User talk:The ed17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


The Signpost
25 February 2015
The Bugle
Issue CVI – January 2015

Published by the Military history WikiProject

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open![edit]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 is just around the corner...[edit]

Hello everyone, and may we wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2015 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. We have a few important announcements concerning the future of the WikiCup.

  • We would like to announce that Josh (J Milburn) and Ed (The ed17), who have been WikiCup judges since 2009 and 2010 respectively, are stepping down. This decision has been made for a number of reasons, but the main one is time. Both Josh and Ed have found that, over the previous year, they have been unable to devote the time necessary to the WikiCup, and it is not likely that they will be able to do this in the near future. Furthermore, new people at the helm can only help to invigorate the WikiCup and keep it dynamic. Josh and Ed will still be around, and will likely be participating in the Cup this following year as competitors, which is where both started out.
  • In a similar vein, we hope you will all join us in welcoming Jason (Sturmvogel 66) and Christine (Figureskatingfan), who are joining Brian (Miyagawa) to form the 2015 WikiCup judging team. Jason is a WikiCup veteran, having won in 2010 and finishing in fifth this year. Christine has participated in two WikiCups, reaching the semi-finals in both, and is responsible for the GA Cup, which she now co-runs.
  • The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. While it may be impossible to please everyone, the judges will make every effort to ensure that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk), The ed17 (talk), Miyagawa (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Figureskatingfan (talk) 18:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Cheers, J Milburn. You should be proud of the extreme amount of effort you've put into and the results you've gotten from the Cup over the last few years. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

GOCE coordinator elections[edit]

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
Writing Magnifying.PNG
GOCE Coordinator.png

Candidate nominations for Guild coordinators to serve from January 1 to June 30, 2015, are currently underway. The nomination period will close at 23:59 on December 15 (UTC), after which voting will commence until 23:59 on December 31, 2014. Self-nominations are welcomed. Please consider getting involved; it's your Guild and it won't coordinate itself, so if you'd like to help coordinate Guild activities we'd love to hear from you.

Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis.
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear Signpost Editor[edit]

NewYorkBrad is available for interviews [1]. NE Ent 02:17, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2014[edit]

Thanks for the badly needed copyedits. I've been crazy busy this week. Gamaliel (talk) 18:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2014[edit]

This month in GLAM logo.png

  • Australia and New Zealand report: ALIA partnership goes countrywide
  • Belgium report: Workshops for collection holders across Europe; Founding event of Wikimedia Belgium; Wiki Loves Monuments in Belgium & Luxembourg; Plantin-Moretus Museum; Edit-a-thon at faculty library in Ghent University; Image donation UGentMemorie; Upcoming activities
  • France report: Wiki Loves Monuments; mass upload; Musée de Bretagne
  • Germany report: Facts, fun and free content
  • Ireland report: Ada Lovelace day in Dublin
  • Italy report: National Library Conference; Wiki Loves Monuments; Archaeological Open Data; BEIC
  • Netherlands report: Video challenge; Wikidata workshop and hackathon; Wikipedia courses in libraries; WWII editathon
  • Norway report: Edit-a-thon far north at the Museum of Nordland (Nordlandsmuseet)
  • Spain report: Picasso, first Galipedia edit-a-thon, course in Biblioteca Reina Sofía and free portraits
  • South Africa report: Wiki Loves GLAMs, Cape Town
  • Sweden report: Use, reuse and contributions back and forth
  • UK report: Medals, maps and multilingual marvels
  • Special story: ORCID identifiers
  • Open Access report: Open proposal: Wikidata for Research; Open Access signalling
  • Tool testing report: Tools for references, images, video, file usage; Popular Pages
  • Calendar: December's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 22:30, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014 GOCE newsletter[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors December 2014 Newsletter
Writing Magnifying.PNG

Copyeditors progress.png

Drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in November's Backlog Elimination Drive. Of the 43 people who signed up for this drive, 26 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: The November Drive removed 26 requests from the Requests page and 509 articles from the {{copy edit}} backlog. We copy edited 83 articles tagged in the target months; July, August, and September 2013. Together with tag removals from articles unsuitable for copy editing, we eliminated July 2013 from the backlog and reduced August and September's tags to 61 and 70 respectively. As of 01:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC), the backlog stood at 1,974 articles, dipping below 2,000 for the first time in the Guild's history (see graph at right). Well done everyone!

