User talk:TheTimesAreAChanging

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives: 1, 2, 3

The Sega Article[edit]

Before you revert the edits on the Sega Article, present me good arguments why the article was good the way it was before. You still haven't responded to my points responding to your concerns. Talk:Sega#Proposed mass deletion

Your GA nomination of Super Monkey Ball (video game)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Super Monkey Ball (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SuperHamster -- SuperHamster (talk) 23:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi again - just a heads up that I've started adding a few comments if you wanted to take a look and/or provide input and/or make any changes. Cheers. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Super Monkey Ball (video game)[edit]

The article Super Monkey Ball (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Super Monkey Ball (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SuperHamster -- SuperHamster (talk) 17:21, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Concept of "undue"[edit]

I've noticed that this user has a tendency to remove certain kinds of relevant, referenced information with the note "undue." I assume this refers to the Undue weight policy which pertains to the representation of minority points of view in a topic overview page. It does not allow one to arbitrarily remove good faith contributions to an article because one does not consider the selection of facts covered to be within the specific purview of what the editor feels is part of a general overview for a topic. While the revert you reverted might not be a super great example, if you'll glance through the user's contribution history, there is a tendency to remove information which doesn't specifically violate any undue weight policy, to my reading. Andrevan@ 06:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC)