is the addition of a category of its own. E.g Category:Encyclopedism probably would have Category:Encyclopedias. As with all things Wikipedia there no need to add more articles, but single article categories are more likely to get merged or deleted. You can add redlink categories, again it's Wikipedia, nobody has to follow through with category creation and population. I won't remove ones that I think seem reasonable or I know fit in with an existing scheme, but as you found I did disagree with the two you added. (It was only the fact they were red that drew me to them.) Tassedethe (talk) 00:20, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Ok thanks. I've readded the encyclopedism cat, created that category page, and added a couple other pages to it. Hopefully that should do the trick. --— Rhododendrites talk |  07:59, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Danube School category[edit]

Re these - was he the only member of the category? I may have forgotten to add the others after creating it - the main article has never had it. The category would be a valid one & I would like to recreate it. Johnbod (talk) 14:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, the only member of a non-existent category. The article doesn't mention this fact either. Tassedethe (talk) 15:18, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wasteland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * "Wasteland", a song by The Mission]] from their 1986 album ''[[God's Own Medicine]]''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the tagging![edit]

Hey Tassedethe; thanks for tagging Walter C. Langsam (I just got to it in the patrolling queue. We've built up quite a backlog). Any chance I can twist your arm into helping out with patrolling directly? ;). Ironholds (talk) 07:44, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hey thanks; it's not on my usual list of "things to do" but I can take a look. Tassedethe (talk) 02:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paul McEwan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {for|the British actor|Paul McEwan (actor)]}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lfc[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Lfc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.. QED237 (talk) 23:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Move request on Thomas Keightley (historian)[edit]

You are encouraged to participate in the discussion underway at Talk:Thomas Keightley (historian) to rename Thomas Keightley (historian)Thomas Keightley. As the editor responsible for moving the name the other way around in the first place, I would like to hear your rationale for doing so. Since your reverted my actions recently to stopgap fix this, I assume you have some reason for wanting to keep this label. However, as far as I can determine, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC appear to be easily met, and I do not seriously believe anyone who has actually .

I have given my own rationale for wanting this move, and it is not anything personal, to undermine what you do, etc. I have laid out the reasons in full on the article talk page, but for one, "Thomas Keightley (historian)" would seem to be a misleading label to many nowadays who recognize him as mythology/folklore writer primarily. As another practical reason, which is self-evident if you put yourself in the shoe of people whose are mainly concentrating on writing the substance of the article, is that they can do without the extra distraction of having to seek out or type out this extraneous "(historian)" when they add a link to this author.--Kiyoweap (talk) 13:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I will make my comments at the request later this week. Tassedethe (talk) 18:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Bedtime Stories (album) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bedtime Stories (album). Since you had some involvement with the Bedtime Stories (album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 05:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

16:15, 27 July 2012‎ Tassedethe (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (1,166 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Tassedethe moved page Bleach (Japanese album) to Bleach (Bleach (Japanese band) album): dab by group) (undo | thank)

Hi, re above move, you may well be/probably are right, but FYI I have put in a RM at Talk:Bleach (album) since this style of double disambiguation has been questioned by another editor. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin McCourt[edit]

A tag has been placed on Kevin McCourt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sionk (talk) 13:46, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael Kent may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {about||the cousin of Queen Elizabeth II|Prince Michael of Kent|the American comedian and magician)|Michael Kent (comedian)}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:32, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Northwich Villa F.C. redirect[edit]

Well done for protecting this page! Any chance that you can also protect its Talk page too? Drawoh46 (talk) 22:26, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. I've protected two related pages that this IP seems to have a grudge against. Tassedethe (talk) 00:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Many thanks! Drawoh46 (talk) 07:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to James Duncan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[James Duncan (Scottish footballer)]] ([fl. 1890s), Sheffield United player

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to E. B. Wilson may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Category:Human name disambiguation pages|Wilson, E. B.}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Edwin Walker may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{|the English cricketer|Edwin Walker (cricketer)|the American archaeologist|Edwin Francis
  • |the English cricketer|Edwin Walker (cricketer)|the American archaeologist|Edwin Francis Walker]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

RE: White Bull[edit]

Discussing in talk, sorry.(Lihaas (talk) 20:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)).