Blitz: The December Blitz will run from December 14–20 and will focus on articles related to Religion, in recognition of this month's religious holidays in much of the English-speaking world. Awards will be given out to everyone who copy edits at least one of the target articles. Sign up here!

Election time again: The election of coordinators to serve from 1 January to 30 June 2015 is now underway. Candidates can nominate themselves or others from December 01, 00:01 (UTC), until December 15, 23:59. The voting period will run from December 16, 00:01 (UTC), until December 31, 23:59. You can read about coordinators' duties here. Please consider getting involved and remember to cast you vote—it's your Guild and it doesn't organize itself!

Thank you all once again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve anything without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open![edit]

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Out of process CfD close[edit]

It is very inappropriate to close a CFD discussion early especially when the close is the opposite of consensus! I'm not going to get into an issue over WP:WHEEL here, but you really do need to reopen that discussion per WP:WHEEL since I believe that your revert is in violation. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:00, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

@Vegaswikian: Wheel war? I'm not using administrator tools there? Anyway, I'm closing it for overall benefit to the encyclopedia. As WP:FATRAT says, "In building consensus, everyone will argue that such or such change breaks their preferred rule and thus simply *can't* be made. It's a good time to apply the WP:Ignore all rules policy and focus on how the proposed change makes the article better regardless of what the rules say." This isn't an article but is in the same spirit. Process should not derail the mission. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:24, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict)@Vegaswikian: That was an inappropriate CFD: those categories are entirely reasonable, standard maintenance categories. Any and all projects, whether Task forces as part of a larger project, or independent WikiProjects, require those in order to use WP:1.0 assessment. I would have done a speedy close myself if I had seen one or two voices confirming my sense of the discussion, Sadads (talk) 03:29, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Closings are generally done by an admin at CfD, so while no powers, it is generally viewed as an admin action. In any case, since you are leaving the close, you should remove the entry made after the discussion was closed! Vegaswikian (talk) 18:11, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (December 2014)[edit]

Hello Wikimedians!

The TWL OWL says sign up today :)

The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:

Other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team.00:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
This message was delivered via the Mass Message tool to the Book & Bytes recipient list.

Seasonal Greets![edit]

Wikipedia Happy New Year.png Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!!

Hello The ed17, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015.
Happy editing,
The Herald : here I am

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

The Signpost: 17 December 2014[edit]

Signpost e-mail[edit]

Hello, The ed17. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Chris Troutman (talk) 05:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Season's Greetings![edit]

Snacks at a Christmas party, Chatham, Ontario, 2014-12-13.jpg Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!!

Hello The ed17! As we gather to celebrate the changing of years and reflect on the meaning of life, the universe, and everything, I would like to wish you and yours a merry Christmas and a happy New Year. Attached is a small snack which I hope will give you the energy to continue being an amazing person and editor in the coming year.

Happy editing,
 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

VisualEditor newsletter—December 2014[edit]

Screenshot showing how to add or remove columns from a table

Did you know?

Basic table editing is now available in VisualEditor. You can add and remove rows and columns from existing tables at the click of a button.

The user guide has more information about how to use VisualEditor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has fixed many bugs and worked on table editing and performance. Their weekly status reports are posted on Upcoming plans are posted at the VisualEditor roadmap.

VisualEditor was deployed to several hundred remaining wikis as an opt-in beta feature at the end of November, except for most Wiktionaries (which depend heavily upon templates) and all Wikisources (which await integration with ProofreadPage).

Recent improvements[edit]

Basic support for editing tables is available. You can insert new tables, add and remove rows and columns, set or remove a caption for a table, and merge cells together. To change the contents of a cell, double-click inside it. More features will be added in the coming months. In addition, VisualEditor now ignores broken, invalid rowspan and colspan elements, instead of trying to repair them.

You can now use find and replace in VisualEditor, reachable through the tool menu or by pressing ⌃ Ctrl+F or ⌘ Cmd+F.

You can now create and edit simple <blockquote> paragraphs for quoting and indenting content. This changes a "Paragraph" into a "Block quote".

Some new keyboard sequences can be used to format content. At the start of the line, typing "*  " will make the line a bullet list; "1.  " or "# " will make it a numbered list; "==" will make it a section heading; ": " will make it a blockquote. If you didn't mean to use these tools, you can press undo to undo the formatting change. There are also two other keyboard sequences: "[[" for opening the link tool, and "{{" for opening the template tool, to help experienced editors. The existing standard keyboard shortcuts, like ⌃ Ctrl+K to open the link editor, still work.

