|This is TheShadowCrow's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to TheShadowCrow.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3|
Your GA nomination of Joel Osteen
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joel Osteen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of StAnselm -- StAnselm 04:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Joel Osteen you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Joel Osteen for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. StAnselm (talk) 04:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
So...the numerous previous blocks didn't teach you about how Wikipedia works? Consider this your final warning. When you make a major addition to a page, and another editor reverts it for legitimate grounds (in this case, there was concern that there was excessive quoting of primary materials and a violation of WP:NPOV), you, not the other editor, are required to go to talk and discuss the matter. Merely because you've added something that is verified does not mean that it gets to stay in automatically. WP:V sets a minimum standard for inclusion; simply being verified does not mean the info goes into an article. There are quite a large number of other policies in play, along with the more general principle that we simply do not include every verifiable fact.
You have to stop. Immediately. It really seems to me that you are simply unable to adjust to the sort of collaborative processes needed to work on a wiki. If you continue edit warring on that article or another, you will need to be blocked. Furthermore, if you make even a single other personal attack (calling good faiths "vandalism" as you did in an edit summary is a personal attack, as explained at WP:NPA), I will ensure that you are blocked.
So, despite the fact that the burden is on you, another editor has actually started discussion on Talk:Joel Osteen. Go join that conversation. Justify the changes you made. Do not reinsert those change until there is consensus for them. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
I made the collage using Photoshop (Adobe), but if you do not have this program installed, I can also recommend the program Paint. You need to copy all the people you wish to include from Wikimedia Commons, but remember to include a reference, otherwise the collage will be deleted after you upload it. Assemble all the people in Paint or Photoshop to make a perfect square. Save it on your desktop. Now go to Wikimedia Commons and click UPLOAD IMAGES/FILES. Choose your collage, fill out necessary information and include a reference, but you have to include a reference of every single person (picture). I also recommend to do no more than 40 people otherwise the square might not work out. Also make sure your images are not pixelated.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joel Osteen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compaq Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
MfD nomination of User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Youri Raffi Djorkaeff
User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Youri Raffi Djorkaeff, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Youri Raffi Djorkaeff and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Youri Raffi Djorkaeff during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 01:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)