Fancy (song)[edit]

For your information, there is only one song with that title and it is by Iggy Azalea.

You're mistaken. There are at least two other songs, Fancy (Bobbie Gentry song) and Fancy (Drake song). There is no article on a song by Iggy Azalea. There is no song called Fancy mentioned on that persons page. I have reverted your change. Thank you. Tassedethe (talk) 14:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Gordon Duncan[edit]

Sorry - I'm making a bit of a mess of this. I personally think Gordon Duncan the piper should have the page Gordon Duncan, being much more notable than the aviator. Since there are only two of that name, hatnotes on each will suffice. I'm happy with the status quo if you object with that, however. Jamesx12345 22:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Not a problem. I agree with your proposal so I'll delete the page. Happy editing. Tassedethe (talk) 22:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Adminship[edit]

What would you think if I nominated you for adminship?--Bigpoliticsfan (talk) 00:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC).

I'd be very flattered, but unfortunately I'm already an admin :) I don't advertise it, nor do I do many admin tasks, which is probably why you didn't relaise. Many thanks though. Tassedethe (talk) 00:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Wow Two People Now[edit]

I thought one was enough, but apparently two people can't do some simple research.

How about before deleting content, you do some research first. Research which would have taken about 10 seconds. Jinx is in fact a champion in the popular MOBA Game League of Legends.

As evidenced by this:

Do your research next time. I've heard that people on Wikipedia delete content without doing any research. Now I see that I'm right. It took me longer to type up the information, then look at the websites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.52.125 (talk) 21:57, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

No content was deleted as Jinx is not an article but a disambiguation page, it is meant for navigation to content. There is no information on "Jinx" on the page League of Legends. And until there is the entry on Jinx will be removed. Tassedethe (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Then do some research. I've found at least three other instances of this present on Wikipedia using popular names and things that will have a disamg page. Now unless all of those pages, and I'll probably find more, remove that reference, then that is completely inconsistent formatting. One has been there for several years. Now either point to a policy where it says that you can't do that, or put it back in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.52.125 (talk) 22:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Please read WP:MOSDAB especially MOS:DABMENTION. Tassedethe (talk) 22:11, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Well at least a policy was pointed out. I will refrain from readding then per Wikipedia policy. Although you could have just pointed out the last link since that said it point blank.
Would it be against Wikipedia policy then to create a list of champions in League or not? If it is allowed, then would the reference be valid and with a link to that article and the list article?
Sorry about that, I didn't notice that the original revert edit also didn't link to a policy. If you added a list of champions (with a reference) then it would be entirely correct to add a link on any disambiguation pages involved. I would avoid adding links for minor characters, they would probably be removed on notability/trivia grounds. Tassedethe (talk) 22:23, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
I would probably avoid trivia sections, too much bias with that, with the link presented above being the reference for multiple ones, just going back to the index page. Maybe I'll get around to that later since I only did this to take a break from homework. Thank you for your time. You've been civil which is a change from what I commonly hear about things like this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.52.125 (talk) 22:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

From Russia with Love[edit]

I'm a little confused about this. It seems better to label it as a disambiguation to me. Was my way really wrong? Survivorfan1995 (talk) 05:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes. Disambiguation pages only have (disambiguation) in the title if there is not a "primary topic" (WP:PRIMARYTOPIC). So we have things like The Beatles with The Beatles (disambiguation) or Elvis Presley with Elvis Presley (disambiguation). But for other subjects we have disambiguation pages like From Russia with Love, Goldfinger, John Smith or Love Story. Whether or not there is a "primary topic" is often argued discussed :) .Tassedethe (talk) 05:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexandru Maxim (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Alexandru Maxim (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Duplicate article[edit]