If you add a category that has been redirected, then VisualEditor now adds its target. Categories without description pages show up as red.

You can again create and edit galleries as wikitext code.

Looking ahead[edit]

VisualEditor will replace the existing design with a new theme designed by the User Experience group. The new theme will be visible for desktop systems at in late December and at other sites early January. (You can see a developer preview of the old "Apex" theme and the new "MediaWiki" one which will replace it.)

The Editing team plans to add auto-fill features for citations in January. Planned changes to the media search dialog will make choosing between possible images easier.


If you would like to help with translations of this newsletter, please subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Subscribe or unsubscribe at Meta.

Thank you! WhatamIdoing (WMF) (talk) 23:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)


Hi Ed, voting actually closed at midnight UTC and I was about to archive the polls... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:43, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Aw shucks, I was hoping that I could sneak in. Thanks for the note! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 06:00, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho[edit]

Thanks, WereSpielChequers! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:59, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

GOCE holiday 2014 newsletter[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors Late December 2014 Newsletter
Writing Magnifying.PNG

Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the December Blitz. Of the 14 editors who signed up for the blitz, 11 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

January drive: The January backlog-reduction drive is just around the corner; sign up here!

Election time again: The election of coordinators to serve from January 1 to June 30, 2015 is now underway. The voting period runs from December 16, 00:01 (UTC), until December 31, 23:59. Please cast your vote—it's your Guild, and it doesn't run itself!

Happy holidays from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2014[edit]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Resilient Barnstar Hires.png The Resilient Barnstar
For your fabulous efforts at maintaining integrity of The Signpost. kosboot (talk) 02:42, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, kosboot! I'm very sorry that I haven't been able to use most of your (extremely appreciated) tips on the suggestions page recently. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:47, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Most welcome. And I think we all understand how real life intrudes on Wikipedia activities. :) kosboot (talk) 02:53, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy Holidays[edit]

074 Frontal d'altar de Mosoll, els Reis d'Orient.jpg Happy Holidays
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. - Ealdgyth - Talk 15:09, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Ealdgyth. My dad loved the pictures. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:59, 26 December 2014 (UTC)


Hi Ed, I just noticed that when you move protected Template:WW2InfoBox in April you also lifted the protection against IP accounts editing it which I instituted for a indefinite period in March. As I suspect this was an accident, I've just reinstated this protection (I considered leaving things as-is, but it's a template with few watchers which directly affects the very popular World War II article and vandalism in the past has been slowly corrected). I hope that this is OK. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 01:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Hey Nick-D, you're correct in that it was a mistake, and it is of course okay that you've reversed me! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
OK, thanks Ed Nick-D (talk) 21:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year![edit]

Fuochi d'artificio.gif

Dear The ed17,
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! A new year has come! How times flies! 2015 will be a new year, and it is also a chance for you to start afresh! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:19, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}} on someone else's talk page.

Happy New Year The ed17![edit]


Can I just say that I'm really glad you had no part in the new rules? Because I respect you, but the giant middle finger of a no-consensus change to FP scoring, combined with a not-even-discussed one FP per article rule is such a giant fuck you to an entire class of contributors... Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter[edit]


Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs)
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2014[edit]

GOCE 2014 report[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors 2014 Annual Report
Writing Magnifying.PNG

Our 2014 Annual Report is now ready for review.


  • Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page;
  • Review the election results;
  • Membership news;
  • Changes around the Guild's pages;
  • Plans for 2015.
– Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 9[edit]

Wikipedia Library owl.svg The Wikipedia Library


Books & Bytes
Issue 9, November-December 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • New donations, including real-paper-and-everything books, e-books, science journal databases, and more
  • New TWL coordinators, conference news, a new open-access journal database, summary of library-related WMF grants, and more
  • Spotlight: "Global Impact: The Wikipedia Library and Persian Wikipedia" - a Persian Wikipedia editor talks about their experiences with database access in Iran, writing on the Persian project and the JSTOR partnership

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

You've got mail![edit]

Hello, The ed17. Please check your email – you've got mail! The subject is The Signpost.
Message added 23:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Go Phightins! 23:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

And again. Go Phightins! 19:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2015[edit]

This Month in GLAM: December 2014[edit]

This month in GLAM logo.png

Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 11:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)


