User talk:Tbone0106

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Tbone0106, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Adolphus79 (talk) 16:25, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gamaliel. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dana Milbank seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 02:36, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Melowese Richardson[edit]

The article Melowese Richardson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BLP1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 20:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Melowese Richardson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melowese Richardson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melowese Richardson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. shoy (reactions) 20:34, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite[edit]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=5jRFD5Mzx9sHZLT_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_57Qg73hoNGBUBXD&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm The4lines. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Raymond, Ohio, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 03:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you will bother to explore the reference already provided, the next page from the reference's landing page will tell you the sequence of the early postmasters. In other words, yes, I think you made a mistake, and I'd appreciate it if you would put what I wrote back on the Raymond page. Tbone0106 (talk) 03:27, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]