Hi. article was restored after move... Has a point though, Para Toda La Vida (Rocío Dúrcal album). Para Toda La Vida dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Of course the 2nd page wasn't created until 2 months after my move, plus it was cut/paste (or rather just paste), so all in all not the greatest edit. Tassedethe (talk) 02:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Maybe. I'm just informing.
  • On an unrelated subject I see from my watchlist (Deletion log); 00:25 . . Tassedethe (talk | contribs) deleted page Seth Jones (disambiguation) ‎(G6: Obviously unnecessary disambiguation page). Can you restore this please. With 3 notable topics there should be a dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Not a problem. Someone had removed the third entry, I'll restore the history. Tassedethe (talk) 15:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Erotica (album) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Erotica (album). Since you had some involvement with the Erotica (album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 04:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Horton (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ''[[David Horton]]''' is a character in ''The Vicar of Dibley]]'' sitcom.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thomas Kirk may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Thomas Andrew Murray Kirk]] (1906–1966), Canadian Member of Parliament, 1949–1958)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of sports writers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • amp;fdq=19960101&td=sysdate-7&sort=newest&ac=Sports |title=The New York Times: Search > Category: |publisher=New York Times |date= |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref>
  • *[Richard Hinds{{cn}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:23, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to LewRockwell.com may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Wayne State University, holding an M.D. and Ph.D. in Cellular Biology from Case Western University)</ref>
  • * William L. Anderson]* – author and [[Frostburg State University]], [[Maryland]], economics professor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William Martin may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * William Martin]] (1796–?), accompanied George Bass and Matthew Flinders in the Tom Thumb, see [[Martin Islet (New

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Alan Baker (shogi) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Baker (shogi) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Baker (shogi) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marchjuly (talk) 03:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Northwich Villa F.C. once again[edit]

The person who corrupting this entry, and its talk page, seems very determined, and is at it once again. Is there any chance that Northwich Villa F.C. and its talk page could be protected again, this time for considerably longer than one week? (Once the edit removing the DIRECT has been reversed.) Drawoh46 (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Already done. I set it to infinite this time, there doesn't seem to be any benefit in just doing it for a month or six months or whatever. It has wasted the time of too many other responsible editors and admins. Tassedethe (talk) 21:07, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
That's an impressive response! Infinite is ideal. Many thanks! Drawoh46 (talk) 21:18, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Deletions[edit]

Hi, Tasse. Thanks, as always, for all your hard work. I don't know if you're aware that Template:db-disambig has been changed? Apparently, it didn't fit with speedy criteria. I clicked on the G8 link in your edit summary, and it said it was for pages ending in (disambiguation) and with fewer than two links. I think some of those you've been deleting haven't had fewer than two links. I only realised the change when I added a speedy tag and it was removed with the above reason given. I also think a lot of these aren't uncontroversial maintenance - I'm finding more than half of them have enough valid entries. Would you consider using PROD instead? It'll then meet the deletion criteria and give an opportunity for them to be looked over by others. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

All the ones I've deleted have had just two links and no more. I can PROD them just as easily. Thanks. Tassedethe (talk) 13:40, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

You may not have been informed of this...Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Fishbaugh. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I hadn't seen that. I used to add all pages I edited to my Watchlist but since it topped 70000 I gave up :) Tassedethe (talk) 00:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

2014 ITF Men's Circuit[edit]

Do you mind completing this article and its sub-article? Banhtrung1 23:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not much into doing tennis articles. Tassedethe (talk) 23:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Ft Hood Shooting[edit]

Please remove the semi-protect from Ft Hood Shooting 2014. It hampers the ability of users to keep the page up to date.

Unfortunately the article was being repeatedly vandalised by anonymous users. I have protected it for 12 hours. You can always use the article talk page to make a specific edit request. Tassedethe (talk) 00:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Hans Olsson[edit]

Sorry, I thought the link led to the page that was already on. Maybe the link should be at the top of the page and ask "Did you mean..." or something of the like. Piguy101 (talk) 16:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Not a problem. On disambiguation pages, it's standard to keep the list of related spellings at the bottom, in the see also section. In this case there is Hans Olson and Hans Olsen. You could imagine there could also be Hans Ollsson or Hans Olssen. Then a hatnote becomes unwieldy. The layout recommendations are at MOS:DABSEEALSO. It says to use a hatnote "when appropriate". In my view that's for cases where the misspelling is highly likely to have been what the user *really* wanted. E.g. if there was a disambiguation page at Jessus then I'd expect a hatnote to Jesus. Of course "when appropriate" will differ among different editors :) Happy editing.Tassedethe (talk) 20:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
That sounds good. I guess no changes are needed. Piguy101 (talk) 21:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Bible In the Beginning poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Bible In the Beginning poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Using automatic tools...[edit]