Sunandclouds.svg Sunshine!
Hello The ed17! Pine has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding {{subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine}} to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding {{User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon}}. Happy editing! Pine 21:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, Pine! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 14:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Reporting on m:Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service[edit]

Hi User:The ed17, I'm not sure if you're the right person to talk to about this, so I apologize in advance for noise. I'm hoping to get an article into the signpost and you've helped me do that in the past. See m:Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service for more details. We're looking to summarize the project and welcome volunteers. TL;DR: we're working to build a cross-lingual, machine learning classifier service for edits that will support new wikitools that need edit quality measures (e.g. WP:Snuggle, User:HostBot, WP:Huggle and User:ClueBot NG). --20:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

@EpochFail: I can still help with that! We're short on volunteers to conduct an interview, but if you and/or your team is willing to write an op-ed extolling the virtues of the project, we can certainly run it. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Great. We'll get a draft to you soon.  :) --EpochFail (talkcontribs) 16:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi User:The ed17. We have a draft here: m:Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service/Signpost/1_-_Intro Edits are welcome, of course.  ;) --EpochFail (talkcontribs) 00:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey EpochFail, thanks! Would you be able to expand it a bit? I can honestly say that after reading that, I would have no idea what you are trying to build. :-p Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Sure. I'll take another pass. Just to make sure I understand, is your feedback only "what are you talking about?" Did you understand that we're building a service for scoring revisions as damaging or not? Was it clear to you that this is something that tools like ClueBot, Huggle and Snuggle need in order to function? Was it clear that we'll be providing a web service as well as libraries? Maybe we should spend a little bit of time discussing what machine classification is. Do you have other questions after reading the piece that I can make sure to address? Thanks again! --EpochFail (talkcontribs) 15:54, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
@EpochFail: Sorry for the delay—I read your post, meant to reply later, then forgot! I've read through it slower and believe that I understand it better. I was going to suggest simplifying it more (or at least defining things like "API," explaining what the code on the indented text says), but I assume that your intended audience is more tech-savvy people? You may also want to expand on how volunteers can volunteer! What does "state of the art" mean? Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Ed, we've give the article a rewrite. Can you take another look? --EpochFail (talkcontribs) 16:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey EpochFail, it looks pretty good to me. I've sent it on to the day-to-day editors for possible publication in the coming issue. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:04, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Hi EpochFail. It looks okay to me, provided the intended audience is, as Ed said, not me, rather tech-savvy editors. I honestly have not the slightest clue what most of it is about, but if you think it will do what you want it to do, I have no particular problem running it. God bless, Go Phightins! 15:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Go Phightins! & Ed thanks! And yes, the material is intended for a tech-savvy audience. Please let me know if you need anything else. --EpochFail (talkcontribs) 16:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]


This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!Keith-264 (talk) 23:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2015[edit]


Ed, as you can notice on my talk page Adan Cuerden took a Wiki-break over a controversy about a picture of Pedro he intended to nominate that was remobved from the article. I am kind of paniking, because he was the head-editor on the FP Signpost entry. I have no idea how to put up a draft - where information is - no idea of anything. He made the draft and put that on my page while we worked together. Tell me now what to do. I don't know how long he will be gone and everything will stop without him. Hafspajen (talk) 20:23, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Hey Hafspajen, take a deep breath! Adam has this week's report set up, and it's really simple to set up the draft (if it comes to that). :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I am afraid I wasn't as calm as you wished. But either way, I meant the next one, not the above. I was already working on the Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-01-21/Featured_content, full speed - also tried to engage others to do some of the job. I meant the next one. If Adam will not be back in time none of us knows how to do that. Hafspajen (talk) 21:43, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Ah, I see. Setting up the draft is easy—go to WP:NEWSROOM and click "start article" when the time comes. I've added a link to the following week's FC in the table for you. The articles, lists, and pictures are taken directly from WP:GO; our weeks sync with that page, so it's an exercise in copy/paste! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Uh, well, thanks. Good to know. As I told you, I have no idea of anything. Yet... Face-smile.svg I really hope Adam will come back soon... this edition is so hopelessly gloomy without him. Not a joke in sight, except for the marmot. Hafspajen (talk) 22:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  • If needed, I'll be more than happy to talk you through it. It's a lot simpler than it looks—I promise! He did saythat he would try to come back for next week's edition, so let's stay hopeful. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  • OK, we hope and if needed you help. When is it the D-Day? Hafspajen (talk) 22:48, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  • We'll probably publish this week on Wednesday (for once) or Thursday. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
OK, I have to take some initiative because it is way too late and we need this. Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-02-25/Featured content. ‎ Where is the content ? I am involved at the FP so I kinda figure out a little bit what we did, but the rest of the project know not much about. Please help adding content. OK; fixed. --Hafspajen (talk) 14:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Looks like you've made a good start, Hafspajen. I've written up blurbs for the two FAs. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
No, I don't think it is necessary... It is not an article, that one has to check history. We have two drafts now, I just moved the title. It works. I just left you this note to alert you that 2015-02-25 is the urgent one, not the other one. --Hafspajen (talk) 03:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Ed, this is not the way we write Singpost. We never revert each other, ever. We try to all respect each others work, and if somebody comes up with an change in what we do, usually leave it as it is. Because we do all respect each other. It is more important to have a good relationship that to have right. This kind of spirit should not exist there. AND - we never make white space. But please continue to go as you wish, I quit. Hafspajen (talk) 10:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
@Hafspajen: I thought we had a good conversation going, and I had compromised by adding some of the text back in! In no way, shape, or form did I intend to offend or drive you away. You have my sincere apologies, and I hope you'll reconsider. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Arrr, OK. OK, I am really at loss - I don't know how I am manage alone ... For me this was the only heaven were we could work together in peace and have fun... Where the heck is Adam? Hafspajen (talk) 10:35, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Preemptive ping[edit]

