User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Grumpy meter
← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ←

And there is also This archive.

Kellermensch re-release[edit]

You have deleted and redirected the article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kellermensch_(album_re-release)&redirect=no It is a re-release, with the debut and EP merged together, and under a completely new label. I agree there may not be that much of a difference, but for the sake chronological releases from the band it should be its own article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rakathor (talkcontribs)

-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:05, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nayantara may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | 2003 || ''[[Manassinakkare]]'' || Gauri || [[Malayalam language|Malayalam]] ||[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)


Hi I am bollysitter, you deleted my entry at Mary Kom film page, BollySitter is focused on bringing awareness about Bollywood films to parents in order to help them make an informed decision if their child should watch a particular film. Our reviews are spoiler-free & objective in order to help you determine what you think is appropriate for your children. As an independent group, we provide fair & trustworthy information and tools, as well as a discussion forum, so that families can have a choice and a voice about the media they consume. We added recommended age and family go factor on the page of Mary Kom Film. Bollysitter (talk) 21:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Graphology may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [Jean-Charles Gille]] in 1991 stated that Juan Huarte de San Juan's 1575 ''Examen de ingenios para las ciencias'' was

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mary Kom (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • publisher = ''[[The Times Of India]]'' | date = September 5, 2014 | accessdate = September 6, 2014]]''}}</ref> It's first day box office collection is the 11th highest of 2014<ref name="Ankita Mehta"

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:53, 14 September 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Majestic 12 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • the name was spelled out, not abbreviated. However, this document was later identified to be a hoax{<ref name="Donovan2011"/> In 1984, a set of documents was allegedly discovered in United States
  • * [http://www.cufon.org/uhr/uhr3.htm UFO Historical Review] Program July 13, 2006]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Thx 4 d barnstar :D. WIll do my best to make articles nicer to see and read. Ssven2 (talk)

Is the lead the only part of the article for Alex Jones that counts?[edit]

Dr. K moved material which is clearly negative and duplicative of other material already in the lead back to the section where it belongs. We do not need to use a sledgehammer in the lead, and no one removed the cites as your edit summary might imply. Cheers. Collect (talk) 22:23, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

continuing to fix up Gail Dines' page[edit]

Hi there,

Thanks for responding to my Teahouse inquiry! Looks like you are willing to help clean up this page and instill a more balanced point of view. Much appreciation!

Here are a few articles about Gail's work that might help: http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/articles/2010/07/27/the_shaping_of_things/ http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2010/jul/02/gail-dines-pornography

Gail also write OpEds here [1] which supports her widespread activism in a legitimate context, and has made this documentary [2]

Here are news updates and reviews of her book: http://gaildines.com/category/news-reviews/

Here's Gail as an expert on CNN: http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2010/07/28/am.intv.dines.pornland.cnn.html

Here's Gail on NECN: http://www.necn.com/news/new-england/_NECN__Broadside__Living_in__Pornland__NECN-251914281.html

Let me know what other info you need! Thanks for your help. I have messaged Demiurge1000 as well, who also answered on the Talk page.

Julia Juliabarry (talk) 14:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

You really got under someone's skin![edit]

Look here. As far as I can tell, they went through many of the articles you've recently hit and effectively reverted all of them. Ravensfire (talk) 20:39, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

its the same troll been blocked multiple times
Thanks for the heads up!

Velaiyilla Pattathari[edit]

I am trying to make the article go up to GA status. Can u help me, bro :D?Ssven2, (talk)

Deletion of content[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.--46.71.77.168 (talk) 15:26, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

It's pretty clear that the disruptive edits are not coming from this editor, but from the IP making the allegations. Removing unsourced information does not make a person a vandal, but re-adding the unsourced content, calling the editor who made the constructive edits a valdal, and targeting that editors edits over multiple articles for no reason is not just disruptive, it's starting to look like blatant harassment. Cmr08 (talk) 20:48, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm not the person behind the IPs listed above. I was just alarmed about his deletion of content in the article Krampus and noticed he is responsible for more deletions throughout Wikipedia. He's been deleting not only unsourced content, but also content that is easily verifiable, but improperly sourced with internet encyclopedias and even properly sourced content, calling it "irrelevant". Many of his edits are like this, where he deletes sourced content and lies about it being unsourced.--46.71.143.155 (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
the only "source" in the removed material is dearcinema.com which is soooooooooo far from being an appropriate reliably published source and "unsourced" while not entirely technically accurate, the actual difference is so minimal as to be irrelevant. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:33, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Eliezer Yudkowsky[edit]

This has been discussed on the talk page and we decided to keep the material, so.... Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. 172.56.36.143 (talk) 03:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

The consensus on the talk page Talk:Eliezer_Yudkowsky#SAT_Score_Request_for_Comment speaks for itself. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry because I did not see the other discussion on the talk page. 69.124.52.215 (talk) 13:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

plagiarismwatcher316[edit]

I am [[user:plagiarismwatcher316:plagiarismwatcer316] and you need to see this information to work with and I will give you my http://www.about.me/napacione if you need the original to compare this to. This is a Stephen Glass situation and I am trying to keep this place honest. https://www.dropbox.com/s/va2vyibdt73qxwr/Robert%20Bapader%20Plagiarized%20Me.pdf?dl=0 The original story is 13,000 plus words and it's a .doc attachment if you want to compare them. Plagiarismwatcher316 (talk) 04:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 13 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Edit on the GamerGate Article[edit]

Would the film qualify if the directors raised their target? --Xoviat (talk) 20:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

There needs to be significant reliable secondary-source coverage. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 20:35, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Subhash Ghai Career Section[edit]

Hi, I work in Mukta Arts Ltd and have edited the career section of Subhash Ghai. The details added are correctly updated and have been provided by him only. Mr Ghai needs his recent profile to be displayed on Wiki. Please do not again revert this to the old version. Thanks, Seemantraj (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Seemant

Subhash Ghai - Career section[edit]

Hi, First of all I am sorry for again editing the page this morning without checking the talk section. Now I have gone through the policies page and fully understand the rules and limitations in editing a page. The source link I used / referred is : http://muktaarts.com/subhash-ghai/. Thanks, Seemantraj (talk) 06:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Editors Barnstar Hires.png The Editor's Barnstar
Thanks for your work on clarifying facts and removing promotional material from the Qnet article. It doesn't get enough attention from good editors, and there's a constant flood of users trying to whitewash it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:NorthBySouthBaranof_et_al._reported_by_User:MicBenSte_.28Result:_.29. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MicBenSte (talkcontribs) 17:31, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Re: Civil Conduct[edit]

Hello there,

I thought I'd leave a message here in appreciation for your civil conduct over at Talk:Bosnian pyramid claims. I find that bias (even where it is justified) can often compromise encyclopedic standards in articles dealing with hoaxes/conspiracies et cetera. It is refreshing to encounter an editor who can view the matter impartially, despite disagreeing with the claims which are the article's subject.

IE Communicate 20:24, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Kitten-stare.jpg

This kitten would like to hang out with Grumpy Cat and Lil Bub on your talk page for a while. (Careful he's not quite house trained.)

TaraInDC (talk) 03:18, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]

Peacedove.svg

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:GamerGate". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Retartist (talk) 06:14, 18 September 2014 (UTC)