...does not mean that you shouldn't look at the edits you're making. A glance at the two articles concerned would tell you that this was a mistake. J Milburn (talk) 23:13, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Mistakes happen. Thanks. Tassedethe (talk) 23:14, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014 disambig contest: let's do it again![edit]

Greetings fellow disambiguator! Remember back in February when we made history by clearing the board for the first time ever, for the monthly disambiguation contest? Let's do it again in May! I personally will be aiming to lead the board next month, but for anyone who thinks they can put in a better effort, I will give a $10 Amazon gift card to any editor who scores more disambiguation points in May. Also, I will be setting up a one-day contest later in the month, and will try to set up more prizes and other ways to make this a fun and productive month. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:50, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Contemporary harpsichord does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 19:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Dabfix is outdated a bit[edit]

I noticed that dabfix replace {{TOC right}} with its redirect "tocright". I asked Dispenser to update the file. -- Magioladitis (talk) 05:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately I think Dispenser has pretty much given up supporting dabfix and dabsolver. See Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation pages with links#IMPORTANT: tool migration. Tassedethe (talk) 05:51, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Cruel Sea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[The Cruel Sea (song)]], a 1960s British hit guitar instrumental by [The Dakotas; subsequently recorded by American group The Ventures as "The Cruel Surf"

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:32, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lee Baxter may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {For|the British actor and singer)|Lee Baxter (singer)}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)


East Harlem[edit]

Can you explain to me what you're doing with the "Dominican Americans" category on this article? You say that its "ambiguous" - why is it any more ambiguous than "Afican-Americans in New York"? Certainly, a better cat would be "Domincan-American culture", but that cat does not exist, and the closest to it is "Dominican Americans". So, what's your rationale? BMK (talk) 04:41, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Please look at the category. There are two countries with similar names Dominica and the Dominican Republic which makes "Dominican Americans" ambiguous. Tassedethe (talk) 05:15, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, that is incorrect. "Dominican American" means only Americans from the Dominican Republic. Dominca doesn't enter into it at all. BMK (talk) 05:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
It would be nice if people making decisions like this, whoever they are, had some actual practical knowledge of the subject. To say this category is "ambiguous" because of the existence of Dominica is absurd and ludicrous. "Dominican American" means one thing, and one thing only, and anytime you see that phrase, that is precisely what it will mean. I have no idea what Americans from Dominica are called, but it's not "Dominican Americans". BMK (talk) 06:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
"People making decisions like this" are volunteer editors like yourself. And at some point the decision was made to avoid ambiguity and move items from the category to Category:American people of Dominican Republic descent. I have reverted your change to the category as it goes against a previous discussion here. If you want to change the remit of the category you should start a new discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. Tassedethe (talk) 14:30, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
At some point someone has created Category:Dominican American (to match Dominican American). I've moved East Harlem to that category, although overall I don't see why the article needs to be in this category at all. The article makes no claim of any particularly strong Dominican American community, other than some Dominicans live there. Tassedethe (talk) 14:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Volunteers? Really? Huh, I've been here 9 years, I just thought my check was in the mail.

It's irrelevant whether we're volunteers or paid for what we do, we still should have some amount of competency, and some knowledge about the real world, and not simply live in Wiki-fantasy Land. Whichever volunteer editor, or group of volunteer editors, was so clueless about reality that they thought "Dominican American" was an ambiguous term really shouldn't be making silly decisions such as that without knowing what they are doing - and I say that not knowing, or caring, who made the decision and under what circumstances. BMK (talk) 16:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Louis Legrand dab[edit]

Hi, I see you've just done a full dab treatment for the 3 Louis Legrands. However, I'd say it was clear that Louis Legrand (artist) is by far the best known of them; would it not be better for Louis Legrand to go straight to him, with a hatnote to Louis Legrand (disambiguation) for the rare cases of the other two men? Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:53, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

I have reverted myself per WP:BRD. Tassedethe (talk) 14:37, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
ok, many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Dab on A Luta Continua[edit]

Hi Tassdethe. I had left "(Album)" after A Luta Continua because there is also a A luta continua as a separate article. Can two articles exist with the same name, with just a difference in upper/ lower case? Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 01:16, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. It is acceptable to have pages differ just by capitalization: WP:NCCAPS#Page names that only differ by capitalization. As that guideline recommends I'll add a link from the album back to the slogan. Tassedethe (talk) 01:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Two redundant templates[edit]