Just to let you know, you should have an email tonight - personal email is blocked at work, which accounts for most of the time I have available for Wiki these days. Parsecboy (talk) 13:22, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Replied! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 08:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

I've done a draft for the 2014 Traffic report[edit]

Numbers are down 18% from last year. Interesting but can't say if it's indicating a trend. Serendipodous 00:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

18%? Holy crap. Is that reflected in the global traffic numbers? (the WMF has graphs somewhere; I'll find them tomorrow, as it's after 3:30am here) When do you think you'll have commentary and whatnot completed by? We could run it as a special report next week. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 08:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I've drafted a commentary. Let me know what you think. Serendipodous 17:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
@Serendipodous: That looks good! I've made a few tweaks that you should check. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:21, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! Revised. Serendipodous 18:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2015[edit]

Battle of the Somme[edit]

You locked Battle of the Somme under full page protection due to edit-warring. The two principal edit-warriors have agreed not to edit the page while moderated discussion is in progress. Could you please unlocked the page to permit third-party edits and to permit the moderator to make consensus edits? Robert McClenon (talk) 15:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Robert McClenon, thanks for pinging me. I intended to and thought I protected the page for only three days; clearly I made a mistake somewhere. I've unlocked the page. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 16:02, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I think that you accidentally protected it indefinitely. Thanks for unlocking it. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Which is exactly what I realized after you pinged me. :-) Thanks again! Best, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 16:26, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Writers Barnstar Hires.png The Writer's Barnstar
With a bar. Efforts like "The Signpost" are exemplary! For such a long period, exemplary with bar(s). Thanks for the long term contribution. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Ditto! Your effort, Ed, to get The Signpost published week by week meant a lot to readers like me. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to you both, billinghurst and Chris troutman. I'm looking forward to taking a lengthy break. ;-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:21, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

NHHC dead links[edit]

Re: Your post on the WikiProject Military history talk page. You mentioned that you were going to contact someone at NHHC by email. Was there any response and did anything come of it? Just curious. Please respond here when you get the chance as I will be watching this page for a reply. Cuprum17 (talk) 17:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

