User talk:TenPoundHammer

Question

TPH, I definitely would be interested in the songs by record label category. When I have some time, I'll have a look into that. Thank you for letting me know. David829 {talk) 15:20, 16 October 2011 {UTC)

Hello You have a new message at my talk page.

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Phoenix B 1of3's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Merry X'mas~!

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®}is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

MFD discussion

Maybe I was being a little mean. I'll collapse that part of the discussion if that would be agreeable with you. --Tothwolf (talk) 04:36, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:Samad_(crater)

Re:Samad_(crater)

There is entire Category:Impact craters on Enceladus Bulwersator (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: Utah

I just haven't been very active on Wikipedia much at all lately. Also, I would have to go back and find some proper sources before I can finish it. But yes, I was strangely enough actually thinking about this the other day, and wondering what it would take to finish it. Not very many people seem to be active around the Utah articles lately, so I've been exploring what I could do to keep them updated. bob rulz (talk) 10:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Cottonwood Mall (Utah), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albertsons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Guidance, navigation and control

I de-prodded this as notable. You otters know what to do next. Bearian (talk) 01:39, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

This is notable because it is a real field of study, complete with conferences. See the talk page for the IP newbie's attempted contesting of the prod. Bearian (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

I placed a reason on the talk page, per your request. Bearian (talk) 01:56, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

postpone

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Codehydro's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at WP:BOTREQ.
Message added 03:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I responded. Tim1357 ^talk 03:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I responded on my talk page a few times and also on WP:BOTREQ. Tim1357 ^talk 04:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

schoolcruft

• context

I thought I was the only person who still worked on cleaning up school articles: [1], [2], [3], [4]. Glad to see you around. (I prefer a reply here) tedder (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

• Actually I'm removing transclusions of {{NOT}} because I think the template is grossly misused. (It's at AFD.) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

And {tl|NOT}} is the same as {{Unencyclopedic}}? Works for me. tedder (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Rouse Properties

Ah, man... I shoulda waited until the AfD finished before I reported the bug. :) But seriously, why isn't your response a case of WP:INHERITED? I'm legitimately curious, not trying to Wikilawyer your !vote. Thanks! Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 22:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Churchill's advocacy of chemical strike against German cities

Hi. You recently proposed this article for deletion as 'overly specific and redundant'. I have contested the prod, as I think the topic of the article, though specific, is notable, and I don't think there's any other article that contains the same information. If you still think it should be deleted, feel free to take it to articles for deletion. Robofish (talk) 11:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Indoor games and sports

I've contested this prod as well. In this case, you thought it was overly broad rather than overly specific, but I again think it's a legitimate topic. Robofish (talk) 11:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Buy Here Pay Here

Hi,

I removed the PROD from Buy Here Pay Here because, although the article had lots of original research and few references, the subject is clearly notable and the old article can be helpful for organizing facts found in the references. I replaced the old article with a referenced stub. Please let me know if you are interested in helping rewrite the article once more, with references. Thanks, RJaguar3 | u | t 07:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

WP:IINFO

TPH, I get that we differ on notability and inclusion, but twice in the past week I've seen you quote WP:IINFO for things clearly not covered by WP:IINFO, which currently is limited to plot-only fiction, lyrics, and stats. Please take the time to re-read it and see what it actually, currently says, and adjust future nomination statements accordingly. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Talk:Yu-Gi-OH! Duel Monsters: Duel Vocal Best!!.
Message added Sarujo (talk) 23:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ICCF Finland

national organizations are usually notable: see the other articles on the other national ICCF federations, all of which I think would be considered notable here by the community, though of course you have the facility to test it.. In any case , such an organization certainly makes enough claim to importance--a much weaker consideration than notability --to pass speedy A7. DGG ( talk ) 03:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

• And please have a look at Disco Fever now. Hammer, I appreciate your work here and usually I agree with you, but you've been around long enough to know that one shouldn't be too trigger-happy. Happy days, Drmies (talk) 04:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about this...

but I've declined your speedy on the Funny Face thing, because it's not a company. Products can't be A7ed. I wouldn't know about the notability - don't think it got marketed here, but I don't remember seeing Kool Aid here either. It'll have to be prod or AfD. (Looks like it's one of those days...) Peridon (talk) 09:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Samu (Zen) deletion

Thanks for updating me as to the potential deletion of Samu (Zen). I made some changes to the page in light of the tags, did this remedy any problems you saw, or are there more? Thx.

P.S. Please reply to me on my Talk page so I get an email. Thx.makeswell (talk) 17:06, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Bad day? Good day? Off your diet and bingeing?

Just makes me nervous to see *anybody* make 135 edits in less than two hours, and removing tags and prod'ing and all, whew! I get the searching on old unencyclopedic tags, not necessarily agreeing (not a specialty of mine) but then could you say more than "(rm)", perhaps "(rm quite old tag)" or even identifying the tag "(rm quite old unremedied unencyclopedic tag)". And the succinct (prod) and (drive-by) could be a tad more reassuring...? 24.28.17.231 (talk) 00:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC) (I'm brumating)

• The unencyclopedic tag is up for deletion, which is why i'm removing it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Shouldn't its fate be decided before mass-removing from use? LadyofShalott 02:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
    • This one looks like a slam dunk delete. Most of the transclusions were misused (some people were confusing it for {{notability}}), and the rest were problems that I fixed in the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

List of Drowning Victims

I have removed your proposal for deletion of, and have started addressing the issues of, the page List_of_drowning_victims. More discussion on the talk page for that article. Ross-c (talk) 11:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)