Before I managed to get the spelling and the caps correct, I created a couple of templates. Neither of these have any references to them, so they could sensibly be deleted. They are: "Template:Fb team Litherland Remcya" and "Template:Fb team Litherland REMCYA". The correct one, which I wish to retain, has the last word spelt REMYCA. Is there a better way of getting redundant pages deleted? Drawoh46 (talk) 11:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

As the sole author you could add {{Db-author}} to the page you wish deleted. I don't see any restriction on the use of that for templates at WP:CSD but it's not an area I'm particularly familiar with. Tassedethe (talk) 13:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. I'll try that. First, I've changed the links to the two templates so that they appear above within quotes, so that there are no references to them. Drawoh46 (talk) 15:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks once again. Your suggestion worked well. Drawoh46 (talk) 18:23, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Glad to help. Happy editing! Tassedethe (talk) 18:44, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Soliciting comment...[edit]

Hi! Would you care to review or comment/vote (support/oppose) at my FA nomination for the article New York Dolls (album)? Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 22:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

American Beauty page dabs[edit]

Hi Tassedethe. I see you do alot of work around page move dabs. I was wondering if you could help. I moved American Beauty (film) to American Beauty (1999 film) (there's a silent film with the same name). Could you offer any assistance to fix the incoming links to the old title? Many thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:35, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Lugnuts. Unfortunately I don't have access to it on my current machine but the software Wikipedia:WPCleaner is very easy to use to fix incoming links. I might be able to chip in when I get chance. Tassedethe (talk) 20:08, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you.[edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For all the work done sorting out the mess that should be straight forward per WP:SONGDAB Richhoncho (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks very much :). Tassedethe (talk) 14:06, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Hive may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Windows Registry|The Registry Hive]], a database that stores information and settings for the [Windows Operating System

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gigolo (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * "Gigolo", a song by Miss Kittin] & The Hacker from ''[[Champagne (EP)|Champagne]]''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Hard Sell (Encore) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * "Magic Mountain" by [[War_(band)|War]] on [[Love_Is_All_Around_(album)|Love Is All Around)]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:03, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to What It Is may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[What It Is (Busta Rhymes song)|"What It Is" (Busta Rhymes song)]], from the 2001 album ''[Genesis''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:00, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Waterloo#Art.2C_entertainment.2C_and_media and Waterloo in popular culture[edit]

Greetings Tassedethe:

I'm responding to your reversion of my redirecting entries from Waterloo#Art.2C_entertainment.2C_and_media to Waterloo in popular culture, as I've seen done on other Wikipedia pages. Here are my thoughts: the categories of items and some of the items themselves in the section Waterloo#Art.2C_entertainment.2C_and_media overlap with the categories and items found in the article Waterloo in popular culture, but those lists are incomplete on both pages. Moreover, there are multiple cases in which items listed on both pages are written differently. It appears to me it would be less confusing for readers AND more efficient for us editors to handle this content the way I "proposed" by making the edit that you reverted. I'd appreciate learning - and learning from - your thoughts about that.

Thanks in advance, and best wishes. Froid (talk) 03:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi @Froid:. Thanks for your reply. I understand the reasoning behind your edit but in general it is completely acceptable for there to be overlap between a disambiguation page FOO and a separate 'FOO in popular culture'. In the case of Waterloo what was at the disambiguation page was actually correct, only titles that were named Waterloo, or could be reasonably referred to as Waterloo (e.g. Waterloo Records). The Waterloo in popular culture page contains pages that wouldn't be acceptable at Waterloo, e.g. songs with partial title matches like Waterloo Sunset.
The style of the pages also can be different. Disambiguation pages have a specific style (see WP:MOSDAB) which emphasises short entries with only a single blue link. The list article can go further by including extra information and further links for each item. It can also add in other things that wouldn't be permitted at a DAB page e.g. references or images.
Disambiguation pages often become cluttered with extra links and in general should be cleaned up by removing the unacceptable entries. Sometimes they can be moved to List article (if a suitable one exists). However cleanup should not remove *all* the entries. For instance I tagged Balada for cleanup yesterday. It contains multiple entries which are partial matches. It should be closer to Ballad (disambiguation) which doesn't have entries for things like Ballad of Easy Rider.
I hope that I've explained my reasoning clearly. If there is anything else I can do please let me know. Thanks. Tassedethe (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi again Tassedethe:
Thank you for the explanation. Later this week, I'll compare and contrast the articles you mentioned. I welcome any additional resources or advice you believe will lend further clarification on this topic.
Best wishes. Froid (talk) 18:30, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Merge discussion for LBC[edit]