@Cuprum17: I sent emails last weekend to the NHHC's web program master and the general Neither have garnered a response. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:21, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Perhaps their schedules were thrown off because of last weeks federal holiday...or maybe they just don't feel that it is their problem. I work with mostly Coast Guard subject matter on Wikipedia and about four years ago the Coast Guard decided to reformat the way things were addressed, changing from .htm to .asp (whatever that means). The result was dozens of dead links in Coast Guard related articles. As I have run across them I have repaired them as I was able, but many are still out there in other less well read Coast Guard articles. Thanks for your reply, perhaps the Navy will reply to you with something positive. The one Good Article that I have been able to produce in the last couple of years has 33 dead citations in it. (I have not marked them all, yet). I guess I will spend my time repairing them so that the article doesn't lose its GA status. I would have much rather spent my time doing research on another article or perhaps even trying my hand at bringing that same GA article to an ACR, a first for me. Oh, well... Cuprum17 (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi, the NHHC wrote me that the old links were all deactivated and the new website is slowly materializing. It contains a lot of mistakes, dead links and missing descriptions, however. A complete photo list is planned. Hyperwar has many of the former NHHC photos online in the old NHHC style. Cheers Cobatfor (talk) 17:55, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
They emailed you back? I haven't gotten a reply. I'd like to think that they are inundated with complaints, but I'm doubtful. Thank you very much! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Maybe they are just nice to foreigners... :-) :-) :-) I think it is nice to have tif-versions of the photos, although I would have preferred, if they would have waited until the complete old website was converted. I also think that an experienced user or more one that knows a lot about U.S. Navy ships does not want to "explore", we just want to find what we are looking for. At least, I also found some new photos. So, we just have to wait and see. Cheers Cobatfor (talk) 19:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
I'd mainly just like redirects from the old to the new URLs. :-) Let's hope they sort it all out soon. Best, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:18, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

USS Aroostook[edit]

Hi, I just realised that you created a page for USS Aroostook (AOG-14) on Commons in 2011. The ship depicted is, however, the minelayer USS Aroostook (CM-3), and not MV Esso Delivery No. 11, which became the gasoline tanker USS Aroostook (AOG-14) in 1943. The NARA description is wrong. CM-3 was decommissioned in 1931 and never reactivated. She was the sistership of USS Oglala (CM-4), famous for being sunk and raised at Pearl Harbor. I corrected the info and uploaded correct photos of AOG-14 from Cheers Cobatfor (talk) 17:55, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the correction! I was mindlessly droning and taking the captions at face value. Dominic, this one's for you to fix on NARA's end. Please see File:Aroostock (AOG14). Gasoline tanker. Port side, 04-30-1943 - NARA - 513045.tif. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Raising a glass to you[edit]

Export hell seidel steiner.png I hope you don't need it - I'll raise one for closing that ridiculous article AfD anyway. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, Panyd. I'm pretty sure I won't need it... I hope. ;-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbitrationGate controversy[edit]

Can you As the deleting admin userfy the ArbitrationGate controversy to User:Retartist/ArbitrationGate controversy. I want to turn it into a joke page in userspace (like the ones with the joke template at the top). Hope this isn't too much trouble --RetΔrtist (разговор) 23:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Given that there is a non-zero possibility that the article will become notable, I'm going to decline this request, as subsequent recreations will need the page history. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Okay RetΔrtist (разговор) 23:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

2014 Year In Review Awards[edit]

Barnstar-stone2-noback.png The Epic Barnstar
For your 2014 contributions to multiple history related articles you are hereby award this Epic Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history Wikiproject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 07:39, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, TomStar81! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

She's Baaaaaaaack[edit]

User:Christina1969's sock IP, is back to continue editwarring at Dreadnoughtus] YET AGAIN.--Mr Fink (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

It looks like Favonian took care of her. Please let me know if she reappears; at this point, I'm ready to indefinitely block the main account. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Will do.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:41, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
And Christina1969 has once again evaded her block by continuing editing with [her IP]--Mr Fink (talk) 21:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Blocked. Thank you for letting me know. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2015[edit]

VisualEditor News 2015—#1[edit]


Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has fixed many bugs and worked on VisualEditor's appearance, the coming Citoid reference service, and support for languages with complex input requirements. Status reports are posted on Upcoming plans are posted at the VisualEditor roadmap.

The Wikimedia Foundation has named its top priorities for this quarter (January to March). The first priority is making VisualEditor ready for deployment by default to all new users and logged-out users at the remaining large Wikipedias. You can help identify these requirements. There will be weekly triage meetings which will be open to volunteers beginning Wednesday, 11 February 2015 at 12:00 (noon) PST (20:00 UTC). Tell Vice President of Engineering Damon Sicore, Product Manager James Forrester and other team members which bugs and features are most important to you. The decisions made at these meetings will determine what work is necessary for this quarter's goal of making VisualEditor ready for deployment to new users. The presence of volunteers who enjoy contributing MediaWiki code is particularly appreciated. Information about how to join the meeting will be posted at mw:Talk:VisualEditor/Portal shortly before the meeting begins. 

Due to some breaking changes in MobileFrontend and VisualEditor, VisualEditor was not working correctly on the mobile site for a couple of days in early January. The teams apologize for the problem.

