Thank you for registering an account.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
You can also place
Your recent edits
Hi there. You added content here. The first paragraph is not supported by the source you provided. Did you get the wrong reference?
The second paragraph you added was too close paraphrasing, and should be considered a copyright violation of the source. You also added "as usual", which should be sourced. Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
TheWikiIndian, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at India Against Corruption. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 12:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- If you want to create an article about the HRA-based India Against Corruption organisation then feel free to create one but please do not conflate it with India Against Corruption. The issue has been discussed at length over many months and venues, with the net result basically being that people were blocked from editing here. You perhaps ought to consider the issue of sourcing and notability before creating such an article because the general feeling was that the HRA-based body is not in fact likely to pass our notability guidelines - that is an unfortunate consequence of its basically being a secretive underground operation. - Sitush (talk) 12:27, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- After the retraction by The Hindu, and the Firstpost page, and the numerous other media sources, this article will be exclusively about "India Against Corruption" the trademark and copyright holders to the name, and not refer in even the smallest way to its impersonators. You have no business to speak on this issue considering that you ran away from Mediation after IAC exposed your bogus edits and hollow sources, whose authors have sent emails to IAC disclaiming the usage of their works on Wikipedia by you to disparage IAC as a right-wing, communalist Hindu nationalist body led by persons like Anna Hazare or Baba Ramdev. TheWikiIndian (talk) 03:47, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
March 31 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Sitush. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Abusive posts, such as the one you left, go against both spirit and rules of Wikipedia Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:05, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
I noticed you have posted twice to Sitush's talk, even though he asked you to go away the first time. Please be less confrontational (it's not really your business if a user has posted a "retired" template) and don't post again after he has has asked you to stop. Bishonen | talk 13:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC).
- And I will reinforce Sitush's WP:3RR warning and point out that 3RR is not an entitlement. You can be blocked for edit-warring without making more than 3 reverts in 24 hours. Dougweller (talk) 15:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
1) India Against Corruption ("IAC") has formally complained to WMF Legal Counsel Michelle Paulson and WMF Community Advocate Phillipe Beaudette about the abusive comments of Sitush "piss off" and AndytheGrump "fuck off' when IAC reports impersonation of itself by the paid editors 'aka' "Indian PR Fakers" for election purposes and that the User Sitush has just published the inaccurate statement that Mr. Arvind Kejriwal President of a political party fighting elections is a "key person" in IAC. This is done as a paid edit to solicit votes for Mr. Kejrijwal's party and to confuse the public that Mr. Kejriwal is still associated with India Against Corruption. Thereby, WMF's servers are being used for political lobbying and is a direct interference in India's democracy, and it is reminded that WMF is a section 501(3)(c) tax exempt organisation which is not allowed to do this.
2) India Against Corruption is concerned that when the article is updated with a recent citation from "The Hindu" newspaper (where the highly respected newspaper publicly retracted their misreporting of Mr. Roy's IAC) to say that that (a) Mr. Sarbajit Roy is National Convenor of IAC, and (b) Mr. Anna Hazare was never a part of IAC, the paid editor Sitush, removed all references to Mr. Sarbajit Roy from this article and replaced Mr Roy's name with that of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal who left the movement of 26 Nov 2012 and is now fighting elections. That admin "DougWeller" and the paid editor Sitush then jointly vandalised Mr.Roy's Wikipedia bio-entry and removed all the sourced text therein.
4) IAC also reminds all admins, that the paid editor Sitush walked out of "Mediation" when he could not reply to IAC's expose of his concocted edits and bogus sources. The 2 main sources cited in the article - Dr. Meera Nanda and Dr. Ramachandra Guha have both issued emails to IAC expressing their dismay that their books are being used to disparage IAC on Wikipedia. The text of these emails to IAC have been communicated to Wikipedia's legal counsel so as to immediately stop the defamations against IAC. TheWikiIndian (talk) 01:06, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- The paid editor Sitush, is it? To solicit votes, etc? You have been blocked for two weeks for personal attacks. In case somebody indefs you for legal threats (I think they're too ridiculous, myself), and you retract them to get unblocked, I ask the unblocking admin to not also remove my block, at least not without consulting me. Bishonen | talk 03:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC).
- Certainly Sitush is a paid editor. Why should I retract it ? Wikipedia is littered with paid editors, and Sitush has been regularly promoting Aam Aadmi Party election candidates on Wikipedia. You know as well as anybody else that your block is a deliberate and standard Wikipedia Admin tactic to prevent discussion on the issues I have just raised on the article talk page. TheWikiIndian (talk) 04:09, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Your talkpage access has been removed for repeating the same personal attacks here. Note, I don't give a piss what you say about me or other admins: access is withdrawn for your continued insults and lies about Sitush. If you wish to request unblock, use this link. Bishonen | talk 04:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC).
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.