User talk:The Obento Musubi
|This is The Obento Musubi's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to The Obento Musubi.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10|
Orphaned non-free image File:Apple Product Image, Mac Pro.tif
Thanks for uploading File:Apple Product Image, Mac Pro.tif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Changing of proper date system to nonsense date system
- The fact that you think "anno Domini" and "before Christ" are proper and "common era" and "before common era" are nonsensical tells me enough about you to know that you shall opt to uphold religious dogma over secularism and therefore we won't see eye-to-eye on this. I personally don't care enough to start anything over it, so I'm going to choose not to be affected by your dismissive language. The Obento Musubi (talk · contribs) 21:13, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- The days of the week are named after pagan Germanic deities. Now, I don't believe in Tue, Woden, Thor or the like but I still call the days of the week names that mean the days of those pagan deities.
- You need to calm down and stop whining about things carrying names that are implicative of a religion just because you aren't religious/you don't follow that religion. The world doesn't revolve around you. You don't get to change things just because you don't like them. Tharthandorf Aquanashi (talk) 22:14, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- I never said that AD, BC, or the days of the week were "nonsense". Implying religion, as in the days of the week, is not the same as explicitly promoting one religion over any other religion or non-religion. (i.e. Anno Domini and Before Christ.) CE and BCE have been widely accepted and implemented. The same can't be said of any alternative names for the days of the week. Now, I'd appreciate it if you would stop projecting judgment onto me by telling me what I am or am not. I don't see any reason to continue this back-and-forth any further since I haven't chosen to challenge the reversion of my edit, nor do I plan to. I have more important things to work on. The Obento Musubi (talk · contribs) 23:43, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think you're really being fair here. The "common era"/"before common era" system isn't nonsense, and it isn't a calendar system The Obento Musubi made up off the top of his head; it's widely used in scholarly circles, and Wikipedia's own style guide says that both Common Era and "BC/AD" conventions can be appropriate for referring to dates. (See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Era_style) That same style guide also says that you should have a specific reason to change from one system to another—and that you should get consensus on a talk page before actually making the change—but that's beside the point, and it doesn't justify treating another user with disrespect. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 05:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kendrick Lamar, To Pimp a Butterfly (2015).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kendrick Lamar, To Pimp a Butterfly (2015).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 07:51, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for uploading a .png version of the album cover. Cheers, The Obento Musubi (talk · contribs) 07:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Come Together-Something (single cover).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Come Together-Something (single cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:32, 9 April 2015 (UTC)