Recent improvements[edit]

The new design for VisualEditor aligns with MediaWiki's Front-End Standards as led by the Design team. Several new versions of the OOjs UI library have also been released, and these also affect the appearance of VisualEditor and other MediaWiki software extensions. Most changes were minor, like changing the text size and the amount of white space in some windows. Buttons are consistently color-coded to indicate whether the action:

  • starts a new task, like opening the Save page dialog:  blue ,
  • takes a constructive action, like inserting a citation:  green ,
  • might remove or lose your work, like removing a link:  red , or
  • is neutral, like opening a link in a new browser window:  gray.

The TemplateData editor has been completely re-written to use a different design (T67815) based on the same OOjs UI system as VisualEditor (T73746). This change fixed a couple of existing bugs (T73077 and T73078) and improved usability.

Search and replace in long documents is now faster. It does not highlight every occurrence if there are more than 100 on-screen at once (T78234).

Editors at the Hebrew and Russian Wikipedias requested the ability to use VisualEditor in the "Article Incubator" or drafts namespace (T86688, T87027). If your community would like VisualEditor enabled on another namespace on your wiki, then you can file a request in Phabricator. Please include a link to a community discussion about the requested change.

Looking ahead[edit]

The Editing team will soon add auto-fill features for citations. The Citoid service takes a URL or DOI for a reliable source, and returns a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. After creating it, you will be able to change or add information to the citation, in the same way that you edit any other pre-existing citation in VisualEditor. Support for ISBNs, PMIDs, and other identifiers is planned. Later, editors will be able to contribute to the Citoid service's definitions for each website, to improve precision and reduce the need for manual corrections.

We will need editors to help test the new design of the special character inserter, especially if you speak Welsh, Breton, or another language that uses diacritics or special characters extensively. The new version should be available for testing next week. Please contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF) if you would like to be notified when the new version is available. After the special character tool is completed, VisualEditor will be deployed to all users at Phase 5 Wikipedias. This will affect about 50 mid-size and smaller Wikipedias, including Afrikaans, Azerbaijani, Breton, Kyrgyz, Macedonian, Mongolian, Tatar, and Welsh. The date for this change has not been determined.

Let's work together[edit]

Subscribe or unsubscribe at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Newsletter. Translations are available through Meta. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) 20:23, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015[edit]

February 2015 GOCE newsletter[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors February 2015 Newsletter
Writing Magnifying.PNG

Copyeditors progress.png

Drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in January's Backlog Elimination Drive. Of the 38 people who signed up for this drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: We were able to remove August 2013 from the general copyediting backlog and November 2014 from the request-page backlog. Many thanks, everyone!

Blitz: The February Blitz will run from February 15–21 and again focuses on the requests page. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one request article. Sign up here!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Biblioworm and Philg88.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: January 2015[edit]

This month in GLAM logo.png

Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 05:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Texas Revolution peer review[edit]

Hi Ed. I've just opened a peer review for Texas Revolution as the final step before we try for FA status. I'd very much appreciate your opinion. Thanks! Karanacs (talk) 14:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Hey Karanacs, I'll try to check in tonight. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 17:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Still trying to make time for this. I should be around tomorrow evening. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015[edit]

Valentine Greets!!![edit]

Wikilove2 new.png Valentine Greets!!!

Hello The ed17, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve,
Happy editing,
 - T H (here I am) 12:21, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Valentine Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Today's Featured Article: Notification[edit]

This is to inform you that Brazilian battleship São Paulo , which you nominated at WP:FAC, will appear on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 5 March 2015. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. Brianboulton (talk) 22:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

I knew it had to be you when I saw a Brazilian battleship. I had to squeeze the summary down to a little over 1200 characters; was there anything I left out you'd like to see put back in? - Dank (push to talk) 03:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Georgios Averof[edit]

