|NEW MESSAGES GO TO THE BOTTOM. NOT THE TOP.
I don't care if you respond to me here or on your talk page. But if you prefer the latter, please let me know in some way.
Saving Country Music Can NOT Be Under Reviews for any singles, or albums!
Stop taking quotes from Saving Country Music and putting them under singer's critical reception sections for any music pages(this and Country Perspective for that matter), these are non notable critics, and should not be used in an Encyclopedia article. You could just as well buy a web domain and write these reviews yourself, it does not mean your opinions belong on Wikipedia.
Wikimedia genealogy project
Just wondering if you have any thoughts re: the idea of WMF hosting a genealogy project. If so, feel free to contribute to this discussion. And apologies if I have made this request before. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Sturgill Simpson - infobox deletion
Hi there, just curious as to the reasoning behind deleting the notable_instruments information, as it seems to be part of the standard infobox for musicians... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_musical_artist -- I think Sturgill's prowess on the guitar justifies this callout. If you want that sourced I can do that.
On the same page the infobox for artists includes current_members also as a standard infobox. And Sturgill has a band under his name.....
I am following up on this because the explanation you gave did not make sense to me given how this infobox template is shown as a default -- and how I have seen it deployed on many band pages.
I also think having the information in the infobox is a nice way to cleanly present the information.
Also, if you delete information like this, I would like it to at least appear somewhere on the page. I guess I'm just wondering why you thought it would be okay to delete the information completely and leave what seemed like a semi-snarky note....