Merge-arrows.svg

An article that you have been involved in editing, LBC, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Khairul Islam 00:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khairul Islam (talkcontribs)

WP:BISHOP revision[edit]

Hi. I've started a discussion about revising the WP:BISHOP guidelines HERE. Please add your comments and invite everyone you think would be interested. Thanks! Dan BD 16:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Betty Cobb (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Betty Cobb (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Safiel (talk) 21:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Summer of Love (Pat Robitaille Album)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Summer of Love (Pat Robitaille Album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page, or a redirect loop.

Deleting composer songs from dabs[edit]

CLOSED:

The page title should be discussed at WP:RM. Tassedethe (talk) 14:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

User:Tassedethe, Really, what is the point? Yes the composition lists of composers need expanding. You could help do that. But what exactly does deleting a composition of John Ireland, Joaquín Rodrigo, Ingvar Lidholm or Arthur Bliss add to Wikipedia? In many of these cases you could copy across a song list from de.wp to the composer article. It would take less effort than deleting compositions from dabs. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:17, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm sure you're doing good work but it's not as if a there's any question of notability here, it's simply that we have more pop editors than classical. BTW Can I ask whether you search wikipedia manually to see that the composer's works are not listed, or whether there's a tool? In ictu oculi (talk) 06:42, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
I've added the compositions into composition lists (actually 2 were there already), and scrapped two composer mentions and added several more - into composition article first. Would you mind putting the completely unnotable Tres Canciones album at (album) and letting it redirect to something more encyclopedic? All the best. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm following the standard for disambiguation pages. If you link to a composer that supposedly wrote a composition "Three Songs" then that article must contain that information. Preferably with a source. Disambiguation pages are not random lists of unsourced information. If you want to add information to disambiguation pages then you should ensure that has been added to the article first. Tassedethe (talk) 13:09, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
I realise that, it just isn't massively helpful that's all. Can I ask, is there a tool or do you do this checking manually? Also can you please move Tres Canciones to (album) and letting it redirect to all the Tres Canciones at dab? Thanks In ictu oculi (talk) 02:26, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry but if you know your entries are not following the guidelines why are you surprised when they are removed? I won't be moving the album. At the moment it is the only article with that title, see here. If you create another article entitled Tres Canciones I will be happy to move the album. In the meantime I will add a hatnote so that people can find the songs. Tassedethe (talk) 02:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Each entry has to be checked manually. Tassedethe (talk) 02:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Because I would like to see a bit of common sense applied to something as banal as listing a Brahms opus on a dab page. I realise 4 November 2011‎ is some time ago, but all the same when you moved (moved Tres Canciones (album) to Tres Canciones: no need for dab) dab guidelines at the time already told editors not to dab by title. Or maybe they didn't, but they certainly don't do so now. This is not the only topic by any means, can you please undo the (old) move. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:00, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


A barnstar for you![edit]

Special Barnstar Hires.png The Special Barnstar
Thank you for noticing the fault and pointing it out on time. Correction made :) Priyanka Nag (talk) 13:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Tassedethe (talk) 13:51, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Indents[edit]

Hi here, aren't Albums and Songs subsections of Music not separate subjects? Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 16:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

If there were bands or record companies then having an overall music header makes some sense. Or if there was another section e.g. ==People==/==Places== etc. Tassedethe (talk) 16:14, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Okay, I suppose it depends on what else is on the page and how long/jumbled the album/song list is. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:25, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Falongen[edit]

Have you looked at the other edits Falongen has done? – S. Rich (talk) 04:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Jim Nelson[edit]

Excuse me. Who are you? Vandalism? You are bordering on libel. Is that what you mean to do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Motherco (talkcontribs) 01:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Repeatedly overwriting an existing disambiguation page, after being politely notified not to do so, is classified as vandalism. Tassedethe (talk) 01:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)