I'm working on the Pisa-class cruiser article and have one source that says Brazil originally committed to buy the ship that became Georgios Averof, but later reneged. This would have been around 1909 and so not exactly unparalleled behavior by them, but I don't think I've ever seen anything about any Brazilian armored cruiser purchases. I'm only really familiar with their BBs, though. You know anything about this, possibly as a reaction to the Argentinian purchase of all those Garibaldi-class armored cruisers a few years earlier?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Hey Sturmvogel 66, sorry about the slow reply—I didn't catch your post with the Wikimedia highlights (below) arriving so soon after. Who's saying that? I've never seen anyone even speculating about Brazil's desire for an armored cruiser, and I've looked through all of the Brazilian Navy-related Times and NY Times articles from 1907–10, many of which were wildly speculative (but none about the Pisas). Furthermore, I can't imagine why Brazil would want the ship. First, they changed their minds on ordering armored cruisers and went with dreadnoughts in 1907. Second, their first two dreadnoughts were not even a year away for most of 1909 (Minas Geraes was handed over to the Brazilians on 5 January 1910, and Sao Paolo followed in July), and they were or had just finished trying to get out of the contractually obligated third. Third, they wanted to be seen as an international power. Buying a ship with an outmoded design doesn't mesh with that goal.
Now, all that being said... could your source be mistaken? I could certainly see Argentina at least inquiring into the ship, given their alarm at the rapidly approaching delivery date of the Brazilian dreadnoughts, and they certainly had a history with Italian shipbuilders (very recent history, if you remember that they bid for the Argentine dreadnoughts). Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
My source for this is a biography of Averof by a non-naval-specialist historian, so I think that it's quite safe to say that he's mistaken. The laid down date alone, four(!) after her sisters', reinforces the account in Conways that says she was built in advance of any order. But I thought that I'd check anyway...--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:52, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Ah, not the most reliable source. I'll double check next time I delve into those articles and let you know if I find anything! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikimedia Highlights from January 2015[edit]

Here are the highlights from the Wikimedia blog in January 2015, covering selected activities of the Wikimedia Foundation and other important events from the Wikimedia movement.
Wikimedia Foundation RGB logo with text.svg

(The Wikimedia Highlights issues from some recent months have not been distributed via this notice, but can be found in the archive.)

About · Subscribe/unsubscribe, 23:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2015[edit]

The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

GOCE March newsletter[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors March 2015 Newsletter
Writing Magnifying.PNG

Copyeditors progress.png

Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the February Blitz. Of the 21 people who signed up, eight copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: The blitz removed 16 articles from the requests list, and we're almost done with December 2014. Many thanks, everyone!

Drive: The month-long March drive begins in about a week. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Sign up here!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Biblioworm and Philg88.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

USS Constitution[edit]

Extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Hey George Ho, I've extended it for an additional three days at your request. Best, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hugh Hefner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Gregory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 25 February 2015[edit]

Wikipedia email re signup[edit]

Hello, The ed17. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 15:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter[edit]

One of several of Godot13's quality submissions during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Australia Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.

In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:

You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)

Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

NYT lookup[edit]

IIRC, you've got access to the NYT archives and I don't so I'd appreciate it if you could do me a small favor whenever you get a chance. I need cites for the voyage of Crown Prince Umberto to South America aboard the Italian armored cruisers San Marcos and San Giorgio in July-Sep 1924 so I can upgrade those articles. Since it's post '23 I can't access it myself, but the NYT seems to be one of the few newspapers that bother to note the voyage at all as I struck out with the Australian and UK newspaper archives.

Also, if you can recommend any sources on the Argentinian Giuseppe Garibaldi-class armored cruisers, that would be great. I need to finish off my good topic on Italian armored cruisers and I can't do it without taking the class article to GA, which, of course, means mini-histories of the foreign ships in the class as well the Italian ones which I've already researched. Thanks in advance for any help that you have time to give.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:06, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Do you recall what articles you saw? I can't find anything on Umberto's voyage. I'm using varying combinations of "Umberto San Marco," "Umberto San Giorgio," "Umberto Argentina," "Umberto cruiser," and "Umberto warship" and not getting anything beyond a Christian Science Monitor article of 1923 announcing that he plans to make a trip.
The Argentine ships are woefully undercovered, something that isn't helped by the Argentine Navy's neglect of its history (there's no historical ship pages, only their current ones). Whitney's Cruisers of World War II might be your best bet; the only other substantial source I know of, excluding Spanish-language books, is HistArMar: [2] [3] [4] [5]. I've been able use a similar Portuguese-language site for the Brazilian ships. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:59, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 21, 2015[edit]

Hi Ed, Nate and Sturm. A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. Does the article need more work? Is there anything I left out of the summary you'd like to see put back in? - Dank (push to talk) 03:54, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Hey Dank, I made an edit to the blurb, but otherwise the current state of the article is Sturm and Parsec's baby, so I'll defer to them. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:59, 2 March 2015 (UTC)