User talk:The Cool Kat

Welcome to my talk page. I am unofficially unretired, and you are welcome to leave a message. ...

WikiProject Animation newsletter - May 2011

The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Animation newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 23:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Turbo Dogs Title Card.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Turbo Dogs Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:31, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

B-Class checklist for WikiProject Animation

Greeting, I am a coordinator for WikiProject Animation. A B-Class checklist will be added to the project banner, along with the work group text, including the importance function. The B-Class checklist will include 6 point parameters to assess against the criteria. If you have any questions, please discuss at our talk page. Thank for your time. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 00:25, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Sorry to put this here

But I didn't know what else to do. Could you take a look at my talk page, please? I just had a semi-private question for you and didn't want to post it here. (Nobody ever looks at my talk page, but they will now that I said that. XD Feel free to delete this after you see it, if you want.) :) SmallCheez (talk) 18:27, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

In reply to the reply you sent me, I figured that wasn't why. XP I see what you mean, but it IS somewhat of a pity it's not allowed to stay. Also, I'm going to assume that 9Story isn't going to email me back, which is also a pity. I kind of had the feeling going into it that it wouldn't be able to stay (the section), but I was like, "Well, if it doesn't belong, then it'll get removed, and that'll be the end of it." Meh. And anyways, thanks for the reassurance. ^_^ Glad to know I'm doing SOMETHING right. And looking over the links you gave me, do you think Wikipedia would mind if I created a separate article for it?( I'm suspecting "yes", but I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask. XP) SmallCheez (talk) 23:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Don't be sorry for the delay, I was taking care of my grandmother and not even on the internet until about a week ago. XD Delay unnoticed. Anyways, yes, they DO seem a little too strict. Maybe it's not important to the whole, but it's a big part of the WK community (or it was; it seems to be waning, but there's also been a decrease of general activity, so we'll see about that when the fandom becomes more active again). Maybe I'm looking through narrow spectacles here, but it seems to me (keywords) that because it caused such a big blow up, it would be worthy. I can see where it's off topic as far as the *article* is concerned (it does make sense it would be its own topic), but I don't see how it wouldn't be a candidate for its own article.

Perhaps it's just wishful thinking on my part. The only reason I myself considered it anywhere close to needing an article is because it carried over to Wikipedia itself. I could see if it was just limited to a certain area, but it's all over the internet. Youtube, Fanfiction, DeviantArt... I'm probably unaware of other sites. It has a Wiki, but it's bound to be inaccurate (well, IS inaccurate, and not just about that, either), so I don't even bother. It was just such a big thing, and I felt that newcoming watchers (assuming they bothered to read the article) needed to be aware of it and not step into that by accident and be chased away by bad experiences that truly don't amount to anything. That was really my main motive.

Well, I'm not gonna worry about it (having its own article, I mean); rules are rules. Meh. (LOL, I went to put 4 tildes and put four exclamation points instead! XD)

SmallCheez (talk) 23:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)